On the status of the hoop conjecture in charged curved spacetimes
Shahar Hod

TL;DR
This paper examines the applicability and limitations of the Thorne hoop conjecture within charged curved spacetimes, clarifying the conditions under which it holds.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the hoop conjecture's validity specifically in the context of charged curved spacetimes, an area less explored in prior work.
Findings
The hoop conjecture's regime of validity is constrained in charged spacetimes.
Certain conditions affect the applicability of the conjecture in these settings.
The paper clarifies the theoretical boundaries of the conjecture's use.
Abstract
The status and regime of validity of the famous Thorne hoop conjecture in spatially regular {\it charged} curved spacetimes are clarified.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
On the status of the hoop conjecture in charged curved spacetimes
Shahar Hod
The Ruppin Academic Center, Emeq Hefer 40250, Israel
The Hadassah Institute, Jerusalem 91010, Israel
Abstract
The status and regime of validity of the famous Thorne hoop conjecture in spatially regular charged curved spacetimes are clarified.
I Introduction
The hoop conjecture Thorne has attracted the attention of physicists and mathematicians since its introduction by Thorne almost five decades ago Thorne ; Mis . This mathematically elegant and physically influential conjecture asserts that a self-gravitating matter configuration of mass will form an engulfing horizon if its circumference radius is equal to (or less than) the corresponding Schwarzschild radius Noteunit . That is, the hoop conjecture states that Thorne
[TABLE]
It is widely believed that the hoop conjecture reflects a fundamental aspect of classical general relativity. In particular, the conjecture is supported by several studies (see Red ; Abr ; Hod1 and references therein). Intriguingly, however, there are also some claims in the physics literature that the Thorne hoop conjecture can be violated in charged curved spacetimes Leon ; Bon .
The main goal of the present compact paper is to clarify the status of the Thorne hoop conjecture in spatially regular charged spacetimes. In particular, below we shall explicitly demonstrate that the hoop conjecture is valid in charged curved spacetimes provided the mass parameter on the r.h.s of the hoop relation (1) is appropriately interpreted as the gravitational mass contained within the engulfing hoop of radius and not as the total (asymptotically measured) mass of the entire spacetime.
II Validity of the hoop conjecture in spatially
regular charged spacetimes
It has been argued in Leon ; Bon that the hoop conjecture (1) can be violated in spatially regular horizonless charged spacetimes. In particular, Ref. Leon analyzed the compactness of spherically symmetric fluid matter configurations with uniform charge densities and concluded that, taking the mass parameter in the r.h.s of the hoop relation (1) as the total mass of the system (as measured by asymptotic observers), the hoop conjecture can be violated. As an illustrative example, Ref. Leon constructed a uniformly charged horizonless ball which is characterized by the dimensionless relations
[TABLE]
This spatially regular horizonless charged matter configurations is characterized by the dimensionless ratio
[TABLE]
and, as claimed in Leon , it therefore violates the hoop conjecture (1).
However, we believe that in the Thorne hoop conjecture (1), which relates the mass parameter of the system to its circumference radius , it is physically more appropriate to interpreted as the gravitational mass contained within the engulfing hoop and not as the total mass of the entire curved spacetime.
In particular, since the exterior electromagnetic energy density associated with a charged ball of radius and electric charge is Got , the electromagnetic energy outside the charged ball is given by the simple expression
[TABLE]
Thus, for a charged ball of radius , electric charge , and total mass (energy) as measured by asymptotic observers, the gravitational mass contained within the ball is given by
[TABLE]
From Eqs. (2) and (5) one obtains the dimensionless relation
[TABLE]
for the horizonless charged matter configuration considered in Leon . Taking cognizance of Eqs. (1) and (6), one finds
[TABLE]
The dimensionless ratio (7) implies, in particular, that the uniformly charged matter configurations studied in Leon do not violate the Thorne hoop conjecture (1).
III Summary
In this compact paper we have explored the (in)validity of the Thorne hoop conjecture Thorne in spatially regular charged curved spacetimes. Our analysis is motivated by the intriguing claims made in the physics literature (see e.g. Leon ; Bon ) according to which this famous conjecture, which is widely believed to reflect a fundamental aspect of classical general relativity, can be violated by horizonless charged matter configurations.
The present analysis clearly demonstrates the fact that, as opposed to the claims made in Leon ; Bon , the Thorne hoop conjecture is valid in charged spacetimes provided that, for a given radius of the engulfing hoop, the mass parameter in the hoop relation (1) is appropriately interpreted as the gravitational mass contained within the hoop (sphere) of radius and not as the total mass of the entire spacetime.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research is supported by the Carmel Science Foundation. I would like to thank Yael Oren, Arbel M. Ongo, Ayelet B. Lata, and Alona B. Tea for stimulating discussions.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1(1) K. S. Thorne, in Magic without Magic: John Archibald Wheeler , edited by J. Klauder (Freeman, San Francisco, 1972).
- 2(2) C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973).
- 3(3) We shall use natural units in which G = c = ℏ = 1 𝐺 𝑐 Planck-constant-over-2-pi 1 G=c=\hbar=1 .
- 4(4) I. H. Redmount, Phys. Rev. D 27 , 699 (1983).
- 5(5) A. M. Abrahams, K. R. Heiderich, S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. D 46 , 2452 (1992).
- 6(6) S. Hod, Phys. Lett. B 751 , 241 (2015) [ar Xiv:1511.03665].
- 7(7) J. P. de León, Gen. Relativ. and Grav. 19 , 289 (1987).
- 8(8) W. B. Bonnor, Phys. Lett. A 99 , 424 (1983).
