Self-Organization and Artificial Life
Carlos Gershenson, Vito Trianni, Justin Werfel, Hiroki Sayama

TL;DR
This paper reviews the concept of self-organization in artificial life, clarifying its definitions, applications across different ALife domains, and discussing future research challenges and open questions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive classification and clarification of self-organization in ALife, bridging concepts across disciplines and domains.
Findings
Clarified the concept of self-organization in ALife
Classified self-organization applications in three ALife domains
Identified future challenges and open questions in the field
Abstract
Self-organization can be broadly defined as the ability of a system to display ordered spatio-temporal patterns solely as the result of the interactions among the system components. Processes of this kind characterize both living and artificial systems, making self-organization a concept that is at the basis of several disciplines, from physics to biology and engineering. Placed at the frontiers between disciplines, Artificial Life (ALife) has heavily borrowed concepts and tools from the study of self-organization, providing mechanistic interpretations of life-like phenomena as well as useful constructivist approaches to artificial system design. Despite its broad usage within ALife, the concept of self-organization has been often excessively stretched or misinterpreted, calling for a clarification that could help with tracing the borders between what can and cannot be considered…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Cellular Automata and Applications · Micro and Nano Robotics
