Statistical testing in a Linear Probability Space
Christopher M Rembold

TL;DR
This paper proposes performing statistical tests in a linear probability space using log-odds, simplifying calculations like Bayes theorem and effect size, and replacing p-values with certainty measures for more accurate analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a linear probability space based on log-odds for statistical testing, offering a more accurate and intuitive framework than traditional probability spaces.
Findings
Statistical testing is more accurate in log-odds space.
Effect size is represented as impact (I) in this space.
Bayes theorem simplifies to addition of weights.
Abstract
Imagine that you could calculate of posttest probabilities, i.e. Bayes theorem with simple addition. This is possible if we stop thinking of probabilities as ranging from 0 to 1.0. There is a naturally occurring linear probability space when data are transformed into the logarithm of the odds ratio (log10 odds). In this space, probabilities are replaced by W (Weight) where W=log10(probability/(1-probability)). I would like to argue the multiple benefits of performing statistical testing in a linear probability space: 1) Statistical testing is accurate in linear probability space but not in other spaces. 2) Effect size is called Impact (I) and is the difference in means between two treatments (I=Wmean2-Wmean1). 3) Bayes theorem is simply Wposttest=Wpretest+Itest. 4) Significance (p value) is replaced by Certainty (C) which is the W of the p value. Methods to transform data into and out…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Data Analysis with R
