Nearly Frobenius theory and semisimplicity of bimodules
Dalia Artenstein, Ana Gonz\'alez, Gustavo Mata

TL;DR
This paper simplifies the theory of nearly Frobenius algebras by removing a redundant condition, explores their properties under algebraic operations, and establishes their equivalence to separable and semisimple bimodule categories.
Contribution
It proves coassociativity is redundant in nearly Frobenius algebras, characterizes normalized nearly Frobenius algebras, and links these to semisimplicity and separability.
Findings
Coassociativity is redundant in nearly Frobenius algebra definition.
Frobenius dimension behaves predictably under algebraic operations.
Normalized nearly Frobenius algebras are equivalent to separable and semisimple bimodule categories.
Abstract
In the first part of this article we prove that one of the conditions required in the original definition of nearly Frobenius algebra, the coassociativity, is redundant. Also, we determine the Frobenius dimension of the product and tensor product of two nearly Frobenius algebras from the Frobenius dimension of each of them. We apply these results to semisimple algebras. In the second part we introduce the notion of normalized nearly Frobenius algebra. We prove a series of equivalences: the concept of normalized nearly Frobenius algebra is equivalent to the concept of separable algebra, equivalent to the fact that the algebra is projective as a bimodule on itself and, finally, equivalent to the category of bimodules is semisimple. Also, we relate these concepts with the property of semisimplicity of the category of modules over the algebra.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Nearly Frobenius theory and semisimplicity of bimodules
Dalia Artenstein, Ana González, Gustavo Mata
Abstract
In the first part of this article we prove that one of the conditions required in the original definition of nearly Frobenius algebra, the coassociativity, is redundant. Also, we determine the Frobenius dimension of the product and tensor product of two nearly Frobenius algebras from the Frobenius dimension of each of them. We apply these results to semisimple algebras.
In the second part we introduce the notion of normalized nearly Frobenius algebra. We prove a series of equivalences: the concept of normalized nearly Frobenius algebra is equivalent to the concept of separable algebra, equivalent to the fact that the algebra is projective as a bimodule on itself and, finally, equivalent to the category of bimodules is semisimple. Also, we relate these concepts with the property of semisimplicity of the category of modules over the algebra.
Keywords: nearly Frobenius algebras, separable algebra, semisimple bimodule category, normalized coproduct.
MSC: 16W99
1 Introduction
The concept of nearly Frobenius algebra is motivated by the result proved in [4], which states that: the homology of the free loop space has the structure of a Frobenius algebra without counit. These objects were studied in [7] and their algebraic properties were developed in [2], in particular the possible nearly Frobenius structures in gentle algebras were described.
In the framework of differential graded algebras, Abbaspour considers in [1] nearly Frobenius algebras that he calls open Frobenius algebras. He proves that if is a symmetric open Frobenius algebra of degree , then is an open Frobenius algebra, where the product at the chain level is given by
[TABLE]
and the coproduct is given by
[TABLE]
In this work we prove that one of the conditions required in the original definition of nearly Frobenius algebra, the coassociativity, is redundant. Also, we determine the Frobenius dimension of the product and tensor product of two nearly Frobenius algebras from the Frobenius dimension of each of them. This applies to the definition of Frobenius algebras too.
In the second part we introduce the notion of normalized nearly Frobenius algebras, we prove that cartesian and tensor product of normalized nearly Frobenius algebras is also a normalized nearly Frobenius algebra. Later, we prove that the concept of normalized nearly Frobenius algebra is equivalent to the concept of separable algebra and equivalent in turn to algebra having Hochschild cohomological dimension zero. We give some applications of these results, for example that the matrix algebra is a normalized nearly Frobenius algebra, therefore is separable. If we consider the category of bimodules over a nearly Frobenius algebra, we prove that the normalized condition over the nearly Frobenius algebra is equivalent that the bimodule category is semisimple.
The work finish relating the concepts described above with the semisimplicity property of the module category on the nearly Frobenius algebra. Although the conclusions presented in the applications are already known the techniques to prove them are originals.
2 Nearly Frobenius algebras
In one of the definitions of Frobenius algebras it is required that the algebra admits a coalgebra structure where the coproduct is a morphism of -bimodules. In the next result we prove that the coassociativity condition is redundant.
Proposition 1**.**
Let be a Frobenius algebra, then the coassociativity condition is a consequence of the -bimodule morphism condition of , and the unit axiom.
Proof.
In the next diagram we illustrate this affirmation.
[TABLE]
All the internal diagrams commute as a consequence of the -bimodule condition, the unit axiom and the natural decomposition of the morphism ; then the external diagram commutes too. ∎
The previous result allows us to give the next alternative definition of nearly Frobenius algebras.
Definition 2**.**
An algebra is a nearly Frobenius algebra if it admits a linear map such that
[TABLE]
commute.
Definition 3**.**
The Frobenius space associated to an algebra is the vector space of all the possible coproducts that make it into a nearly Frobenius algebra (), see [2]. Its dimension over is called the Frobenius dimension of , that is,
[TABLE]
Definition 4**.**
Let and be two nearly Frobenius algebras. A homomorphism is a nearly Frobenius homomorphism if it is a morphism of algebras and the following diagram commutes.
[TABLE]
*If is bijective then is said to be an isomorphism between and .
Notation: nFrob is the category of nearly Frobenius algebras.
Theorem 5**.**
Let be a nearly Frobenius algebra, an algebra and an isomorphism of algebras. Then admits a nearly Frobenius structure defined as
[TABLE]
In particular .
Proof.
We need to check that is a -bimodule morphism. That is,
[TABLE]
commute. To prove this we only need to see that the dotted face of the next cube commutes.
[TABLE]
Since is an isomorphism of algebras and is a nearly Frobenius coproduct in all the other faces commute and then the dotted face commutes. ∎
Remark 6*.*
Assume that and are -algebras. The product of the algebras and is the algebra with the addition and the multiplication given by the formulas and , where , and , . The identity of is the element , where and . If \bigl{(}A_{1},\Delta_{1}\bigr{)} and \bigl{(}A_{2},\Delta_{2}\bigr{)} are nearly Frobenius algebras then admits a natural structure of Nearly Frobenius algebra. In the next paragraph we describe this structure.
First, we define , where and , where . Then
[TABLE]
To prove that this defines a bimodule morphism it is necessary to guarantee that satisfies that
[TABLE]
Denote , then
[TABLE]
On the other hand
[TABLE]
Remember that and are bimodule morphisms, then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
This proves that . Then is a nearly Frobenius algebra.
Remark 7*.*
Similarly, we can consider the tensor product of the -algebras and . As before, we can define a nearly Frobenius coproduct on . In this case we take the transposition map and the coproduct on and to define the coproduct on as follows
[TABLE]
Since all the maps are linear, the map is linear too. We will test only one of the two necessary conditions to guarantee that it is bimodule morphism, the other one is analogous.
[TABLE]
Proposition 8**.**
Consider and two -algebras, then the following isomorphisms of vector spaces hold:
. In particular . 2. 2.
. Therefore .
Proof.
In Remark 6 we saw that there exist natural inclusions of in and, in Remark 7, of in .
To finish the proof it is necessary to check that the maps are surjective.
We note the unit of as , where e_{1}=\bigl{(}1_{A},0\bigr{)} and e_{2}=\bigl{(}0,1_{B}\bigr{)}.
Let’s take and express as follows:
[TABLE]
with and for all . Since is a bimodule morphism we can prove that and, in a similar way, that . Then, we conclude that the coproduct has the expression
[TABLE]
This allows us to define and . Using again that is a bimodule morphism, we deduce that and are also bimodule morphisms, then \bigl{(}A,\Delta_{A}\bigr{)} and \bigl{(}B,\Delta_{B}\bigr{)} are nearly Frobenius algebras. In particular \Delta=\iota\circ\bigl{(}\Delta_{A}+\Delta_{B}\bigr{)}. 2. 2.
Consider and , bases of and respectively, where and . Then
[TABLE]
Using that is bimodule morphism we have that
[TABLE]
As when we can define
[TABLE]
analogously we can define
[TABLE]
Note that with these definitions the coproduct is
[TABLE]
∎
The next corollary is a consequence of Theorem 5 and Proposition 8.
Corollary 9**.**
If is a semisimple algebra over an algebraically closed field , then it is possible to determine completely its Frobenius dimension.
Proof.
By the Artin-Wedderburn Theorem we have that . Then
[TABLE]
Finally
[TABLE]
∎
Corollary 10**.**
Let be a finite group. If does not divide the order of and is an algebraically closed field, then it is possible to determine completely the Frobenius dimension of .
Proof.
Applying Maschke’s theorem we have that is a semisimple algebra then, by the previous corollary, it is possible to determine completely its Frobenius dimension. ∎
In the next results we are going to use an example presented in [2], which has a small error in its calculation. We shall now present the result quoted and its correction.
Let be a cyclic finite group of order and the group algebra , with the natural basis \bigl{\{}g^{i}:\;i=1,\dots,n\bigr{\}}. This algebra is a nearly Frobenius algebra. Moreover, we can determine all the nearly Frobenius structures that it admits.
Using the bimodule condition of the coproduct, we can prove that a basis of the Frobenius space is
[TABLE]
where and \displaystyle{\Delta_{k}\bigl{(}1\bigr{)}=\sum_{i=1}^{k-1}g^{i}\otimes g^{k-i}+\sum_{i=k}^{n}g^{i}\otimes g^{n+k-i}} for .
In particular, we have that
[TABLE]
The general expression of any nearly Frobenius coproduct in the unit is
[TABLE]
where for .
Corollary 11**.**
If is a finite abelian group, then it is possible to determine .
Proof.
If is a finite abelian group, then , where is a finite cyclic group for . The group algebra is isomorphic, as a -algebra, to . Therefore, applying Theorem 5 and Proposition 8
[TABLE]
Finally,
[TABLE]
∎
Examples 2.1**.**
We illustrate the results given in Proposition 8 with a couple of examples.
Let’s consider the cyclic groups and where and and their corresponding group algebras , . Then, by Proposition 8,1., is a nearly Frobenius algebra of Frobenius dimension .
[TABLE]
where ,and .
[TABLE]
where , , and . Therefor
[TABLE]
where \Delta_{1}(1,1)=\bigl{(}\Delta_{1}^{1}(1),0\bigr{)}, \Delta_{2}(1,1)=\bigl{(}\Delta_{2}^{1}(1),0\bigr{)}, \Delta_{3}(1,1)=\bigl{(}0,\Delta_{1}^{2}(1)\bigr{)}, \Delta_{4}(1,1)=\bigl{(}0,\Delta_{2}^{2}(1)\bigr{)} and \Delta_{5}(1,1)=\bigl{(}0,\Delta_{3}^{2}(1)\bigr{)}.
Then, the general expression of any nearly Frobenius coproduct in the unit is
[TABLE]
where for and . 2. 2.
Consider the linear quiver Q:\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\kern 9.1111pt\hbox{\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\vtop{\kern 0.0pt\offinterlineskip\halign{\entry@#!@&&\entry@@#!@\cr&\crcr}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-9.1111pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\textstyle{\underset{1}{\bullet}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}}}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 15.8177pt\raise 5.1875pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-0.8264pt\hbox{\scriptstyle{\eta}}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 32.00002pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\kern 32.00002pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\textstyle{\underset{2}{\bullet}}}}}}}}}\ignorespaces}}}}\ignorespaces and its associated path algebra:
[TABLE]
It is known that is a vector space of dimension 1, and a generator is the coproduct defined as
[TABLE]
Now we will construct the tensor product of two copies of :
[TABLE]
This algebra admits only one coproduct, and it is
[TABLE]
On the other hand, if we consider the next quiver
[TABLE]
and the algebra we can prove that this algebra is isomorphic to . The isomorphism given on the basis is as follows:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
It is clear that the isomorphism respects the algebra structures. Then, we can conclude that has dimension one and a generator is:
[TABLE]
Remark 12*.*
In these lines we want to make notice that we cannot establish a nice property that relates the Frobenius dimension of a quotient algebra with the original algebra. First, in the Example 7 of [2] a nontrivial coproduct is constructed in the quotient algebra from a nontrivial structure on , but and .
In addition, we can not always recover a nontrivial structure on the quotient from one on the original algebra, for example if we consider with all the arrows having the same orientation and the radical square zero algebra , we know that admits only one nontrivial nearly Frobenius coproduct, that is
[TABLE]
and this structure is trivial in . But we can prove that admits nontrivial nearly Frobenius coproducts, moreover .
In the next paragraph we will give a nice interpretation of the Frobenius space of an algebra using hochschild cohomology.
Remark 13*.*
For an -bimodule , where is an algebra we call
[TABLE]
the sub–bimodule of invariants. In Remark 1 of [2] is shown that every nearly coproduct is determined by its value in , that is, we have a linear isomorphism
[TABLE]
Moreover, if we remember that the [math]-group of Hochschild cohomology of with coefficients in is
[TABLE]
In particular for we have
[TABLE]
Then, it is possible to identify the Frobenius space of with the 0-group of Hochschild cohomology of with coefficients in .
2.1 Normalized nearly Frobenius algebras
In the following results we will restrict ourselves to work with a subfamily of nearly Frobenius algebras. This construction is motivated by the notion of normalized Fourier transform (see [5]).
Definition 14**.**
Let be an algebra and a nearly Frobenius coproduct, we say that is normalized if , where is the product of . If admits a normalized Frobenius coproduct we will say that is a normalized nearly Frobenius algebra.
Example 2.1**.**
Let be a cyclic finite group. The group algebra is a nearly Frobenius algebra. We can consider the nearly Frobenius coproduct . It is a simple verification that is normalized.
Proposition 15**.**
If and are nearly Frobenius algebras with normalized coproducts, then has normalized coproduct. 2. 2.
If and are nearly Frobenius algebras with normalized coproducts, then has normalized coproduct.
Proof.
By previous results we know that and are nearly Frobenius algebras. We only need to prove that the induced coproducts are normalized.
In the first case the coproduct is defined as
[TABLE]
where and , . Then
[TABLE]
Using that and are normalized we have that and , therefore . 2. 2.
In the second case the coproduct is defined as
[TABLE]
where is the transposition map. With this notation the product in can be described as
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
This concludes the proof that the coproduct of is normalized.
∎
2.2 Separable algebras
In this section, we present known results about separable algebras and we study their relationship with the notion of normalized nearly Frobenius algebras.
A good reference for this section is [3].
Definition 16**.**
Let be a commutative ring. An -algebra is called separable if the multiplication map
[TABLE]
has a section (i.e. ) which is an -bimodule homomorphism.
Proposition 17**.**
*Let be a commutative ring and let be a separable -algebra. Given a section of which is an -bimodule homomorphism, set
and write for suitable and , for every . Then we have*
- (1)
* i.e. .* 2. (2)
* i.e. for every .*
Definition 18**.**
Let be an algebra over a commutative ring . An element is called a separability element for (over ) if fulfills (1) and (2).
Proposition 19**.**
*Let be an algebra over a commutative ring . Then
is a separable -algebra contains a separability element for over .
Moreover any separability element of is an idempotent element of the ring .*
Proposition 20**.**
Let be an algebra over a field . If is separable over , then .
Theorem 21**.**
Let be an algebra over a field of finite dimension. Then, the following conditions are equivalent.
- (1)
* has Hochschild cohomological dimension [math].* 2. (2)
* is projective as -module.* 3. (3)
* has a separability element.*
Theorem 22**.**
An algebra admits a normalized nearly Frobenius coproduct if and only if is separable.
Proof.
If is a normalized nearly Frobenius coproduct then such that , and m\bigl{(}\Delta(1)\bigr{)}=1. Therefore is a separability element thus is separable.
Conversely, let be a separability element, first note that for all then it induces a nearly Frobenius coproducto such that .
Finally, the condition say that m\bigl{(}\Delta(1)\bigr{)}=1 then m\bigl{(}\Delta(a)\bigr{)}=m\bigl{(}a\Delta(1)\bigr{)}=am\bigl{(}\Delta(1)\bigr{)}=a1=a, , thus . Therefore is a normalized nearly Frobenius coproduct. ∎
Remark 23*.*
Note that we prove, in particular, that every separable algebra is a nearly Frobenius algebra. Moreover, the concept of nearly Frobenius coproduct or nearly Frobenius algebra is a weakening of the concept of separable algebra.
Example 2.2**.**
Every Azumaya algebra is nearly Frobenius algebra. Remember that an -algebra is said to be an Azumaya -algebra if is both central and separable over . See [6].
An immediate consequence of Proposition 18, Theorem 21 and Theorem 22 is the following result.
Proposition 24**.**
* admits a normalized nearly Frobenius coproduct if and only if has Hochschild cohomological dimension [math].*
Definition 25**.**
An algebra over an algebraically closed field is called semisimple if is finite dimensional and every left -module is projective.
The next result can be proved using Theorem 4.5.7 of [6] together with the theorem of Artin-Wedderburn.
Proposition 26**.**
Let be a separable algebra over a field , then is semisimple. If is a perfect field then the concepts are equivalents.
Corollary 27**.**
Every normalized nearly Frobenius algebra is semisimple.
Remark 28*.*
Note that we prove, in Corollary 9, that if is algebraically closed then every semisimple algebra over is nearly Frobenius. Now, using Proposition 25, we have that every semisimple algebra is separable if is perfect. Then, the result of Corollary 9 can be refined in the following way. If is a perfect field and is a -algebra, then is a semisimple algebra if and only if is a normalized nearly Frobenius algebra.
2.2.1 Applications
The following results are known, but this paper presents another way of proving them using the previously determined Frobenius structures.
Matrix algebra:
If we consider the matrix algebra , one nearly Frobenius coproduct of this algebra is
[TABLE]
for this coproduct we have \bigl{(}m\circ\Delta\bigr{)}(I)=I. Then is separable, in particular, if is an algebraically closed field, then is semisimple.
Group algebra:
In , where is a cyclic finite group, we can define the nearly Frobenius coproduct
[TABLE]
Note that
[TABLE]
Then is separable, and semisimple if is an algebraically closed field.
Example 2.3**.**
Retaking the example 1 of Examples 2.1, using the Proposition 15, we can see that admits a normalized coproduct then it is separable. Remember that and , where and are cyclic groups of order and respectively.
Truncated polynomial algebra:
Let be a nearly Frobenius algebra where a basis of the Frobenius space is
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Then, , where for all , is a general nearly Frobenius coproduct.
It is easy to prove that there is not a normalized copoduct:
[TABLE]
Then is not separable, for all .
Path algebra:
Finally we consider the path algebra generated by the quiver
[TABLE]
A=\Bbbk Q=\bigl{\langle}e_{1},e_{2},e_{3},\alpha,\beta,\alpha\beta\bigr{\rangle}. and the nearly Frobenius coproduct is
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Note that , then is not normalized. Therefore is not separable.
2.3 Bimodule category on normalized nearly Frobenius algebras
In this section we study the relationship between the normalized nearly Frobenius structure on an algebra and its category of bimodules.
First we give a technical result that will be used later.
Lemma 29**.**
An object is projective if and only if the structure morphism splits in .
Proof.
The direct of the assertion is a consequence of the fact that the algebra has unit.
Now we suppose that splits in , then exists such that in .
As is a homomorphism in the next diagram commutes
[TABLE]
Let be , homomorphism and epimorphism in .
[TABLE]
If we only consider the linear structure in the previous diagram we can affirm that there exist a linear map such that . Using this map we define the map as the composition
[TABLE]
First we prove that :
[TABLE]
The last step is to prove that is a homomorphism in , i.e. the diagram
[TABLE]
commutes.
Note that is a composition of homomorphisms in .
[TABLE]
∎
Let be a -algebra and the product of this algebra. Then \bigl{(}A,{}_{A}m_{A}\bigr{)}\in{}_{A}\mathcal{M}_{A} where is .
The following theorem is the central result of this section that allows to relate the normalized nearly Frobenius algebras with their bimodules.
Theorem 30**.**
The object \bigl{(}A,{}_{A}m_{A}\bigr{)}\in{}_{A}\mathcal{M}_{A} is projective if and only if admits a normalized nearly Frobenius coproduct.
Proof.
If \bigl{(}A,{}_{A}m_{A}\bigr{)} is projective bimodule, then, by Lemma 29, there exists a homomorphism in such that .
We define as .
First note that the normalized condition is immediate:
[TABLE]
To prove that is an -bimodule homomorphism we need to check that \bigl{(}m\otimes 1\bigr{)}\bigl{(}1\otimes\Delta\bigr{)}=\Delta\circ m=\bigl{(}1\otimes m\bigr{)}\bigl{(}\Delta\otimes 1\bigr{)}.
Remember that is a homomorphism in , then the next diagram commutes
[TABLE]
This implies that
[TABLE]
commutes. Then .
Applying the associativity of the product and the fact that is a homomorphism in , in particular in , we have that the next diagram commutes
[TABLE]
Then .
Reciprocally, let be a normalized nearly Frobenius coproduct. Applying the Lemma 29 we need to prove that split, i.e. there exists a morphism in such that .
We define . Note that
[TABLE]
To finish we need to prove that is a homomorphism in , i.e. the next diagram commutes
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The internal diagrams commute by the nearly Frobenius property of the coproduct . Then the external diagram commutes. ∎
Corollary 31**.**
Let be a -algebra. Then, the next conditions are equivalent
* admits a normalized nearly Frobenius algebra.* 2.
\bigl{(}A,{}_{A}m_{A}\bigr{)}* is projective in .* 3.
Every \bigl{(}M,\rho_{M}\bigr{)}\in{}_{A}\mathcal{M}_{A} is projective. 4.
The category is semisimple (every \bigl{(}M,\rho_{M}\bigr{)}\in{}_{A}\mathcal{M}_{A} is semisimple).
Proof.
is Theorem 30.
It is immediate.
To prove that \bigl{(}M,\rho_{M}\bigr{)} is projective is equivalent, by the Lemma 29, to prove that split, i.e. there exists in such that .
As \bigl{(}A,{}_{A}m_{A}\bigr{)} is projective, by the Theorem 30, there exist nearly Frobenius coproduct normalized. Then we define the map as the composition
[TABLE]
First we prove that :
[TABLE]
Finally we need to prove that is un homomorphism in i.e. the next diagram commutes
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The expressions and agree by the Frobenius condition of the coproduct .
It is a classic result in representation theory (see, for example, [3]). ∎
Remark 32*.*
If we look the examples of section 2.2, we can conclude that the categories of bimodules over and are semisimple, but the category of bimodules over is not semisimple.
Finally, with everything developed we relate the studied with the category of modules on a nearly Frobenius algebra.
Theorem 33**.**
If is a perfect field we have the following sequence of equivalences:
[TABLE]
If is not a perfect field we have the following sequence of implications:
[TABLE]
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] H. Abbaspour. On the Hochschild homology of open Frobenius algebras . J. Noncommut. Geom., 10 (2) pp. 709-743 (2016).
- 2[2] D. Artenstein, A. González, and M. Lanzilotta, Constructing Nearly Frobenius Algebras . Algebras and Representation Theory (2015) Volume 18, 339-367.
- 3[3] Ibrahim Assem. Algèbres et modules . Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa, 1997.
- 4[4] Ralph L. Cohen and Véronique Godin, A polarized view of string topology . Topology, geometry and quantum field theory, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 308, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2004, pp. 127-154.
- 5[5] Walter Ferrer Santos, Fourier theory for coalgebras, bicointegrals and injectivity for bicomodules . Hopf Algebras (Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics), Volume 237 (2004), 225-240.
- 6[6] Timothy J. Ford, Separable Algebras . Graduate Studies in Mathematics 183. American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island, 2017.
- 7[7] A. González, E. Lupercio, C. Segovia and B. Uribe, Orbifold Topological Quantum Field Theories in Dimension 2 . Preprint.
