# $^{93m}$Mo isomer depletion via beam-based nuclear excitation by   electron capture

**Authors:** Yuanbin Wu, Christoph H. Keitel, Adriana P\'alffy

arXiv: 1904.00809 · 2019-06-03

## TL;DR

This paper critically examines a recent experiment claiming nuclear excitation by electron capture (NEEC) in $^{93m}$Mo isomer depletion, finding theoretical rates that are vastly lower than experimental claims, thus challenging the original interpretation.

## Contribution

The study provides a detailed theoretical analysis of NEEC in a beam-based setup, revealing a significant discrepancy with experimental observations and questioning the previous conclusion.

## Key findings

- Theoretical NEEC excitation rates are about nine orders of magnitude lower than experimental values.
- The results conflict with the interpretation that NEEC caused the observed isomer depletion.
- The study highlights the need for re-evaluating experimental data and models for NEEC processes.

## Abstract

A recent nuclear physics experiment [C. J. Chiara {\it et al.}, Nature (London) {\bf 554}, 216 (2018)] reports the first direct observation of nuclear excitation by electron capture (NEEC) in the depletion of the $^{93m}$Mo isomer. The experiment used a beam-based setup in which Mo highly charged ions with nuclei in the isomeric state $^{93m}$Mo at 2.4 MeV excitation energy were slowed down in a solid-state target. In this process, nuclear excitation to a higher triggering level led to isomer depletion. The reported excitation probability $P_{\rm{exc}} = 0.01$ was solely attributed to the so-far unobserved process of NEEC in lack of a different known channel of comparable efficiency. In this work, we investigate theoretically the beam-based setup and calculate excitation rates via NEEC using state-of-the-art atomic structure and ion stopping power models. For all scenarios, our results disagree with the experimental data by approximately nine orders of magnitude. This stands in conflict with the conclusion that NEEC was the excitation mechanism behind the observed depletion rate.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.00809/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.00809/full.md

## References

54 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.00809/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.00809