New $\gamma$-ray Transitions Observed in $^{19}$Ne with Implications for the $^{15}$O($\alpha$,$\gamma$)$^{19}$Ne Reaction Rate
M. R. Hall, D. W. Bardayan, T. Baugher, A. Lepailleur, S. D. Pain, A., Ratkiewicz, S. Ahn, J. M. Allen, J. T. Anderson, A. D. Ayangeakaa, J. C., Blackmon, S. Burcher, M. P. Carpenter, S. M. Cha, K. Y. Chae, K. A. Chipps,, J. A. Cizewski, M. Febbraro, O. Hall, J. Hu, C. L. Jiang

TL;DR
This study observed new gamma-ray transitions in $^{19}$Ne, leading to revised spin-parity assignments for key states, which impacts the reaction rate calculations for astrophysical processes like x-ray bursts.
Contribution
The paper provides new gamma-ray transition data that revise the spin-parity assignments of specific states in $^{19}$Ne, improving understanding of the $^{15}$O($eta$,$ abla$)$^{19}$Ne reaction.
Findings
Revised spin-parity assignments for 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states in $^{19}$Ne.
Strong evidence supporting $J^ ext{pi}$ of 7/2$^-$ and 9/2$^-$ for these states.
Implications for more accurate reaction rate calculations in astrophysical models.
Abstract
The O(,)Ne reaction is responsible for breakout from the hot CNO cycle in Type I x-ray bursts. Understanding the properties of resonances between and 5 MeV in Ne is crucial in the calculation of this reaction rate. The spins and parities of these states are well known, with the exception of the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states, which have adopted spin-parities of 9/2 and 7/2, respectively. Gamma-ray transitions from these states were studied using triton-- coincidences from the F(He,)Ne reaction measured with GODDESS (Gammasphere ORRUBA Dual Detectors for Experimental Structure Studies) at Argonne National Laboratory. The observed transitions from the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states provide strong evidence that the values are actually 7/2 and 9/2, respectively. These assignments are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
New -ray Transitions Observed in 19Ne with Implications for the 15O(,)19Ne Reaction Rate
M.R. Hall
D.W. Bardayan
Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
T. Baugher
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA
A. Lepailleur
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA
S.D. Pain
Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
A. Ratkiewicz
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA
S. Ahn
National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
J.M. Allen
Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
J.T. Anderson
Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
A.D. Ayangeakaa
Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
J.C. Blackmon
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
S. Burcher
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
M.P. Carpenter
Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
S.M. Cha
Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, South Korea
K.Y. Chae
Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, South Korea
K.A. Chipps
Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
J.A. Cizewski
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA
M. Febbraro
Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
O. Hall
Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
J. Hu
Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
C.L. Jiang
Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
K.L. Jones
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
E.J. Lee
Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, South Korea
P.D. O’Malley
Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
S. Ota
Physics Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA
B.C. Rasco
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
D. Santiago-Gonzalez
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
D. Seweryniak
Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
H. Sims
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA
Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
K. Smith
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
W.P. Tan
Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
P. Thompson
Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
C. Thornsberry
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
R.L. Varner
Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
D. Walter
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA
G.L. Wilson
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
Department of Physics and Applied Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, USA
S. Zhu
Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
Abstract
The 15O(,)19Ne reaction is responsible for breakout from the hot CNO cycle in Type I x-ray bursts. Understanding the properties of resonances between and 5 MeV in 19Ne is crucial in the calculation of this reaction rate. The spins and parities of these states are well known, with the exception of the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states, which have adopted spin-parities of 9/2- and 7/2-, respectively. Gamma-ray transitions from these states were studied using triton-- coincidences from the 19F(3He,)19Ne reaction measured with GODDESS (Gammasphere ORRUBA Dual Detectors for Experimental Structure Studies) at Argonne National Laboratory. The observed transitions from the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states provide strong evidence that the values are actually 7/2- and 9/2-, respectively. These assignments are consistent with the values in the 19F mirror nucleus and in contrast to previously accepted assignments.
I Introduction
The 15O(,)19Ne reaction is an important breakout reaction from the hot CNO cycle in explosive astrophysical environments such as Type I x-ray bursts (XRBs). Type I XRBs are thought to occur in close binary systems containing an accreting neutron star Woosley and Taam (1976); Joss (1977). The hydrogen-rich material accreted onto the surface of the star provides the fuel for the hot CNO cycle, which can then break out into the rp-process, synthesizing isotopes up to Schatz et al. (2001). Knowledge of the 15O(,)19Ne breakout reaction is therefore critical to our understanding of the nucleosynthesis occurring in this environment. It has been shown that this reaction rate has a large effect on the light curves observed from XRBs, and models do not even predict explosions if the rate is near the lower limit of its uncertainty Fisker et al. (2006); Cyburt et al. (2016). The reaction can not be measured directly in the important astrophysical temperature range due to the currently insufficient intensity of radioactive 15O beams and small reaction cross section. Therefore, the rate must be estimated by measuring the properties of the important resonances in 19Ne.
The resonances in the reaction cross section correspond to the energy levels in 19Ne above the alpha separation threshold at MeV. Many of the resonances from energy levels between 4 and 5 MeV have been characterized in previous experiments Mythili et al. (2008); Tan et al. (2009); Davids et al. (2011); Parikh et al. (2015). However, the spins of two 19Ne states at 4.14 and 4.20 MeV remain in question.
Over 45 years ago Garrett et al. (1972), these two levels were proposed as members of the rotational band, with negative parity, and the mirrors of the 3.998- and 4.032-MeV levels, which have values of 7/2- and 9/2-, respectively Tilley et al. (1995). A study of the 16O(6Li,)19Ne reaction by Garrett et al. Garrett et al. (1972) first showed that the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV 19Ne states had spin-parities of 7/2- or 9/2- and suggested that their assignments were reversed from their order in the 19F mirror nucleus. Since that time, evidence supporting both spin-parity assignments for the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states has been found; the adopted Tilley et al. (1995) spin assignments remain uncertain.
Gamma rays from the decay of the 19Ne 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states were studied by Davidson et al. Davidson and Roush (1973) using the 17O(3He,)19Ne reaction, where they reported the observation of three transitions. For the 4.14-MeV state, a single transition to the 1.508-MeV state was observed, whereas for the 4.20-MeV state, transitions to the 0.238- and 1.508-MeV states were reported. Based on the (relatively weak) transition to the 0.238-MeV 5/2+ state, the 4.20-MeV state was assigned , consistent with the assignment of the 3.998-MeV state and transition to the 0.197-MeV state in the 19F mirror nucleus (see Fig. 1). The analysis of triton angular distributions from the 19F(3He,)19Ne reaction study by Parikh et al. Parikh et al. (2015) was also consistent with multi-step FRESCO calculations for a 9/2- assignment for the 4.14-MeV state and a 7/2- assignment for the 4.20-MeV state.
However, Some evidence suggests that the spin assignments for the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states could be reversed and, therefore, in the same order that they occur in 19F. The lifetimes and -decay branching ratios of the states in 19Ne that are important in the 15O(,)19Ne reaction were measured at the University of Notre Dame using the 17O(3He,)19Ne and 19F(3He,)19Ne reactions, respectively Tan et al. (2005, 2007, 2009). For the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states, the lifetimes were measured to be 18 fs and 43 fs, respectively Tan et al. (2009, 2005). A comparison with the measured lifetimes of the 3.998- (7 fs) and 4.032-MeV (15 fs) 19F states suggested that the spin-parities of the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states in 19Ne should be 7/2- and 9/2-, respectively, analogous to the 19F mirror nucleus. It was also noted by Ref. Tan et al. (2009) that the resonance corresponding to the 4.14-MeV state may dominate the 15O(,)19Ne reaction rate in a narrow temperature range around 0.8 GK if the state has a sufficient -decay branching ratio.
In addition, in a study of the 15O(,)19Ne reaction rate by Davids et al. Davids et al. (2011), the reduced transition probabilities of the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV levels were calculated and compared with those found for the 3.998-MeV state in 19F. A transition to the 1.508-MeV () state, to which both 19Ne levels primarily decay, will be either an 1 or 2 transition depending on the spin-parity. For the 19F states at 3.998- and 4.032-MeV, the and values are 0.0017 MeV fm3 and 9020 MeV fm5, respectively. If the spin-parity of the 4.14-MeV state is assumed to be 7/2-, this yields MeV fm3, which is in good agreement with the 19F value. Similarly, if the 4.20-MeV state is assumed to be 9/2- yields MeV fm5, which is also in good agreement with 19F. The authors note that the reduced transition probabilities calculated with opposite spin assignments did not agree, but the measured -ray branching ratios still supported the tentative spin assignments adopted in Ref. Tilley et al. (1995).
II Experimental Setup and Analysis
To resolve these discrepancies of the assignments of the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV levels in 19Ne, the 19F(3He,)19Ne reaction was measured at Argonne National Laboratory using the coupling of the Compton-suppressed high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector array Gammasphere Lee (1990) with the silicon detector array ORRUBA (Oak Ridge Rutgers University Barrel Array) Pain et al. (2007), called Gammasphere ORRUBA Dual Detectors for Experimental Structure Studies (GODDESS) Ratkiewicz et al. (2013); Pain (2014); Pain et al. (2017). A 30-MeV 3He beam was delivered by the ATLAS accelerator onto a 938-g/cm2 CaF2 target at the GODDESS target position. A rendering Ratkiewicz et al. (2013) of the GODDESS setup can be seen in Fig. 2; a more in-depth description can be found in Ref. Hall (2019).
The charged particles produced in the reaction were detected in E-E telescopes in the downstream half of ORRUBA. In the barrel, the six telescopes consisted of a 65-m-thick BB10 detector in front of a 1000-m-thick Super X3 detector. Downstream of the ORRUBA barrel, an endcap of two QQQ5 telescopes, consisting of highly-segmented detectors with thicknesses of 100 and 1000 m, was mounted. A 0.5-mm-thick aluminum plate was mounted in front of the QQQ5 detectors to stop the elastically-scattered 3He beam. On average, the plate reduced the triton energies in the endcap detectors by approximately 1/3, allowing the tritons from the population of the 19Ne ground state to stop in the QQQ5 telescopes. In total, ORRUBA covered laboratory angles ranging from approximately 18∘ to 162∘ (though, only laboratory angles less than 90∘ were considered during the analysis). The triton spectrum populating excitations in 19Ne can be seen in Fig. 3. This spectrum looks different than that of Ref. Tan et al. (2007) due to the different bombarding energy, different angular coverage of the detectors, and the existence of the previously mentioned aluminum plate in front of the detectors.
Gamma rays from the decay of 19Ne were measured in Gammasphere, in coincidence with the tritons from the reaction between 19Ne excitation energies of 3.8 and 4.4 MeV (shaded region in Fig. 3). To calibrate Gammasphere, sources of 152Eu, 56Co, and 238Pu+13C were used, which provided calibration rays with energies ranging from 122 to 6128 keV. The systematic uncertainties on the energy calibration were estimated to range from to keV between energies of 100 and 7000 keV. These uncertainties were combined in quadrature with the statistical uncertainties on each of the peak centroids to determine the uncertainty on the transition energy. The 19Ne excitation energies were calculated for each detected -ray cascade if more than one cascade was placed. The final excitation energy was determined by averaging each value and weighting them by their uncertainties.
Since the lifetimes of the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV levels are very short, the decay of these states occurred when the 19Ne nuclei were in flight. Therefore, the rays from the de-excitation of these states were found to be Doppler broadened and a Doppler correction was applied to the Gammasphere spectra for the transitions depopulating the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states. The angle and energy of the 19Ne nuclei were calculated for each event using the angle and energy of the triton detected in ORRUBA, and the values of used for the correction ranged between 0.005 and 0.025. The correction was applied assuming the 19Ne nuclei did not lose any energy in the target before decaying, since this assumption produced -ray peaks with the best energy resolution and signal-to-noise ratio.
To further improve the signal-to-noise ratio, the differences between the recorded Gammasphere and ORRUBA time stamps for each event were used to reduce the random -ray background. True coincidences appear as a sharp peak in this time difference spectrum. Off-peak timing was used to estimate the random-coincident background present in the spectra. The random background generated using the timing was subtracted from the spectra to produce the results presented in the following section.
III Results
In total, four transitions from the 19Ne states at 4.14 and 4.20 MeV were identified in the data via triton-- coincidences. Using the transition energies, the levels were determined to have energies of 4141.80.7 keV and 4199.81.1 keV, which are in good agreement with previous measurements Tilley et al. (1995). A comparison between the 19F and 19Ne partial level schemes and observed transitions is displayed in Fig. 1.
Figure 4 summarizes the justification for the placement of the transitions depopulating the 4141.8- and 4199.8-keV states. For the 4141.8-keV state, three transitions were observed in the triton-gated -ray spectra. Figure 3a shows the 2527.2(10)-keV ray from the de-excitation of the 4141.8-keV state, which was produced by gating on the rays from the de-excitation of the 1616-keV state. Figure 3b is gated on the two transitions that depopulate the 5/2- 1507-keV state; the two transitions observed depopulate the 4141.8- and 4199.8-keV levels. The -ray spectrum shown in Figure 3c is gated on the 238-keV 5/2+ to ground state transition, confirming the 3897.5-keV transition depopulating the 4141.8-keV state. The branching ratios for the transitions from the 4141.8-keV state were determined to be 14(4)%, 68(4)%, and 18(4)%, respectively.
In contrast to Ref. Davidson and Roush (1973), there is no evidence in the Fig. 3c spectrum of a 3962-keV de-excitation from the 4199.8-keV state to the 238-keV state. Since this spectrum was also gated on tritons corresponding to excitation energies between 3.8 and 4.4 MeV, if this transition did exist it should have been visible in this spectrum. In Ref. Davidson and Roush (1973), this transition is relatively weak in a spectrum only gated on neutrons, with no excitation energy gate and no - coincidences. Therefore, it is likely that the previously observed, weak transition was incorrectly placed as depopulating the 4199.8-keV state.
The de-excitations from the 4141.8-keV state to the 238- and 1616-keV states were first observed in this work. The low spin-parity of the 1616-keV state () suggests that the spin-parity of the 4141.8-keV state is 7/2-, instead of 9/2-, based on the multipolarity of the transition. In addition, an (rather than higher multipolarity) transition is consistent with the measured (short) lifetime of this state. Since one 7/2- and one 9/2- state is expected in this region, the spin-parity of the 4199.8-keV state must be 9/2-. These spin-parity assignments are also supported by the transitions previously observed for the mirror states in 19F (see Fig. 1). The -ray branching ratios obtained for the 4141.8-keV state also match well with those found for the 3998-keV state Tilley et al. (1995): 18(4)%, 70(4)%, and 12(6)% for the 3998-keV 19F state compared to 18(4)%, 68(4)%, and 14(4)% for the 4141.8-keV 19Ne state.
Figure 5 shows the fractional contributions of the 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states to the 15O(,)19Ne reaction rate. The calculated fractional contributions assume -decay branching ratios of , as found in Ref. Tan et al. (2009). From Fig. 5, it is clear that the 4.14-MeV state has less importance than considered previously with a spin of 7/2-, while the 4.20-MeV state is slightly more important.
IV Conclusion
The 19F(3He,)19Ne reaction was measured with GODDESS to provide additional information on 19Ne excitations important in nucleosynthesis. The 4.14- and 4.20-MeV states in 19Ne could provide important resonances for the 15O(,)19Ne breakout reaction in Type I x-ray bursts. However, conflicting information regarding the spin-parities of these states made their potential contributions uncertain. The 19F(3He,)19Ne reaction was studied using GODDESS to search for -ray transitions that could resolve this discrepancy.
Using triton-- coincidences, the two levels were confirmed at energies of 4141.8 and 4199.8 keV. Two new transitions were observed from the 4141.8-keV state to the 238- and 1616-keV states. In addition, two previously observed transitions were also found from the 4141.8- and 4199.8-keV states to the 1508-keV state. The decay scheme from these states matches well with the decay scheme previously observed for the two proposed mirror states in 19F. The present triton-gated -ray measurements and the results from Refs. Tan et al. (2009); Davids et al. (2011) suggest that the previously accepted spin-parities for these states should be reversed. Therefore, we assign spin-parities of 7/2- and 9/2- to the 4141.8- and 4199.8-keV states, respectively. It was noted in Ref. Tan et al. (2009) that the 4141.8-keV state could have the largest contribution to the 15O(,)19Ne reaction rate if it has a sufficient -decay branching ratio. Further studies targeting this quantity are necessary to help constrain the rate further.
V Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation Grant Numbers PHY-1419765 (Notre Dame) and PHY-1404218 (Rutgers), the National Nuclear Security Administration under the Stewardship Science Academic Alliances program through DOE Cooperative Agreement DE-NA002132, and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (numbers NRF-2016R1A5A1013277 and NRF-2013M7A1A1075764). The authors also acknowledge support from the DOE Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, under contract numbers DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-FG02-96ER40963, DE-FG02-96ER40978, and DE-AC02-06CH11357. This research used resources of Argonne National Laboratory’s ATLAS facility, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Woosley and Taam (1976) S. E. Woosley and R. E. Taam, Nature (London) 263 , 101 (1976).
- 2Joss (1977) P. C. Joss, Nature (London) 270 , 310 (1977).
- 3Schatz et al. (2001) H. Schatz, A. Aprahamian, V. Barnard, L. Bildsten, A. Cumming, M. Ouellette, T. Rauscher, F.-K. Thielemann, and M. Wiescher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 , 3471 (2001) . · doi ↗
- 4Fisker et al. (2006) J. L. Fisker, J. Görres, and M. Wiescher, Astrophys. J. 650 , 332 (2006).
- 5Cyburt et al. (2016) R. H. Cyburt, A. M. Amthor, A. Heger, E. Johnson, L. Keek, Z. Meisel, H. Schatz, and K. Smith, Astrophys. J. 830 , 55 (2016).
- 6Mythili et al. (2008) S. Mythili, B. Davids, T. K. Alexander, G. C. Ball, M. Chicoine, R. S. Chakrawarthy, R. Churchman, J. S. Forster, S. Gujrathi, G. Hackman, et al. , Phys. Rev. C 77 , 035803 (2008) . · doi ↗
- 7Tan et al. (2009) W. P. Tan, J. Görres, M. Beard, M. Couder, A. Couture, S. Falahat, J. L. Fisker, L. Lamm, P. J. Le Blanc, H. Y. Lee, S. O’Brien, A. Palumbo, E. Stech, E. Strandberg, and M. Wiescher, Phys. Rev. C 79 , 055805 (2009) . · doi ↗
- 8Davids et al. (2011) B. Davids, R. H. Cyburt, J. Josè, and S. Mythili, Astrophys. J. 735 , 40 (2011).
