Counterexamples to hyperkahler Kirwan surjectivity
Kevin McGerty, Thomas Nevins

TL;DR
This paper constructs counterexamples showing that the hyperkahler Kirwan map is not always surjective, using specific hyperkahler quotients involving cotangent bundles of groups and representations.
Contribution
It provides the first known counterexamples to hyperkahler Kirwan surjectivity for certain group actions, expanding understanding of hyperkahler quotient topology.
Findings
Counterexamples for $U(n)$-actions on specific hyperkahler manifolds
Failure of hyperkahler Kirwan map surjectivity in these cases
Establishment of a 'Kahler = GIT quotient' correspondence for certain cotangent bundles
Abstract
Suppose that M is a complete hyperkahler manifold with a compact Lie group K acting via hyperkahler isometries and with hyperkahler moment map . It is a long-standing problem to determine when the hyperkahler Kirwan map is surjective. We show that for each , the natural -action on admits a hyperkahler quotient for which the hyperkahler Kirwan map fails to be surjective. As a tool, we establish a ``Kahler GIT quotient'' assertion for products of cotangent bundles of reductive groups, equipped with the Kronheimer metric, and representations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometry and complex manifolds · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
