Multi-Task Learning for Argumentation Mining
Tobias Kahse

TL;DR
This paper evaluates multi-task learning across four NLP scenarios, demonstrating its potential to improve performance especially with sparse data and long sequences, while also analyzing when it may not help.
Contribution
It extends empirical research on multi-task learning by systematically analyzing its effectiveness in argumentation mining and related tasks, and introduces a flexible framework for such experiments.
Findings
Multi-task learning improves performance in all evaluated scenarios.
Dataset properties like entropy influence multi-task learning success.
Multi-task learning is especially beneficial for long input sequences and data-sparse tasks.
Abstract
Multi-task learning has recently become a very active field in deep learning research. In contrast to learning a single task in isolation, multiple tasks are learned at the same time, thereby utilizing the training signal of related tasks to improve the performance on the respective machine learning tasks. Related work shows various successes in different domains when applying this paradigm and this thesis extends the existing empirical results by evaluating multi-task learning in four different scenarios: argumentation mining, epistemic segmentation, argumentation component segmentation, and grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. We show that multi-task learning can, indeed, improve the performance compared to single-task learning in all these scenarios, but may also hurt the performance. Therefore, we investigate the reasons for successful and less successful applications of this paradigm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Software Engineering Research · Natural Language Processing Techniques
