The C*-algebra of the semi-direct product K and A
Hedi Regeiba, Jean Ludwig

TL;DR
This paper characterizes the C*-algebra of a semi-direct product group formed by a compact group acting on an abelian locally compact group, extending known results to a broader class of groups.
Contribution
It provides a general description of the C*-algebra of semi-direct product groups with compact and abelian components, generalizing earlier specific cases.
Findings
Describes the C*-algebra as an algebra of operator fields over the spectrum.
Generalizes previous results for special classes of semi-direct product groups.
Provides a framework for analyzing the structure of C*-algebras in this context.
Abstract
Let be the semi-direct product group of a compact group acting on an abelian locally compact group . We describe the -algebra of in terms of an algebra of operator fields defined over the spectrum of , generalizing previous results obtained for some special classes of such groups.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Advanced Algebra and Logic
The -algebra of the semi-direct product .
Regeiba Hedi And Ludwig Jean
Université de Sfax, Faculté des Sciences Sfax, BP 1171, 3038 Sfax, Tunisia
Université de Gabés Faculté des Sciences de Gabés Cité Erriadh 6072 Zrig Gabés Tunisie.
Université de Lorraine, Institut Elie Cartan de Lorraine, UMR 7502, Metz, F-57045, France.
Abstract.
Let be the semi-direct product group of a compact group acting on an abelian locally compact group . We describe the -algebra of in terms of an algebra of operator fields defined over the spectrum of , generalizing previous results obtained for some special classes of such groups.
1. Introduction
It is wellknown that for a simply connected nilpotent Lie group and more generally for an exponential solvable Lie group , its dual space is homeomorphic to the space of co-adjoint orbits through the Kirillov mapping (see [7]). If we consider semi-direct products of compact connected Lie groups acting on simply connected nilpotent Lie groups , then again we have an orbit picture of the dual space of (see [8]) and one can imagine that the topology of is linked to the topology of the admissible co-adjoint orbits.
By definition the -algebra of a locally compact group is the completion of the convolution algebra with respect to the norm
[TABLE]
The unitary dual or spectrum of is in bijection with the dual space of . Define the Fourier transform on by
[TABLE]
Then can be identified with the sub-algebra of the big -algebra of bounded operator fields given by
[TABLE]
Here denotes the space of bounded linear operators on the Hilbert space .
In order to understand the structure of the algebra , we must determine the special conditions which determine the operator fields .
For instance if , then it is easy to see that
[TABLE]
Since is compact, its irreducible unitary representations are finite dimensional. So is always trivially a compact operator. Furthermore, the spectrum of has the discrete topology. So there is no continuity condition for the operator fields.
If is abelian, then is a locally compact Hausdorff space and
[TABLE]
If is more generally a locally compact group of the form , then its dual space has a complicated structure determined by the -orbits in and the spectra of the stabilizer groups of the elements of . The topology of has been described in the paper of W. Bagget [2], which will be used intensively here. For the motion groups of the form the conditions for have been described explicitly in [3]. For some other groups only a detailed description of the topology of is known (see for instance [4] and [9]).
In section , we recall the results of Bagget on the topology of , define the Fourier transform for and discover the conditions which determine the algebra inside the big algebra (see Definition 2.20). To see what are the difficulties, consider a converging net of irreducible representations of . Here is a net of unitary characters of the abelian group , is the stabilizer of in and is an element of . Then . The problem is to understand for the behavior of the net of operators acting on the different Hilbert spaces . We shall in fact construct for a certain converging subnet of the net a common Hilbert space , such that contains a copy of the Hilbert space of and a projection for every in the subnet and we show that the essential condition for an operator field to be an element of is an operator norm convergence of the net to a limit operator which is determined by the restriction of the operator field to the limit set of the subnet.
In the last paragraph we present as example the group , for .
2. The -algebra of the group
2.1. Preliminaries.
Let be locally compact group, be an abelian and suppose is homomorphism of into the group of automorphisms of such that the mapping \left.\begin{array}[]{cccc}&&&\\ \Psi:&K\times A&\longrightarrow&A\\ &(k,a)&\mapsto&\Psi(k)(a)\end{array}\right. is continuous. For simplicity, we write the action of the automorphism on an element of as
The semi-direct product of the groups and is the following locally compact group. is the topological product of and and is equipped with the group law
[TABLE]
where we write the multiplication in with the symbol and multiplication in additively as .
The group can be homeomorphically and isomorphically identified with the closed normal subgroup of consisting of all pairs , where is an element of . Also, is homeomorphic and isomorphic to the closed subgroup of consisting of all pairs , where is an element of . (We write for the multiplicative identity of , for the additive identity of , and for the identity of ).
Now, let and be a unitary character of , and let to be the character of defined by
[TABLE]
Thus acts on the left as a group of continuous transformations on . If is in , the stability subgroup of is the closed subgroup
[TABLE]
Definition 2.1**.**
**
- (1)
We define the space to be the collection of all closed subgroups of equipped with the compact-open topology see **[6]. 2. (2)
Let denote the set of all pairs where is a closed subgroup of and is an irreducible unitary representation of
Proposition 2.2**.**
[see, [2] 2.1-D] Any closed subgroup of which contains is of the form , where is a closed subgroup of . Further, a net of closed subgroups of converges to in if and only if the net of subgroups of converges to the subgroup in
Let now . Then the Hilbert space of the representation can be identified with , thus if , and we have
[TABLE]
2.2. The topology of the dual space of the group .
The dual space or spectrum of has been described by G.Mackey (for details, see [10] and [11]).
For each character and any irreducible unitary representation of the stabilizer of in , we have that
[TABLE]
is an irreducible unitary representation of
[TABLE]
whose restriction to is a multiple of (see [2] proposition p.181) and the induced representation is an irreducible representation of .
On the other hand, every irreducible unitary representation of extends to an irreducible representation (also denoted by ) of the entire group defined by
[TABLE]
The following Propositions give the relationship between and the set of all elements (see [12])
Proposition 2.3**.**
Let be an irreducible unitary representation of . Then is supported by a -orbit in . Suppose is an element of . Then is equivalent to a representation of the form where is an irreducible unitary representation of
Proposition 2.4**.**
Let and be as in the above proposition. Assume and are elements of i.e, for some element of . Suppose further that is equivalent to and also is equivalent to for two elements . Then
- (1)
** 2. (2)
the representation , is equivalent to the representation .
Definition 2.5**.**
A cataloguing triple we mean a triple , where is a character of is the stabilizer and is an irreducible unitary representation of We denote by the induced representation
By Baggett in [2] (Proposition - ), we have
Proposition 2.6**.**
The mapping is onto
For the proof of the following theorem, see - of [2].
Theorem 2.7**.**
The -algebra of the locally compact group is .
Definition 2.8**.**
Let be the set of all functions which satisfy:*
- (1)
The domain of is a closed subgroup of . 2. (2)
* is complex-valued and continuous on its domain.*
In the section of [6], Fell has defined a topology on .
Definition 2.9**.**
The Fell topology on is the topology defined as follows. Let be a net of elements of . For each , let be the domain of . Let be in and denote by the domain of . Then the net converges to in the Fell topology if and only if the following two conditions hold.
- (1)
The net converges to in 2. (2)
For each subnet of the net and for each net of points of such that for each is an element of and such that the net converge to an element of , the net of complex numbers converges to
In [6] Fell describes the topology on in terms of the elements of and in terms of the Fell topology on . Here is one consequence of that description.
Theorem 2.10**.**
Let be a net of elements of and be an element of . Assume that, for some function of positive type associated with , there exists a net of functions which satisfies:
- (1)
Each is a finite sum of functions of positive type associated with . 2. (2)
The net converges to in the Fell topology of .
Then the net converges to in
The topology of the dual space of the group has been described by Baggett in [2] in the following theorem:
Theorem 2.11**.**
The topology of may be described as follows: Let be a subset of and an element of . is contained in the closure of if and only if there exist: a cataloguing triple for , an element of and a net of cataloguing triples, such that:
- (1)
For each , the element of is an element of 2. (2)
The net converges to in 3. (3)
* contains , and contains .*
The following lemma is the key for Definition 2.20.
Lemma 2.12**.**
Let be a properly converging net with the limit (i.e is a closed subgroup of and ). Then for some subnet we have that
[TABLE]
Proof.
The limit set of the net in is according to [2] the set
[TABLE]
We can as in [2] realize all these representations on subspaces in the common Hilbert space . Take some such that contains . Choose a , such that contains . Let be the minimal left and right translation -invariant subspace of containing and thus also a copy of the Hilbert space of the representation of . Then has dimension .
Then also contains a copy of the irreducible representation of . Let be the -isotopic component inside . We write
[TABLE]
where . There exists such that . Similarly we have , , for some . Of course and can be [math].
However, since the representations converge to the representation , we can assume that for a subnet the subspaces can be realized inside for large enough (see [2], 4.2-D Theorem). This tells us also that for large enough and hence, again for a subnet, we can suppose that is fixed for every . Since the dimensions of the spaces are smaller than the dimension of , we can also assume that all the dimensions are the same and equal to some common .
We choose for every an orhonormal basis of , which passes through the copies of and through . We choose the such that is a copy of the space . Since the dimension of is finite, we can assume (passing to a subnet) that exists in for every . Let be the character of the irreducible representation of . Then for any and for every . According to Bagget, the pairs converge in to the pair , where denotes the character of an irreducible representation (see [2], 7.1-B Lemma). This implies that (see [2],1.4-A Proposition)
[TABLE]
for every and similarly
[TABLE]
This shows that acts on by a multiple of . Define for any and the function on by
[TABLE]
where denotes the left regular representation of on . Since in for every , the functions converge uniformly on to the function , where
[TABLE]
Now the operator , which acts on the Hilbert space is the rank one operator which converges to the operator on the Hilbert space . This shows that the restriction of to is irreducible. Hence and . ∎
2.3.
Remark 2.13**.**
Identifying for every the Hilbert space with via the basis given by the ’s, we see also that for every the operators converge strongly and hence in operator norm to the operator .
We have by of [5]:
Theorem 2.14**.**
Let be a postliminal -algebra. Then admits a composition net such that for any , which is not an ordinal, the quotient is with continuous trace and such that for every ordinal the relation holds.
We take now as -algebra our , which is .
Let
[TABLE]
Then and . The subsets
[TABLE]
are locally compact and Hausdorff in their relative topologies, since is the spectrum of the algebra , which is of continuous trace (see [5]). Let be the spectrum of . Then
[TABLE]
2.4. The Fourier transform.
Let us first write down explicitly the representation . Its Hilbert space can be identified with the space
[TABLE]
Let be an element of For all and we use the same calculation as in (2.1) and we have that
[TABLE]
Let us compute for the operator We have for and that
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Definition 2.15**.**
For each the Fourier transform of is the isometric homomorphism on into which is given by
[TABLE]
Let now be the dense subspace of defined by
[TABLE]
Definition 2.16**.**
Let be a closed subgroup of the compact group and let be an irreducible representation of with character . We may identify the Hilbert space with , . Let*
[TABLE]
- (1)
Define for such that and for the operator on by
[TABLE] 2. (2)
Define for , for a closed subgroup of , for , the linear projection by
[TABLE]
Proposition 2.17**.**
**
- (1)
The linear operator is an selfadjoint projection of the Hilbert space . 2. (2)
For any closed subgroup of , , and we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
- (1)
We have for that
[TABLE]
Let . Then for ,
[TABLE]
Hence the operator is the identity on .
Let and let its character. For let
[TABLE]
Then the mapping is also contained in and for another we have that
[TABLE]
It is easy to see now that
[TABLE]
since . Furthermore, for it follows that
[TABLE]
Hence and is zero on . This shows that
[TABLE] 2. (2)
For , we have by (2.2) that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
∎
Lemma 2.18**.**
Let Then we have:
- (1)
* .* 2. (2)
Let be a converging net in with limit such that for any . Then, identifying the Hilbert spaces of the representations with , we have that in operator norm for any .
Proof.
- (1)
Let be a -algebra. According to ([5], chapter 3 §3.3) , if a net goes to infinity, i.e. this net has no converging subnet, then for any Now Bagget [2] has shown that for every net of cataloguing triples we have that goes to infinity, if and only if the net goes to infinity in . 2. (2)
Let first be contained in . Let
[TABLE]
Then we see that and by Remark that 2.13
[TABLE]
point wise in . Therefore also
[TABLE]
where denotes the space of complex matrices of size .
Using Lebesgue, we see that
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
The lemma follows now from the density of in .
∎
2.5. A -condition.
Let be as before a semi-direct product of a compact group with a locally compact abelian group .
Remark 2.19**.**
Let be a net in which converges to . We can suppose that for a subnet (also denoted by for simplicity of notation) that the triples converge to in and that the Hilbert spaces and are identified with for some and that all these spaces , are subspaces of the common Hilbert space . The representation can be disintegrated into an integral of irreducible representations supported by the limit set
[TABLE]
of the net (see Theorem 2.11). We denote by the corresponding representation of the algebra on the Hilbert space . Let us observe that by the construction of we have that
[TABLE]
We can extend this representation to the larger -algebra consisting of all uniformly bounded operator fields satisfying and we denote this extension also by (see [1]) .
Definition 2.20**.**
Let be the family consisting of all uniformly bounded operator fields satisfying the following conditions:
- (1)
* is a compact operator on for every * 2. (2)
** 3. (3)
Let be a properly converging net in with the properties and notations of the preceding Remark 2.19. Then
[TABLE]
Proposition 2.21**.**
* is a -algebra for the norm containing .*
Proof.
First we show that is a norm closed involutive subspace of . It is clear that is a sub-space of . The conditions are evidently true for every in the closure of . For the condition , let and let such that Then also . Hence for any there exists such that such that for any Therefore choosing some we have for large enough that
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
Hence . Since is a representation, it follows that is involutive and so is an involutive Banach space. Let us show that it is an algebra.
Let . We must show that is in too.
The conditions are necessarily true for .
Let us check point (3). It follows from property for , using the involution ∗, that also
[TABLE]
We then have that, since for every ,
[TABLE]
where .
Since satisfies all the conditions of it follows that is contained in . ∎
Proposition 2.22**.**
The spectrum of the algebra can be identified with
Proof.
We have by of [5]:
Theorem 2.23**.**
Let be a postliminal -algebra. Then admits a composition sequence such that the quotients are - algebras with continuous trace.
This theorem applies of course to our -algebra . Let now
[TABLE]
The subsets
[TABLE]
are locally compact and Hausdorff in their relative topologies, since is the spectrum of the algebra , which is of continuous trace (see [5]). Then
[TABLE]
Evidently . Define:
[TABLE]
Then the ’s are closed ideals of and
[TABLE]
Let now . Let
[TABLE]
If , then for every and then , which is impossible. Hence
[TABLE]
We have now that , but .
This means in particular that is contained in the hull of the ideal . But is the kernel of the subset . In other words is an element of the closure of the subset , but .
There exists therefore a net , such that in . Hence, there exists for and for any an element , such that for any , we have that
[TABLE]
Then does not go to infinity in because of condition . Hence, either for a subnet, the net converges in to some , and then by condition (3)
[TABLE]
for any . Now for any we have that
[TABLE]
This shows that
[TABLE]
Since in our case , relation 2.4 implies that . But then , since is completely continuous (see [5], 4.1.11. Corollary).
The other possibility is that the net converges in to a limit set contained in .
Now for , it follows from condition , that
[TABLE]
which shows that . But this implies then by (2.5) that for every . Therefore is [math] on . This contradiction shows that . ∎
Theorem 2.24**.**
Let be the semi-direct product of a compact group with an abelian locally compact group . Then the -algebra is isomorphic to the group -algebra .
Proof.
We know now that . It suffices to apply the theorem of Stone-Weierstrass to the -algebra and its subalgebra .
∎
3. Examples
Example 3.1**.**
For all , let the the the semi-direct product of the compact Lie group with the abelian group . The -algebra of this group is discribed by Abdelmoula, Elloumi and Ludwig in [3].
We can parameterize the dual space in the following way:
[TABLE]
For and , we denote by the stabilizer of . The projection are
[TABLE]
and for
[TABLE]
For any and we have that
[TABLE]
Let be the family consisting of all operator fields satisfying the following conditions:
- (1)
is a compact operator on for every 2. (2)
3. (3)
[TABLE]
Then, the -algebra of the group the group is isomorphic to under the Fourier transform.
Example 3.2**.**
Define the abelian group and the compact groups and by:
[TABLE]
Then, by [13], Ch. 4, 2, 3.1., we have that
[TABLE]
Furthermore, the spectrum of the abelian group is the set of all infinite products
[TABLE]
where almost everywhere.
Define for the subgroups and of by
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Then is isomorphic to the quotient group and it has elements. The Haar measure on is given by
[TABLE]
A function is continuous, if and only if for every , there exists such that
[TABLE]
Then the Haar measure on is given according to [13], Ch. 3, 3, example (vi) by
[TABLE]
For , the stabilizer is the direct product
[TABLE]
where if and if .
Let for
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
in . The stabilizer in is the subgroup
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Choose for every the trivial character of . Then, according to Definition 2.16, the dimensions are one and the projections are given by
[TABLE]
Therefore, by Remark 2.19, the limit set of the sequence is the spectrum itself and then for any and we have that
[TABLE]
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] W.B. Arveson, Subalgebras of C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras , Acta Math., 123 141-224 (1969).
- 2[2] Baggett, W., A description of the topology on the dual spaces of certain locally compact groups , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 132 175 − 215 ( 1968 ) 132175 215 1968 {132}\ \ 175-215\ (1968) .
- 3[3] F.Abdelmoula, M.Elloumi, J.Ludwig, The C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebra of the motion group S O ( n ) ⋉ ℝ n left-normal-factor-semidirect-product 𝑆 𝑂 𝑛 superscript ℝ 𝑛 SO(n)\ltimes{\mathbb{R}}^{n} , Bull. Sci. math. 135 166 − 177 ( 2011 ) . 135166 177 2011 135\ 166-177\ (2011).
- 4[4] Ben Halima. M, Rahali. A On the dual topology of a class of Cartan motion groups , J. Lie Theory , 22 491 − 503 ( 2012 ) 22491 503 2012 22\ 491-503\ (2012) .
- 5[5] J. Dixmier, Les C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algèbres et leurs représentations , Gauthier-Villars.
- 6[6] J. M. G, Fell, Weak containment and induced representations of groups II , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 110 110 110 , 424 − 447 424 447 424-447 ( 1964 ) 1964 (1964) .
- 7[7] H. Leptin, J. Ludwig, Unitary representation theory of exponential Lie groups, De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics, 18, ( 1994 ) 1994 (1994) .
- 8[8] Lipsman, R.L., Orbit theory and harmonic analysis on Lie groups with co-compact nilradical , J. Math. pures et appl., 59, 337 − 374 ( 1980 ) 337 374 1980 337-374\ (1980) .
