Realising $\pi_\ast^e R$-algebras by global ring spectra
Jack Morgan Davies

TL;DR
This paper investigates how algebraic structures in equivariant stable homotopy theory can be realized by global ring spectra, establishing conditions for such realizations and their multiplicative enhancements.
Contribution
It provides criteria for realizing algebraic maps as global ring spectrum maps and describes when these can be enhanced to $ ext{E}_ ext{infty}$-structures.
Findings
Realization of algebraic maps as global ring spectrum maps under projectivity.
Conditions for upgrading to $ ext{E}_ ext{infty}$-structures when étale or over $ ext{Q}$-algebras.
Construction of various global spectra with controlled homotopy types.
Abstract
We approach a problem of realising algebraic objects in a certain universal equivariant stable homotopy theory; the global homotopy theory of Schwede. Specifically, for a global ring spectrum , we consider which classes of ring homomorphisms can be realised by a map in the category of global -modules, and what multiplicative structures can be placed on . If witnesses as a projective -module, then such an exists as a map between homotopy commutative global -algebras. If is in addition \'{e}tale or is a -algebra, then can be upgraded to a map of -global -algebras or a map of --algebras, respectively. Various global spectra and -global ring spectra are then…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Realising -algebras by global ring spectra
J.M. Davies111[email protected]
Abstract
We approach a problem of realising algebraic objects in a certain universal equivariant stable homotopy theory; the global homotopy theory of Schwede [Sch18]. Specifically, for a global ring spectrum , we consider which classes of ring homomorphisms can be realised by a map in the category of global -modules, and what multiplicative structures can be placed on . If witnesses as a projective -module, then such an exists as a map between homotopy commutative global -algebras. If is in addition étale or is a -algebra, then can be upgraded to a map of -global -algebras or a map of --algebras, respectively. Various global spectra and -global ring spectra are then obtained from classical homotopy theoretic and algebraic constructions, with a controllable global homotopy type.
Contents
- Introduction
- 1 Background in global homotopy theory
- 2 Homotopy theory over a global ring spectrum
- 3 Globally flat -modules
- 4 Realising algebra with -modules
- 5 Realising algebra with homotopy global ring spectra
- 6 Realising algebra with -global ring spectra
- 7 Realising algebra with -ring spectra
- 8 Examples
Introduction
A key feature of the stable homotopy category is the interplay between algebra and homotopy theory. In this article we explore a variant of the following realisation problem:
Given a ring spectrum , when does a map of graded rings come from a map of -module spectra ?
Example 0.1**.**
If is an Eilenberg–Mac Lane spectrum and is concentrated in degree zero, then the answer is “always”. One way to see this is to recognise the full subcategory of the (-) category of -module spectra spanned by Eilenberg–Mac Lane spectra as the (nerve of the) category of -modules; see [Lur17, Proposition 7.1.1.13(3)]. In particular, this provides us with an Eilenberg–Mac Lane -module spectrum with and a bijection of sets
[TABLE]
In general though, the answer is more complicated. For a nonexample, consider the periodic real -theory spectrum and the -algebra . Using Toda brackets one can show there is no -module spectrum with an isomorphism of -modules ; see [Sag08, Lemma 8.4].
This question is also interesting when we consider multiplicative structures. If the spectrum of Example 0.1 is an -ring spectrum and a map of commutative rings, then obtains an essentially unique -structure such that is a map of -ring spectra; see [Lur17, Proposition 7.1.3.18]. As expected, there are also nonexamples in the multiplicative setting too. Consider the map of rings , where the codomain is the ring of Gaussian integers. It is shown in [SVW99, Proposition 2] that one cannot construct an -ring spectrum lifting (in the sense of [SVW99, Definition 1]) the map , however, an additive construction is simple – just take . Notice this map is ramified at the prime 2, hence it is not étale; see Examples 8.6 and 8.8 for more discussion.
One solution to the multiplicative problem can be obtained by paraphrasing the work of Baker–Richter using obstruction theory for -ring spectra.
Theorem 0.2** (Baker–Richter [BR07]).**
Let be an -ring spectrum and a map of graded commutative rings recognising as a projective -module. Then there is a homotopy commutative -algebra spectrum and a map of homotopy commutative ring spectra , such that . If in addition, is étale, then has an -structure (unique up to contractible choice) and is a map of -ring spectra.222For the existence of the homotopy commutative -algebra spectrum , one can use the same arguments as in the proof of [BR07, Theorem 2.1.1], as all that is important there is the fact is projective over ; see Sections 4 and 5 for more details. For the -structure, one can use the same arguments as in the proof of [BR07, Proposition 2.2.3], as the vitally important extra assumption is that is étale; see Section 6 for more details.
The goal of this article is to explore this question of realisablity and extend Theorem 0.2 to the setting of global homotopy theory, and in this way obtain new global homotopy types. In global homotopy theory, one has global spectra , objects of a stable model category, who naturally have global homotopy groups, denoted as for each compact Lie group . In particular, each global spectrum has nonequivariant homotopy groups, which are simply when is the trivial group. This concept of a universal equivariant stable homotopy theory has been explored by Bohmann, Greenlees, Lewis, May, and Steinberger; see [Boh14], [GM97], and [LMS86]. We will be using the category of orthogonal spectra with the global model structure as defined by Schwede in [Sch18, Theorem 4.3.18]. This (model) category of global spectra is symmetric monoidal, so we can speak of monoids (which we call global ring spectra) and commutative monoids (which we call ultra-commutative ring spectra), as well as modules and algebras over these various types of monoids. There also exist intermediary multiplicative structures of global spectra, such as homotopy associative and commutative, -global, and -ring spectra; see Definitions 1.7, 1.9, and 7.3, as well as Diagram (1.11) which explains how these concepts relate.
To generalise Theorem 0.2, one needs to keep in mind that we are not just looking for any realisation of nonequivariant algebraic information by global spectra, but rather realisations over which we understand their global homotopy type. For example, the global spectra , , and , the global Eilenberg–Mac Lane spectra of the global Burnside ring, global complex representation ring, and constant global functor of (see Remark 3.2 for more details) all have the nonequivariant homotopy type of the Eilenberg–Mac Lane spectrum , but wildly different global homotopy groups. To overcome this problem, we investigate a condition called globally flat; see Definition 3.1.
Definition 0.3**.**
Let be a global ring spectrum and a left -module spectrum. We say that is globally flat as an -module if a certain natural map
[TABLE]
is an isomorphism, for all compact Lie groups . An -algebra is called globally flat if it is globally flat as an -module.
Our main theorem then shows that given an ultra-commutative ring spectrum , certain maps of commutative -algebras can be realised by maps of globally flat -modules , and that a variety of multiplicative structures can be placed on such an . The following theorem summarises Theorem 5.1, Corollary 6.16, and Theorem 7.4.
Theorem A**.**
Let be an ultra-commutative ring spectrum and a map of graded commutative rings recognising as a projective -module. Then there exists a globally flat homotopy commutative global -algebra , unique to global homotopy. If in addition is étale, then can be given an -global -algebra structure, unique up to contractible choice, lifting the homotopy commutative multiplication. Analogously, if is a -algebra, then has a -structure lifting the homotopy commutative multiplication.
To prove the above theorem we need to further develop the tools in global homotopy theory a little beyond [Sch18]. In particular, we will relativise some statements made in [Sch18] from the stable global homotopy category to the stable global homotopy category of -modules , and constantly work with the adjective globally flat. As a result, we mimic an array of constructions from classical stable homotopy theory in the setting of global homotopy theory whilst maintaining sufficient control of global homotopy types. For example, one can perform simple localisation constructions, realise Galois extensions of graded rings, and lift nonequivariant spectra from chromatic homotopy theory, all to the global setting. More explicitly, the following is shown as a series of examples in Section 8.
Theorem B**.**
Let be a fixed ultra-commutative or cofibrant -global ring spectrum (see Definition 1.9), and write and for the periodic global complex -theory and global complex cobordism spectra; see [Sch18, Section 6.4] and [Sch18, Section 6.1], respectively.
For any (countable) subset , there exists globally flat -global -algebra with
[TABLE]
see Example 8.4. Moreover, for every -module , there exists a globally flat -module with ; see Example 8.5. 2. 2.
*If a prime is invertible in and the **th cyclotomic polynomial is irreducible over , then there exists a globally flat -global ring spectrum realising the map of rings , where is a *th root of unity; see Example 8.9. 3. 3.
If is a -Galois extension of (graded) rings for a finite group , then is realisable as a globally flat -global -algebra , and the -action on is realisable by a -action of -global -algebras on ; see Example 8.10. 4. 4.
Every -module is realisable by a globally flat -module; see Example 8.11. 5. 5.
For every prime and every integer , there exists a globally flat homotopy associative -algebra , a global height Morava -theory spectrum, which is nonequivariantly equivalent to the Morava -theory spectrum ; see Example 8.13.
The uniqueness of the examples above is also discussed.
Let us now explain the ingredients of this article.
Outline
In §1, we recall some of the basic concepts and constructions of global homotopy theory (the details of which can be found inside Schwede’s book [Sch18]), in §2, we relativise some of this content with respect to a global ring spectrum , and in §3, globally flat -modules are defined and discussed. The next four sections realise nonequivariant algebraic data in terms of global homotopy theory, first additively in §4, multiplicatively up to a single homotopy in §5, multiplicatively up to higher homotopies in §6, and multiplicatively with power operations in §7. In §4, we study classical constructions and results (of [EKMM97, Chapter IV], [Wol98], and folklore) in the global setting by carefully tracking global flatness, and in §5, we use the ideas of Baker–Richter [BR07, Section 2] are also applied to the global homotopy category. In §6, we state and prove some known results about endomorphism operads to help us use the nonequivariant -obstruction theory of Goerss–Hopkins [GH04] and Robinson [Rob04]; this section is by far the most technical in this article. In §7, we place -structures (equivalent to certain equivariant norm or multiplicative transfer structures) on certain homotopy commutative global -algebras when working rationally, essentially as a corollary of §4 and §5. In §8, we see examples of many of the statements made throughout the rest of the article, and construct new global homotopy types by enriching known nonequivariant and algebraic constructions with controllable global data.
Conventions
Algebraic
All -representations are finite-dimensional, real, and orthogonal. Homomorphisms of graded rings and graded modules are all degree preserving and graded commutative rings satisfy graded commutativity, . Given two integers and a graded module , the th level of the shifted module is , so that for all spectra we have
[TABLE]
Categorical
All categories are locally small, i.e., the mathematical object is always a set for each pair of objects and in a category . Let be a symmetric monoidal category. The categories of left and right -modules will be denoted as and respectively. When is a commutative monoid, will denote the category of -modules. An -fold monoidal product over , , inside will be written as . All statements made in this article work equally well for left or right -modules, with the appropriate changes made.
Global homotopical
The entirety of this article takes place with respect to an arbitrary multiplicative global family ; see [Sch18, Definition 1.4.1, Proposition 1.4.12(iii)]. This means phrases such as “global equivalence”, “global model structure”, “globally flat”, etc., are all made relative to this global family . This added flexibility gives us maximum generality, and includes the four most important global families, those of all, finite, and abelian compact Lie groups, as well as the trivial family. This last global family reduces this whole article to statements about the nonequivariant orthogonal spectra of [MMSS01]. Let be a global spectrum. For positive integers we define as and as using the notation of [Sch18, Construction 4.1.23]. The global spectra and are globally cofibrant in the model structure of Theorem 1.5.
Model categorical
Given a topological category then will denote the mapping space between objects and of . If has a topological model structure, the above mapping space does not necessarily have the “correct homotopy type” unless is cofibrant and is fibrant in . We will write . If is a global ring spectrum (see Definition 1.7) and (see Theorem 1.13) we will write . With respect to this model structure the functor is not homotopical in either variable and will often be left derived, which can be modelled by taking a cofibrant replacement in either the left, the right, or both variables; see [Sch18, Theorem 4.3.27]. If is an ultra-commutative ring spectrum (see Definition 1.10) then the homotopy category has a symmetric monoidal structure with product and unit , which follows from [Sch18, Corollary 4.3.29 (ii)]. Homotopy limits and colimits are defined as in [BK72, Chapters XI-XII], i.e., by deriving the adjoint to the constant diagram functor. For each model category that we use, fix cofibrant and fibrant replacement functors and . We assume the reader is familiar with texts on model categories such as [DS95].
Topological
Denote by the category of compactly generated weak Hausdorff spaces and continuous maps (see [Sch18, Appendix A]), which we will call the category of spaces. Let denote the point in and write for the category of based spaces. Given a -representation , then denote by the one-point compactification of , with the -action inherited from . We assume the reader is familiar with the foundations and basics of modern stable homotopy theory from either [EKMM97], [Lur17], or [MMSS01].
Acknowledgements
The core of this article is a product of my Masters’ thesis at the University of Bonn. I am very happy to thank my Master’s advisor Stefan Schwede for suggesting this topic and answering countless questions, as well as my PhD advisor Lennart Meier for many discussions and his valuable insight, and Yuqing Shi for her proof reading. Finally, I greatly appreciate the recommendations and corrections of an anonymous referee, who directly improved the quality of this article.
1 Background in global homotopy theory
Global homotopy theory is the study of spectra with compatible actions of all compact Lie groups in some global family , a collection of compact Lie groups closed under isomorphisms, closed subgroups, and quotient groups; see [Sch18, Definition 1.4.1]. We will work with orthogonal spectra as this category, in a certain sense,“contains enough symmetry” to model global spectra. All of the material in this section can be found in [Sch18] unless otherwise stated.
First, let us define as the topological category whose objects are real inner product spaces, and whose morphism spaces are defined as
[TABLE]
where denotes the Thom space of a vector bundle , and the space of linear isometric embeddings from to . Composition in is described in [Sch18, Construction 3.1.1]. Notice that if , then is homeomorphic , the orthogonal groups of and with an added basepoint.
Definition 1.1** ([MMSS01, Example 4.4]).**
An orthogonal spectrum is a topologically enriched functor . A map of orthogonal spectra is a natural transformation. Let us denote the category of orthogonal spectra by .
For us the word spectrum will mean orthogonal spectrum. This category of spectra has a symmetric monoidal structure with product and unit object the sphere spectrum ; see [MMSS01, Section 21] or [Sch18, Section 3.5]. Following the notation of [Lur17] we will also write for the wedge (coproduct) of spectra.
We now make a crucial observation. Let be a spectrum, be a compact Lie group in , and be any -representation. By considering as a real inner product space, we obtain a based space , which by functorality of has a -action:
[TABLE]
This is how the category of orthogonal spectra encodes the representation theory of all compact Lie groups , and in a certain sense “contains enough symmetry”.
Definition 1.2** ([MM02, Definition III.3.2]).**
Let be a spectrum and a compact Lie group. We define the zeroth -homotopy group of as the colimit
[TABLE]
where denotes homotopy classes of continuous equivariant maps of based -spaces, denotes the poset of finite -subrepresentations of the complete -universe; see [Sch18, Definition 1.1.12], and the maps in the colimit are defined by the composition
[TABLE]
where the latter map is postcomposition with a certain structure morphism of ; see [Sch18, p.232].
The above definition does not depend on the chosen complete -universe by a cofinality argument; see [MM02, Remark V.1.10]. To define homotopy groups for we either smash the domain with on the right for , or shift the codomain on the right by for ; see [Sch18, (3.1.11)]. These sets have a natural abelian group structure for all compact Lie groups and all integers ; see [Sch18, p.233]. Write for the graded abelian group . There is a wealth of structure between and for two compact Lie groups and in . For every continuous homomorphism of compact Lie groups there is a restriction map , which is constructed by pulling -actions back to -actions; see [Sch18, Construction 3.1.15]. For each closed inclusion of compact Lie groups there is a transfer map , which is defined using a Thom-Pontryagin construction; see [Sch18, Section 3.2]. These two families of maps generate the set of natural transformations from to as functors from to , which are the natural operations on global homotopy groups; see [Sch18, Proposition 4.2.5 & Theorem 4.2.6].
Definition 1.3** ([Sch18, Construction 4.2.1, Definition 4.2.2]).**
Let be the pre-additive global Burnside category, whose objects are compact Lie groups inside and morphism groups are defined by
[TABLE]
A global functor is an additive functor from to the category of abelian groups. Let denote the category of global functors and natural transformations.
By definition the assignment constitutes a global functor for any spectrum and any integer . We define a graded global functor to be a collection of global functors . For any global spectrum we write for the graded global functor .
Suppose we have a map of orthogonal spectra , then by Definition 1.2 we see the construction of equivariant homotopy groups is functorial. We obtain an array of induced maps, for all compact Lie groups in and integers , which we all call ,
[TABLE]
Definition 1.4** ([Sch18, Definition 4.1.3]).**
Let be a map of orthogonal spectra. We say is a global equivalence if the induced map is an isomorphism.
A theorem of Schwede says the global equivalences are part of a model structure on .
Theorem 1.5** ([Sch18, Theorem 4.3.17]).**
There exists a topological stable model structure on , the global model structure, whose weak equivalences are global equivalences and fibrant objects the global--spectra; see [Sch18, Definition 4.3.14].
Denote by the category of orthogonal spectra with the global model structure of Theorem 1.5. We remind the reader that for us the phrases “global equivalence” and “global--spectra” are relative to an ambient global family . We will write for the homotopy category of . When the ambient global family is trivial (when contains only the trivial group) then will be written as , which is equal to the stable model category of orthogonal spectra defined in [MMSS01, Theorem 9.2].
Remark 1.6**.**
In particular, by [Sch18, Definition 4.3.14] we see a global equivalence of spectra is a nonequivariant equivalence, and a global fibration is a nonequivariant fibration. This also implies a nonequivariant cofibration is a global cofibration by standard model categorical lifting properties; see [DS95, Proposition 3.13].
In this article we would like to study global homotopy theory relative to a ring spectrum . There are many different types of ring spectra one can talk about, with various levels of multiplicative structure. Let us first make the purely categorical definitions.
Definition 1.7** ([Sch18, Definition 3.5.15]).**
A global ring spectrum is a monoid object of . A homotopy associative (resp. commutative) global ring spectrum is an associative (resp. commutative) monoid object of .
Let us recall some operadic definitions.
Definition 1.8**.**
A topological monoidal model category is a topological model category (see [MMSS01, Definition 5.12]) endowed with a closed symmetric monoidal structure which satisfies the pushout product axiom of [SS00, Definition 3.1].
Suppose is a topological monoidal model category, then for any object of the th level of the endomorphism operad of is defined as the mapping space
[TABLE]
with the tautological -action from . Let be a topological operad. An -algebra in is a map of topological operads , which is only homotopically well-defined if is a bifibrant object of . The category of topological operads has a model structure, with weak equivalences (resp. fibrations) gives by levelwise topological weak equivalences (resp. fibrations); see [BM03, Example 3.3.2]. An -operad is a -cofibrant replacement of the terminal (commutative) operad, and an -object in is an -algebra in for any -operad ; see [BM03, Section 1]. For a proof that the definition of an -object is independent of the chosen -operad (see [BM03, Section 4]), but for consistency, let us fix a topological -operad .
Definition 1.9**.**
An -global ring spectrum is an -object of .
By [Spi01, Theorem 4.4] (or [BM03, Example 4.6.4]), the category of -global ring spectra, denoted as , has an induced model structure from (as the latter satisfies the monoid axiom by [Sch18, Proposition 4.3.28]), so weak equivalences (resp. fibrations) are given by global weak equivalences (resp. global fibrations) in .
The same holds for the trivial global family , and we denote by the model category of nonequivariant -ring spectra, called -rings. Moreover, with these definitions, we see the identity is a right Quillen functor (with left adjoint also given by the identity); this is further justified by [BM09, Theorem 2.14].
Let us warn the reader that an -global ring spectrum is not in general globally equivalent to a strictly commutative orthogonal spectrum (unless the global family is trivial). There is a tactable difference between these two notions of commutativity in equivariant and global homotopy theory: multiplicative norms and power operations; see [BH15] and [Sch18, Section 5], respectively.
Definition 1.10** ([Sch18, Definition 5.1.1]).**
An ultra-commutative ring spectrum is a commutative monoid of .
The sphere spectrum , the Thom spectra and , and the connective global -theory spectrum are all ultra-commutative ring spectra; see [Sch18, p.303], [Sch18, Section 6.1], and [Sch18, Construction 6.3.9], respectively. The -global ring spectrum of [Sch18, p.303] is not ultra-commutative, as demonstrated by a lack of power operations. Let be a prime greater than 3, then the Moore spectra (the cofibres of multiplication by ) are examples of homotopy commutative but not -global or even simply global ring spectra; see [Ang08, Example 3.3]. There is also a concept of a homotopy commutative global spectrum with power operations, called -ring spectra, which mimic the nonequivariant -ring spectra of [BMMS86]. These are not -global ring spectra by lifting the nonequivariant example of [Noe14] into global homotopy theory; see [Sta18, Example 3.46].
In summary, we have the following diagram of implications between adjectives of global spectra.333An -global ring spectrum is an -global ring spectrum (using the definition of an -object from [BM03, Remark 4.6]) as a cofibrant replacement of the unique map from the associative operad to the commutative operad implies all -algebras are -algebras. An application of [BM03, Remark 4.6] in shows the model categories of -global ring spectra and global ring spectra are Quillen equivalent. In particular, there is also an arrow in Diagram (1.11) from -global ring spectra to global ring spectra, but we will not use this fact.
[TABLE]
For a global ring spectrum we have a categories of left and right -modules, which obtain global model structures through the extension of scalars adjunction
[TABLE]
Theorem 1.13** ([Sch18, Corollary 4.3.29]).**
Let be a global ring spectrum. There are topological model structures on and whose weak equivalences (resp. fibrations) are the weak equivalences (resp. fibrations) of . Moreover, if is an ultra-commutative ring spectrum, then is a monoidal model category with respect to .
Denote by and the topological monoidal model categories given above. In particular, when our ambiant global family is the trivial global family, we will write and , which are equal to the nonequivariant model categories of left and right -module orthogonal spectra of [MMSS01, Theorem 12.1]. Taking , we see is also a topological monoidal model category.
Definitions 1.7, 1.9, and 1.10 can all be relativised (by taking categories under ) to define global -algebras, homotopy commutative -algebras, -global -algebras, and ultra-commutative -algebras, respectively. In particular, the category of -global -algebras will be given a model structure by considering it as the category of -global ring spectra under a fixed ; see Definition 1.9 and [DS95, Remark 3.10]. With this definition, the identity is a right Quillen functor, with left adjoint the identity too.
2 Homotopy theory over a global ring spectrum
In [Sch18], the foundations of global homotopy theory were mostly established over the global sphere spectrum. In this section we will extend some results of [Sch18, Section 4] to statements over an arbitrary global ring spectrum .
Proposition 2.1** ([Sch18, Proposition 4.3.22(i), Theorem 4.4.3]).**
Let be a global ring spectrum. The triangulated category is compactly generated and has coproducts indexed on arbitrary sets.
Proof.
Using [Sch18, Theorem 4.4.3] and the fact (1.12) is a Quillen adjunction shows the set of -modules is a set of compact weak generators of ; see [Sch18, Definition 1.1.27, Construction 4.1.7]. The statement about coproducts follows by the same argument from [Sch18, Proposition 4.3.22(i)], as coproducts in can be modelled by a wedge of bifibrant objects in . ∎
Construction 2.2**.**
The proof of [Sch18, Theorem 4.4.3] uses the fact the spectra represent the functors from . If is a global ring spectrum, then the fact Adjunction 1.12 is a Quillen adjunction with respect to the model structures of Theorems 1.5 and 1.13 means the left -module represents the functor
[TABLE]
This means that given a fibrant left -module and an element , then we can represent by a map of left -modules .
Proposition 2.3** ([Sch18, Theorem 4.5.1]).**
Let be a global ring spectrum. Then the identity functor is a right Quillen functor, whose derived left adjoint is fully faithful.
Proof.
From the definitions of the model structures on and , we see the identity is a right Quillen functor with the associated left Quillen functor. The right Quillen functor takes all global equivalences to weak equivalences so it need not be derived to induce a functor on homotopy categories. The unit of the derived adjunction
[TABLE]
is then an isomorphism for all objects of . Hence is fully faithful. ∎
Definition 2.4** ([Sch18, Definition 4.5.6]).**
Let be a global ring spectrum. We say a left -module is left induced if is in the essential image of the functor .
Remark 2.5** ([Sch18, Remark 4.5.3]).**
One can calculate the value of on an -module by taking a nonequivariant cofibrant replacement of . The global homotopy type of is then well-defined. Indeed, as is a left Quillen functor, then nonequivariant acyclic cofibrations are sent to global acyclic cofibrations, and by Ken Brown’s lemma (see [DS95, Lemma 9.9]) we see nonequivariant weak equivalences between nonequivariant cofibrant objects are in fact global equivalences. In particular, we see that the derived adjunction counit can be modelled by taking a nonequivariant cofibrant replacement of .
This remark implies the following alternative characterisation of left induced modules.
Corollary 2.6**.**
Let be a global ring spectrum and a left -module. Then the following are equivalent.
The left -module is left induced. 2. 2.
The derived adjunction counit is an isomorphism in . 3. 3.
A (and hence every) nonequivariant cofibrant replacement of in is in fact a global equivalence.
The same statement holds for right -modules, mutatis mutandis. For use in this proof, let - (resp. -) refer to a model categorical property inside (resp. inside ). We will also use Remark 1.6 without mention.
Proof.
Without loss of generality is -bifibrant. By Remark 2.5, parts 2 and 3 are equivalent, and part 2 implies part 1 by definition. To see part 1 implies part 3, suppose that is left induced, then by Remark 2.5 there exists an -cofibrant -module and an isomorphism in . From our (co)fibrancy assumptions, this lifts to a strict map in , and factors through an -cofibrant replacement of ,
[TABLE]
as is -cofibrant and is an -acyclic fibration. The map is a -equivalence by assumption, by Remark 2.5 the -equivalence is also a -equivalence, hence is a -equivalence. ∎
3 Globally flat -modules
Studying the left induced left -modules of Definition 2.4 is one way to safely pass from nonequivariant to global information. However, it is not as tactable as one might like, which leads us to the following.
Definition 3.1**.**
Let be a global ring spectrum and a left -module. We say is globally flat if for all inside the canonical -module morphisms
[TABLE]
are isomorphisms, where is the unique map. An -algebra (of any kind) is globally flat if the underlying -module is.
We will see some examples of -modules in Proposition 3.4 which are globally flat, and there are also natural nonexamples.
Remark 3.2**.**
Consider a global Eilenberg–Mac Lane spectrum (see [Sch18, Remark 4.4.12]), which is a global spectrum associated to a global functor , defined uniquely up to isomorphism in by the requirement that and for all . Let us also consider the global functors and , which are defined such that for a finite group the group is the Burnside ring of finite -sets and is the complex representation ring of ; see [Sch18, Example 4.2.8]. We claim that could never be globally flat over (so long as is not trivial) as the Burnside ring and the complex representation ring are not isomorphic as abelian groups for all compact Lie groups , the smallest example being . The same goes for the global Eilenberg–Mac Lane spectrum of the constant global functor at over ; see [Sch18, Example 4.2.8].
Remark 3.3**.**
Notice that for each in , the map above is the image of the map under the extension of scalars adjunction induced by
[TABLE]
For a global -algebra , as the map is a multiplicative map, then using an extension of scalars adjunction for graded -algebras we see is also multiplicative in this case. Let us summarise some more properties of these maps below.
Proposition 3.4**.**
Let be a global ring spectrum. Then for all in the maps are natural in the -module variable , and form a morphism of graded global functors
[TABLE]
Moreover, if denotes the full subcategory of spanned by the globally flat -modules, then is closed under arbitrary suspensions, wedges, filtered homotopy colimits, and contains .
Proof.
Defining using the extension of scalars adjunction from Remark 3.3 shows the naturality in . For naturality in the compact Lie group variable we need to show these maps commute with restrictions and transfers, as [Sch18, Proposition 4.2.5 & Theorem 4.2.6] imply these maps form a -basis of , for any in . Fix some -module , and let be any morphism of compact Lie groups in . The compatibility of these maps with restrictions then follows from the equalities
[TABLE]
The second equality comes from the equality of group homomorphisms, and the third equality from the that fact restriction maps are -module homomorphisms. For the transfers, let be a closed subgroup of a compact Lie group inside , then we obtain the following equalities,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The second equality is a consequence of Frobenius reciprocity (see [Sch18, Corollary 3.5.17(v)]) and the third equality from the equality as group homomorphisms. This shows the maps are natural in , hence is a morphism of graded global functors.
For the “moreover statement”, notice is in as for all in the map is the canonical isomorphism
[TABLE]
When is an object of , then for all integers , is in from the natural isomorphisms
[TABLE]
If are objects of for all in some indexing set , then is also in from the natural isomorphisms
[TABLE]
Finally, if we have a filtered system of left -modules inside , then is in from the natural isomorphisms
[TABLE]
Remark 3.5**.**
One consequence of Definition 3.1 and the naturality of these maps in is the following simple observation. Let be a map of globally flat -modules. Then is a global equivalence if and only if is an equivalence. The “only if” direction follows from Definition 3.1, and the converse is a consequence of the following naturality diagram of -modules,
[TABLE]
Notice how this resembles Remark 2.5, in that the global homotopy type of both the classes of left induced and of globally flat -modules are controlled by nonequivariant information.
4 Realising algebra with -modules
Our first step in realising algebra in global homotopy theory is additive, i.e., as -modules.
Proposition 4.1**.**
Let be a global ring spectrum and a projective left -module. There is a globally flat left -module and an isomorphism of left -modules.
Proof.
The projectivity condition means there is an idempotent morphism of -modules
[TABLE]
for some indexing set and , and a -module isomorphism . Define as a fibrant replacement (in ) of . By construction . We can construct a map of left -modules such that by Construction 2.2. This implies is idempotent in . Proposition 2.1 allows us to use [Nee01, Proposition 1.6.8] with respect to the idempotent map , which gives us a commutative diagram in ,
[TABLE]
where is the homotopy colimit of . As we see
[TABLE]
using the fact . Proposition 3.4 shows is globally flat. ∎
Next we consider realising morphisms of -modules by morphisms of -modules.
Proposition 4.3**.**
Let be a global ring spectrum and a globally flat left -module such that is projective as a left -module. Then for all left -modules , the functor induces an isomorphism of abelian groups
[TABLE]
Proof.
First let us assume is a wedge of suspensions of , so
[TABLE]
Suppose is an arbitrary left -module and consider
[TABLE]
The above map is a bijection as both of the above sets are canonically in bijection with , the left by representability (see Construction 2.2), and the right by elementary algebra. To extend this observation we consider the following diagram of abelian groups,
[TABLE]
The vertical isomorphisms come from the universal property of coproducts, or properties of shifts. The naturality of these maps give us the commutativity of the above diagram. The lower-horizontal map is a product of the isomorphism (4.4) and the quick calculation . This gives us our desired result in the case when is a wedge of suspensions of .
Consider now a globally flat left -module such that is projective over . By Proposition 4.1 we have a left -module which realises . Using the same notation as in Proposition 4.1, we see by (4.2) is a retract of so the top-horizontal isomorphism in (4.5) descends to an isomorphism
[TABLE]
Setting we then lift the isomorphism to a map . As both and are globally flat and is an isomorphism by construction, Remark 3.5 says is an isomorphism inside . The following commutative diagram of abelian groups then finishes our proof,
[TABLE]
∎
A consequence of Proposition 4.3 is the following strengthening of Proposition 4.1.
Corollary 4.6**.**
Let be a global ring spectrum and a projective left -module. Then there exists a globally flat left -module with , unique up to global equivalence.
Proof.
Proposition 4.1 gives us existence. Let and be two globally flat -modules with isomorphisms and , then lifting the isomorphism using Proposition 4.3 gives an isomorphism in by Remark 3.5. ∎
It was mentioned in §2 that left induced left -modules were hard to work with, in particular, their homotopy groups hard to calculate. The following theorem shows that left induced left -modules are globally flat in special cases.
Theorem 4.7**.**
Let be a global ring spectrum, and a left -module such that is a projective left -module. Then is globally flat if and only if is left induced.
Let us use the same notation as in the proof of Corollary 2.6.
Proof.
Without loss of generality we can take to be a -fibrant -module. By Corollary 2.6, it is necessary and sufficient to show an -cofibrant replacement is a global equivalence if and only if is globally flat.
As is projective over , we use the proof of Proposition 4.1, with respect to the trivial global family, to obtain a left -module , which is a sequential -homotopy colimit of wedges of suspensions of , such that there exists an isomorphism of left -modules . Using Proposition 4.3, again with respect to the trivial global family, we see the natural map
[TABLE]
is an isomorphism of abelian groups, leading us to recognise by a morphism in . As is -cofibrant and is -fibrant, we can take to be a strict map in . As is an -equivalence between -cofibrant -modules, then by Remark 2.5 we see is a -equivalence. Moreover, by Proposition 3.4 and the fact that sequential -homotopy colimits and sequential -homotopy colimits can be modelled by mapping telescopes, we see is globally flat. The following naturality diagram of graded global functors shows is a gl-weak equivalence if and only if is globally flat,
[TABLE]
∎
Proposition 4.8**.**
Let be a global ring spectrum, a globally flat left -module such that is a projective left -module. Then for any right -module there is an isomorphism of -modules
[TABLE]
Proof.
The canonical map of this proposition is defined for each in as
[TABLE]
Above the operation is the derived -relative box product pairing, which is defined as follows: first one takes cofibrant replacements of and , say and , and then one considers the composition
[TABLE]
where the first morphism is the absolute box product pairing of [Sch18, Construction 3.5.12], and the second morphism is induced by postcomposed with the canonical map . This postcomposition and [Sch18, Theorem 3.5.14] imply that (4.9) is bilinear over , giving us the desired -linear derived -relative box product
[TABLE]
The maps have similar properties to the maps from Definition 3.1, which is not remarkable as . The fact is natural in the right -module variable follows from the bifunctorality of , and the fact these maps are natural in and follow from the same reasoning of Proposition 3.4. We now have a map of graded global functors
[TABLE]
Writing for the full subcategory of consisting of left -modules such that is an isomorphism for all right -modules . One observes is in and is closed under arbitrary suspensions, wedges, and filtered homotopy colimits, using similar reasoning to Proposition 3.4 and the fact that commutes these constructions as is a closed symmetric monoidal category. As is globally flat and is a projective -module, Corollary 4.6 says is globally equivalent to an explicit model given in the proof of Proposition 4.1, i.e., as a sequential homotopy colimit of wedges of shifts of , so such an is in , which finishes our proof. ∎
Remark 4.10** (Tor and Ext spectral sequences).**
Propositions 4.3 and 4.8 resemble degenerate cases of a global Ext and global Tor spectral sequences respectively (similar to those found in [EKMM97, Section IV.4]). In fact these two statements would need to be used to construct such spectral sequences. This is done in [Dav18, Section 2.3], although the only practical application (according to the author) seems to be a weakening of the hypothesis of projectivity in Proposition 4.8 to a flatness hypothesis.
The following is a generalisation of Proposition 4.1 along the lines of [Wol98, Theorem 6].
Proposition 4.11**.**
Let be a global ring spectrum and a left -module of projective dimension at most two such that for all in , the groups
[TABLE]
vanish. Then there exists a globally flat left -module with .
The necessity of the “Tor-condition” above will be clear in the proof, and in particular holds if or is flat over .
Proof.
This proof follows along the same lines as [Wol98, Theorem 6]. First we deal with the projective dimension one case, so let
[TABLE]
be a projective resolution of the left -module . By Proposition 4.3 and Corollary 4.6 we have globally flat left -modules and , and a map of -modules realising the first map in the projective resolution above. Define as the cofibre of . To see is globally flat over , consider the following diagram of abelian groups with exact rows, for each in
[TABLE]
By assumption, the -group above vanishes, hence induces an injection on all global homotopy groups, from which we immediately obtain, for each inside , the short exact sequence of left -modules
[TABLE]
By (4.12) and the five lemma we see is globally flat. Setting , we also obtain .
Suppose now has projective dimension two, or equivalently that we have two exact sequences
[TABLE]
where each is a projective left -module. Notice that the second short exact sequence above implies
[TABLE]
Using the projective dimension one case above, we can realise the first sequence of (4.13) by a cofibre sequence of globally flat left -module spectra,
[TABLE]
We can also use Corollary 4.6 to obtain a globally flat left -module recognising . Consider the commutative diagram of abelian groups
[TABLE]
The top row exact by the cofibre sequence (4.14) and the bottom row by applying to the first short exact sequence of (4.13). Using Proposition 4.3 for and mapping into , we see the middle and right vertical maps are isomorphisms. A diagram chase then shows there is a map of left -modules recognising . Taking a fibrant replacement of in ( is already cofibrant), we realise in and define as the cofibre of this map. To see is globally flat, we use the same argument as in the projective dimension 1 case. ∎
5 Realising algebra with homotopy global ring spectra
In this section we obtain our first realisation result with multiplicative structure.
Theorem 5.1**.**
Let be an ultra-commutative ring spectrum and a map of graded commutative rings witnessing as a projective -module. Then there exists a globally flat homotopy commutative global -algebra with , such that for all homotopy commutative -algebras and all maps of -algebras , there exists a unique map of homotopy commutative global -algebras such that inside .
In particular, is the initial globally flat homotopy commutative global -algebra recognising inside the homotopy category .
Remark 5.2**.**
The above theorem generalises to the case when is a cofibrant -global ring spectrum, as the only fact we need for the following proof is that the homotopy category has a monoidal structure inherited from the (derived) smash product over . If is a cofibrant -global ring spectrum, then write for an -operad and by [BM09, Proposition 2.3] the enveloping algebra (see [BM09, Definition 1.11]), is a well-pointed monoid in . By [BM09, Theorem 1.10] the category of global -modules, defined in the operadic sense (see [BM09, Definition 1.1]), is equivalent to the category of -modules . By [BM09, Proposition 2.7(a)] we see this category comes with a left induced model structure from , which moreover has the expected monoidal structure. The monoidal structure on then induces the desired monoidal structure on .
Recall that if is an -module spectrum, then refers to the -fold smash product of over , and similarly, for a -module the iterated tensor product is always over .
Proof of Theorem 5.1.
This proof follows along the same lines as [BR07, Theorem 2.1.1]. We obtain existence of by Corollary 4.6, which gives us a globally flat -module with . Proposition 4.8 iteratively calculates
[TABLE]
for all in and Proposition 4.3 gives us the first isomorphism
[TABLE]
for all -modules . Setting , we transport the unit and multiplication map of the -module along for and , respectively, to obtain unit and multiplication maps on inside . As is a monoidal model category and is bifibrant, is also cofibrant by the pushout product axiom (see [SS00, Definition 3.1]), and these unit and multiplication maps can be realised by strict maps of -modules and . The unitality, associativity, and commutativity of these maps in come from for , , and , respectively, again setting .
To show the existence and uniqueness of , let be a homotopy commutative -algebra and a map of -algebras. Recall the set of morphisms of commutative monoids in a symmetric monoidal category can be written as the equaliser
[TABLE]
where the parallel maps send and , and denotes the category of commutative algebra objects of . Applying this to the symmetric monoidal categories and with and , and using with we obtain the natural bijection
[TABLE]
This allows us to lift to a unique map in . ∎
6 Realising algebra with -global ring spectra
Using nonequivariant obstruction theory, we can place an -structure on the in Theorem 5.1, given some more conditions on . To access this nonequivariant obstruction theory, we need some statements about endomorphism operads. Recall the model structure on the category of topological operads from [BM03, Example 3.3.2], where weak equivalences and fibrations are given level-wise.
Lemma 6.1**.**
Let be a topological monoidal model category. If is an acyclic fibration between bifibrant objects, then there is a zigzag of weak equivalences of topological operads
[TABLE]
Proof.
Define a topological operad at level by the following pullback diagram of spaces,
[TABLE]
The composition operation on is the product of the composition operations on and , and in this way and induce maps of topological operads. To be a little more precise, given two nonnegative integers and , the composition operation
[TABLE]
is explicitly given by the assignment
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
This composition operation generalises to arbitrary -tuples of nonnegative integers in the obvious way. From this definition, it is clear that and commute with the various composition operations on , , and , inducing morphisms of topological operads.
As is an acyclic fibration, is cofibrant, and and are fibrant, we see is also an acyclic fibration of spaces. Similarly, as is a weak equivalence, and are cofibrant, and is fibrant, we see is a weak homotopy equivalence of spaces. We conclude is a weak equivalence as the category of topological spaces is (right) proper, and is also a weak equivalence (an acyclic fibration even) as a base change of an acyclic fibration. As and assemble to form maps of topological operads, the above argument witnesses these assembled maps as weak equivalences of topological operads. Hence we obtain a zigzag of weak equivalences
[TABLE]
Let and be two model categories with the same underlying category. Let - be the adjective referring to the model categorical property inside , for .
Theorem 6.3**.**
Let and be topological monoidal model categories with the same underlying symmetric monoidal category such that the -weak equivalences are contained in the -weak equivalences and the -fibrations are contained in the -fibrations. If is a 1-weak equivalence, where is 2-bifibrant and 1-bifibrant, then there is a zigzag of weak equivalences between the topological endomorphism operads
[TABLE]
In particular, if as model categories, then a weak equivalence between bifibrant objects induces a zigzag of weak equivalences between endomorphism operads.
Proof.
First we factorise as a 1-acyclic cofibration followed by a 1-acyclic fibration
[TABLE]
Notice the 1-acyclic fibrations are contained in the 2-acyclic fibrations, so by lifting properties we see 2-cofibrations are contained inside 1-cofibrations. In particular, 2-cofibrant objects are 1-cofibrant. We then see that is 1-bifibrant as is 1-cofibrant and is 1-fibrant. We now define a topological operad at level by the following pullback diagram of spaces,
[TABLE]
Similar to the proof of Lemma 6.1, the composition operation on is the product of that on and such that and both induce morphisms of topological operads. The product map is a 1-acyclic cofibration by the pushout product axiom, and is -fibrant, so is an acyclic fibration of spaces. Similarly, is weak homotopy equivalence of spaces, as is 2-cofibrant, and are 2-fibrant, and is a -weak equivalence. Similar to Lemma 6.1, we see and are both weak homotopy equivalences of spaces. This gives us the zigzag of weak equivalences of topological operads
[TABLE]
Using Lemma 6.1 with respect to we obtain the following zigzag of weak equivalences of topological operads
[TABLE]
Combining the two zigzags above, we obtain the desired result. ∎
Setting in Theorem 6.3 one obtains a generalisation of Lemma 6.1 to the case when is simply a weak equivalence between bifibrant objects. There is also a dual statement to Theorem 6.3.
Corollary 6.5**.**
Let and be topological monoidal model categories, with the same underlying monoidal category , such that the -weak equivalences are contained in the -weak equivalences, and the -cofibrations are contained in the -cofibrations. If is a 1-weak equivalence, where is 1-bifibrant and 2-bifibrant, then there is a zigzag of weak equivalences between the topological endomorphism operads
[TABLE]
Proof.
First we factorise as a 1-acyclic cofibration followed by a 1-acyclic fibration. The result follows from the “in particular” statement of Theorem 6.3 for the 1-acyclic cofibration. The rest of the proof is dual to the proof of Theorem 6.3. ∎
Before we prove the main result of this section, let us recall [Rob04, Definition 3.1], which we relativise over a base -ring . Notice this is a purely nonequivariant condition.
Definition 6.6**.**
Let be an -ring and a homotopy commutative -algebra. Then we say the -algebra satisfies the perfect universal coefficient formula if the following two conditions hold:
The graded ring is flat over . 2. 2.
For every , the natural map
[TABLE]
is an isomorphism, where the (derived) smash products above are taken relative to .
We can now state the main theorem of this section. Recall the definition of a étale morphism of (graded) commutative rings from [Sta20, Tag 00U0].
Theorem 6.7**.**
Let be an ultra-commutative ring spectrum and a homotopy commutative global -algebra which is left induced as an -module and which satisfies the perfect universal coefficent formula as a nonequivariant homotopy commutative -algebra. Suppose that either is an étale morphism of graded commutative rings or that it is a localisation.444The sentence “Suppose that…” can be replaced by any sentence which implies that the -cotangent complex of [RW02, Section 3.2] is contractible, and the conclusion of the theorem will remain valid. Then has an -global -algebra structure, unique up to contractible choice in , and the natural map
[TABLE]
is a weak equivalence of spaces, where the codomain is discrete.
Unique up to contractible choice means a certain moduli space (à la [GH04]) is contractible.
Remark 6.9**.**
Just as in Remark 5.2, the above theorem generalises to the case when is simply a cofibrant -global ring spectrum. We suggest the interested reader follows the proof of Theorem 6.7 in the situation when is ultra-commutative, and then comes back to this remark. Indeed, suppose we are in the situation of Theorem 6.7 where is only assumed to be an -global ring spectrum. First, we take a cofibrant replacement of inside , using the model structure of Definition 1.9. An -global -algebra structure on is an -structure on in and a morphism in . By [BM09, Lemma 1.7], we see this is equivalent to an -structure on in , where is the enveloping operad of the -algebra , where is an -operad; see [BM09, Definition 1.5]. One can then replace each occurance of (resp. ) in the whole of the proof of Theorem 6.7 below with (resp. ), using the facts that is -cofibrant and is cofibrant in in tandem with [BM09, Proposition 2.3] to see is an admissible and -cofibrant operad. Notice the second half of the proof (regarding the nonequivariant deformation theory) remains untouched by this change.
The proof of Theorem 6.7 uses the vanishing of certain obstruction groups found in [Rob04]. The étale case can be found in [RW02], and the localisation case we do ourselves now.
Lemma 6.10**.**
Let be a graded commutative ring (considered as an -dga with trivial differential) and be a multiplicative subset of . Then for every graded -module , the -cotangent complex is contractible in the derived category of .
Proof.
The proof follows the analogous argument for the usual cotangent complex of Quillen; see [Qui70, Proposition 5.1]. Writing , then a simple fact about localisation is that is quasi-isomorphic to for every -complex . This fact and the flat base change of [RW02, Theorem 5.8(1)] give us the following chain of quasi-isomorphisms
[TABLE]
where the last quasi-isomorphism comes from the definition [RW02, Paragraph 3.2]. ∎
Proof of Theorem 6.7.
Using the same notation as the proof of Corollary 2.6, we can without loss of generality take to be -bifibrant, and the fact is left induced means an -cofibrant replacement of -modules is a -equivalence; see Corollary 2.6. As done in the proof of [BR07, Proposition 2.2.3], we use a relativised version of [Rob04, Corollary 5.8] (using our perfect universal coefficient formula assumption), and by either [RW02, Theorem 5.8(3)] in the étale case or Lemma 6.10 in the localisation case, we obtain an --structure on . In other words, we obtain an -structure on inside , so a map of topological operads
[TABLE]
where is an -operad. We are now in the position to use Theorem 6.3 with respect to , (see Remark 1.6), and , which gives us a zigzag of weak equivalences of topological operads
[TABLE]
In particular, we obtain a bijection of sets
[TABLE]
where denotes the category of topological operads with the model structure of [BM03, Example 3.3.2]. Using the fact that is cofibrant in and all objects are fibrant, we define our --structure on to be the image of under the above isomorphism.
To show this -structure is unique up to homotopy, observe the following chain of bijections of of (derived) mapping spaces of topological operads,
[TABLE]
The first isomorphism is induced by (6.11), and the second by [RW02, Theorem 5.8(3)] and either [Rob04, Corollary 5.8] in the étale case and Lemma 6.10 in the localisation case. At this stage we use to view (resp. ) as an object of (resp. ). Let be a cofibrant replacement of in , and for a cofibrant replacement of in . Consider the composition
[TABLE]
The first map is an -equivalence between cofibrant nonequivariant --algebras (hence cofibrant nonequivariant -modules) and hence a -equivalence by Remark 2.5, and the second map is a -equivalence as is left induced (see Corollary 2.6), hence the composition (6.13) is a global equivalence. By the usual arguments, is bifibrant in , hence cofibrant in , and is bifibrant in , hence (6.13) can be realised by a single map in . Considering these replacements now, we drop the superscript from our notation.
To see the --algebra structure on is unique up to contractible choice, we need to define a moduli space, which we do following [GH04, Section 5]. Considering as a simplicial model category via the singular set functor, we let be the classifying space of the category of -global -algebras which are isomorphic to inside the category of commutative algebra objects of (the isomorphism is not part of the data) and with morphisms that are -equivalences. By [DK84] we see there are weak equivalences of spaces
[TABLE]
where the coproduct is indexed by global equivalence classes of objects in (this is a set using the definitions of [DK84]), is the classifying space of the subcategory of consisting of objects equivalent to a chosen (bifibrant) representative and -equivalences, and is the monoid component of automorphisms of in . Let us first notice that the space is nonempty and path-connected by (6.12), so is contractible if and only if is contractible. From (6.14) we see that
[TABLE]
is the path component of based at the identity. From the fibrancy conditions compiled above for and , then the fact is left induced gives us a chain of weak equivalences of derived mapping spaces
[TABLE]
the second weak equivalence in induced by the Quillen adjunction between and given by the identity. Our goal now is to show is discrete. Following the proof of [BR07, Theorem 2.2.4], we use a relativised version of [GH04, Theorem 4.5] over , with (the fact satisfies the perfect universal coefficient formula as an -algebra implies the Adams condition required in [GH04, Definition 3.1]). From this we obtain a second quadrant spectral sequence converging to the homotopy groups of based at the identity,
[TABLE]
where the homomorphism set is that of graded commutative -algebras, and is the th derived functor of -linear derivations into (see [GH04, Section 4]). Using the fact that is contractible for all -modules , then the comparison results of [BR04] show that the above -page is concentrated in filtration , meaning it collapses on the -page, and shows is weakly equivalent to a discrete space with
[TABLE]
In particular, we see that is contractible, hence the -global -algebra structure on is unique up to contractible choice. Moreover, this argument and (6.15) show (6.8) is an isomorphism. ∎
Theorem 6.7 ties nicely into our continuing story about realising objects in global homotopy theory straight from algebraic information.
Corollary 6.16**.**
Suppose we are in the situation of Theorem 5.1. If is in addition an étale morphism of graded commutative rings, then the globally flat homotopy commutative -algebra of Theorem 5.1 realising , has an -global -algebra structure, unique up to contractible choice, and the natural map
[TABLE]
is a weak equivalence of spaces, where the codomain is discrete.
Proof.
The proof of Theorem 5.1 states that can be modelled by a bifibrant globally flat -module, and Theorem 4.7 states that the projectivity of over implies is also left induced. Moreover, Propositions 4.3 and 4.8 show that satisfies the perfect universal coefficient formula as an nonequivariant -algebra (recall finite relative tensor products of projective modules are projective modules), placing us within the hypotheses of Theorem 6.7 above. ∎
7 Realising algebra with -ring spectra
After Theorem 6.7, one might have the following query:
Why have we not placed an ultra-commutative structure on the from Theorem 6.7 despite the fact is an ultra-commutative ring spectrum?
The answer is that the obstruction theory for ultra-commutative ring spectra akin to the -obstruction theory of [GH04] and [Rob04] has not been developed yet. However this section aims to find a compromise.
The difference between ultra-commutative ring spectra and -global ring spectra that one can detect on their homotopy groups is the presence of power operations; see [Sch18, Definition 5.1.6, Theorem 5.1.11]. The concept of a -structure on global spectra is discussed in [Sch18, Remark 5.1.16] and in-depth in [Sta18], and is the minimal structure on a global homotopy type to have power operations. A -spectrum in global homotopy theory is analogous to an -spectrum in classical homotopy theory; see [Sch18, Remark 5.1.14]. Let us first define the spectra we need.
Construction 7.1**.**
Let be a compact Lie group inside . We define the global spectra as where is any faithful -representation; see [Sch18, Construction 1.1.27, Construction 4.1.7]. By [Sch18, Proposition 1.1.26] this is well-defined up to a preferred zigzag of global equivalences; see [Sch18, Definition 1.1.27]. For any we define to be the orthogonal spectrum , where has the tautological -action; see [Sch18, p.27, Construction 4.1.7]. It follows from [Sch18, Proposition 1.1.26] that is globally contractible. Notice that the -coinvariants of are precisely by [Sch18, Definition 1.1.27], and has the nonequivariant homotopy type of ; see [Sch18, Remark 1.1.29].
We will also need to recall the following general construction.
Construction 7.2**.**
Let be a finite group and a closed symmetric monoidal category with finite coproducts. For a monoid of we obtain a monoid , whose multiplication is defined through the multiplication on and the group . In particular, if and is a global ring spectrum, then is a global ring spectrum with .
Recall again, that iterated tensor products of -modules are taken relative to , for both module spectra and algebraic modules.
Definition 7.3**.**
Let be an ultra-commutative ring spectrum and an -module. For a fixed , a -structure on is a series of maps in , for all ,
[TABLE]
such that for all integers , with and , the following diagrams (from [Sta18, Proposition 1.12]) commute in ,
[TABLE]
We justify the use of the notation by [Sta18, Theorem 3.30], which states the definition of above is a model for the left derived functor of the symmetric -algebra functor .
Theorem 7.4**.**
Let be an ultra-commutative ring spectrum and a map of graded commutative rings which witnesses as a projective -module. If is a -algebra for some then there exists a globally flat homotopy commutative -algebra such that , with a unique (up to global equivalence) -structure lifting the homotopy commutative multiplication on . In particular, if is a -algebra, then is a --algebra.
Remark 7.5**.**
Similar to Remark 5.2, the proof of Theorem 7.4 also holds in the more general case that is an -global ring spectrum. This might seem a little surprising, because the statement of the above theorem seems to imply that our -module inherits its power operations from the ultra-commutative ring spectrum , however, this is a red herring. Indeed, in the proof below it is clear that the -structure on (i.e. the power operations) comes from the fact that is a -algebra, not the power operations on .
We will use a small lemma from homological algebra to obtain the above statement.
Lemma 7.6**.**
Let be a graded commutative ring, a graded -module, and a positive integer. Suppose that each , the submodule of concentrated in degree , is a -module. If is a projective as a graded -module, then is a projective left -module, and is a projective -module.
Proof.
We will prove these facts in the opposite order. The tensor-hom adjunction shows inductively that if is a projective -module then any tensor power of over is projective as an -module. In general, if a finite group acts on an -module by -module homomorphisms, then as long as is a module over the canonical map into the -coinvariants has a splitting
[TABLE]
In particular, is a direct summand of the projective -submodule of . Hence is projective over . In our case this implies is a projective -module. To see is projective over we use the extension of scalars adjunction,
[TABLE]
corresponding to the unique map of groups . The exactness of the above functor now follows as is a projective -module. ∎
Proof of Theorem 7.4.
First realise by a globally flat homotopy commutative -algebra with using Theorem 5.1. The fact is a -algebra implies that multiplication by is an isomorphism on each -module , for all . We can then apply Lemma 7.6 to see is an -module with a projective -module. To calculate the homotopy groups of for every we employ Proposition 4.8, which when evaluated at the trivial group states
[TABLE]
It follows from Lemma 7.6 again that the -module satisfies the hypotheses of Proposition 4.3. Hence we obtain a natural isomorphism
[TABLE]
Using this isomorphism we define our desired maps , as the unique preimage of the iterated multiplication map on factored through the -coinvariants. These maps satisfy the properties of Definition 7.3 as the iterated multiplication maps on factored through the -coinvariants do. ∎
One can combine Theorems 6.7 and 7.4 to say that if is also an étale map and is rational, then has a --algebra structure and an -global -algebra structure. This is as close as we can get to saying has the global homotopy type of an ultra-commutative ring spectrum with the technology of this article.
8 Examples
Using the work above, we can show that many classical constructions in stable homotopy theory can be lifted to global homotopy theory, whilst maintaining control of the global homotopy type. We will consider localisation constructions, realisations of Galois extensions of (graded) commutative rings, some examples pertaining to periodic global complex -theory, and some examples from chromatic homotopy theory.
For this section will denote an ultra-commutative or cofibrant -global ring spectrum (in the later case, we will use Remarks 5.2 and 6.9 without reference).
Example 8.1** (Localisation of algebras by an element in ).**
Let be an element in the nonequivariant homotopy groups of , and let be the map representing under the representability isomorphism
[TABLE]
see Construction 2.2. Taking a fibrant replacement in , one can then recognise the composition of maps in
[TABLE]
by a strict map map in , which we will denote also by . One can define the -module as the homotopy colimit of the tower
[TABLE]
where as-per-usual, denotes a fixed functorial fibrant replacement. As is defined by a filtered homotopy colimit, it is also easy to calculate for any in :
[TABLE]
By inspection we see is globally flat. It is simple to place a homotopy commutative -algebra structure on . The unit is given by the map from into the first stage of the homotopy colimit, and the multiplication map is given by the composite
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where the last map is the inclusion into the first stage, which is an global equivalence using the calculations above. The fact that the multiplication map (8.2) is an isomorphism in shows satisfies the perfect universal coefficient formula as an -algebra as we shall see shortly in Lemma 8.3. The localisation part of Theorem 6.7 then upgrades to a globally flat -global -algebra, whose global homotopy groups we totally understand. Moreover, this -global -algebra structure is unique up to contractible choice.
Let us now prove that satisfies the hypotheses of Theorem 6.7.
Lemma 8.3**.**
The homotopy commutative -algebra of Example 8.1 satisfies the perfect universal coefficient formula as an -algebra.
Proof.
Part 1 of the conditions in Definition 6.6 is clear for as an -algebra, as in we have as mentioned above. Using this fact, and the analogous fact in algebra, part 2 then boils down to showing the map
[TABLE]
is an isomorphism. By two extension of scalars adjunctions, one of -global ring spectra and one of graded rings , the above map is naturally equivalent to the isomorphism
[TABLE]
where the hom-set above is in the category . ∎
Example 8.4** (Localisation of algebras by a set in ).**
For any countable multiplicative subset one can define a globally flat -global -algebra such that
[TABLE]
Indeed, one definition for such an is to enumerate , represent these elements by maps of -modules as in Example 8.1, and then define
[TABLE]
where we have suppressed some (de)suspensions of maps. The same techniques from Example 8.1 show is a globally flat homotopy commutative -algebra with naturally isomorphic to , and that can be given an -global -algebra structure, unique up to contractible choice. It is important here that we can commute maps representing elements in the homotopy groups of to obtain a well-defined object in .
Let us note that the reason we cannot extend the above result to subsets of arbitrary size is that one would like to set
[TABLE]
however, using the techniques of this article, it is not clear such a filtered diagram in can be strictified to a diagram in . This is of course possible, with a more careful study of localisations, as done in [Dav18] or [Dav19] in the global setting, [HH14] in the equivariant setting, and [EKMM97, Section V] or [Lur17, Section 7] in the nonequivariant setting.
Example 8.5** (Localisations of modules).**
Given a countable multiplicative subset and an -module , one can consider the localisation of at , defined as the global -module
[TABLE]
Using the description of , one obtains an alternative formula for ,
[TABLE]
where we used the fact that homotopy colimits commute with derived relative smash products (up to global equivalence). One can use this formula, the global flatness of , and nonequivariant flatness of localisation to obtain the calculation for each compact Lie group , where acts on through the algebra map induced by the unique map .
It is possible to generalise the above localisation examples to algebras over -global ring spectra, to localise global ring spectra at elements in equivariant homotopy groups, and to construct localisations with ultra-commutative structure. These things are work-in-progress; see [Dav19].
Let us return to a counter-example from the introduction.
Example 8.6** (Global Gaussian sphere (absolute version)).**
The fact that realises as a projective abelian group, implies that the base change over also realises as a projective -module. By Theorem 5.1 we obtain a globally flat homotopy commutative ring spectrum realising the -module , which is unique up to global equivalence. We claim that this homotopy commutative global ring spectrum does not come from an -global ring spectrum. Indeed, by the proof of Theorem 5.1 the object is bifibrant in , and by Theorem 4.7, a cofibrant replacement in is a global equivalence. Theorem 6.3 gives us a zigzag of weak equivalences of topological operads
[TABLE]
For a contradiction, assume there existed a map of topological operads , where is an -operad. Post-composing with (8.7), and using the fact that is cofibrant and all topological operads are fibrant, we obtain a morphism of topological operads . This gives us an -structure on , which due to the projectivity of over shows the natural map of -rings in
[TABLE]
is an equivalence, a contradiction of [SVW99, Proposition 2].
As in the nonequivariant case, the solution is to invert 2.
Example 8.8** (Global Gaussian sphere (after inverting 2)).**
Let us now work over the -global ring spectrum of Example 8.1. We then have and using the same techniques as in Example 8.6, we obtain a realisation of the morphism
[TABLE]
by a globally flat -module spectrum . Moreover, by base change, we see the morphism is étale as is étale, which is true as is smooth and ramified only at the prime 2. By Theorem 6.7, we obtain a realisation of as a globally flat -global -algebra, unique up to contractible choice, which we will denote as . Moreover, as is globally flat over then for any compact Lie group we have
[TABLE]
One can generalise the above example, following [SVW99].
Example 8.9** (Adjoining roots of unity in good cases).**
Fix a prime and an integer . Suppose that is invertible inside and that the th cyclotomic polynomial
[TABLE]
is irreducible. One can then define a globally flat -global ring spectrum as the localisation
[TABLE]
where is given as in Construction 7.2, is a generator of , and the localisation is done à la Example 8.1. The reason this recognises the base change over of the map of rings , is due to the fact that on , inverting the element is the same as taking a quotient by , as from our hypotheses these elements are idempotents in ; more details can be found in [SVW99]. Furthermore, one can check that the map of graded rings is étale and realises as a projective -module, so Corollary 6.16 states the realisation as an -global -algebra is unique up to contractible choice. Theorem 7.4 states that if in addition is invertible in , then has a --algebra structure as well.
Further generalisations of the previous two examples exist, following [BR07].
Example 8.10** (Galois extensions of rings).**
Let be a finite group and a -Galois extension of graded commutative rings, so now be defined. For a finite group , a -Galois extension of rings the data of a morphism of rings and a -action on as an -algebra such that and the morphism of rings
[TABLE]
is an isomorphism; see [BR07, Definition 1.1.1] for example. The graded case is similar. By [BR07, Theorem 1.1.4], we see that is a finitely generated projective -module, so we can apply Theorem 5.1 to obtain a globally flat homotopy commutative -algebra , uniquely determined in , recognising . Moreover, Theorem 5.1 also realises the -action on as a -action on inside . We note that is étale. Indeed, if is a -Galois extension of rings, then using the formulation of étale morphism as given in [Lur17, Definition 7.5.0.1], we see it suffices to show the -algebra multiplication map is the projection onto a summand. This follows though, as by definition the map is an isomorphism, and the mlutplication map is the composition of with the projection onto the factor indexed by the identity element of . Corollary 6.16 then shows that has an -global -algebra structure, unique up to contractible choice. Moreover, this corollary also states that the natural map
[TABLE]
is a weak equivalence of spaces, allowing us to lift the -action on to a -action on as an -global -algebra. Furthermore, if is invertible in , then obtains a --algebra structure, compatible with the homotopy commutative -algebra structure by Theorem 7.4.
We now begin with two of examples involving the global complex -theory spectra defined in [Sch18].
Example 8.11** (All modules over are realisable).**
In [Sch18, Section 6.4], Schwede constructs the ultra-commutative ring spectrum , the periodic global complex -theory spectrum, which for each compact Lie group and each finite CW-complex , comes with an isomorphism between the group and the Grothendieck group of isomorphism classes of -vector bundles over ; see [Sch18, Corollary 6.5.23]. Moreover, the underlying nonequivariant homotopy type of is the classical complex -theory spectrum; see [Sch18, Remark 6.4.15]. This implies that , where is the Bott element; see [Sch18, Construction 6.4.28]. It follows that all -modules are 2-periodic, hence the data of two -modules, i.e., the data of two abelian groups. This implies that all graded -modules have projective dimension of 1 or less. To apply Proposition 4.11, we need to check a particular Tor-condition, but this follows from the facts that and global Bott periodicity [Sch18, Theorem 6.4.29].
Indeed, as for each compact Lie group , then complex representation ring is a free -module, as any finite dimensional complex -represenation splits as a unique sum of simple -complex representations. This shows views the codomain as a free module over . Equivariant Bott periodicity states that , where is the image of the classical Bott periodicity element from . In summary, we obtain the calculation
[TABLE]
for every -module and every compact Lie group .
This allows us to use Proposition 4.11, which states that every graded -module can be realised by a (not necessarily unique) globally flat -module.
Example 8.12** (Periodic -theory from connective -theory).**
Writing for the ultra-commutative ring spectrum of global connective complex -theory (see [Sch18, Construction 6.4.32]) and for the Bott class (called in [Sch18, p. 648]), then we claim that the -global ring spectrum is globally equivalent to periodic global complex -theory . Indeed, there is a morphism of ultra-commutative ring spectra (see [Sch18, (6.4.33)]) which becomes an equivalence after localising at . This example is inherently tautological, as the definition of requires the definition as an input anyhow.
The next example uses the well-defined global homotopy type of [Sch18, Section 6] to lift constructions from chromatic homotopy theory to global homotopy theory. The techniques used here are essentially thoses of [EKMM97, Section V.4] combined with Section 3.
Example 8.13** (Global Morava -theory spectra).**
For this example, restrict to the global family of abelian compact Lie groups and fix a prime . Let be the ultra-commutative global complex cobordism spectrum of [Sch18, Example 6.1.53]. It is explained in [Sch18, Example 6.1.53] that has the nonequivariant homotopy type of the classical complex cobordism spectrum found in [Ada74, Example III.2.4]. Recall Quillen’s and Lazard’s theorem, which combined state that
[TABLE]
where we can assume that , where the elements correspond to the Hazewinkel generators. Writing for the cofibre of the multiplication by map on ,
[TABLE]
where . Define, for any , the global th Morava -theory spectrum as the -module
[TABLE]
where the above smash product is relative to and derived, a countably infinite relative smash product is defined as the sequential homotopy colimit of the finite stages, and the localised -global ring spectrum is from Example 8.1. Analysing the nonequivariant construction given in [EKMM97, Section V.4] (or [Lur10, Lecture 22]), we see has the nonequviariant homotopy type of classical height Morava -theory as has the nonequivariant homotopy type as . We claim that each is globally flat over . To see this, we use the fact that the morphism recognises the as a free -module for all abelian compact Lie groups – a statement which we can transfer from that for a fixed abelian compact Lie group , found in [Sin01, Theorem 1.3], as by [Sch18, Example 6.1.5.3] the global spectrum is a model for tom Dieck’s equivariant bordism for a fixed compact Lie group . This means the map induced by multiplication by ,
[TABLE]
is injective. From this, the bottom row in the commutative diagram of -modules is exact,
[TABLE]
where above. By the five lemma, we see is globally flat over . We can compute for from the short exact sequence
[TABLE]
From this we see is globally flat over . By induction, each finite stage in the sequential homotopy colimit defining the infinite derived relative smash product
[TABLE]
is globally flat over . By Proposition 3.4 we then see the -module above is also globally flat, and Example 8.5 leads us to the fact that too, is globally flat over . Nonequivariant Morava -theory is most useful when considered as a ring spectrum, and either [EKMM97, Section V.4] or the proof of [Lur10, Lecture 22, Lemma 2] seemlessly work in our case too, giving the structure of a globally flat homotopy associative -algebra.
Using the same techniques of [EKMM97, Section V.4], one can construct globally flat -modules of global Brown–Peterson spectra , its truncations , global height Johnson–Wilson theory , and global connective height Morava -theory . We won’t mention the details of these objects here, as the only way these constructions deviate from [EKMM97] is by using Schwede’s model for and the adjective globally flat, and none of the realisation results of Sections 4- 7 where used. We hope these ideas could be used in combination with the recent work of Hausmann on a Quillen’s theorem for compact abelian Lie groups (see [Hau19]) to further the study of global chromatic homotopy theory.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[Ada 74] J. F. Adams. Stable homotopy and generalised homology. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. Chicago - London: The University of Chicago Press. X, 373 p. £3.00 (1974)., 1974.
- 2[Ang 08] V. Angeltveit. Topological Hochschild homology and cohomology of A ∞ subscript 𝐴 A_{\infty} -ring spectra. Geometry & Topology , 12(2):987–1032, 2008.
- 3[BH 15] Andrew J. Blumberg and Michael A. Hill. Operadic multiplications in equivariant spectra, norms, and transfers. Adv. Math. , 285:658–708, 2015.
- 4[BK 72] A. K. Bousfield and D. M. Kan. Homotopy limits, completions and localizations , volume 304. Springer Science & Business Media, 1972.
- 5[BM 03] C. Berger and I. Moerdijk. Axiomatic homotopy theory for operads. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici , 78(4):805–831, 2003.
- 6[BM 09] Clemens Berger and Ieke Moerdijk. On the derived category of an algebra over an operad. Georgian Math. J. , 16(1):13–28, 2009.
- 7[BMMS 86] R. R. Bruner, J. P. May, J. E. Mc Clure, and M. Steinberger. H ∞ subscript 𝐻 H_{\infty} ring spectra and their applications. , volume 1176. Springer, Cham, 1986.
- 8[Boh 14] A. M. Bohmann. Global orthogonal spectra. Homology, Homotopy and Applications , 16(1):313–332, 2014.
