# The ENUBET Beamline

**Authors:** ENUBET Collaboration: G. Brunetti, F. Acerbi, G. Ballerini, M., Bonesini, A. Branca, C. Brizzolari, M. Calviani, S. Carturan, M.G. Catanesi,, S. Cecchini, F. Cindolo, G. Collazuol, E. Conti, F. Dal Corso, G. De Rosa, C., Delogu, A. Falcone, B. Goddard, A. Gola, R.A. Intonti, C. Jollet, V. Kain, B., Klicek, Y. Kudenko, M. Laveder, A. Longhin, L. Ludovici, L. Magaletti, G., Mandrioli, A. Margotti, V. Mascagna, N. Mauri, A. Meregaglia, M. Mezzetto, M., Nessi, A. Paoloni, M. Pari, E. Parozzi, L. Pasqualini, G. Paternoster, L., Patrizii, C. Piemonte, M. Pozzato, M. Prest, F. Pupilli, E. Radicioni, C., Riccio, A.C. Ruggeri, G. Sirri, M. Soldani, M. Stipcevic, M. Tenti, F., Terranova, M. Torti, E. Vallazza, F. Velotti, M. Vesco, L. Votano

arXiv: 1903.09044 · 2020-11-30

## TL;DR

The ENUBET project aims to develop a precision neutrino beamline with monitored lepton production, enabling more accurate neutrino cross section measurements, through a realistic static focusing design and potential time-tagged beam capabilities.

## Contribution

This paper presents a realistic design of the ENUBET hadron beamline using static focusing and simulation results, advancing towards a monitored, time-tagged neutrino beam.

## Key findings

- Static focusing design is more efficient than expected.
- Slow proton extraction reduces pile-up effects.
- Synchronization of proton extraction with horn pulse is feasible.

## Abstract

The ENUBET ERC project (2016-2021) is studying a narrow band neutrino beam where lepton production can be monitored at single particle level in an instrumented decay tunnel. This would allow to measure $\nu_{\mu}$ and $\nu_{e}$ cross sections with a precision improved by about one order of magnitude compared to present results. In this proceeding we describe a first realistic design of the hadron beamline based on a dipole coupled to a pair of quadrupole triplets along with the optimisation guidelines and the results of a simulation based on G4beamline. A static focusing design, though less efficient than a horn-based solution, results several times more efficient than originally expected. It works with slow proton extractions reducing drastically pile-up effects in the decay tunnel and it paves the way towards a time-tagged neutrino beam. On the other hand a horn-based transferline would ensure higher yields at the tunnel entrance. The first studies conducted at CERN to implement the synchronization between a few ms proton extraction and a horn pulse of 2-10 ms are also described.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.09044/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.09044/full.md

## References

4 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.09044/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.09044