A Logic of Objective and Subjective Oughts (full paper with proofs)
Aldo Iv\'an Ram\'irez Abarca, Jan Broersen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a formal logic integrating objective and subjective oughts, extending the stit framework with deontic and epistemic operators to better model responsibility and ethical considerations in AI.
Contribution
It presents a new axiomatization and semantics for a logic of objective and subjective oughts, addressing key puzzles in knowledge and obligation.
Findings
Provides soundness and completeness proofs for the logic.
Addresses Horty's puzzles for knowledge and obligation.
Extends the stit paradigm with deontic and epistemic operators.
Abstract
The relation between agentive action, knowledge, and obligation is central to the understanding of responsibility --a main topic in Artificial Intelligence. Based on the view that an appropriate formalization of said relation would contribute to the development of ethical AI, we point out the main characteristics of a logic for objective and subjective oughts that was recently introduced in the literature. This logic extends the traditional stit paradigm with deontic and epistemic operators, and provides a semantics that deals with Horty's puzzles for knowledge and obligation. We provide an axiomatization for this logic, and address its soundness and completeness with respect to a class of relevant models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
