# Joining bits and pieces of reionization history

## TL;DR

This paper combines CMB and astrophysical data to reconstruct the reionization history, achieving precise measurements of optical depth and duration, and finds no evidence for complex reionization scenarios beyond monotonic models.

## Contribution

It introduces a novel, free-form reconstruction method of reionization history using combined CMB and astrophysical data, improving constraints on optical depth and duration.

## Key findings

- Optical depth τ = 0.051 with tight error bounds.
- Reionization duration between redshifts 6 and 10 is well constrained.
- No evidence supports multi-phase reionization scenarios.

## Abstract

Cosmic Microwave Background temperature and polarization anisotropies from Planck have estimated a lower value of the optical depth to reionization ($\tau$) compared to WMAP. A significant period in the reionization history would then fall within $6<z< 10$, where detection of galaxies with Hubble Frontier Fields program and independent estimation of neutral hydrogen in the inter galactic medium by Lyman-$\alpha$ observations are also available. This overlap allows an analysis of cosmic reionization which utilizes a direct combination of CMB and these astrophysical measurements and potentially breaks degeneracies in parameters describing the physics of reionization. For the first time we reconstruct reionization histories by assuming photo-ionization and recombination rates to be free-form and by allowing underlying cosmological parameters to vary with CMB (temperature and polarization anisotropies and lensing) data from Planck 2018 release and a compilation of astrophysical data. We find an excellent agreement between the low-$\ell$ Planck 2018 HFI polarization likelihood and astrophysical data in determining the integrated optical depth. By combining both data, we report for a minimal reconstruction $\tau=0.051^{+0.001+0.002}_{-0.0012-0.002}$ at 68\% and 95\% CL, which, for the errors in the current astrophysical measurements quoted in the literature, is nearly twice better than the projected cosmic variance limited CMB measurements. For the duration of reionization, redshift interval between 10\% and complete ionization, we get $2.9^{+0.12+0.29}_{-0.16-0.26}$ at 68\% and 95\% CL, which improves significantly on the corresponding result obtained by using Planck 2015 data. By a Bayesian analysis of the combined results we do not find evidence beyond monotonic reionization histories, therefore multi-phase reionization scenario is disfavored compared to minimal alternatives.