# Full Scale Proton Beam Impact Testing of new CERN Collimators and   Validation of a Numerical Approach for Future Operation

**Authors:** M. Bergeret, F-X. Nuiry, M. Calviani, M.A. Fraser, M. Butcher, L-M., Grec, L. Gentini, A. Lechner, M. Frankl, V. Rizzoglio, S. Burger, A. Cherif

arXiv: 1904.11700 · 2019-04-29

## TL;DR

This study validates the structural response of CERN collimator jaws under proton beam impacts through experiments and numerical analysis, highlighting their elastic behavior and sensitivity to mounting support, with implications for future design and modeling.

## Contribution

It introduces a combined experimental and numerical approach to validate collimator jaw designs under proton impacts, addressing complex geometries and boundary conditions.

## Key findings

- Jaw response remains elastic under impact.
- Jaw geometry is sensitive to mounting support.
- Numerical models face limitations with complex geometries.

## Abstract

New collimators are being produced at CERN in the framework of a large particle accelerator upgrade project to protect beam lines against stray particles. Their movable jaws hold low density absorbers with tight geometric requirements, while being able to withstand direct proton beam impacts. Such events induce considerable thermo-mechanical loads, leading to complex structural responses, which make the numerical analysis challenging. Hence, an experiment has been developed to validate the jaw design under representative conditions and to acquire online results to enhance the numerical models. Two jaws have been impacted by high-intensity proton beams in a dedicated facility at CERN and have recreated the worst possible scenario in future operation. The analysis of online results coupled to post-irradiation examinations have demonstrated that the jaw response remains in the elastic domain. However, they have also highlighted how sensitive the jaw geometry is to its mounting support inside the collimator. Proton beam impacts, as well as handling activities, may alter the jaw flatness tolerance value by $\pm$ 70 ${\mu}$m, whereas the flatness tolerance requirement is 200 ${\mu}$m. In spite of having validated the jaw design for this application, the study points out numerical limitations caused by the difficulties in describing complex geometries and boundary conditions with such unprecedented requirements.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.11700/full.md

## Figures

17 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.11700/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.11700/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.11700