# How to Optimally Constrain Galaxy Assembly Bias: Supplement Projected   Correlation Functions with Count-in-cells Statistics

**Authors:** Kuan Wang (1), Yao-Yuan Mao (1), Andrew R. Zentner (1), Frank C. van, den Bosch (2), Johannes U. Lange (2), Chad M. Schafer (3), Antonia S., Villarreal (4), Andrew P. Hearin (4), and Duncan Campbell (3) ((1) U., Pittsburgh, (2) Yale, (3) Carnegie Mellon, (4) Argonne)

arXiv: 1903.09656 · 2022-07-22

## TL;DR

This paper investigates how combining traditional galaxy clustering and lensing measurements with count-in-cells statistics can more effectively constrain galaxy assembly bias, improving understanding of galaxy-halo connections.

## Contribution

It demonstrates that count-in-cells statistics provide more efficient constraints on galaxy assembly bias than traditional methods when combined with correlation functions.

## Key findings

- Count-in-cells statistics outperform traditional observables in constraining assembly bias.
- Combining $w_p(r_p)$ with count statistics reduces parameter degeneracies.
- Count statistics should be integrated into future galaxy-halo connection studies.

## Abstract

Most models for the connection between galaxies and their haloes ignore the possibility that galaxy properties may be correlated with halo properties other than mass, a phenomenon known as galaxy assembly bias. Yet, it is known that such correlations can lead to systematic errors in the interpretation of survey data. At present, the degree to which galaxy assembly bias may be present in the real Universe, and the best strategies for constraining it remain uncertain. We study the ability of several observables to constrain galaxy assembly bias from redshift survey data using the decorated halo occupation distribution (dHOD), an empirical model of the galaxy--halo connection that incorporates assembly bias. We cover an expansive set of observables, including the projected two-point correlation function $w_{\mathrm{p}}(r_{\mathrm{p}})$, the galaxy--galaxy lensing signal $\Delta \Sigma(r_{\mathrm{p}})$, the void probability function $\mathrm{VPF}(r)$, the distributions of counts-in-cylinders $P(N_{\mathrm{CIC}})$, and counts-in-annuli $P(N_{\mathrm{CIA}})$, and the distribution of the ratio of counts in cylinders of different sizes $P(N_2/N_5)$. We find that despite the frequent use of the combination $w_{\mathrm{p}}(r_{\mathrm{p}})+\Delta \Sigma(r_{\mathrm{p}})$ in interpreting galaxy data, the count statistics, $P(N_{\mathrm{CIC}})$ and $P(N_{\mathrm{CIA}})$, are generally more efficient in constraining galaxy assembly bias when combined with $w_{\mathrm{p}}(r_{\mathrm{p}})$. Constraints based upon $w_{\mathrm{p}}(r_{\mathrm{p}})$ and $\Delta \Sigma(r_{\mathrm{p}})$ share common degeneracy directions in the parameter space, while combinations of $w_{\mathrm{p}}(r_{\mathrm{p}})$ with the count statistics are more complementary. Therefore, we strongly suggest that count statistics should be used to complement the canonical observables in future studies of the galaxy--halo connection.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.09656/full.md

## Figures

19 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.09656/full.md

## References

159 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.09656/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.09656