# CNN-based Prostate Zonal Segmentation on T2-weighted MR Images: A   Cross-dataset Study

**Authors:** Leonardo Rundo, Changhee Han, Jin Zhang, Ryuichiro Hataya, Yudai, Nagano, Carmelo Militello, Claudio Ferretti, Marco S. Nobile, Andrea, Tangherloni, Maria Carla Gilardi, Salvatore Vitabile, Hideki Nakayama,, Giancarlo Mauri

arXiv: 1903.12571 · 2019-04-01

## TL;DR

This study evaluates CNN architectures for automatic prostate zone segmentation on T2-weighted MRI, demonstrating U-Net's superior generalization across multiple datasets in a preliminary deep learning approach.

## Contribution

It compares three CNN models for prostate zone segmentation and assesses their cross-dataset generalization capabilities, highlighting U-Net's effectiveness.

## Key findings

- U-Net outperforms SegNet and pix2pix in segmentation accuracy.
- Pre-training improves performance in most cases.
- U-Net generalizes well across multi-centric datasets.

## Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among US men. However, prostate imaging is still challenging despite the advances in multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which provides both morphologic and functional information pertaining to the pathological regions. Along with whole prostate gland segmentation, distinguishing between the Central Gland (CG) and Peripheral Zone (PZ) can guide towards differential diagnosis, since the frequency and severity of tumors differ in these regions; however, their boundary is often weak and fuzzy. This work presents a preliminary study on Deep Learning to automatically delineate the CG and PZ, aiming at evaluating the generalization ability of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) on two multi-centric MRI prostate datasets. Especially, we compared three CNN-based architectures: SegNet, U-Net, and pix2pix. In such a context, the segmentation performances achieved with/without pre-training were compared in 4-fold cross-validation. In general, U-Net outperforms the other methods, especially when training and testing are performed on multiple datasets.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.12571/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.12571/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.12571/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.12571