Determinants of Seidel matrices and a conjecture of Ghorbani
Douglas Rizzolo

TL;DR
This paper investigates the determinants of Seidel matrices of simple graphs and shows that almost all such graphs have determinants at least n-1 as the number of vertices grows large.
Contribution
It establishes that the proportion of graphs with Seidel matrix determinants at least n-1 approaches one as the graph size increases.
Findings
Most graphs have Seidel matrix determinants ≥ n-1 for large n
The probability of a random graph having a high determinant tends to one
Provides asymptotic behavior of Seidel matrix determinants in large graphs
Abstract
Let be a simple graph on . The Seidel matrix of is the matrix whose 'th entry, for is if and otherwise, and whose diagonal entries are . We show that the proportion of simple graphs such that tends to one as tends to infinity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Determinants of Seidel matrices and a conjecture of Ghorbani
Douglas Rizzolo
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19808
Abstract.
Let be a simple graph on . The Seidel matrix of is the matrix whose ’th entry, for is if and otherwise, and whose diagonal entries are [math]. We show that the proportion of simple graphs such that tends to one as tends to infinity.
Key words and phrases:
Seidel matrices, Seidel energy, determinants of random matrices
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
05C50
Let be a simple graph on . The Seidel matrix of is the matrix whose ’th entry, for is if and otherwise, and whose diagonal entries are [math]. The Seidel matrix of is related to the adjacency matrix of by , where is the identity matrix and is the all ones matrix. Let be the eigenvalues of . The Seidel energy of , defined as
[TABLE]
was introduced by Haemers in [5] as a notion of energy that was invariant under Seidel switching and taking graph complements. In [5] it was conjectured that . This conjecture was confirmed for special families of graphs in [4] and [6], and was recently confirmed in full generality in [1]. In investigating Haemers’ conjecture Ghorbani [4] showed that the following conditions are equivalent
- (1)
, 2. (2)
for all ,
and made the following conjecture:
Conjecture 0.1**.**
The proportion of graphs on satisfying tends to as tends to infinity.
In this short note we confirm this conjecture. We remark that, in [4], an infinite family of graphs with was given, so it is known that not all graphs satisfy the above conditions. However, it was shown in [1] that, for all and ,
[TABLE]
This raises the question of finding a sharp lower bound for the quantities , which we leave open.
Observe that if is a uniformly random graph with vertex set , then the entries of above the diagonal are independent and, for ,
[TABLE]
Moreover, the diagonal entries of , being constants and thus independent of everything, are independent of each other and of the entries of above the diagonal. Consequently, in the language of the random matrix literature, is a real Wigner matrix [2]. Note however, that care must be taken when reading the random matrix literature because some authors require their Wigner matrices to satisfy additional assumptions on the diagonal matrices.
The study of determinants of real Wigner matrices has a long history in the random matrix literature, but techniques have only recently advanced to the point where they can handle matrices whose entries above the diagonal can only take two values [7]. Using these results, we are able to give a short resolution of the conjecture.
Theorem 0.2**.**
Let be a uniformly random graph on vertex set . Then .
Proof.
Let be the eigenvalues of , with multiplicities. Fix . Wigner’s semicircle law, see e.g. [2, Theorem 2.1.1] implies that for every and ,
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
we can fix so that
[TABLE]
Define . Fixing such that
[TABLE]
it follows from Equation (1) that there exists such that implies that
[TABLE]
In particular, with high probability the proportion of eigenvalues that are larger than is bounded above, and away from, . Using [8, Theorem 1.2], we see that for some not depending on ,
[TABLE]
for all .
On the event that
[TABLE]
we use the first condition to approximate the eigenvalues it applies to and the second for the eigenvalues smaller than in absolute value to see that
[TABLE]
Since , the last term in the product dominates, so there exists such that implies that .
Therefore, for , we have that
[TABLE]
From this it follows immediately that . ∎
The argument we’ve given in fact proves the much stronger result.
Theorem 0.3**.**
For every we have .
It seems likely that the exact asymptotic growth of the determinant can be determined using very recent results from the random matrix literature [3], but note that Seidel matrices do not fit the definition of Wigner matrices in that paper and we have not pursued this direction.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Saieed Akbari, Mostafa Einollahzadeh, Mohammad Mahdi Karkhaneei, and Mohammad Ali Nematollahi. Proof of a conjecture on the seidel energy of graphs. ar Xiv:1901.06692 , 2019.
- 2[2] Greg W. Anderson, Alice Guionnet, and Ofer Zeitouni. An introduction to random matrices , volume 118 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
- 3[3] Paul Bourgade and Krishnan Mody. Gaussian fluctuations of the determinant of wigner matrices. ar Xiv:1811.06815 , 2018.
- 4[4] Ebrahim Ghorbani. On eigenvalues of Seidel matrices and Haemers’ conjecture. Des. Codes Cryptogr. , 84(1-2):189–195, 2017.
- 5[5] Willem H. Haemers. Seidel switching and graph energy. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. , 68(3):653–659, 2012.
- 6[6] Mohammad Reza Oboudi. Energy and Seidel energy of graphs. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. , 75(2):291–303, 2016.
- 7[7] Terence Tao and Van Vu. Random matrices have simple spectrum. Combinatorica , 37(3):539–553, 2017.
- 8[8] Roman Vershynin. Invertibility of symmetric random matrices. Random Structures Algorithms , 44(2):135–182, 2014.
