# Precise radial velocities of giant stars. XII. Evidence against the proposed planet Aldebaran b

## TL;DR

This study analyzes extensive radial-velocity data of Aldebaran to evaluate the planet hypothesis, finding evidence against a stable planetary companion and suggesting stellar oscillations as an alternative cause.

## Contribution

It provides a comprehensive reanalysis of radial velocities, challenging previous planet claims and highlighting the importance of data stability and stellar activity in exoplanet detection.

## Key findings

- Radial-velocity variations are inconsistent with a stable planetary orbit.
- A two-planet model is dynamically unstable and unlikely.
- Stellar oscillations may explain observed radial-velocity signals.

## Abstract

Radial-velocity variations of the K giant star Aldebaran ($\alpha$ Tau) were first reported in the early 1990s. After subsequent analyses, the radial-velocity variability with a period of $\sim 629\,\mathrm{d}$ has recently been interpreted as caused by a planet of several Jovian masses. We want to further investigate the hypothesis of an extrasolar planet around Aldebaran. We combine 165 new radial-velocity measurements from Lick Observatory with seven already published data sets comprising 373 radial-velocity measurements. We perform statistical analyses and investigate whether a Keplerian model properly fits the radial velocities. We also perform a dynamical stability analysis for a possible two-planet solution. As best Keplerian fit to the combined radial-velocity data we obtain an orbit for the hypothetical planet with a smaller period ($P=607\,\mathrm{d}$) and a larger eccentricity ($e=0.33 \pm 0.04$) than the previously proposed one. However, the residual scatter around that fit is still large, with a standard deviation of $117\,\mathrm{ms}^{-1}$. In 2006/2007, the statistical power of the $\sim 620\,\mathrm{d}$ period showed a temporary but significant decrease. Plotting the growth of power in reverse chronological order reveals that a period around $620\,\mathrm{d}$ is clearly present in the newest data but not in the data taken before $\sim$ 2006. Furthermore, an apparent phase shift between radial-velocity data and orbital solution is observable at certain times. A two-planet Keplerian fit matches the data considerably better than a single-planet solution, but poses severe dynamical stability issues. The radial-velocity data from Lick Observatory do not further support but in fact weaken the hypothesis of a substellar companion around Aldebaran. Oscillatory convective modes might be a plausible alternative explanation of the observed radial-velocity variations.