Paths to Scalable Carbon Neutrality for MIT
Caleb Amy, Julien Barber, and Coling Kelsall

TL;DR
This paper offers strategic recommendations for MIT to achieve carbon neutrality by analyzing emission reduction options, implementation timelines, costs, scalability, and risks, leveraging MIT's technological and financial strengths.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive framework for MIT to pursue carbon neutrality, considering multiple factors and scenarios, grounded in MIT's unique capabilities.
Findings
Evaluation of emission reduction strategies and their scalability.
Analysis of costs and risks associated with different scenarios.
Recommendations for leveraging MIT's strengths in technology and finance.
Abstract
The goal of this report is to provide actionable recommendations for paths to carbon neutrality from MITs largest group of stakeholders, students. In the report, we consider the optimization of emissions reductions, the timescale of solution implementation, cost, scalability, and the associated risks inherent to two different scenarios. Similarly, it leverages MITs strengths, such as its position as the world leader in technology and innovation as well as its financial strength, which enables it to make relatively low return investments and use contracting power to enable renewable projects.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClimate Change Policy and Economics · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Green IT and Sustainability
