# A Lower Bound and Several Exact Results on the $d$-Lucky Number

**Authors:** Sandi Klav\v{z}ar, Indra Rajasingh, D. Ahima Emilet

arXiv: 1903.07863 · 2019-03-20

## TL;DR

This paper establishes a lower bound for the $d$-lucky number of graphs, proves its sharpness with corona graphs, and determines this number for specific graph classes like $G_{n,m}$-web graphs and generalized cocktail-party graphs.

## Contribution

It provides a new lower bound on the $d$-lucky number based on clique and degree invariants and computes exact values for certain graph families.

## Key findings

- Lower bound on $d$-lucky number in terms of clique and degree invariants.
- Sharpness of the bound demonstrated with corona graphs.
- Exact $d$-lucky numbers determined for $G_{n,m}$-web graphs and generalized cocktail-party graphs.

## Abstract

If $\ell: V(G)\rightarrow {\mathbb N}$ is a vertex labeling of a graph $G = (V(G), E(G))$, then the $d$-lucky sum of a vertex $u\in V(G)$ is $d_\ell(u) = d_G(u) + \sum_{v\in N(u)}\ell(v)$. The labeling $\ell$ is a $d$-lucky labeling if $d_\ell(u)\neq d_\ell(v)$ for every $uv\in E(G)$. The $d$-lucky number $\eta_{dl}(G)$ of $G$ is the least positive integer $k$ such that $G$ has a $d$-lucky labeling $V(G)\rightarrow [k]$. A general lower bound on the $d$-lucky number of a graph in terms of its clique number and related degree invariants is proved. The bound is sharp as demonstrated with an infinite family of corona graphs. The $d$-lucky number is also determined for the so-called $G_{n,m}$-web graphs and graphs obtained by attaching the same number of pendant vertices to the vertices of a generalized cocktail-party graph.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.07863/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.07863/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.07863/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.07863