Clarifying causal mediation analysis for the applied researcher: Defining effects based on what we want to learn

TL;DR

This paper clarifies causal mediation analysis for applied researchers by explaining effect types, emphasizing causal thinking, and proposing a flexible class of interventional effects aligned with diverse research questions.

Contribution

It introduces a clear explanation of causal mediation effects, differentiates analysis perspectives, and proposes a generalized class of interventional effects for better applicability.

Findings

Differentiates explanatory and interventional perspectives

Highlights the importance of causal thinking in mediation analysis

Proposes a flexible, generalized class of interventional effects

Abstract

The incorporation of causal inference in mediation analysis has led to theoretical and methodological advancements -- effect definitions with causal interpretation, clarification of assumptions required for effect identification, and an expanding array of options for effect estimation. However, the literature on these results is fast-growing and complex, which may be confusing to researchers unfamiliar with causal inference or unfamiliar with mediation. The goal of this paper is to help ease the understanding and adoption of causal mediation analysis. It starts by highlighting a key difference between the causal inference and traditional approaches to mediation analysis and making a case for the need for explicit causal thinking and the causal inference approach in mediation analysis. It then explains in as-plain-as-possible language existing effect types, paying special attention to motivating these effects with different types of research questions, and using concrete examples for illustration. This presentation differentiates two perspectives (or purposes of analysis): the explanatory perspective (aiming to explain the total effect) and the interventional perspective (asking questions about hypothetical interventions on the exposure and mediator, or hypothetically modified exposures). For the latter perspective, the paper proposes tapping into a general class of interventional effects that contains as special cases most of the usual effect types -- interventional direct and indirect effects, controlled direct effects and also a generalized interventional direct effect type, as well as the total effect and overall effect. This general class allows flexible effect definitions which better match many research questions than the standard interventional direct and indirect effects.