Automatic Defect Segmentation on Leather with Deep Learning

TL;DR

This paper presents a fully automatic deep learning-based system for detecting and segmenting surface defects on leather, significantly reducing manual inspection effort and improving accuracy in quality control.

Contribution

It introduces a novel automated defect detection system using deep learning and robotic image acquisition, achieving high segmentation accuracy without human intervention.

Findings

91.5% segmentation accuracy on training data

70.35% segmentation accuracy on test data

Effective defect detection verified by multiple performance metrics

Abstract

Leather is a natural and durable material created through a process of tanning of hides and skins of animals. The price of the leather is subjective as it is highly sensitive to its quality and surface defects condition. In the literature, there are very few works investigating on the defects detection for leather using automatic image processing techniques. The manual defect inspection process is essential in an leather production industry to control the quality of the finished products. However, it is tedious, as it is labour intensive, time consuming, causes eye fatigue and often prone to human error. In this paper, a fully automatic defect detection and marking system on a calf leather is proposed. The proposed system consists of a piece of leather, LED light, high resolution camera and a robot arm. Succinctly, a machine vision method is presented to identify the position of the defects on the leather using a deep learning architecture. Then, a series of processes are conducted to predict the defect instances, including elicitation of the leather images with a robot arm, train and test the images using a deep learning architecture and determination of the boundary of the defects using mathematical derivation of the geometry. Note that, all the processes do not involve human intervention, except for the defect ground truths construction stage. The proposed algorithm is capable to exhibit 91.5% segmentation accuracy on the train data and 70.35% on the test data. We also report confusion matrix, F1-score, precision and specificity, sensitivity performance metrics to further verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.