# Recommending research articles to consumers of online vaccination   information

**Authors:** Eliza Harrison, Paige Martin, Didi Surian, Adam G. Dunn

arXiv: 1904.11886 · 2020-08-20

## TL;DR

This study evaluates methods for matching vaccination-related webpages to their original research articles, demonstrating that simple ranking tools can effectively identify credible sources and potentially reduce misinformation online.

## Contribution

The paper introduces and tests a tool that matches vaccination webpages to their source research articles, comparing different ranking approaches including CCA, and finds simple methods are quite effective.

## Key findings

- Baseline ranking correctly identified sources for over 25% of webpages.
- Augmenting methods with CCA improved performance but did not surpass the baseline.
- More than half of webpages' sources were ranked within the top 50 articles.

## Abstract

Online health communications often provide biased interpretations of evidence and have unreliable links to the source research. We tested the feasibility of a tool for matching webpages to their source evidence. From 207,538 eligible vaccination-related PubMed articles, we evaluated several approaches using 3,573 unique links to webpages from Altmetric. We evaluated methods for ranking the source articles for vaccine-related research described on webpages, comparing simple baseline feature representation and dimensionality reduction approaches to those augmented with canonical correlation analysis (CCA). Performance measures included the median rank of the correct source article; the percentage of webpages for which the source article was correctly ranked first (recall@1); and the percentage ranked within the top 50 candidate articles (recall@50). While augmenting baseline methods using CCA generally improved results, no CCA-based approach outperformed a baseline method, which ranked the correct source article first for over one quarter of webpages and in the top 50 for more than half. Tools to help people identify evidence-based sources for the content they access on vaccination-related webpages are potentially feasible and may support the prevention of bias and misrepresentation of research in news and social media.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.11886/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.11886/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.11886/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.11886