Two Algorithms for Computing Exact and Approximate Nash Equilibria in Bimatrix Games
Jianzong Pi, Joseph L. Heyman, and Abhishek Gupta

TL;DR
This paper introduces two algorithms for identifying strategic equivalence to zero-sum games and computing approximate Nash equilibria in bimatrix games, supported by extensive simulations.
Contribution
It presents novel algorithms for detecting strategic equivalence to zero-sum games and computing approximate Nash equilibria in bimatrix games.
Findings
Algorithms effectively identify strategic equivalence.
Algorithms successfully compute approximate Nash equilibria.
Numerical simulations demonstrate high efficacy of the methods.
Abstract
In this paper, we first devise two algorithms to determine whether or not a bimatrix game has a strategically equivalent zero-sum game. If so, we propose an algorithm that computes the strategically equivalent zero-sum game. If a given bimatrix game is not strategically equivalent to a zero-sum game, we then propose an approach to compute a zero-sum game whose saddle-point equilibrium can be mapped to a well-supported approximate Nash equilibrium of the original game. We conduct extensive numerical simulation to establish the efficacy of the two algorithms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Economic theories and models · Game Theory and Voting Systems
