# Obfuscation for Privacy-preserving Syntactic Parsing

**Authors:** Zhifeng Hu, Serhii Havrylov, Ivan Titov, Shay B. Cohen

arXiv: 1904.09585 · 2020-05-28

## TL;DR

This paper presents a neural obfuscation method for natural language that preserves syntactic structure for parsing while enhancing privacy, outperforming random substitution baselines.

## Contribution

Introduces a neural obfuscation technique for privacy-preserving syntactic parsing that maintains syntactic roles and improves parser performance over random substitution.

## Key findings

- Neural obfuscation maintains high parsing accuracy.
- Obfuscation degrades random substitution performance.
- Substituted words retain syntactic properties but differ semantically.

## Abstract

The goal of homomorphic encryption is to encrypt data such that another party can operate on it without being explicitly exposed to the content of the original data. We introduce an idea for a privacy-preserving transformation on natural language data, inspired by homomorphic encryption. Our primary tool is {\em obfuscation}, relying on the properties of natural language. Specifically, a given English text is obfuscated using a neural model that aims to preserve the syntactic relationships of the original sentence so that the obfuscated sentence can be parsed instead of the original one. The model works at the word level, and learns to obfuscate each word separately by changing it into a new word that has a similar syntactic role. The text obfuscated by our model leads to better performance on three syntactic parsers (two dependency and one constituency parsers) in comparison to an upper-bound random substitution baseline. More specifically, the results demonstrate that as more terms are obfuscated (by their part of speech), the substitution upper bound significantly degrades, while the neural model maintains a relatively high performing parser. All of this is done without much sacrifice of privacy compared to the random substitution upper bound. We also further analyze the results, and discover that the substituted words have similar syntactic properties, but different semantic content, compared to the original words.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.09585/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.09585/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.09585/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.09585