Quadratic Gorenstein rings and the Koszul property I
Matthew Mastroeni, Hal Schenck, and Mike Stillman

TL;DR
This paper investigates the Koszul property of quadratic Gorenstein rings, providing conditions under which certain non-Koszul rings of regularity 3 exist, thus answering an open question in the field.
Contribution
It establishes sufficient conditions for non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein rings and constructs examples with regularity 3 for all codimensions at least 9.
Findings
Constructed non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein rings of regularity 3 for all codimension ≥ 9
Provided conditions linking Cohen-Macaulay rings and their Nagata idealizations to the Koszul property
Negatively answered the open question about Koszulness of quadratic Gorenstein rings with regularity 3
Abstract
Let be a standard graded Gorenstein algebra over a field presented by quadrics. Conca, Rossi, and Valla have shown that such a ring is Koszul if or if and , and they ask whether this is true for in general. We determine sufficient conditions on a non-Koszul quadratic Cohen-Macaulay ring that guarantee the Nagata idealization is a non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein ring. We use this to negatively answer the question of Conca-Rossi-Valla, constructing non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein rings of regularity 3 for all .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Quadratic Gorenstein Rings and the Koszul Property I
Matthew Mastroeni
Department of Mathematics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
,
Hal Schenck
Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
and
Mike Stillman
Department of Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850
Abstract.
Let be a standard graded Gorenstein algebra over a field presented by quadrics. In [CRV01], Conca-Rossi-Valla show that such a ring is Koszul if or if and , and they ask whether this is true for in general. We determine sufficient conditions on a non-Koszul quadratic Cohen-Macaulay ring that guarantee the Nagata idealization is a non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein ring. We use this to negatively answer the question of [CRV01], constructing non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein rings of regularity 3 for all .
Key words and phrases:
Syzygy, Koszul algebra, Gorenstein algebra.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 13D02; Secondary 14H45, 14H50
Schenck supported by NSF 1818646.
Stillman supported by NSF 1502294.
1. Introduction
Let be a homogeneous ideal in a standard graded polynomial ring over a field , and set . In this paper, we study the relationship between two conditions that impose extraordinary constraints on the homological properties of , namely the Gorenstein and Koszul properties. The ring is Gorenstein if it is Cohen-Macaulay and its canonical module is isomorphic to a shift of :
[TABLE]
where and . This implies that the graded Betti numbers have a symmetry
[TABLE]
for all .
On the other hand, is Koszul if the ground field has a linear free resolution over . That is, we have for all and with . Koszul algebras have strong duality properties such as a close relationship between the Hilbert series of and the Poincaré series of over . In particular, when is Koszul, its defining ideal must be generated by homogeneous forms of degree two, and there are significant restrictions [Bac88] [ACI10, 3.2] [BHI17, 3.4, 4.2] on the graded Betti numbers of over compared to general quadratic algebras. Moreover, Koszul algebras appear as many rings of interest in commutative algebra, topology, and algebraic geometry; they include quotients by any quadratic monomial ideal, the coordinate rings of Grassmannians [Kem90] and sufficiently small general sets of points in projective space [Kem92], and all suitably high Veronese subrings of any standard graded algebra [Bac86]. We refer the interested reader to the surveys [Frö99] and [Con14] and the references therein for further details about Koszul algebras.
A particularly important motivation for the present article is that, if is the homogeneous coordinate ring of a general curve of genus in its canonical embedding, Vishik and Finkelberg prove that is Koszul in [VF93]. Building on this, Polishchuk shows that is Koszul if is not a plane quintic, hyperelliptic, or trigonal in [Pol95]. Such rings are also quadratic and Gorenstein by [Eis05, 9.5], so a natural question is:
Question 1.1**.**
Are quadratic Gorenstein rings always Koszul?
Unfortunately, in [Mat17], Matsuda shows that this is not the case by constructing a quadratic Gorenstein toric ring of regularity four and codimension seven which is not Koszul. Nonetheless, there is some evidence that quadratic Gorenstein rings are Koszul, at least when is a complete intersection or has small Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity (see §2 for a review of this concept):
- •
Every quadratic complete intersection is Koszul. This was first proved by Tate in [Tat57]; see [Con14, 1.19] for an easier argument due to Caviglia.
- •
If , then is Koszul by [CRV01, 2.12].
- •
If and , then is Koszul. This follows from [CRV01, 6.15] and more recently by [EK17] when and by [Cav00] when .
- •
If , and , then is the canonical ring of a curve by [Eis05, 9C.2] so that is Koszul by [VF93] and [Pol95].
Note that the symmetry (1.1) of the free resolution of a quadratic Gorenstein ring forces unless is a hypersurface and that is also Koszul in that case by the first bullet above. These results led Conca, Rossi, and Valla to pose the following question.
Question 1.2** ([CRV01, 6.10]).**
If is a quadratic Gorenstein ring with , is Koszul?
More generally, one might ask:
Question 1.3**.**
For which positive integers and is every quadratic Gorenstein ring with and Koszul?
Matsuda’s example in [Mat17] does not address the Conca-Rossi-Valla question since the toric ring he constructs has regularity four. We give a negative answer (Example 4.2) to Question 1.2 with codimension nine and a partial answer to Question 1.3. In fact, our main result (Theorem 3.5) provides a machine for producing lots of examples of non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein rings by deducing conditions on a quadratic Cohen-Macaulay ring such that the idealization is a non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein ring.
After introducing the necessary background on Cohen-Macaulay rings in §2, we prove our main result in §3 and apply it in §4 to give many examples of non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein rings. As a consequence, we prove the existence of non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein rings with and for all in characteristic zero, which is the setting originally considered in [CRV01].
Notation 1.4**.**
Throughout the remainder of the paper, we use the following notation unless specifically stated otherwise. Let be a fixed ground field of any characteristic, be a standard graded polynomial ring over , and be a graded ideal such that is Cohen-Macaulay. We set , where is the -invariant of , and denotes the idealization of . Recall that the ideal is called nondegenerate if it does not contain any linear forms. We can always reduce to a presentation for with nondegenerate by killing a basis for the linear forms contained in , and we will assume that this is the case throughout. We denote the irrelevant ideal of by .
2. Background on Cohen-Macaulay rings
In this section, we briefly recall some invariants associated to standard graded algebras and discuss how they specifically relate to Cohen-Macaulay rings. We refer the reader to [BH93] and [BS13] for further details and any unexplained terminology.
Let be a standard graded algebra of dimension . An important invariant of is its (Castelnuovo-Mumford) regularity
[TABLE]
where denotes the -th local cohomology module of with respect to its irrelevant ideal. Recall that the injective hull of over is the injective -module
[TABLE]
This is a graded -module where is the set of -linear maps of degree . The canonical module of is the Matlis dual of its top local cohomology module
[TABLE]
A closely related quantity is the -invariant of , which is defined by
[TABLE]
so that is generated in degrees at least . As a consequence, we have an inequality
[TABLE]
When is Cohen-Macaulay, it is well known that for all so that the preceding becomes an equality. Moreover, we say that a Cohen-Macaulay ring is level if is generated in a single degree and Gorenstein if is cyclic.
When is Cohen-Macaulay, the minimal number of generators of is called the type of and denoted by . By Grothendieck-Serre duality, we also have
[TABLE]
where and so that applying to the minimal free resolution of over yields the minimal free resolution of up to shifts, and we can therefore read the type of as the rank of last free module in the minimal free resolution of .
We will be particularly interested in the case of Artinian rings for examples, so we elaborate on how the above definitions translate to that case. Recall that the socle of is the ideal . When is Artinian, it has finitely many nonzero graded components, and the degree of the last nonzero component is called the socle degree of as . In this case, we have so that
[TABLE]
is the socle degree of . We will therefore use the terminology of regularity, -invariant, and socle degree interchangeably in this case. Furthermore, is level if and only if and Gorenstein if and only if is one-dimensional as a -vector space.
Under appropriate conditions, all of these invariants can also be read off from the so-called -polynomial of , which is the unique integer polynomial such that the Hilbert series of can be expressed as a rational function
[TABLE]
The -vector of is just the vector
[TABLE]
of coefficients of the -polynomial, where . If is Cohen-Macaulay, then, after extending to an infinite ground field if necessary, we can reduce to the Artinian case by killing a maximal regular sequence of linear forms. Since this does not affect the Betti numbers or Hilbert series of , we see that the length of the -vector is none other than regularity of , , and if is level, then .
We close this section with an observation which is relevant to Question 1.3.
Proposition 2.1** ([HM+07, 3.1]).**
Suppose that is a quadratic Cohen-Macaulay ring. Then , and equality holds if and only if is a complete intersection.
3. Non-Koszul quadratic idealizations
We now come to the central construction of this paper. Given a ring and an -module , the idealization of over is the -algebra whose underlying -module is with multiplication defined by
[TABLE]
for all and . In particular, by identifying and with and in , we view as a subring of , and the ideal generated by in has square zero.
Remark 3.1**.**
When is a standard graded algebra and is a graded -module, the idealization has a natural -grading given by
[TABLE]
for each . With this grading, it is clear that the idealization is standard graded if and only if is generated in degree one. Since is always nonzero in degree one for , we see that the idealization of a Cohen-Macaulay ring is standard graded if and only if is level.
The usefulness of idealization for our purposes is that it gives a canonical way of producing Gorenstein rings from Cohen-Macaulay rings. The following well known result, adapted here to the standard graded setting, was discovered independently by at least Foxby, Gulliksen, and Reiten; see [Rei72, 7] and the lemma preceding Theorem 3 in [Gul72].
Proposition 3.2**.**
If is a standard graded level -algebra, then is a Gorenstein standard graded ring.
Properties of the level algebra often carry over to its idealization. To guarantee that is still quadratic, we need to impose a slightly stronger condition on than merely being level. We say that a standard graded algebra is superlevel if it is level and has a linear presentation over . That is, there is an exact sequence
[TABLE]
In particular, every Gorenstein ring is superlevel since in that case. If is a minimal presentation for over , then gives a presentation for over , which is minimal up to summands of that map to zero. Hence, is superlevel if and only if the entries of the matrix of of degree at least two are all contained in . However, for examples, it will suffice to find rings such that has a linear presentation over .
Lemma 3.3**.**
Let be a quadratic level algebra. Then is a quadratic algebra if and only if is superlevel.
Proof.
There is an obvious -algebra isomorphism . We also have , and if is minimally generated by elements, then , where
[TABLE]
Assembling all of these facts together, we see that
[TABLE]
Moreover, since , this isomorphism is graded if we grade by total degree in the variables of and the . That is, , where and for all . Since is generated by quadrics, it follows from the above presentation that is quadratic if and only if the minimal first syzygies of are generated by the linear syzygies and , which happens if and only if the minimal first syzygies of over are all linear as . ∎
In order to show that non-Koszulness can be passed from to its idealization , we make use of a technical result of Gulliksen computing the graded Poincaré series of in terms of those of and . The graded Poincaré series of a finitely generated graded -module is the formal power series
[TABLE]
When , we omit the superscript from the notation and refer to as the graded Poincaré series of . Note that is Koszul if and only if .
Theorem 3.4** ([Gul72, Thm 2]).**
If is a standard graded -algebra and is a finitely generated graded -module generated in degree one, then the graded Poincaré series of is
[TABLE]
Combining this result with the above observations, we have the following.
Theorem 3.5**.**
If is is a non-Koszul, quadratic superlevel algebra, then is a non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein ring. Moreover, we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
By Proposition 3.2 and Lemma 3.3, it suffices to prove that is not Koszul. Write
[TABLE]
for some with non-negative coefficients. By the above theorem, we know that
[TABLE]
so that
[TABLE]
for all . Since all of the polynomials in the above expression have non-negative coefficients, any monomial in the support of must also belong to the support of . Since is not Koszul, there is an such that has a monomial with in its support; hence, so does , and is not Koszul. The statements about the codimension and regularity of follow from considering the Hilbert series of and the fact that is Cohen-Macaulay. ∎
Remark 3.6**.**
The interested reader may wish to consult [CI+15, 2.3] where the above argument was also discovered in the context of retracts of rings, of which idealization is a special case. Part (1) of that result shows that Gulliksen’s proof of Theorem 3.4 carries over with minimal changes to general retracts. We thank Srikanth Iyengar for bringing this paper to our attention.
4. Examples of non-Koszul superlevel algebras
4.1. Almost complete intersections
Proposition 4.1**.**
If is a quadratic Cohen-Macaulay almost complete intersection with and , then is a non-Koszul superlevel algebra.
Proof.
Since the conclusion is preserved under flat base change and killing a regular sequence of linear forms on , we may assume without loss of generality that the ground field is infinite and that is Artinian, and we can choose a quadratic complete intersection with . Set , the ideal directly linked to by . Since is an almost complete intersection, is a Gorenstein ideal, and
[TABLE]
for . As is generated in degree two, it follows . On the other hand, is generated in degrees at least so that is generated in degrees at least 2. Combining this with the fact that is Gorenstein of regularity 2, it follows that must be generated by quadrics, and in particular, is generated in degree exactly so that is level.
The exact sequence yields an induced exact sequence
[TABLE]
for . Since has a Gorenstein linear resolution, we see that for . Hence, , and has a linear presentation since it is generated in degree .
Finally, is necessarily non-Koszul since any Cohen-Macaulay Koszul almost complete intersection of codimension 4 must have regularity 3 by [Mas18, 3.3]. ∎
Recall that the graded Betti numbers may be compactly summarized in the Betti table of , where the entry in column and row is ; the indexing is designed so that the regularity of is the index of the bottom-most nonzero row in the Betti table of (compare (2.1)). This is illustrated in our next example.
Example 4.2**.**
As a concrete example of the above proposition, consider the ring defined by the ideal
[TABLE]
To see that has socle degree 2, it suffices to note that . Since contains the squares of the variables, it is enough to observe that contains all four square-free cubic monomials by multiplying by each variable. The Betti table of is given by
[TABLE]
Since , it follows that is a non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein ring with and .
Since is Cohen-Macaulay, it follows from (2.2) that the -dual of the minimal free resolution of is the minimal free resolution of up to shifting. Hence, when , it follows from the proof of Lemma 3.3 and an explicit computation of the last differential in the minimal free resolution of in Macaulay2 [M2] that the generators for the defining ideal of presented as a quotient of the polynomial ring are
[TABLE]
Furthermore, the Betti table for is
[TABLE]
Example 4.3**.**
One can show that any quadratic Cohen-Macaulay almost complete intersection with and is non-Koszul and superlevel. The essential point is that, after possibly extending to an infinite ground field, we can choose a quadratic complete intersection , and any other quadric such that will necessarily be a Lefschetz element of degree 2 on by Hilbert function considerations, and conversely, every almost complete intersection formed by killing a Lefschetz element of degree 2 on a quadratic complete intersection of codimension in this way has and . The proof that is superlevel and not Koszul is then essentially Lemma 4.2 of the recent paper [MS20].
Generalizing the preceding example, one ring of this type is
[TABLE]
for all by adapting [CHI18, A.2] to the commutative case. In [MS20], McCullough and Seceleanu consider another family of rings of this type to show that subadditivity fails for quadratic Gorenstein rings. Migliore and Mirò-Roig have also shown in [MM03] that generic quadratic almost complete intersections of even codimension are of this form.
4.2. Ideals of generic forms
In this section, we assume that is a field of characteristic zero. By a generic set of quadrics, we mean a point in a Zariski-open subset of . Five generic quadrics in four variables satisfy the conditions of Proposition 4.1, and generic quadrics in more variables provide a larger class of examples of superlevel algebras.
Theorem 4.4** ([FL02, 7.1]).**
If is an Artinian algebra with generated by generic quadrics in variables, then is Koszul if and only if or .
For an ideal generated by generic forms of degree in variables, Hochster-Laksov [HL87] prove that has maximal growth in degree , that is
[TABLE]
Consequently, we see that a ring defined by generic quadrics in variables is non-Koszul and has socle degree 2 if and only if
[TABLE]
The -vector of such an algebra is simply .
Theorem 4.5**.**
Let be an ideal generated by generic quadrics, where and satisfies the inequalities in (4.1). Then is non-Koszul and superlevel. Hence, is a non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein ring with -vector
[TABLE]
Proof.
Since is Artinian and has socle degree two, it suffices to show that . By upper semicontinuity of the Betti numbers (see [BC02, 3.13]), it further suffices to prove that the corresponding Betti numbers vanish for some initial ideal of .
Let denote the initial ideal of in the degree reverse lexicographic order. As long as does not contain the monomials
[TABLE]
we will have so that the projective dimension of is at most . In that case, the exact sequence then induces exact sequences
[TABLE]
for all . Since is generated in degree at least 3, we have for all and all . In particular, combining this fact with the preceding observations yields for as wanted.
Note that the monomials (4.3) are the smallest quadratic monomials in the degree reverse lex order. Since is generated by generic forms, we may assume that the determinant of the matrix of coefficients of the largest monomials for all the generators of is nonzero, which is a Zariski-open condition on . Therefore, after taking suitable -linear combinations of generators of , we see that contains the largest monomials in the degree reverse lex order, and these monomials must span as and have the same Hilbert function. The largest quadratic monomials are disjoint from the smallest so long as . This holds for all by the estimates
[TABLE]
and by an explicit check when and .
In the remaining cases, we cannot use the above argument. However, the case follows from Proposition 4.1. Additionally, when and , we see that has no cubic term, which implies that .
For the cases , we claim that . Indeed, we may assume as above that the lead terms of the quadrics generating are the largest monomials in degree reverse lex order . If denotes the set of exponent vectors of the remaining degree two monomials, then we may assume each quadric has the form for some .
By Schreyer’s algorithm [EM+16], we can construct a free resolution of from a Gröbner basis including these quadrics. Now, write for the number of copies of in (which does not depend on the particular coefficients of the quadrics), and consider the portion of the differential . Since we obtain the minimal free resolution of by pruning , we have if and only if this submatrix of scalars and linear forms splits, which occurs exactly when the scalar part of has rank . Furthermore, the entries of the scalar part of this submatrix are polynomials in the so that this determines a Zariski-open condition on for the vanishing of . Therefore, for generic sets of quadrics if we can show that there is at least one example with this property, and this is easily checked by a direct computation picking random quadrics in Macaulay2. ∎
Example 4.6** ([Roo93]).**
Not all non-Koszul algebras of socle degree 2 come from this construction. Roos shows that for with and
[TABLE]
the ring is not Koszul. In this case, the Betti table of is given by
[TABLE]
This ring has -vector , which cannot be realized by generic forms in 6 variables. Applying the idealization construction to Roos’ example, we obtain a non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein ring with Betti table
[TABLE]
Because Roos’ example is superlevel, (4.2) does not characterize all -vectors of non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein rings of regularity three. This raises the question of which -vectors are possible for such rings.
Theorem 4.7**.**
Over a field of characteristic zero, there exist non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein rings with -vector for all .
Proof.
For each , the value appearing in (4.2) is decreasing in and takes every integer value in the range , where
[TABLE]
Hence, there will be no gaps in the codimensions attained by so long as
[TABLE]
We claim that this holds for all . This follows from the fact that
[TABLE]
when and by an explicit check when . Thus, the construction of Theorem 4.5 yields non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein rings with -vector for all , and for all with the exceptions of . Example 4.6 takes care of the case, and slight modifications yield superlevel non-Koszul algebras of socle degree two in the remaining cases. These cases arise from ideals of the form , where is given by Figure 4.2 below and is generated by the squares of the variables appearing in the generators of . The quotients corresponding to these examples are easily checked in Macaulay2 to be superlevel with idealization having -vector for the appropriate in the list above. ∎
Remark 4.8**.**
We have assumed that we are working over a field of characteristic zero in this section in order to simplify the statements of our results. However, the proof of Theorem 4.5 shows that we obtain non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein rings of regularity 3 and almost every codimension greater than or equal to 9 in all characteristics. We only need to specify a particular characteristic for the exceptional cases that require a direct computation in Macaulay2.
4.3. More examples via tensor products
When is a non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein ring, the idealization will again be non-Koszul, quadratic, and Gorenstein with codimension and regularity increased by one. In this case, (3.1) shows that the idealization is just the tensor product . In particular, the results of the previous section show that Question 1.3 has a negative answer for all and . We can produce more examples by tensoring with other Gorenstein Koszul algebras.
Proposition 4.9**.**
Let be a quadratic ring and be a superlevel Koszul algebra. Then is Koszul (resp. level, superlevel) if and only if is. Moreover, we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
Since tensoring over is exact, tensoring the minimal free resolution of over with yields the minimal free resolution of over . As is Koszul, we see that so that is Koszul if and only if is by [CDR13, §3.1, 2]. Write for some standard graded polynomial ring . The other parts easily follow from the fact that the minimal free resolution of over is the tensor product of the minimal free resolutions of over and of over . In particular, when is level, the equalities concerning the codimension, type, and regularity of also follow from the fact that the -polynomial of is the product of the -polynomials of and . ∎
Corollary 4.10**.**
Over a field of characteristic zero, there exists a non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein ring of codimension and regularity for every and .
Proof.
If is a non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein ring and is a Gorenstein Koszul algebra, then is again a non-Koszul quadratic Gorenstein ring. We can therefore produce more examples of such rings by tensoring Matsuda’s example , which has and , with appropriate Gorenstein Koszul algebras and combining this with our results. Specifically, if we take any quadratic Gorenstein ring with , then by the Buchsbaum-Eisenbud structure theorem for such rings so that is Koszul, and tensoring with Matsuda’s example gives a negative answer to Question 1.3 for . If we take where is a matrix of variables, then the Gulliksen-Negård resolution [BV88, 2.5, 2.26] shows that and so that we also obtain a negative answer for . Propagating these negative answers and the negative answers of Theorem 4.7 by tensoring with complete intersections completes the proof. ∎
We summarize the preceding discussion in Figure 4.3 below. Aside from the seven remaining cases of codimension , one might still hope that every quadratic Gorenstein ring with is Koszul, which could explain the affirmative answers in regularity three.
5. Future Directions
Matsuda’s example cannot be obtained with our methods; there are no superlevel quadratic algebras with the right Hilbert function. It would be interesting to find geometric interpretations of our results. The initial example that inspired the results of this paper was a certain inverse system related to the Artinian reduction of a smooth curve of genus seven and degree eleven in defined by five quadrics which is projectively normal but not Koszul [SS12]. We plan to investigate this further, as well as studying how idealization relates to the parameter space of Gorenstein algebras and work by Iarrobino-Kanev [IK99] and Boij [Boi99]. In a followup paper [MSS19], we provide further affirmative(!) and negative answers to Question 1.3 by alternative methods. More recently, McCullough-Secelanu show in [MS20] that idealizing an example of Roos [Roo16] gives a negative answer to the case.
Additionally, for Artinian algebras such as those constructed in §4.2, much attention has been devoted recently to determining which Gorenstein rings have the weak Lefschetz property (or WLP); this property asserts the existence of a linear form such that the -linear multiplication map has maximal rank for all . The ranks of multiplication maps play an important role in [CRV01] and [Cav00]. We intend to further investigate how WLP may interact with the Koszul property for quadratic Artinian Gorenstein algebras.
Acknowledgements**.**
Macaulay2 computations were essential to our work. We also thank BIRS-CMO, where we learned of Matsuda’s result.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[ACI 10] L. Avramov, A. Conca, and S. Iyengar. Free resolutions over commutative Koszul algebras. Math. Res. Lett. 17 (2010), no. 2, 197–210.
- 2[Bac 86] J. Backelin. On the rates of growth of the homologies of Veronese subrings. Algebra, algebraic topology and their interactions (Stockholm, 1983) , 79–100, Lecture Notes in Math., 1183, Springer, Berlin, 1986.
- 3[Bac 88] J. Backelin. Relations between rates of growth of homologies. Research Reports in Mathematics 25, Department of Mathematics (1988), Stockholm University.
- 4[Boi 99] M. Boij. Components of the space parametrizing graded Gorenstein Artin algebras with a given Hilbert function. Pacific J. Math. 187 (1999), no. 1, 1–11.
- 5[BHI 17] A. Boocher, S. H. Hassanzadeh, and S. Iyengar. Koszul algebras defined by three relations. Homological and computational methods in commutative algebra , 53–68, Springer I Nd AM Ser., 20, Springer, Cham, 2017.
- 6[BS 13] M. Brodmann and R. Sharp. Local cohomology. An algebraic introduction with geometric applications. Second edition. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 136. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013.
- 7[BC 02] W. Bruns and A. Conca. Gröbner bases and determinantal ideals. Commutative algebra, singularities and computer algebra (Sinaia, 2002) , 9–66, NATO Sci. Ser. II Math. Phys. Chem., 115, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 2003.
- 8[BH 93] W. Bruns and J. Herzog. Cohen-Macaulay rings. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 39. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
