# OGLE-2017-BLG-1186: first application of asteroseismology and Gaussian processes to microlensing

## TL;DR

This paper demonstrates the first use of asteroseismology and Gaussian processes to analyze a microlensing event with a variable source, providing new insights into source and lens properties.

## Contribution

It introduces the novel application of asteroseismology and Gaussian processes to microlensing data with variable sources, enhancing analysis techniques.

## Key findings

- Source is an oscillating red giant with a 9-day timescale.
- Lens likely a brown dwarf or ultracool dwarf at ~9-10 kpc.
- 35% probability lens is a bulge object, 65% background disc.

## Abstract

We present the analysis of the event OGLE-2017-BLG-1186 from the 2017 Spitzer microlensing campaign. This is a remarkable microlensing event because its source is photometrically bright and variable, which makes it possible to perform an asteroseismic analysis using ground-based data. We find that the source star is an oscillating red giant with average timescale of $\sim 9$ d. The asteroseismic analysis also provides us source properties including the source angular size ($\sim 27~\mu{\rm as}$) and distance ($\sim 11.5$ kpc), which are essential for inferring the properties of the lens. When fitting the light curve, we test the feasibility of Gaussian Processes (GPs) in handling the correlated noise caused by the variable source. We find that the parameters from the GP model are generally more loosely constrained than those from the traditional $\chi^2$ minimization method. We note that this event is the first microlensing system for which asteroseismology and GPs have been used to account for the variable source. With both finite-source effect and microlens parallax measured, we find that the lens is likely a $\sim 0.045~M_{\odot}$ brown dwarf at distance $\sim 9.0$ kpc, or a $\sim 0.073~M_{\odot}$ ultracool dwarf at distance $\sim 9.8$ kpc. Combining the estimated lens properties with a Bayesian analysis using a Galactic model, we find a $\sim 35$ per cent probability for the lens to be a bulge object and $\sim 65$ per cent to be a background disc object.