# Aquaplanet Models on Eccentric Orbits: Effects of Rotation Rate on   Observables

**Authors:** Arthur D. Adams, William R. Boos, Eric T. Wolf

arXiv: 1903.06216 · 2019-05-01

## TL;DR

This study explores how combined effects of rotation rate and orbital eccentricity influence observable emission from exoplanets, proposing methods to infer rotation rates using infrared photometry, especially with JWST data.

## Contribution

It demonstrates that rotation rates of eccentric exoplanets can be inferred from infrared emission ratios, even when rotation is difficult to measure directly.

## Key findings

- Emission ratios vary significantly with rotation regime.
- Eccentricity and viewing geometry affect emission light curves.
- Infrared band ratios can distinguish between rotation states.

## Abstract

Rotation and orbital eccentricity both strongly influence planetary climate. Eccentricities can often be measured for exoplanets, but rotation rates are currently difficult or impossible to constrain. Here we examine how the combined effects of rotation and eccentricity on observed emission from ocean-rich terrestrial planets can be used to infer their rotation rates in circumstances where their eccentricities are known. We employ an Earth climate model with no land and a slab ocean, and consider two eccentricities ($e=0.3$ and 0.6) and two rotation rates: a fast Earth-like period of 24 hours, and a slower pseudo-synchronous period that generalizes spin synchronization for eccentric orbits. We adopt bandpasses of the Mid-Infrared Instrument on the James Webb Space Telescope as a template for future photometry. At $e=0.3$ the rotation rates can be distinguished if the planet transits near periastron, because slow rotation produces a strong day-night contrast and thus an emission minimum during periastron. However, light curves behave similarly if the planet is eclipsed near periastron, as well as for either viewing geometry at $e=0.6$. Rotation rates can nevertheless be distinguished using ratios of emission in different bands, one in the water vapor window with another in a region of strong water absorption. These ratios vary over an orbit by $\lesssim\!0.1$ dex for Earth-like rotation, but by 0.3--0.5 dex for pseudo-synchronous rotation because of large day-night contrast in upper-tropospheric water. For planets with condensible atmospheric constituents in eccentric orbits, rotation regimes might thus be distinguished with infrared observations for a range of viewing geometries.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.06216/full.md

## Figures

17 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.06216/full.md

## References

93 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.06216/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.06216