On the largest element in D(n)-quadruples
Andrej Dujella, Vinko Petri\v{c}evi\'c

TL;DR
This paper investigates the extremal sizes of the largest element in D(n)-quadruples for non-square integers n, constructing families with elements of order |n|^3 and |n|^{2/5}.
Contribution
It introduces new constructions of D(n)-quadruples demonstrating the possible large and small sizes of their largest elements.
Findings
Largest element can be of order |n|^3
Largest element can be of order |n|^{2/5}
Provides explicit families of D(n)-quadruples
Abstract
Let be a nonzero integer. A set of nonzero integers such that is a perfect square for all is called a --tuple. In this paper, we consider the question, for given integer which is not a perfect square, how large and how small can be the largest element in a -quadruple. We construct families of -quadruples in which the largest element is of order of magnitude , resp. .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
On the largest element in -quadruples
Andrej Dujella
Department of Mathematics
Faculty of Science
University of Zagreb
Bijenička cesta 30, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
and
Vinko Petričević
Department of Mathematics
Faculty of Science
University of Zagreb
Bijenička cesta 30, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Abstract.
Let be a nonzero integer. A set of nonzero integers such that is a perfect square for all is called a --tuple. In this paper, we consider the question, for given integer which is not a perfect square, how large and how small can be the largest element in a -quadruple. We construct families of -quadruples in which the largest element is of order of magnitude , resp. .
Key words and phrases:
-quadruples.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 11D09; Secondary 11G05
1. Introduction
For a nonzero integer , a set of distinct nonzero integers such that is a perfect square for all is called a --tuple (or a Diophantine -tuple with the property ).
The most studied case is and --tuples are called Diophantine -tuples. Fermat found the first Diophantine quadruple, it was the set . In 1969, Baker and Davenport [1] proved that the set can be extended to a Diophantine quintuple only by adding to the set. In 2004, Dujella [11] proved that there are no Diophantine sextuples and that there are at most finitely many Diophantine quintuples. Recently, He, Togbé and Ziegler proved that there are no Diophantine quintuples [23] (see also [3]). On the other hand, there are examples of -quintuples and sextuples for , e.g. is a -quintuple [7], while is a -sextuple [21] (see also [18]). For an overview of results on Diophantine -tuples and its generalizations see [14].
Several authors considered the problem of the existence of Diophantine quadruples with the property . It is easy to show that there are no -quadruples if ([4, 22, 25]). Indeed, assume that is a -quadruple. Since the square of an integer is or , we have that or . This implies that none of the ’s is divisible by . Therefore, we may assume that . But now we have that or , a contradiction. On the other hand, it is shown in [6] that if and , then there exists at least one -quadruple. For , the question of the existence of -quadruples is still open.
The Lang conjecture on varieties of general type implies that the size of sets with the property is bounded by an absolute constant (independent on ). It is known that the size of sets with the property is for ; for , and for prime (see [9, 10, 19] and also [2]).
It is easy to see that there exist infinitely many -quadruples. Indeed, the set for is a -quadruple (see e.g. [8]). More precisely, it was proved in [24] that the number of -quadruples with elements is , where (the main contribution comes from the quadruples of the form where , see [12]). If is a perfect square, say , then by multiplying elements of a -quadruple by we obtain a -quadruple, and thus we conclude that there exist infinitely many -quadruples. Moreover, it was proved in [6] that any -pair , such that is not a perfect square, can be extended to a -quadruple.
The following conjecture was proposed in [13].
Conjecture 1**.**
If a nonzero integer is not a perfect square, then there exist only finitely many -quadruples.
As we already mentioned, it is easy to verify the conjecture in case since there does not exist a -quadruple in that case. Only other cases where the conjecture is known to be true are the cases and , see [15, 16] (these two cases are equivalent since, by [6], all elements of a -quadruple are even).
Motivated by Conjecture 1, in this paper we consider the question, for given integer which is not a perfect square, what can be said about the largest element in a -quadruple. In particular, the question how large it can be (compared with ) is closely related with Conjecture 1. On the other hand, the question how small it can be (again compared with ) makes sense also in the case when is a perfect square. Since is a -quadruple if and only if has the same property, without loss of generality we may assume that . Our main results are collected in the following theorem.
Theorem 1**.**
Let be real numbers such that and . Then there exist an integer which is not a perfect square and a -quadruple such that
[TABLE]
In Section 2 we will consider -quadruples, where is not a perfect square, with large elements and construct family of quadruples with of order of magnitude , while in Section 3 we will consider -quadruples with small elements and construct family of quadruples with of order of magnitude . Since elements of both families of quadruples are polynomials in one variable, a standard construction with -quadruples will finish the proof of Theorem 1.
It should be noted that we do not know what are best possible results in both direction, i.e. is there any family of -quadruples with of order of magnitude with or . We will show in Section 3 that we cannot have .
2. -quadruples with large elements
The proof of the fact that for and there exists at least one -quadruple [6], is based on explicit formulas for -quadruples, where , , , , and , while elements of -quadruples are polynomials in . For example,
[TABLE]
is a -quadruple. This example shows that it is possible to have . The same conclusion also follows from the fact that
[TABLE]
is a -quadruple (see [17]).
In order to find families of quadruples with larger elements (compared with ), we performed an extensive search for -quadruples (similar as explained in [20]) and then sieve them according to the requirement that is relatively large (in particular, larger that ). Then we search for properties which are common to several found quadruples. For example, quadruples containing one small element (e.g. ) and quadruples containing a regular triple (a -triple is called regular if ). We have extracted the following interesting examples:
[TABLE]
These examples suggest that for every positive integer there might exist a quadruple such that . Furthermore, in these three examples (and some other found examples) we have that . In fact, these examples suggests that we may take that . Starting with these assumptions, it is now easy to reconstruct the corresponding family of -quadruples:
[TABLE]
Here is an arbitrary nonzero integer. By taking , we obtain and .
After the substitution , the family of quadruples becomes
[TABLE]
with . Thus, , and are even polynomials in , while is odd (analogously as in (1)). From these properties, it is also possible to reconstruct the polynomials by the method of undetermined coefficients.
In our example we have and . Hence, as . If we take , and multiply all elements of the quadruple by , we get quadruple in which and . Hence, now we have . By varying nonnegative integers and , we get that any point from the interval is an accumulation point of the set \{\log{d}/\log{|n|}\,:\,\mbox{{a,b,c,d}D(n)n}\}.
3. -quadruples with small elements
In this section, we consider the question how small can be elements of a -quadruple, in particular how small can be its largest element. As we have already seen at the end of the previous section, it is easy to get quadruples in which is of order of magnitude . Indeed, we can take any nonzero integer and any fixed -quadruple , and multiply its elements by large positive integer to get -quadruple , which yields as .
Thus, we are interested if there are (families of) examples with significantly smaller that . If , then we can assume that , and from it follows that . Hence, we may assume that . We claim that cannot be smaller that . Indeed, let . Since , we have . We may assume that (if the proof is analogous). From , we get . We obtain , which implies , and this contradicts .
As the examples of -triple and -triple show, in a -triple we may have all elements of the order . However, we were not able to find -quadruples with the same property.
3.1. -quadruples of the form
In considering certain problems with -quadruples, it might be convenient to study sets of the form . In order to satisfy the definition of a -quadruple, such sets has to satisfy only four conditions: , , and are perfect squares, compared with six conditions which has to be satisfied by general set of four elements.
By considering -quadruples of the form , we found examples with :
[TABLE]
is a -quadruple,
[TABLE]
is a -quadruple, while
[TABLE]
is a -quadruple.
We can improve slightly these results to get families of -quadruples of the form such that is of order of magnitude .
Let and . We get
[TABLE]
We write the third condition in the form , which gives that is a perfect square, say
[TABLE]
We get
[TABLE]
It remains the satisfy the last condition that is a perfect square. The condition leads to
[TABLE]
If we take , the condition becomes
[TABLE]
This quartic over has a -rational point , and therefore it can be in standard way (see e.g. [5]) transformed into an elliptic curve. There is another point on the quartic:
[TABLE]
If we take the point , we get
[TABLE]
which gives the -quadruple , where
[TABLE]
which satisfies as .
3.2. -quadruples with
Now we describe the construction of a family of -quadruples in which is of order of magnitude . The construction is motivated by the following experimentally found example:
[TABLE]
is a -quadruple.
Let and put , . We get
[TABLE]
Now put , , and we get
[TABLE]
By taking , we obtain
[TABLE]
It remains to satisfy the condition that is a perfect square. We put . This leads to the equation
[TABLE]
In order to find some of its solution, we introduce the condition . This gives , and by inserting it in (2) (the discriminant of the equation in becomes a square), we get
[TABLE]
Thus, we obtain the rational -quadruple , where
[TABLE]
In order to get quadruples with integers elements, we put and search for the solution in the form . The condition that rational functions appearing in become polynomials, leads to , , . We take and , and we obtain the -quadruple
[TABLE]
which satisfies as . For we get our starting motivating example: -quadruple .
We now apply the same argument as at the end of Section 2. We have and . If we take , and multiply all elements of the quadruple by , we get quadruple in which and . Hence, we have . By varying nonnegative integers and , we get that any point from the interval is an accumulation point of the set
[TABLE]
which together with the mentioned result from the end of Section 2 finishes the proof of Theorem 1.
Remark 1**.**
As we mentioned in the introduction, the question how small the largest element of a -quadruple can be make sense also in the case when is a perfect square. By taking the -quadruple as a motivating example, we found that
[TABLE]
is a -quadruple, and this yields as . Thus, a version of Theorem 1 with a nonzero perfect square holds for . Again, we do not know whether the lower bound for is best possible.
Acknowledgements. The authors were supported by the Croatian Science Foundation under the project no. IP-2018-01-1313. The authors acknowledge support from the QuantiXLie Center of Excellence, a project co-financed by the Croatian Government and European Union through the European Regional Development Fund - the Competitiveness and Cohesion Operational Programme (Grant KK.01.1.1.01.0004). The authors acknowledge the usage of the supercomputing resources of Division of Theoretical Physics at Ruđer Bošković Institute.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] A. Baker and H. Davenport, The equations 3 x 2 − 2 = y 2 3 superscript 𝑥 2 2 superscript 𝑦 2 3x^{2}-2=y^{2} and 8 x 2 − 7 = z 2 8 superscript 𝑥 2 7 superscript 𝑧 2 8x^{2}-7=z^{2} , Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 20 (1969), 129–137.
- 2[2] R. Becker, M. Ram Murty, Diophantine m 𝑚 m -tuples with the property D ( n ) 𝐷 𝑛 D(n) , Glas. Mat. Ser. III, to appear.
- 3[3] M. Bliznac Trebješanin and A. Filipin, Nonexistence of D ( 4 ) 𝐷 4 D(4) -quintuples , J. Number Theory 194 (2019), 170–217.
- 4[4] E. Brown, Sets in which x y + k 𝑥 𝑦 𝑘 xy+k is always a square , Math. Comp. 45 (1985), 613–620.
- 5[5] I. Connell, Elliptic Curve Handbook, Mc Gill University, 1999.
- 6[6] A. Dujella, Generalization of a problem of Diophantus , Acta Arith. 65 (1993), 15–27.
- 7[7] A. Dujella, On Diophantine quintuples , Acta Arith. 81 (1997), 69–79.
- 8[8] A. Dujella, The problem of the extension of a parametric family of Diophantine triples , Publ. Math. Debrecen 51 (1997), 311–322.
