Qualitative counting closed geodesics
Bastien Karlhofer, Jarek K\k{e}dra, Micha{\l} Marcinkowski, Alexander, Trost

TL;DR
This paper explores the geometric properties of word metrics on fundamental groups of manifolds, focusing on the abundance or scarcity of closed geodesics and their impact on the metric's diameter.
Contribution
It introduces a framework to analyze the finiteness or infiniteness of the diameter of word metrics based on closed geodesic properties.
Findings
Finite diameter indicates abundance of closed geodesics
Infinite diameter indicates scarcity of closed geodesics
Provides examples illustrating both cases
Abstract
We investigate the geometry of word metrics on fundamental groups of manifolds associated with the generating sets consisting of elements represented by closed geodesics. We ask whether the diameter of such a metric is finite or infinite. The first answer we interpret as an abundance of closed geodesics, while the second one as their scarcity. We discuss examples for both cases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Qualitative counting closed geodesics
Bastien Karlhofer
BK: University of Aberdeen
,
Jarek Kędra
JK: University of Aberdeen and University of Szczecin
,
Michał Marcinkowski
MM: IMPAN, Wrocław
and
Alexander Trost
AT: University of Aberdeen
Abstract.
We investigate the geometry of word metrics on fundamental groups of manifolds associated with the generating sets consisting of elements represented by closed geodesics. We ask whether the diameter of such a metric is finite or infinite. The first answer we interpret as an abundance of closed geodesics, while the second one as their scarcity. We discuss examples for both cases.
1. Introduction
It is a classical observation due to John Milnor [12] and Albert Schwarz [13] that the word metric on the fundamental group of a closed manifold carries information about the Riemannian metric of the universal cover (the metrics are quasi-isometric). In this approach the word metric on the fundamental group is associated with a finite generating set. In the present paper we explore the word metrics on the fundamental group associated with geometrically meaningful generating sets. Specifically, we consider generating sets consisting of closed local geodesics. We then ask the most basic question as to whether the diameter of such a word metric is finite or infinite. The first answer is interpreted as abundance of closed geodesics while the second as their scarcity. We present examples for both cases.
1.1. Statement of the results
Let be a complete Riemannian manifold and let denote the set of closed local geodesics based at . Let denote the subgroup of the fundamental group generated by elements represented by closed local geodesics. We are interested in the word norm on associated with the set of the elements represented by closed geodesics. We call it the closed geodesic norm. We apply methods of geometric group theory to prove the following results.
Theorem 1.2**.**
Let be a closed Riemannian manifold of negative curvature admitting a geodesic symmetry through . If is nonabelian then the diameter of the closed geodesic norm is infinite.
The situation changes if the manifold is only non-positively curved. A rich source of examples is provided by locally symmetric spaces , where is a semisimple Lie group, a maximal compact subgroup and a lattice. The natural metric on is non-positively curved and we have the following result.
Theorem 1.3**.**
Let be a complete Riemannian manifold of nonpositive curvature admitting a geodesic symmetry through . If is isomorphic to a finite index subgroup in an irreducible -arithmetic Chevalley group of rank at least then the diameter of the closed geodesic norm on is finite.
Our proof of Theorem 1.3 amounts to showing that the closed geodesic norm is bounded above by a conjugation invariant norm and then we use the fact that such norms have finite diameter on S-arithmetic Chevalley groups [7, 8]. It would be interesting for find a direct geometric argument which would prove a more general statement.
Conjecture 1.4*.*
Let be a locally symmetric space of rank at least . If the lattice is invariant under the Cartan involution then the diameter of the closed geodesic norm is finite.
An equivalent form of the above conjecture is that the diameter of the word norm on associated with the generating set consisting of elements invariant under the Cartan involution is finite. More generally, it is not known whether conjugation invariant norms on lattices in Lie groups of rank at least have finite diameter. A piece of evidence that their diameter may be finite comes from the fact that such lattices do not admit unbounded quasimorphisms. The above Conjecture 1.4 is a much weaker statement in this direction.
1.5. A comment on counting closed geodesics
Classically, counting closed geodesics is done in the form of estimates of the number of geodesics of a given length [1]. Here, we propose a different way of counting. Namely, by measuring how big the subgroup of the fundamental group generated by closed local geodesics is and whether it has finite or infinite diameter with respect to the closed geodesic norm. Finite diameter of the closed geodesic norm is interpreted as abundance of closed local geodesics and infinite diameter as their scarcity. For example, on a flat torus every element of the fundamental group is represented by a closed local geodesic so and the norm has diameter one. On the other hand, on a hyperbolic punctured torus, we have that for a suitably chosen basepoint and the closed geodesic norm is equivalent to the palindromic length on the free group; see Example 1.7 for details.
1.6. Examples
Example 1.7** (Hyperbolic punctured torus).**
Let be the hyperbolic punctured torus viewed as a quotient of an ideal hyperbolic square. Let the basepoint be represented by the centre of the square. Then the generators of the fundamental group are represented by closed geodesics (drawn in blue in the figure below).
The central symmetry of the square defines a geodesic symmetry such that it acts on the fundamental group by inverting generators. It follows that closed local geodesics represent palindromes in the free group . Indeed, is equal to if and only if the reduced word is a palindrome. Thus the closed geodesic norm is equal to the palindromic length on and this is known to have infinite diameter [2], [3, Example 6.7].
Example 1.8** (Hyperbolic closed surface I).**
Let be a closed hyperbolic surface of genus obtained as a quotient of a regular hyperbolic -gon in which the opposite sides are identified and with its centre representing the basepoint. As in the case of the punctured torus the central symmetry defines a geodesic symmetry which is the hyperelliptic involution. Also in this case . It follows from Theorem 1.2 that the diameter of the closed geodesic norm is infinite.
Example 1.9** (Hyperbolic closed surface II).**
Let be a closed hyperbolic surface of genus obtained as a quotient of a regular hyperbolic octagon with identifications which yield the following presentation of the fundamental group
[TABLE]
As before the basepoint is represented by the centre of the octagon and its central symmetry descends to a geodesic symmetry of . Observe, that the homomorphism induced by on the first homology is defined by and . Thus the subspace of consisting of elements such that is -dimensional generated by and . In particular, the subgroup is infinite and of infinite index. It is not difficult to see that is also nonabelian. Thus it follows from Theorem 1.2 that the closed geodesic norm on has infinite diameter.
Example 1.10** (Closed hyperbolic -manifold).**
Let be a right-angled regular hyperbolic dodecahedron and let be the right-angled Coxeter group of isometries of the hyperbolic space generated by the reflections in the faces of . Let be the kernel of the homomorphism which sends reflections through the opposite faces to the same generator. Then is a closed hyperbolic manifold glued from dodecahedra. Thus . Moreover, the geodesic symmetry at the centre of the dodecahedron descends to a geodesic symmetry of . To see this observe that if is a generator then , where is the reflection in the face of opposite to the face of reflection . This means that the conjugation by preserves and, moreover, . Since conjugates of the six elements by elements of generate we obtain that the conjugation by preserves and that . It follows from Theorem 1.2 that the closed geodesic norm in has infinite diameter.
Example 1.11**.**
Chinburg and Reid [6] proved that there are infinitely many noncomensurable examples of closed hyperbolic -manifolds in which all closed geodesics are simple. Let be such a manifold. It follows that cannot admit a geodesic symmetry through a point contained in a closed geodesic. For if was a geodesic symmetry through a point , where is a geodesic segment with endpoints at then would be a closed geodesic with a self-intersection at .
Furthermore, Jones and Reid [9] proved later that if two closed geodesics in intersect then they are perpendicular. They moreover, proved that has points at which at least two closed geodesic intersect. Let be such a point. It follows that at most three closed geodesics can intersect at for dimensional reasons and hence the group is finitely generated.
Example 1.12** (Locally symmetric space of higher rank).**
Let be a non-compact semisimple Lie group, its maximal compact subgroup and a lattice. If is a Cartan involution preserving the lattice (setwise) then it descends to a geodesic symmetry of the locally symmetric space .
Let be a finite index subgroup so that the locally symmetric space is a manifold. The geodesic symmetry is given by the inverse-transpose and hence the closed geodesics represent symmetric matrices of . If then the space is hyperbolic and the closed geodesic norm has infinite diameter. If then is an arithmetic Chevalley group of rank at least and it follows from Theorem 1.3 that the diameter of the closed geodesic norm is finite. Observe that in this case the group is infinite.
Acknowledgements
This work was partly funded by the Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant RPG-2017-159. MM is supported by the grant Sonatina 2018/28/C/ST1/00542 funded by Narodowe Centrum Nauki. MM and JK were partially supported by SFB 1085 “Higher Invariants” funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
2. Definitions and supporting results
2.1. Geodesics
We use terminology from [4]. Let be a metric space and let . A map is called a geodesic from to if for every and and . The image of such is called a geodesic segment. A local geodesic is a map such that for every there exists an such that for every . A metric space is called a geodesic metric space if every two points of can be joined by a geodesic. A complete connected Riemannian manifold is a geodesic metric space.
Let denote a circle with the standard metric of total length . A (locally) isometric embedding is called a closed (local) geodesic. If is a path then its reverse is defined by . We define similarly the reverse of a loop . A geodesic symmetry at is an isometry such that for every geodesic such that .
Lemma 2.2**.**
[4, Theorem 4.13, Chapter II.4]** Let be a complete, non-positively curved Riemannian manifold with a basepoint . Then every element is represented by a unique local geodesic .
Lemma 2.3**.**
[10, Theorem 3.8.14]** If is closed Riemannian manifold of negative curvature then every free homotopy class of loops is represented by a unique closed local geodesic. In particular, each conjugacy class in is represented by a unique closed local geodesic.
2.4. Quasimorphisms and norms on groups
Let be a group. A function is called a quasimorphism if there exists such that
[TABLE]
for every . The smallest number with the above property is called the defect of . If for every and every then is called homogeneous; see [5] for background on quasimorphisms.
A function such that for all :
- •
,
- •
if and only if ,
- •
is called a norm on a group . If in addition then is called conjugation invariant. The supremum is called the diameter of or the diameter of with respect to . If then is called unbounded.
The number is called the translation length of with respect to the norm . If a group contains an element with positive translation length with respect to the norm then is called stably unbounded.
Example 2.5**.**
Let be an infinite symmetric group. That is, a group of finitely supported bijections of a countably infinite set. The cardinality of the support defines a conjugation invariant norm of infinite diameter in which every element has translation length equal to zero.
3. Proofs
Let be a complete Riemannian manifold. Let be a geodesic symmetry through . By an abuse of notation we denote the induced automorphism of the fundamental group by . Define the following two subsets of the fundamental group of :
[TABLE]
Recall that denotes the set of all closed local geodesics through .
Lemma 3.1**.**
If every element of has a unique geodesic representative then .
Proof.
If is a closed local geodesic through , then and have a common initial segment. Thus, by the uniqueness of extension of geodesics, and . This proves that .
Let be a local geodesic representing . Since is, on the one hand, represented by a geodesic segment and, on the other hand, by a local geodesic , we get that due to the uniqueness of geodesic representatives. This implies that and hence . ∎
Remark 3.2*.*
Observe that it is important here that is a manifold. More precisely, that a geodesic is uniquely determined by its initial segment. For example, the graph presented on the figure below admits a geodesic symmetry through but its closed geodesics going around one of the squares are not preserved setwise.
Lemma 3.3**.**
If every element of has a unique local geodesic representative then the subgroup is normal.
Proof.
According to Lemma 3.1 the subgroup is generated by the set . Let and let . Then
[TABLE]
which means that the conjugate of an element is a product of two elements from . ∎
Corollary 3.4**.**
If every element of has a unique local geodesic representative then the closed geodesic norm on is dominated by a norm invariant with respect to the conjugation action of .
Proof.
Let . Since is invariant under conjugations by elements of the associated word norm is invariant under the conjugation action by .
Let . This means that , where and . It follows from Lemma 3.3 that
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Theorem 1.3.
If is a finite group then there is nothing to prove. So assume that is infinite. Since it is normal in , it is of finite index, according to [11, (5.3) Proposition, p.324]. If follows from [7, 8] that every conjugation invariant norm on a finite index subgroup of an S-arithmetic Chevalley group of rank at least has finite diameter and hence the statement follows from Corollary 3.4. ∎
Proof of Theorem 1.2.
Let be a differential -form and let be defined by
[TABLE]
where is a closed local geodesic representing the conjugacy class of . The map is a homogeneous quasi-morphism, see [5, Example 2.3.1].
If is such that then vanishes on . Indeed,
[TABLE]
which implies that .
Let be two noncommuting elements. Then
[TABLE]
is conjugate to . Let be a closed local geodesic representing the conjugacy class of . It follows that (up to reparametrisation by a shift).
Let be a -form supported in a small ball such that , where is as above. Let . Then
[TABLE]
We thus constructed a nontrivial homogeneous quasimorphism which vanishes on the generating set . A standard computation shows that it is Lipschitz with respect to the word norm associated with :
[TABLE]
where is the defect of . We finally obtain that
[TABLE]
which shows that the translation length of is positive and hence the closed geodesic norm on is stably unbounded. In particular, it has infinite diameter. ∎
Corollary 3.5**.**
Let be as in Theorem 1.2. Let be noncommuting elements represented by closed local geodesics. Then their commutator has positive translation length with respect to the closed geodesic norm. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] W. Ballmann, G. Thorbergsson, and W. Ziller. Closed geodesics and the fundamental group. Duke Math. J. , 48(3):585–588, 1981.
- 2[2] Valery Bardakov, Vladimir Shpilrain, and Vladimir Tolstykh. On the palindromic and primitive widths of a free group. J. Algebra , 285(2):574–585, 2005.
- 3[3] Michael Brandenbursky, Jarek K ‘ edra, and Egor Shelukhin. On the autonomous norm on the group of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms of the torus. Commun. Contemp. Math. , 20(2):1750042, 27, 2018.
- 4[4] Martin R. Bridson and André Haefliger. Metric spaces of non-positive curvature , volume 319 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
- 5[5] Danny Calegari. scl , volume 20 of MSJ Memoirs . Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2009.
- 6[6] Ted Chinburg and Alan W. Reid. Closed hyperbolic 3 3 3 -manifolds whose closed geodesics all are simple. J. Differential Geom. , 38(3):545–558, 1993.
- 7[7] Światosław R. Gal and Jarek Kędra. On bi-invariant word metrics. J. Topol. Anal. , 3(2):161–175, 2011.
- 8[8] Światosław R. Gal and Jarek Kędra. Finite index subgroups in chevalley groups are bounded: an addendum to "on bi-invariant word metrics". ar Xiv:1808.06376 , 2018.
