# Forecasting the rates of future aftershocks of all generations is   essential to develop better earthquake forecast models

**Authors:** Shyam Nandan, Guy Ouillon, Didier Sornette, Stefan Wiemer

arXiv: 1903.07075 · 2020-01-08

## TL;DR

This study introduces an advanced seismicity model, SVETAS, based on the ETAS framework, which significantly improves earthquake forecasting accuracy by accounting for spatial variability and future aftershock generations.

## Contribution

The paper presents the SVETAS model, a novel spatially variable ETAS-based approach that outperforms existing models in earthquake forecasting using Californian data.

## Key findings

- SVETAS model consistently outperforms other models in experiments.
- Accounting for spatial variation improves forecast accuracy.
- Forecasting future aftershocks of all generations enhances model performance.

## Abstract

Currently, one of the best performing and most popular earthquake forecasting models rely on the working hypothesis that: "locations of past background earthquakes reveal the probable location of future seismicity". As an alternative, we present a class of smoothed seismicity models (SSMs) based on the principles of the Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model, which forecast the location, time and magnitude of all future earthquakes using the estimates of the background seismicity rate and the rates of future aftershocks of all generations. Using the Californian earthquake catalog, we formulate six controlled pseudo-prospective experiments with different combination of three target magnitude thresholds: 2.95, 3.95 or 4.95 and two forecasting time horizons: 1 or 5 year. In these experiments, we compare the performance of:(1) ETAS model with spatially homogenous parameters or GETAS (2) ETAS model with spatially variable parameters or SVETAS (3) three declustering based SSMs (4) a simple SSM based on undeclustered data and (5) a model based on strain rate data, in forecasting the location and magnitude of all (undeclustered) target earthquakes during many testing periods. In all conducted experiments, the SVETAS model comes out with consistent superiority compared to all the competing models. Consistently better performance of SVETAS model with respect to declustering based SSMs highlights the importance of forecasting the future aftershocks of all generations for developing better earthquake forecasting models. Among the two ETAS models themselves, accounting for the optimal spatial variation of the parameters leads to strong and statistically significant improvements in forecasting performance.

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.07075