The Unexpected Spectrum of the Innermost Ejecta of the Red Hypergiant VY CMa
Roberta M. Humphreys, L. M. Ziurys, J. J. Bernal, Michael S. Gordon,, L. Andrew Helton, Kazunori Ishibashi, Terry J. Jones, A. M. S. Richards, and, Wouter Vlemmings

TL;DR
This study uses HST/STIS spectra to reveal that the innermost ejecta of VY CMa contain strong atomic and molecular emissions originating close to the star, challenging previous assumptions about their formation in a dusty shell.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the strong K I and molecular emissions originate in small clumps near the star, not in a distant circumstellar shell, providing new insights into the star's immediate environment.
Findings
K I emission is 10-20 times stronger in ejecta than on the star.
VO is confirmed as a circumstellar molecule.
Ejecta have a nearly clear line of sight to the star's radiation.
Abstract
HST/STIS spectra of the small clumps and filaments closest to the central star in VY CMa reveal that the very strong K I emission and TiO and VO molecular emission, long thought to form in a dusty circumstellar shell, actually originate in a few small clumps 100's of AU from the star. The K I lines are 10 to 20 times stronger in these nearest ejecta than on the star. The observations also confirm VO as a circumstellar molecule. In this letter we discuss the spectra of the features, their motions and ages, and the identification of the molecular emission. The strength of the atomic and molecular features in the small clumps present an astrophysical problem for the excitation process. We show that the clumps must have a nearly clear line of sight to the star's radiation.
| Object | K I FluxesaaThe fluxes here are measured in a aperture. The clumps are somewhat larger. | K I em Vel | K I abs Vel | Abs. Lines Vel. | Object | Trans Vel. | Direct. | Orient. | Total Vel. | Dist. | Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | ergs cm-2 s-1 | km s-1 | km s-1 | km s-1 | Name | km s-1 | deg | deg | km s-1 | AU | yr |
| Star | 6.7 , 3.0 | 50.8, 59.2 | 9.0, 4.7 | 67.1(21) | |||||||
| W1 knot A | 7.2 , 6.5 | 42.6, 44.0 | -12.5, -10.9 | 57.7(17) | 21.6 4 | -45.6 6 | -28 5 | 24.6 4.5 | 390 | 77 14 (1922) | |
| W1 knot B | 8.1 , 8.4 | 45.8, 46.0 | -16.4, | 67.7(15) | 18.9 6 | -14 12 | -25 6 | 21.5 6 | 300 | 67 20 (1932) | |
| W2 knot | 5.0 , 5.2 | 47.3, 46.0 | -22, -24.5 | 76.0(13) | 32.6 10 | -43 10 | -15 5 | 32.6 10 | 640 | 94 28 (1905) | |
| E1 A | 6.1 , 1.1 | 45.4, 45.2 | 0.4, -1.5 | 81.5(15) | 27.4 5 | 50 8 | -19 4 | 29.0 6 | 590 | 98 20 (1901) | |
| E1 B | 5.3 , 6.5 | 47.3, 44.8 | -5, -3.9 |
| Vacuum Wavelength Å | Lab Vacuum Wavelength Å | Identification | ReferenceaaReferences 1) Wallerstein (1971), 2) Ram et al. (1999), 3) Wallerstein & Gonzalez (2001), 4) Keenan & Schroeder (1952) 5) Adam et al. (1995) 6) Simard & Hackett (1991) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7592.8 | 7591.5bbApproximate R-branch bandhead | TiO A-X R3 (0,1) | 1, 2 |
| 7631.0 | 7629.9bbApproximate R-branch bandhead | TiO A-X R2 (0,1) | This work, 2 |
| 7668.1 | 7667.0 | K I | 1 |
| 7675.1 | 7673.7bbApproximate R-branch bandhead | TiO A-X R1 (0,1) | 1, 2 |
| 7702.23 | 7701.10 | K I | 1 |
| 7708.4 | 7707.1bbApproximate R-branch bandhead | TiO A-X 2 | 1,2 |
| 7753.0 | 7751.6bbApproximate R-branch bandhead | TiO A-X R1 (1,2) | This work, 2 |
| 7786.0 | 7785.0bbApproximate R-branch bandhead | TiO A-X R2 (2,3) | 2, 3 |
| 7803.4 | 7802.38 | Rb I | 1 |
| 7831.7 | 7830.3bbApproximate R-branch bandhead | TiO A-X R1 (2,3) | 2,3 |
| 7854.7 | 7853.2bbApproximate R-branch bandhead | VO B-X (0,0) | This work, 4, 5 |
| 7869.2 | 7867ddBlended branches | VO B-X (0,0) | 1, 4, 5 |
| 7901.3ccBlended feature | 7899ddBlended branches | VO B-X (0,0) | This work, 4,5 |
| 7913.8 | 7912.3eeQ-branch bandhead | VO B-X (0,0) | 1, 4, 5 |
| 7922.7 | 7920ddBlended branches | VO B-X (0,0) | This work, 4, 5 |
| 7943.4 | 7940ddBlended branches | VO B-X (0,0) | 1, 4, 5 |
| 7951.5ccBlended feature | 7949.8 | Rb I + VOccBlended feature | 1 |
| 7964.5 | 7963ddBlended branches | VO B-X (1,1) | This work, 4, 5 |
| 7979.8ccBlended feature | 7978ddBlended branches | VO B-X (1,1) | This work, 4, 5 |
| 7988.9 | 7987ddBlended branches | VO B-X (1,1) | This work, 4, 5 |
| 8438.15 | unknown | ||
| 8448.2 | 8446.4ffEstimate of Q-branch maximum | TiO E-X (0,0) | This work, 6 |
| 8456.8 | 8455.6ffEstimate of Q-branch maximum | TiO E-X (0,0) | This work, 6 |
| 8467.2 | 8466.1ffEstimate of Q-branch maximum | TiO E-X (0,0) | This work, 6 |
| 8476.7 | 8475ddBlended branches | TiO E-X (0,0) | This work, 6 |
| 8541.8 | 8540ddBlended branches | VO B-X (0,1) | This work, 4, 5 |
| 8594.6 | 8593ddBlended branches | VO B-X (0,1) | This work, 4, 5 |
| 8608.2 | 8607ddBlended branches | VO B-X (0,1) | This work, 4, 5 |
| 8628.7 | 8627ddBlended branches | VO B-X (0,1) | This work, 4, 5 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
The Unexpected Spectrum of the Innermost Ejecta of the Red Hypergiant
VY CMa111Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555.
Roberta M. Humphreys
Minnesota Institute for Astrophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
L. M. Ziurys
Departments of Astronomy and Chemistry, University of Arizona
J. J. Bernal
Department of Chemistry, University of Arizona
Michael S. Gordon
USRA-SOFIA Science Center, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
L. Andrew Helton
USRA-SOFIA Science Center, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
Kazunori Ishibashi
Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan
Terry J. Jones
Minnesota Institute for Astrophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
A. M. S. Richards
Jodrell Bank, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, UK
Wouter Vlemmings
Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, 439 92, Onsala, Sweden
Abstract
HST/STIS spectra of the small clumps and filaments closest to the central star in VY CMa reveal that the very strong K I emission and TiO and VO molecular emission, long thought to form in a dusty circumstellar shell, actually originate in a few small clumps 100’s of AU from the star. The K I lines are 10 to 20 times stronger in these nearest ejecta than on the star. The observations also confirm VO as a circumstellar molecule. In this letter we discuss the spectra of the features, their motions and ages, and the identification of the molecular emission. The strength of the atomic and molecular features in the small clumps present an astrophysical problem for the excitation process. We show that the clumps must have a nearly clear line of sight to the star’s radiation.
circumstellar matter — stars: individual (VY Canis Majoris) — stars: massive — stars: mass-loss — stars: winds, outflows – ISM: molecules — line: identification
††facilities: HST(STIS)
1 Introduction
The red hypergiant VY CMa is the most extreme known case of stellar surface activity in terms of energy, mass outflow, and size scale. It is one of the strongest 10–20 m sources in the sky, with powerful maser activity, an unusual set of molecular features, the strongest known K I emission, and other rare characteristics. This unique combination of traits makes it one of the most important objects for understanding episodic mass loss and stellar activity. Unfortunately, ground-based spectra do not resolve the dust-formation zone and the geometry of the inner ejecta. In this paper we report HST/STIS spectroscopy with spatial resolution 01. Unexpectedly, these data reveal that molecular and K I emission are concentrated in a few bright knots, 0.3″from the star, rather than being distributed in a dusty circumstellar envelope.
Earlier multi-wavelength HST/WFPC2 images revealed a circumstellar environment with numerous knots, arcs and prominence-like loops visible by scattered light (Smith et al., 2001). Using transverse motions measured from second epoch images plus ground-based Doppler velocities (Humphreys et al. 2005, Paper I), we mapped the 3D morphology of the ejecta and showed that these features were both spatially and kinematically distinct from the surrounding nebulosity (Humphreys et al. 2007 (PaperII), Jones et al. 2007). They were ejected at different times over several hundred years in different directions, apparently by localized processes from different regions on the star.
Mass estimates from surface photometry in the HST images and from near and mid-IR imaging and polarimetry of the SW Clump, yield minimum masses (dust + gas) of 5 10*-3* M*⊙* (Shenoy et al., 2013; Gordon et al, 2019). ALMA sub-millimeter observations reveal prominent dust components 05 from the star with the brightest (Clump C) having a total mass of at least 2.5 10*-3* M*⊙* (O’Gorman et al., 2015). More recent ALMA measurements of Clump C yield a dust mass alone of 1.2 10*-3* M*⊙, implying a total mass of 0.1 M⊙* (Vlemmings et al., 2017). These measurements imply short term, high mass loss in separate events over several hundred years.
The mass loss mechanism for red supergiants is not understood. Leading processes include radiation pressure on grains, pulsation and convection, with convection being the most promising. The prominent arcs and dusty clumps in VY CMa provide clues to an additional mechanism, surface activity and magnetic fields. The presence of magnetic fields is supported by the Zeeman splitting and polarization of the masers in its circumstellar ejecta (Vlemmings et al., 2002, 2003, 2005; Shinnaga et al., 2017). Recent ALMA continuum observations (Vlemmings et al., 2017) reveal polarized dust emission from magnetically aligned gains within 05 of the star.
In addition to the large-scale features clearly visible in the HST images, the ejecta are filled with numerous small condensations and filaments, suggesting that lesser events have occurred. Ground-based spectroscopy has been limited to 08 spatial resolution (Paper I). Several small dusty knots and filaments 05 from the star very likely represent the most recent mass loss events. We therefore obtained HST/STIS observations with a spatial resolution of 01 to probe VY CMa’s innermost ejecta and the frequency of recent events.
Our spectra of the star and the structures closest to the star yielded a surprising result. The very strong K I emission lines generated by resonant scattering and the molecular electronic spectra, assumed to form in the dusty envelope around the star, actually arise in the knots, not the immediate environment of the star. These observations also indicate that VO is actually a circumstellar molecule. In this Letter we focus on the spectra of these knots and filaments nearest the star and the identification of the circumstellar molecular transitions. We also discuss the motions of the knots, their spatial orientation, and time since ejection, as well as the implications for the excitation of the atomic and molecular lines.
2 HST/STIS Observations
The HST/STIS observations were planned in two visits to allow for two different slit orientations to cover the small knots and filaments immediately to the west and east of the star with three slit positions and to separate the individual knots to the south and southwest of the star with three slit positions as shown in Figure 1. The central star222The star is obscured by circumstellar dust, thus its spectrum is observed by scattered light. By “central star” we mean the bright object arcsec. was observed at each visit. Slits W1 and W2 were placed over the nebulous condensations visible in Figure 1. Although there are no obviously associated optical features with ALMA Clump C, slit E1 passed over the Clump C region and faint filaments just to the east of the star.
We used the STIS/CCD with the G750M grating at tilts 7795Å and 8561Å to measure the K I emission lines at 7665Å and 7699Å and the Ca II absorption triplet (8498,8542,8662Å). The K I lines, formed by resonant scattering, are the strongest emission features in VY CMa and are the best tracers of the gas. The strong Ca II lines are reflected by dust. The 52x0.1 slit was used for the west/east knots and filaments and the 02 slit was chosen for the knots south of the star to cover the somewhat more extended structures. At the 1.2 kpc distance of VY CMa (Zhang et al., 2012), 01 is 120 AU. After acquisition, the star was centered on the slit using a peakup in the red, and the telescope was then offset to the positions shown in Figure 1. The observations were completed on 2018 January 5 and February 11.
All of the spectra were processed using the sub-pixel modeling technique developed for the eta Car Treasury programs (Davidson 2006) to mitigate degradation of the HST’s spatial resolution along the slit. Consequently, the scale in the processed spectra is 0.0253” per pixel. Contemporary flat-field images were also obtained to correct for fringing and were processed in the same way as the science images and were normalized to be used as contemporary fringe flat-field images.
3 Spectra and Motions of the Inner Knots
We extracted one dimensional spectra of the visible knots in slits W1 and W2 and at two positions in slit E1 as well as the star with a spatial width of 01 along the slit. Sample extracted spectra shown in Figure 2. The differences between the star and W1 knot A are immediately apparent. The molecular emission bands in the 7795Å spectrum and the broad molecular emission band and atomic emission lines in the 8561Å spectrum are unique to the three extractions west of the star. The spectra of knot B in W1 and the knot in W2 are very similar to knot A with small differences in the flux level of the continuum due to different distances from the star. The emission bands are not present in the two extractions in E1. Nor are they present in any spectra extracted in slits to the south of the star.
The K I emission lines are much stronger relative to the continuum level in W1 knots A and B and the W2 knot than on the star. The total flux in the K I emission profiles is 10 to 20 times greater than on the star. All three knots show absorption components in the K I lines as does the star. The Rb I emission lines at 7800Å and 7947Å (Wallerstein, 1971) are not detectable in the spectrum of the star. The 8561Å spectra are dominated by the broad molecular feature and the strong Ca II triplet in absorption. Numerous weaker absorption lines are present due to Fe I and Ti I. The measured parameters of the K I emission lines, their Heliocentric velocities and the velocities of the absorption lines are summarized in Table 1 for the star and at these five positions.
We measured the transverse motions of the these knots and filaments following the procedure described in Paper II using our two epochs of HST/WFPC2 images from 1999 and 2005. VY CMa was imaged in four filters, F410M, F547M, F656N, and F1042M, with a range of exposure times. The images are tightly aligned in pixel space and blinked to identify any offset. We measure the x and y positions of the blinked images three times in each filter combination in which the knot or filament is identified. The measurements are then combined for a weighted mean. In combination with the Doppler velocity measured from the K I lines relative to the star, we determine each clump’s orientation, direction of motion and total space velocity and then estimate its age or time since ejection included in Table 1.
The three small condensations to the west of the star are well defined, but the more filamentary features in slit E1 are more irregular and difficult to measure. We were not able to measure any reproducible positions for B in E1. The results for E1 position A are based on just the highest quality/best measurements in one filter the F656 long, see Paper II. It is not surprising that these knots and filaments closest to the star are the most recent ejections. They appear to fall into two time epochs about 1920 - 1930 and 1900, which likely represent VY CMa’s most recent active periods.
4 The Molecular and Atomic Emission Features
Numerous atomic emission lines and molecular bandheads are present in the spectrum of VY CMa. Many of the TiO and VO transitions were observed by Wallerstein (1971, 1986) and Wallerstein & Gonzalez (2001). A bandhead of ScO was also identified by Wallerstein (cited in Hyland et al. (1969)) and by Herbig (1974). We confirm many of these past identifications, as well as new molecular bands, including the broad feature in the far-red spectrum. We also demonstrate that these molecules are clearly circumstellar, as opposed to being formed closer to the star in its wind. We thus present the first conclusive evidence for the identification of VO as circumstellar. Our identifications are summarized in Table 2 and shown in Figure 3.
We identify VO bandheads of the B-X electronic transition. Figure 3 shows spectra of the (0,0) and (0,1) vibrational transitions. A simulation of the (0,0) spectra is also shown above the astronomical data, using pGopher (Western, 2014). The simulation reproduces the observed spectrum quite well, assuming a temperature of 450 K. The complexity of the spectrum arises from the presence of fine structure and P,Q, and R branch line blending in the quartet-quartet electronic transition. Wallerstein (1971) identified some of these features (Table 3), but most are new assignments, based on the laboratory work of Keenan & Schroeder (1952) and Adam et al. (1995). Cheung et al. (1994) and Adam et al. (1995) conducted the first accurate spectral analysis of VO, and made assignments of the fine-structure components unknown to Wallerstein. These spectra are definitive evidence for the presence of VO in circumstellar ejecta 100’s of AU from the central star.
For TiO, the A-X electronic band is prominent with numerous sharp R-branch ( J = +1) bandheads with less intense P and Q features arising from the (0,1), (1,2) and (2,3) vibrational sequence. New identifications for TiO spectra are the R2 (0,1) and R1 (1,2) features, which are based on laboratory measurements of Ram et al. (1999). (The subscript on the R refers to the spin-orbit component, as indicated by quantum number , of the lower level, where = 1,2, and 3). A simulation of the three fine structure (0,1) features is presented above the data, and reproduces the observed spectra well. The simulation assumes a temperature of 350 K.
\startlongtable
In addition to the A-X electronic transition, the E-X transition of the (0,0) vibrational band of TiO is observed for the first time in VY CMa. As measured in the laboratory by Simard & Hackett (1991), this band consists of four prominent peaks, arising from strong Q-branches blended with P and R-branch transitions, as shown by the simulation above the observed data. The E-X transition has been previously reported in the peculiar red nova merger remnants V4332 Sgr and V1309 Sco (Tylenda et al., 2015; Kaminski et al., 2015). The TiO E-X spectrum was best reproduced assuming T 250 K. Note that the excited A and E states lie ∼ 13,000 cm*-1* and ∼ 11,800 cm*-1* higher in energy above the ground states. Despite its designation, the E state actually lies lower in energy by about 1250 cm*-1*.
TiO2 emission has been mapped within 1″around the central star by De Beck et al. (2015) from observations with ALMA with 02 resolution. The morphology of the TiO2 emission with LSR velocities greater than 44 km s*-1* overlaps the strong TiO (and K I) emission in the knots to the west of the star. The TiO A-X bandheads in W1 knot A have a mean Heliocentric velocity of 53.4 6.0 km s*-1*, 68 km s*-1* LSR. This spatial and kinematic overlap suggests that the TiO2 emission may originate from the same dusty condensations. But a comparable correspondence does not apply to the region just east of the star. The velocities of the TiO2 emission there are blueshifted with an LSR velocity range of 28 -43 km s*-1* compared to the LSR velocity ( 60 km s*-1*) of the visible filaments to the east, but their spectra lack TiO emission.
One feature near 8438Å remains unidentified. The line profile is quite sharp, suggesting an atomic origin. However, Herbig (1974) explained how a complex structure in an electronic transition could be shrunk down to a single apparent line in VY CMa due to the crowding of the rotational structure near the bandheads. Possible wavelength agreements with Sc I and Ca I/Ca I] all involve unlikely high level transitions.
5 A Basic Astrophysical Question – Excitation of the Strong K I and Molecular Emission in the Ejecta
Evidently the extraordinary K I doublet and the strong molecular emission, originate primarily in a few small diffuse clumps 03 west of the central star, unresolved in ground-based spectra. Our results significantly alter the existing models. In this Letter, we offer only a simplified outline of the problem333We do not discuss various semi-obvious caveats – e.g., the dependence on viewing direction, whether brightness might not imply a maximum in the gas density, etc..
K I is observed throughout the the extended ejecta via resonant scattering (Paper 1), but the strong molecular emission is observed only in the clumps to the west of the star. As our discussion below suggests, radiative excitation and resonant scattering are feasible for the strong K I doublet in the clumps. On the other hand, gas temperatures are probably important for the molecular emission. Our derived temperatures of 300 – 400 K are close to the expected dust-grain temperatures and radiation-density temperatures in the clumps. Excitation by shocks or MHD waves may be important for the molecules, but shocks have at least one disadvantage: the observed temperatures require low shock speeds of the order of 4 km s*-1*, inefficient for energy transport. Thus our measurements support radiative excitation of the molecules which originate in the clumps, but collissional process may play a role.
The K I doublet is VY CMa’s strongest emission feature, and it leads to a remarkable unpredicted result described below. With a total luminosity of the order of 4 in just two narrow lines (Paper I), it greatly exceeds the K I features known in other evolved cool stars (Bernat & Lambert, 1976; Plez & Lambert, 1994; Guilain & Mauron, 1996). As explained in Paper I, resonance scattering of continuum photons is the only likely production mechanism. Paper I emphasized that this process is a zero-sum game; we must explain why the spectrum has no strong absorption feature comparable to the observed emission – i.e., like the absorption part of a pure-scattering P Cygni profile. In Appendix A2 of Paper I, we explained how the absorption can be hidden if the dust-formation zone at AU is very inhomogeneous. That scenario is too lengthy to repeat here, but a crucial point is that most escaping photons – roughly 2% of the star’s output in the relevant wavelength range – follow multiply-scattered paths between opaque condensations. In the simplest viable model, emergent K I would have a mottled appearance with a diameter of the order of 600 AU ( 500 mas).
However, the HST/STIS data now show that most of the K I emission comes from a few condensations – for instance, Knot W1-A produces roughly 10% of the total K I flux associated with the “star image” in ground-based spectra (Paper I). Relatively little K I emission appears in the central object ( mas or 100 AU). In the only model that appears realistic to us, the small clumps must “see” remarkably clear holes in the circumstellar dust shell. We expect to publish a detailed analysis later, and here we only sketch the reasoning for W1 knot A. (1) With a diameter of 200 AU or less, located 400 AU from the star, the knot intercepts 1% to 2% of the star’s light if there is no dust between them. (2) With and K, the star radiates about 25 per Å around 7700 Å; so the knot intercepts 0.5 per Å or less. (3) Each of the K I lines from knot W1-A has a luminosity of roughly 0.3 , corrected for interstellar extinction. (4) Therefore, if other conditions are favorable, then the knot’s observed K I brightness can be attained if the incident continuum in wavelength interval Å is converted via resonance scattering in the knot, required for the two K I lines. The corresponding velocity width is of the order of 30 km s*-1*, which appears possible with an allowable velocity dispersion in a knot and the K I oscillator strengths. The main result of this exercise is that the path from the star to each bright knot must be nearly free of dust; a 50% extinction loss would increase the needed to an implausible value.
This is a remarkable result, since dust is expected to have optical depths along typical radial paths (Paper I). According to the above analysis, in a roughly -wide cone toward each bright knot. Thus, during roughly a century since the knots were ejected, the star ejected practically no material in those directions – even though it presumably rotates. The strong K I have been reported since 1958 (Wallerstein, 1958). We suspect that this may be explained in terms of the statistics of size scales and time scales in the outflow structure; but it was not expected, and it gives an unpredicted constraint on the outflow physics.
As we emphasized earlier, the mass loss mechanisms for RSGs are uncertain; and VY CMa is arguably the most significant example because it is extreme in several respects. Its localized sources of molecular emission and scattered atomic lines, reported above, were not predicted; and they imply major gaps or holes in the outflow structures formed by large-scale stellar activity. Related processes may occur in more normal RSGs. High-resolution imaging of Ori has revealed small condensations and filaments within 1 (Kervella et al., 2011). Future theoretical models of active regions must account for these observed density contrasts and size scales.
R. Humphreys thanks Kris Davidson and George Wallerstein for useful comments and discussion. This work was supported by NASA through grant GO-15076 (P.I. R. Humphreys) from the Space Telescope Science Institute and National Science Foundation grant AST-1515568 (P.I. L. Ziurys).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Adam et al. (1995) Adam, A. G., Barnes, M., Berno, B., et al. 1995, J Mol Spectroscopy, 170, 94
- 2Allard et al (2000) Allard, F, Hauschildt, P. H., & Schwenke, D. 2000, Ap J, 540, 1005
- 3Bernat & Lambert (1976) Bernat, A. P. & Lambert, D. L. 1976, Ap J, 210, 395
- 4Cheung et al. (1994) Cheung, A. S.-C., Hajigeorgious, P. G., Huanh, G., Huang, S.-Z., & Merer, A. J. 1994, J Mol Spectroscopy, 163, 443
- 5Davidson (2006) Davidson, K., 2006, ”The 2005 HST calibration workshop: Hubble after the transition to two-gyro mode”, Proceedings of a workshop held at the Space Telescope Science Institute, 2005, Oct 26-28, ed. A. M. Koekemoer, P. Goudfrooij, & L. L. Dressel (Baltimore, MD), 247
- 6De Beck et al. (2015) de Beck, E. et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A 36
- 7Dobrodey (2001) Dobrodey, N. V. 2001, A&A, 365, 642
- 8Gordon et al (2019) Gordon, M. S., Jones, T. J., Humphreys, R. M. et al. 2019, AJ, in press
