A review and evaluation of the use of longitudinal approaches in business surveys
Paul A. Smith, Wesley Yung

TL;DR
This paper reviews how longitudinal methods are applied and can enhance the design, operation, and analysis of business surveys, despite these surveys not being inherently longitudinal.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of longitudinal approaches in business surveys and discusses their potential to improve survey accuracy and relevance.
Findings
Longitudinal methods can improve business survey design and analysis.
Rotating panel designs help estimate changes over time.
Longitudinal analysis enhances interpretation of survey outputs.
Abstract
Business surveys are not generally considered to be longitudinal by design. However, the largest businesses are almost always included in each wave of recurrent surveys because they are essential for producing good estimates; and short-period business surveys frequently make use of rotating panel designs to improve the estimates of change by inducing sample overlaps between different periods. These design features mean that business surveys share some methodological challenges with longitudinal surveys. We review the longitudinal methods and approaches which can be used to improve the design and operation of business surveys, giving examples of their use. We also look in the other direction, considering the aspects of longitudinal analysis which have the potential to improve the accuracy, relevance and interpretation of business survey outputs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
