Rethinking CO Antibiosignatures in the Search for Life Beyond the Solar System
Edward W. Schwieterman, Christopher T. Reinhard, Stephanie L. Olson,, Kazumi Ozaki, Chester E. Harman, Peng K. Hong, and Timothy W. Lyons

TL;DR
This paper challenges the idea that CO is a reliable antibiosignature by showing that biospheres can produce high CO levels, especially around M dwarf stars, complicating the interpretation of atmospheric data in the search for extraterrestrial life.
Contribution
It demonstrates through modeling that reducing biospheres can sustain high CO levels, and highlights the importance of contextual analysis in interpreting potential antibiosignatures.
Findings
Reducing biospheres can maintain CO levels around 100 ppmv.
Photochemistry around M dwarf stars favors CO buildup.
High CO levels may coexist with life, complicating biosignature interpretation.
Abstract
Some atmospheric gases have been proposed as counter indicators to the presence of life on an exoplanet if remotely detectable at sufficient abundance (i.e., antibiosignatures), informing the search for biosignatures and potentially fingerprinting uninhabited habitats. However, the quantitative extent to which putative antibiosignatures could exist in the atmospheres of inhabited planets is not well understood. The most commonly referenced potential antibiosignature is CO, because it represents a source of free energy and reduced carbon that is readily exploited by life on Earth and is thus often assumed to accumulate only in the absence of life. Yet, biospheres actively produce CO through biomass burning, photooxidation processes, and release of gases that are photochemically converted into CO in the atmosphere. We demonstrate with a 1D ecosphere-atmosphere model that reducing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
