Low-loss waveguides on Y-cut thin film lithium niobate: towards acousto-optic applications
Lutong Cai, Ashraf Mahmoud, Gianluca Piazza

TL;DR
This study explores how varying the oxide layer thickness in Y-cut lithium niobate waveguides affects optical loss and acoustic device performance, providing design insights for high-quality acousto-optic devices.
Contribution
It offers experimental evidence linking oxide thickness to waveguide loss and electromechanical coupling, guiding optimized design of low-loss photonic and acousto-optic devices.
Findings
Increasing oxide thickness reduces waveguide loss.
Resonators with quality factor > 1 million achieved.
Optimal oxide thickness around 1.5 μm balances loss and coupling.
Abstract
We investigate the dependence of photonic waveguide propagation loss on the thickness of the buried oxide layer in Y-cut lithium niobate on insulator substrate to identify trade-offs between optical losses and electromechanical coupling of surface acoustic wave (SAW) devices for acousto-optic applications. Simulations show that a thicker oxide layer reduces the waveguide loss but lowers the electromechanical coupling coefficient of the SAW device. Optical racetrack resonators with different lengths were fabricated by argon plasma etching to experimentally extract waveguide losses. By increasing the thickness of the oxide layer from 1 {\mu}m to 2 {\mu}m, propagation loss of 2 {\mu}m (1 {\mu}m) wide waveguide was reduced from 1.85 dB/cm (3 dB/cm) to as low as 0.37 dB/cm (0.77 dB/cm), and, resonators with quality factor greater than 1 million were demonstrated. An oxide thickness of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
