Quantitative system risk assessment from incomplete data with belief networks and pairwise comparison elicitation
Cristina De Persis, Jose Luis Bosque, Irene Huertas, Simon, Paul Wilson

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian belief network approach for quantitative risk assessment from incomplete data, using pairwise comparison for prior elicitation and Bayesian updating, demonstrated on spacecraft re-entry risk.
Contribution
It presents a novel method combining belief networks and pairwise comparison elicitation for risk assessment with incomplete data, applied to spacecraft explosion risk.
Findings
Effective Bayesian updating with incomplete data
Successful application to spacecraft re-entry risk
Improved elicitation of prior probabilities
Abstract
A method for conducting Bayesian elicitation and learning in risk assessment is presented. It assumes that the risk process can be described as a fault tree. This is viewed as a belief network, for which prior distributions on primary event probabilities are elicited by means of a pairwise comparison approach. A Bayesian updating procedure, following observation of some or all of the events in the fault tree, is described. The application is illustrated through the motivating example of risk assessment of spacecraft explosion during controlled re-entry.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Safety Analysis · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
