Dissecting the Phase Space Snail Shell
Zhao-Yu Li, Juntai Shen (Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ. & Shanghai, Astronomical Obs.)

TL;DR
This study investigates the snail shell pattern in the Gaia DR2 data's phase space, revealing its dependence on orbit temperature and supporting a satellite-disk encounter origin over internal perturbations.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the origin and properties of phase space snail shells, emphasizing the role of orbit temperature and external perturbations.
Findings
Snail shell exists mainly in colder orbits with low radial action.
The snail shell weakens and disappears in hotter, dynamically 'hotter' orbits.
The results support a satellite-disk encounter scenario over internal bar buckling as the origin.
Abstract
The on-going vertical phase mixing, manifesting itself as a snail shell in the phase space, has been discovered with the Gaia DR2 data. To better understand the origin and properties of the phase mixing process, we study the vertical phase-mixing signatures in arches (including the classical ``moving groups'') of the phase space near the Solar circle. Interestingly, the phase space snail shell exists only in the arches with km/s, i.e., stars on dynamically ``colder'' orbits. The snail shell becomes much weaker and eventually disappears for increasingly larger radial action (), quantifying the ``hotness'' of orbits. Thus one should pay closer attention to the colder orbits in future phase mixing studies. We also confirm that the Hercules stream has two branches (at fast and slow ), which may not be…
| Arch ID | Contains | Number of Stars | Snail Amplitude | Snail Prominence | Range of slit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (kpc) | |||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| A1 | 8,966 | 0.086 | Indistinct | ||
| A2 | 16,335 | 0.005 | Indistinct | ||
| A3 | Leo | 36,540 | 0.422 | Moderate | |
| A4 | Sirius | 183,689 | 0.332 | Prominent | |
| A5 | Coma, Dehnen986 | 106,166 | 0.282 | Prominent | [-0.30, -0.20] |
| A6 | Dehnen9814 | 61,412 | 0.186 | Moderate | [-0.26, -0.18] |
| A7 | Hyades, Pleiades | 287,909 | 0.304 | Prominent | [-0.26, -0.18] |
| A8 | Hercules Fast | 58,537 | 0.377 | Prominent | [-0.34, -0.26] |
| A9 | Hercules Slow, Ind | 84,978 | 0.045 | Indistinct | |
| A10, A11 | HR 1614, Bobylev1622 | 49,909 | 0.027 | Indistinct | |
| A12 | Arcturus | 17,383 | 0.059 | Indistinct |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Dissecting the Phase Space Snail Shell
Zhao-Yu Li11affiliation: Department of Astronomy, School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China; correspondence should be addressed to: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 2affiliationmark: 3 3affiliationmark: Juntai Shen11affiliation: Department of Astronomy, School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China; correspondence should be addressed to: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 2affiliationmark: 3 3affiliationmark: 4 4affiliationmark:
Abstract
The on-going vertical phase mixing, manifesting itself as a snail shell in the phase space, has been discovered with the Gaia DR2 data. To better understand the origin and properties of the phase mixing process, we study the vertical phase-mixing signatures in arches (including the classical “moving groups”) of the phase space near the Solar circle. Interestingly, the phase space snail shell exists only in the arches with km/s, i.e., stars on dynamically “colder” orbits. The snail shell becomes much weaker and eventually disappears for increasingly larger radial action (), quantifying the “hotness” of orbits. Thus one should pay closer attention to the colder orbits in future phase mixing studies. We also confirm that the Hercules stream has two branches (at fast and slow ), which may not be explained by a single mechanism, since only the fast branch shows the prominent snail shell feature. The hotter orbits may have phase-wrapped away already due to the much larger dynamical range in radial variation to facilitate faster phase mixing. To explain the lack of a well-defined snail shell in the hotter orbits, the disk should have been perturbed at least Myr ago. Our results offer more support to the recent satellite-disk encounter scenario than the internal bar buckling perturbation scenario as the origin of the phase space mixing. Origin of the more prominent snail shell in the color-coded phase space is also discussed.
Subject headings:
Galaxy: disk — Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics — Galaxy: structure — stars: kinematics and dynamics
††slugcomment: Accepted for Publication on ApJ22affiliationtext: Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, 200240, Shanghai, China33affiliationtext: Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 80 Nandan Road, Shanghai 200030, China44affiliationtext: College of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
1. INTRODUCTION
The Milky Way disk is not in a complete dynamical equilibrium. It shows prominent structure in kinematic space that is phase mixing in both horizontal and vertical directions. Since the full phase-space information of individual stars may be obtained, the Milky Way is unique and valuable to reveal the disk dynamical evolution in detail. The picture of the Milky Way evolution is complicated, which is affected by both internal and external perturbations. The resonances of the bar and spiral arms can significantly influence the stellar orbits to cause the radial migration in the disk (Friedli et al., 1994; Sellwood & Binney, 2002; Roškar et al., 2008; Minchev & Famaey, 2010) and to generate substructures in the velocity phase space for stars in the solar neighborhood (Dehnen, 2000; Fux, 2001; Antoja et al., 2009, 2011; Quillen et al., 2011; Hunt & Bovy, 2018). Large scale bulk motions observed in the Galactic disk (e.g., Siebert et al., 2011; Carlin et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2015; Tian et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018a, b) could also be induced from dynamical processes related to the bar and spiral arms (Siebert et al., 2012; Debattista, 2014; Faure et al., 2014; Monari et al., 2015, 2016). Moreover, satellite galaxies or sub-halos interacting with the Milky Way can perturb the disk to generate warps, flares or other vertical motions such as the bending and breathing features in the outer disk (Hunter & Toomre, 1969; Quinn et al., 1993; Kazantzidis et al., 2008; Purcell et al., 2011; Gómez et al., 2013; Widrow et al., 2014; D’Onghia et al., 2016; Laporte et al., 2018a, b).
Using the revolutionary Gaia data Antoja et al. (2018) discovered clear evidence of vertical phase mixing in the solar neighborhood for the first time. A clear snail shell can be seen in the phase space. As first shown in Laporte et al. (2019), the phase space snail shell is also prominent in the number density contrast map. This feature can be understood as the phase mixing process in a vertically perturbed disk, where the vertical oscillation frequency depends on the oscillation amplitude, generating a snail shell structure in space (Tremaine, 1999; Antoja et al., 2018). Candlish et al. (2014) investigated the evolution of the phase mixing process for disrupting star clusters that show development and winding of a phase space spiral due to the anharmonic oscillation111See Fig. 4.27 in Binney & Tremaine (2008) for a schematic view of phase mixing process.. In fact, the concept of phase mixing/wrapping has been implied in several previous works. Minchev et al. (2009) showed that an unrelaxed disk can produce wave-like features in the velocity phase space that get closer due to the phase wrapping. As shown in Quillen et al. (2009), external perturbations could excite phase mixing for stars in the disk to induce streams in the velocity distribution. de la Vega et al. (2015) found that phase wrapping excited by external perturbations might account for the bending and breathing modes in the disk. The North/South asymmetry in the vertical stellar number density profile discovered in Widrow et al. (2012) is also a reflection of the snail shell with all the stars projected on the axis.
The phase space snail shell shows up more clearly when color-coded with azimuthal velocity () of stars (Fig. 1c in Antoja et al. 2018), which was suggested to indicate the tight correlation between the in-plane and vertical motions. The two motions are clearly entangled, but there are still important details to be clarified (Binney & Schönrich, 2018; Darling & Widrow, 2019). Laporte et al. (2019) found snail shell at different stellar age bins, and the shape of the snail changes systematically across the Galactic disk. Similar results are also obtained in other studies (Tian et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019). One possible culprit of the vertical perturbation is the merging Sagittarius dwarf with the last pericentric passage occurred at Myr ago (Antoja et al., 2018; Binney & Schönrich, 2018; Bland-Hawthorn et al., 2019; Laporte et al., 2019). The other competing scenario is the spontaneous bending waves as a source of long lived internal vertical perturber (Chequers & Widrow, 2017), also including the perturbation from a bar buckling event (Khoperskov et al., 2019).
It has been well known that the velocity phase space in the solar neighborhood, e.g., , shows complex kinematic substructures, known as “moving groups” (Dehnen, 1998; Skuljan et al., 1999; Famaey et al., 2005; Antoja et al., 2008). Gaia revealed new configurations in the phase space, which are the multiple arches in the space and diagonal ridges in the space (Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018a; Antoja et al., 2018). The arches appear for the whole range of azimuthal velocity, with all the classical moving groups embedded in the more extended arched substructures (Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018a). Ramos et al. (2018) remarked that the more roundish moving groups and the elongated arches are morphologically different entities, with some moving groups belonging to the same arch. To the first order, the velocity phase space could be considered as an assembly of arches. Previous studies argued that internal dynamical effects of structures in the Galactic disk mainly generate kinematic features with radial velocity () and azimuthal velocity () with respect to the local circular motion within km/s (Minchev et al., 2009). On the other hand, stars with larger radial and azimuthal velocities resembling arc-like features in the plane may be related to the disk ringing effect caused by external interactions with satellite galaxies (Minchev et al., 2009; Gómez et al., 2012).
Considering the different internal or external origins of the arches, the connection between the arches and previous vertical perturbation events is still an open question. For example, Michtchenko et al. (2019) reported that the snail shell is only produced by the classical moving groups, with no evidence of incomplete vertical phase mixing from external perturbations. This apparent inconsistency with other works needs to be better understood by properly dissecting the velocity phase space into distinct arches. Here we utilize the second Gaia data release (DR2) with radial velocity, proper motions and parallax available to investigate the properties of different arches in the phase space. Hopefully, this study will shed light on the origin of the snail shell and the correlation between the in-plane and vertical motions. The sample is described in §2. The results are shown and discussed in §3, and summarized in §4.
2. SAMPLE
2.1. Sample Selection
Gaia DR2 opens a new era of precise stellar dynamics, providing astrometric parameters for 1.3 billion sources down to mag, as well as line-of-sight velocities for 7.2 million stars brighter than 12 mag, with the median parallax uncertainty for bright sources ( mag) at 0.03 mas and the proper motion uncertainty at 0.07 mas/yr (Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018b). We adopted the same sample selection as Antoja et al. (2018), i.e., selecting stars with positive parallaxes with relative uncertainty less than 20% (). As pointed out by Antoja et al. (2018), the sample selection makes a reasonably good distance estimator (Schönrich & Aumer, 2017; Luri et al., 2018).
The sample consists of 6.2 million stars, covering the region with kpc. Following Antoja et al. (2018), we adopt = (8.34, 0, 0.027) kpc as the Sun position (Reid et al., 2014). The local standard of rest (LSR) circular velocity is set to 240 km/s (Reid et al., 2014). Here we adopt the peculiar velocities of the Sun with respect to LSR as = (11.1, 12.24, 7.25) km/s (Schönrich, 2012). Our main results are not affected if we choose other measurements of the solar peculiar motion, e.g., Tian et al. (2015) or Huang et al. (2015). The typical velocity uncertainty is about 1 km/s for the radial, azimuthal, and vertical velocities (Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018b; Antoja et al., 2018).
In this study, we select the stars in a narrow annulus in the solar neighborhood ( kpc), which contains 0.93 million stars. The phase space distribution of stars in the solar neighborhood is known to show a variety of arches and clumps. The position of the major arches are consistent with recent works (Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018a; Antoja et al., 2018; Ramos et al., 2018). We confirm that the stars in this sample show the same snail shells in the phase space when color-coded with the number density, , and as in Antoja et al. (2018).
To evaluate the influence of the parallax bias in the Gaia catalog, we also tested our results with the parallax corrected Gaia sample (Schönrich et al., 2019). The parallax corrected sample size is reduced to 60% of that used here. The snail shell patterns in both samples are in excellent agreement; our results and main conclusions are unaffected by the parallax correction, since most of the stars are still very close to the solar neighborhood.
2.2. Identification of Arches
We further dissect the sample in the phase space into different arches containing the classical moving groups, e.g., Sirius, Hyades, Coma Berenices (hereafter Coma for brevity), Pleiades, and Hercules. By applying the Stationary Wavelet Transform (Starck & Murtagh, 2002) on the distribution of Gaia DR2 data in the solar neighborhood, Ramos et al. (2018) identified 12 arches (A1 to A12). Adopting the positions and extensions of the arches in Ramos et al. (2018), we dissect the velocity phase space into different regions corresponding to these 12 arches.
We identify the gaps between these arches by adjusting the contrast level of the number density map (see Appendix for more information). Fig. 1 shows the arches separated by the dotted lines in the velocity phase space. Clearly, the arches are well separated.222Arches A10 and A11 are grouped together due to the ambient boundary between them. The classical moving groups, such as the Sirius, Coma and Hyades-Pleiades, are embedded in arches A4, A5, and A7, respectively. Note that arches A8 and A9 together form the Hercules stream (Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018a; Ramos et al., 2018). Considering their azimuthal velocity difference, we refer to A8 as the Hercules Fast branch with median km/s, and A9 as the Hercules Slow branch with median km/s. Properties of the arches are listed in Table 1. is not considered when classifying arches.
To highlight the snail shell in the number density map of the phase space, we adopt the method in Laporte et al. (2019) to derive the number density contrast ,
[TABLE]
where is the Gaussian kernel convolved number density distribution.
To further increase the visibility of the snail shell, we generate the enhanced map based on the map. Since the inter-shell region in the map has values typically less than , we can significantly enhance the snail shell pattern by showing only those regions with .
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Dissecting the Phase Space Snail Shell
The phase space distributions of the arches are shown in Figs. 2, 3, and 4, which are color-coded with number density , number density contrast , enhanced map, radial velocity and azimuthal velocity . The arches are grouped according to the prominence of the phase space snail shell. The arches with prominent snail shells are shown in Fig. 2, arches with moderate snail shells in Fig. 3, and arches with indistinct snail shells in Fig. 4.
In Fig. 2, for each arch, the snail shells revealed in , and enhanced maps are almost identical. The snail shell pattern is slightly different in the and color-coded phase space compared to the number density map, but the amplitude contrast of the snail shell is only km/s. This may be due to the variation of the snail shell shape with the radial or azimuthal velocities for each arch, which will be discussed in greater detail in Section 3.5. For arch A8, there seems to be no visible snail shell in the or color-coded phase space.
From the phase space in Fig. 1, it seems that the snail shell only exists for arches with km/s (i.e., km/s). This velocity range corresponds to the dynamically colder orbits, which are closer to circular orbits. Stars with velocities outside that region are denoted as hotter orbits.
We also quantify the amplitude/contrast of the snail shell. For the phase space distribution of each arch, along a constant slit, profile as a function of is extracted. The slit range listed in Table 1 is purposely chosen to cut through the shell (local maximum) and inter-shell regions (local minimum). Profiles of the number density contrast are shown in Fig. 5. The colder orbits (top panel) show large fluctuations with a similar zigzag pattern due to the multiple intersections of the snail shell with the slit, while the hotter orbits (middle panel) show roughly flat profiles with small fluctuations, indicating the weak or indistinct snail shell in the hotter orbits. To quantify the amplitude of the snail shell, in each profile, we measure the difference between the maximum value within km/s and the minimum value within km/s. The results are also listed in Table 1. Clearly, the amplitude/contrast of the snail shell in colder orbits () is significantly higher than that of the hotter orbits ().
Fig. 6 shows the phase space distributions for all the stars on colder orbits (top row; including A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, and A8) and hotter orbits (bottom row; including A1, A2, A9, A10, A11, and A12). Stars on the colder orbits clearly show a very prominent snail shell in the number density (left) and color-coded phase space (right), and a slightly weaker snail shell in the color-coded phase space (middle). On the other hand, the hotter orbits (the bottom row) do not exhibit the clear snail shells in the number density, or color-coded phase spaces. If the phase space snail shell really exists in the hotter orbits, it is significantly blurred or incoherent. The bottom panel in Fig. 5 compares the density profiles between the combined colder and hotter orbits, confirming our argument for the prominent snail shell in the colder orbits only. Notice that in Fig. 6, for the colder orbits, the snail shell patterns between the and color-coded phase spaces are different. This probably indicates that the snail shell shape varies across the arches in the colder orbits. This will be discussed in greater detail in Section 3.5.
As shown in Fig. 4, the phase space distributions of arches A10, A11 and A12 are more elongated along the axis than arches A1 and A2. This is consistent with simple theoretical expectation of approximately harmonic oscillators. The difference between the median azimuthal velocities of the arches at high and low is 100 km/s, corresponding to 3.5 kpc in terms of the difference in the guiding radius ()333, assuming a flat rotation curve.. Therefore, compared to the arch at higher , stars with lower have much smaller , where both the vertical oscillation frequency and vertical velocity amplitude are larger (), resulting in a more elongated distribution along the vertical velocity axis in the phase space. This simple argument is also consistent with the snail shape variation found by Laporte et al. (2019) in their Fig. 15 for a region centered on kpc, which is more elongated along the axis compared to the snail shell at kpc. Similar results are also seen in Wang et al. (2019).
One may use the radial action to quantify the extent of the radial oscillation (or “hotness”) of orbits. We use the action-based galaxy modeling package AGAMA (Vasiliev, 2019) to directly compute of each star in our sample, with the best-fit potential from McMillan (2011) adopted. has the dimension of angular momentum. Its unit in our paper is . Fig. 7 shows the color-coded phase space distribution of our sample. As expected, is smaller for nearly circular orbits with velocity closer to the circular velocity of the LSR. Fig. 8 shows the phase space distributions for stars in different ranges. The snail shell becomes much weaker for increasingly larger values; the snail shell is indistinct with . This phenomenon is expected since stars with large occupy a wide range of guiding radius distribution, resulting in a significantly blurred snail shell. Moreover, hotter stars respond poorly to dynamical perturbations.
This could also explain why the snail shells of arches A3 and A6 shown in Fig. 3 are not as prominent as those in Fig. 2 (for A4, A5, A7, and A8). Stars in A3 and A6 have large radial action () to blur the snail shell feature.
In Fig. 7, the red ellipse represents the contour of , which agrees well with the azimuthal velocity ranges of colder orbits marked with the two black dashed lines. The phase space distributions of stars with and are shown in Fig. 9. Clear snail shell can only be seen for the subsample with . The lower panels with show a significantly blurred or incoherent snail shell feature. This agrees with Fig. 6, confirming that hotter orbits (with larger radial oscillation) do not show prominent snail shell in the phase space. Arches A3 and A6 are partially included in the sample with to result in a blurred snail shell feature in the lower right panel of Fig. 9 for the color-coded phase space.
The median of our sample is 0.018, which is very similar to the result in Bland-Hawthorn et al. (2019) within a few percent ( after being converted to our unit). The larger subsample (above the median ) of Bland-Hawthorn et al. (2019) shows a weak phase space snail shell. Apparently, their high subsample contains a significant fraction of colder orbits defined by us, thus giving rise to the weak snail shell.
3.2. Two Branches of the Hercules Stream
The Hercules stream, as a prominent low azimuthal velocity structure in the velocity phase space, has been extensively studied in the literature. Stellar spectra of individual stars in the stream suggest multiple stellar populations with different ages and metallicities, arguing against the stream as a disrupted stellar cluster or the debris of a satellite galaxy (Famaey et al., 2005; Bensby et al., 2007). Previous theoretical works have suggested that the Hercules stream is due to the dynamical effects of the bar and/or spiral arms (Dehnen, 2000; Antoja et al., 2014; Pérez-Villegas et al., 2017; Hunt & Bovy, 2018).
Gaia DR2 showed that the Hercules stream is composed of two branches at different azimuthal velocities (Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018a; Ramos et al., 2018). For the two branches of the Hercules stream, it is surprising to see that only the fast branch (arch A8; bottom row in Fig. 2) shows the prominent snail shell but not for the slow branch (arch A9; middle row in Fig. 4). This difference should be physical and not due to small number statistics, since the slow branch (A9) even has % more stars than the fast branch (A8) as listed in Table 1. Therefore, the Hercules stream may not be a homogeneous kinematic structure. If the two branches can be explained by a single mechanism, then it is difficult to understand the difference in the vertical phase space distributions, considering the small azimuthal velocity difference ( km/s) between the two branches.
3.3. Phase Mixing in Colder and Hotter Orbits
The snail shell in the phase space reflects the vertical phase mixing with anharmonic oscillation (Antoja et al., 2018). Stars with larger vertical action have smaller vertical oscillation frequency (Binney & Schönrich, 2018). Binney & Schönrich (2018) also showed that depends sensitively on , with smaller at larger , which forms a narrow and sequential distribution in plane for each ; the snail shell shape may change slightly at different . Our result shows clear phase space snail shells for stars in individual arch on the colder orbits. The snail shell shapes of these arches are also slightly different from each other as shown in Fig. 2. This is roughly consistent with Binney & Schönrich (2018); each arch usually has a small range, which corresponds nicely to a narrow strip in the plane to induce a clear phase space snail shell.
Binney & Schönrich (2018) suggested that the unclear snail shell in the phase space number density distribution observed in Antoja et al. (2018) is due to the fact that stars lie in a “broad swath” in the plane. As shown in the top left panel of Fig. 6, all the stars on colder orbits combined together show prominent snail shell in the phase space number density distribution. These results may indicate that the distribution of stars on colder orbits in the plane is more well-defined and narrower than “a broad swath”.
Both the analytical estimation and simple test particle simulations using galpy444http://github.com/jobovy/galpy (Bovy, 2015) with the MWPotential2014 show that stars on hotter orbits typically have much larger dynamical range in the disk with the radial oscillation amplitudes kpc than stars on colder orbits ( kpc). It is therefore natural that hotter orbits will scramble the signal, as hotter stars arrive at this very local sample from a range of guiding radii. As shown in Bland-Hawthorn et al. (2019), given the same amplitude of the vertical perturbation, stars on circular orbits at larger radius will form a more loosely winding phase space snail shell at lower vertical oscillation frequency than the stars on circular orbits at smaller radius. The snail shell at larger radius becomes more elongated in the direction, but reduced in the direction (). Due to the large radial range of the hotter orbits, the elongation of the phase space ellipse changes during its radial oscillation, leading to a blurred distribution and faster phase mixing.
Stars on the hotter orbits have probably phase-wrapped away already to show significantly blurred and indistinct snail shell, while the stars on the colder orbits are still in the process of vertical phase mixing. To demonstrate this argument we perform a simple simulation with 100,000 test particles in a realistic Milky Way potential (Irrgang et al., 2013; Antoja et al., 2018) to track the evolution of the hotter and colder orbits. Note that our test particle simulation is designed to mimic an external vertical perturbation. We have verified that it can well reproduce the simulation results in Antoja et al. (2018), e.g., their Fig. 3a and Extended Figs. 3a and 3b.
To consider the fact that the perturbation happened in the past, and we observe the stars in the solar neighborhood at present, we retro-tracked the orbits to make sure their present location is indeed near the solar radius. Initially all test particles are distributed around R = 8.34 kpc with median km/s ( km/s) and median km/s ( km/s), representing arches A1 and A2 at higher . Then the particle orbits are integrated backwards without vertical perturbation (). The distributions of the test particles in plane at 300 Myr ago is shown in panel (a1) of Fig. 10. Then we impose the vertical perturbation on all the particles in two approaches.
The first approach is similar to Antoja et al. (2018), where the test particles are displaced vertically (median kpc and km/s with dispersions of 0.2 kpc and 2 km/s). For the 300 Myr case, after the perturbation, the phase space distribution is shown in panel (a3) of Fig. 10. After 300 Myr evolution, almost all the test particles now arrive in the solar radius as shown in panel (a2) in the plane, with a snail shell feature in the number density contrast map () of the phase space distribution in panel (a4). In addition, we test to impose the same vertical perturbation on test particles at 400, 500, 600, and 700 Myr ago. The number density contrast map () of the final phase space distributions of the four tests are shown in Panels (b1)(b4) in Fig. 10.
In the second approach, under the impulsive approximation of the external perturbation (Binney & Schönrich, 2018), a vertical velocity kick is imposed to all the test particles with the vertical positions barely changed (median and km/s with dispersion of 0.02 kpc and 10 km/s). Panels (a1) (a4) and (b1) (b4) in Fig. 11 show the test particle simulation results. Combining Figs. 10 and 11, it seems that the snail shell becomes blurred or indistinct if the perturbation was imposed at least 500 Myr ago.
For comparison, we perform similar test particle simulation on colder orbits in arch A4 (Sirius). The test results are shown in Fig. 12. Clearly, the snail becomes more tightly wound with the perturbation imposed at earlier stages. Compared to the snail shell shape in Fig. 2 for the colder orbits, test particle simulations with perturbations imposed Myr ago seem to agree well with the snail shell shape displayed by the colder orbits in Fig. 2.
The test particle simulations support our conclusions on the faster phase mixing of the hotter orbits. It seems that the vertical phase mixing should have started at least Myr ago, or there is not enough time for the snail shell pattern in hotter orbits to phase-mix away. Our result helps put tighter constraints on the vertical perturbation event of the Milky Way disk, which was suggested to occur Myr ago (Antoja et al., 2018). The lack of snail shell pattern can offer a new perspective, and can place important constraints on the occurrence time of the phase mixing event.
Clearly, these test particle simulations still have limitations. For example, Darling & Widrow (2019) found that the phase space snail becomes less wound in a self-consistent simulation with self-gravity than the test particle run at longer time scales ( 1 Gyr). In the future more self-consistent simulations are desired to better constrain the detailed perturbation history of the Galactic disk.
We have shown that the existence or the lack of the prominent phase space snail shells is connected to the dichotomy of colder and hotter orbits, and to the different arches in the phase space. Our results and explanations strongly argue against the suggestion that the phase space snail shell is only produced by the major moving groups with no evidence of the ongoing vertical phase mixing (Michtchenko et al., 2019). There are two obvious counter arguments to their suggestion. Firstly, arches A3 and A6, which do not contain any of the major moving groups, still show phase space snail shell. Secondly, the Hercules Slow branch (A9), being a major moving group, shows no prominent snail shell feature.
3.4. and Color-Coded Phase Spaces
Binney & Schönrich (2018) suggested that the vertical and radial oscillation frequencies (, ) anti-correlate with (hence the angular momentum or the guiding radius ). Stars with different follow a narrow and sequential trend in the plane, leading to the formation of the snail shell in the color-coded phase space. On the other hand, faster leads to faster change of . Therefore, the color-coded phase space shears into a spiral that differs from the color-coded phase space spiral in the tightness of the winding (Binney & Schönrich, 2018). Different simulations also indicate that the coupled motions in horizontal and vertical directions lead to clear snail shells in and color-coded phase spaces (Darling & Widrow, 2019; Laporte et al., 2019). In particular, the bar buckling perturbation scenario predicts the most clear snail shell in color-coded phase space (Khoperskov et al., 2019).
However, for some arches in colder orbits, or color-coded phase spaces show no clear snail shell (see Fig. 2). It may be understandable for arches with a narrow range of . For example, the range of arch A4 (Sirius) is only 15 km/s, which is difficult to highlight snail shell (with larger ) in the color-coded phase space. In Fig. 6, if we combine all the stars on colder orbits, a moderate snail shell in (and even weaker in ) color-coded phase space is present. These results suggest that the coupling between the in-plane and vertical motions may be weaker for the colder orbits than previously expected.
3.5. The Enhanced Snail Shell in the Color-Coded Phase Space
Mathematically speaking, the color-coded phase space in Antoja et al. (2018) is just the number weighted average of the azimuthal velocity of all the arches. In an ideal case, imagine that there is only one arch at some and a featureless background at lower . If all the stars in this arch are arranged into a snail shell shape in number density phase space, then the combination with the smooth background at lower naturally results in a pronounced snail shell color-coded in , which, in principle, has the same shape as the snail shell in the number density distribution.
To demonstrate this argument, we create a featureless background by combining all the stars on the hotter orbits555In order to highlight the color-coded snail shell in the Hercules Fast branch, the arches A1 and A2 at higher are excluded from the hotter orbits background construction. The combination with those two arches will result in a less prominent, but still visible snail shell in the phase space when color-coded in .. The background is then combined with each arch on the colder orbits, namely, A4, A5, A7, and A8. Clear snail shells can be seen in the color-coded phase space of each composition shown in Fig. 13. Consistent with our expectation, for each arch in Fig. 13, the shape of the color-coded snail shell is consistent with the corresponding map as shown in Fig. 2.
On the other hand, if we combine arches with different snail shell shapes at different , then the outcome color-coded with (or ) will be a snail shell slightly different from the number density map of the combination. To test this argument, we combine arches A4 and A7 together. The result is shown in Fig. 14. Apparently, the number density contrast map and and color-coded phase spaces show slightly different snail shell shapes, especially in the inner region of the phase space. This is mainly due to the different snail shell shapes between the two arches. From Fig. 2, we can see that the shapes of the snail shell of the arches are not identical, especially in the central part of the phase space. Therefore, combining the arches in the colder orbits would result in different snail shell shapes between the number density map and the (or ) color-coded phase spaces, as shown in Figs. 6 and 9. As shown in Fig. 2, for each arch on colder orbits, the snail shell shapes are also different between the number density map and (or ) color-coded phase spaces, although the amplitude contrast of the snail shell is only km/s. This is probably due to the slight variation of the snail shell shape with (or ) for stars in each arch.
To summarize, it is the colder orbits that manifest the effect of ongoing vertical phase mixing, with the hotter orbits providing a featureless background to highlight the snail shell of the colder orbits in the color-coded phase space. Moreover, combining the arches on colder orbits could result in different snail shell shapes color-coded in or compared to the number density map.
4. summary
We provide a new perspective to understand the origin of the snail shell in the phase space and its dependence on the radial and azimuthal velocities with the Gaia DR2 data. We identify arches in the phase space, which include classical “moving groups” or “kinematic streams”. Connection between the arches and the snail shell is investigated in detail. Interestingly, the snail shell only exists for stars on the colder orbits ( km/s). Arches A3 (Leo), A4 (Sirius), A5 (Coma), A6, A7 (Hyades-Pleiades), and A8 (Hercules Fast) all show prominent or moderate snail shell in the phase space number density distribution, but not for the arches A1, A2, A9 (Hercules Slow), A10, A11, and A12 (Arcturus), which are mainly composed of stars on hotter orbits.
The snail shell shapes are slightly different for the arches on the colder orbits. The amplitude of the snail shell is quantified by the difference between the local maximum and minimum of the profile along a narrow slit in the phase space. Consistent with the visual expectation, the amplitudes of the snail shell for the colder orbits ( 0.3) are significantly higher than those of the hotter orbits ( 0.03).
We use the radial action to quantify the extent of the radial oscillation (“hotness”) of orbits. The snail shell becomes much weaker for larger values, and essentially disappears with . Thus one should focus more on the colder orbits in the future phase mixing study, with stars on the hotter orbits removed.
We also confirm that the Hercules stream is composed of two branches with different . Only the fast branch (A8) shows the prominent snail shell, but not the slow branch (A9). The Hercules stream may not be a homogeneous kinematic structure, which probably formed via different physical processes.
It seems that stars on hotter orbits have sufficiently phase-mixed to show significantly blurred and indistinct snail shell in the space. The hotter orbits typically have much larger dynamical range in the disk than the colder orbits. Therefore, stars on hotter orbits make blurred elliptical rotation in the phase space, which leads to faster phase mixing. These results help to put tighter constraints on the vertical perturbation history of the Milky Way disk. To explain the lack of snail shell in the hotter orbits, the Milky Way disk should be perturbed at least Myr ago.
Khoperskov et al. (2019) proposed that during the buckling process, the bar can generate bending waves in the disk to form the phase space snail shell. The bar buckling scenario predicts more pronounced snail shell in the color-coded phase space, rather than the or number density color-coded phase space. However, this is not seen in our results. They also suggested that the snail shell can sustain for 4 Gyr due to the persistence of the bending wave in the disk. It is not clear if this scenario could explain the lack of snail shells in hotter orbits. In addition, the contribution of the bar buckling mechanism on the Milky Way disk vertical perturbation may be much weaker compared to that of the Sagittarius dwarf (Laporte et al., 2019). Also this bar buckling scenario may have some difficulties explaining recent observations on phase space distributions of different stellar populations (Tian et al., 2018; Laporte et al., 2019). Apparently, more theoretical efforts are needed in the future to better constrain the time of impact and to potentially determine the mass of the perturber. The coupling between the in-plane and vertical motions for the colder orbits may be weaker than previously thought.
The colder/hotter dichotomy in terms of the appearance of the phase space snail shell also provides a natural explanation on the significant snail shell in the color-coded phase space. Since only the colder orbits exhibit the effect of ongoing vertical phase mixing, the featureless phase space distribution of the hotter orbits provides a background to highlight the snail shell of the colder orbits in the color-coded phase space. Moreover, combining the colder orbits together could result in different snail shell shapes in the or color-coded phase space compared to that in the number density map.
We thank the referee for helpful comments to improve quality of the paper. We also want to thank Jerry Sellwood, Victor Debattista, Martin Smith and Chao Liu for helpful suggestions and discussions. The research presented here is partially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China under grant No. 2018YFA0404501; by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant Nos. 11773052, 11761131016, 11333003; and by the “111” Project of the Ministry of Education. ZYL is supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, and the Key Lab of Computational Astrophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. J.S. acknowledges support from a Newton Advanced Fellowship awarded by the Royal Society and the Newton Fund. The paper was completed at KITP, which is supported in part by NSF grant PHY-1748958. This work made use of the facilities of the Center for High Performance Computing at Shanghai Astronomical Observatory.
This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (http://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, http://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement.
Appendix A Arches Identification
The normalized empirical density distribution of the phase space is estimated with (km/s)2 bin size. With the wavelet transform method, Ramos et al. (2018) found the locations and extensions of the arches in the space. To classify stars into different arches, it is necessary to determine the gaps between these arches identified in Ramos et al. (2018). Across the phase space, the stellar number density could vary up to two orders of magnitude from one arch to another, also for the gaps between the different arches. In fact, gaps between the arches with different number densities can be better visualized with different display contrast, i.e., changing the minimum and maximum number densities to be shown in the phase space. Fig. 15 illustrates the phase space distribution of our sample with different number density contrast. The left panel has the lowest number density threshold (between and ), highlighting the arches with the lowest number density, i.e., A1, A2, A10, A11, and A12. Due to the ambient boundary between A10 and A11, they are not separated but grouped as a single arch in the analysis. In the middle panel, the lower and upper number density thresholds are increased to and , respectively, leaving gaps at the higher number density visible. Arches A3, A6, A8, and A9 can be well separated. The right panel in Fig. 15 highlights the three major arches in the highest density region with number density threshold between and , namely, A4 (Sirius), A5 (Coma) and A7 (Hyades and Pleiades).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Antoja et al. (2008) Antoja, T., Figueras, F., Fernández, D., & Torra, J. 2008, A&A, 490, 135
- 2Antoja et al. (2011) Antoja, T., Figueras, F., Romero-Gómez, M., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1423
- 3Antoja et al. (2009) Antoja, T., Valenzuela, O., Pichardo, B., et al. 2009, Ap J, 700, L 78
- 4Antoja et al. (2014) Antoja, T., Helmi, A., Dehnen, W., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A 60
- 5Antoja et al. (2018) Antoja, T., Helmi, A., Romero-Gómez, M., et al. 2018, Nature, 561, 360
- 6Bensby et al. (2007) Bensby, T., Oey, M. S., Feltzing, S., & Gustafsson, B. 2007, Ap J, 655, L 89
- 7Binney & Schönrich (2018) Binney, J., & Schönrich, R. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1501
- 8Binney & Tremaine (2008) Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition (Princeton University Press)
