On the opposing roles of the Boussinesq and non-Boussinesq baroclinic torques in surface gravity wave propagation
Eyal Heifetz, Ron Maor, Anirban Guha

TL;DR
This paper reexamines surface gravity wave propagation by analyzing the opposing roles of Boussinesq and non-Boussinesq baroclinic torques, revealing conditions under which the Boussinesq approximation is valid.
Contribution
It provides a new understanding of wave propagation mechanisms by distinguishing the effects of Boussinesq and non-Boussinesq torques and their dependence on water depth.
Findings
Non-Boussinesq torque opposes Boussinesq torque, hindering wave propagation.
Non-Boussinesq torque vanishes in deep water, validating Boussinesq approximation.
The bottom boundary influences the two torques differently depending on water depth.
Abstract
Here we suggest an alternative understanding of the surface gravity wave propagation mechanism based on the baroclinic torque, which operates to translate the interfacial vorticity anomalies at the air-water interface. We demonstrate how the non-Boussinesq term of the baroclinic torque acts against the Boussinesq one to hinder wave propagation. By standard vorticity inversion and mirror imaging, we then show how the existence of the bottom boundary affects the two types of torque. Since the opposing non-Boussinesq torque results solely from the mirror image, it vanishes in the deep water limit and its magnitude is half of the Boussinesq torque in the shallow water limit. This reveals that Boussinesq approximation is valid in the deep water limit, even though the density contrast between air and water is large. The mechanistic roles, played by the Boussinesq and non-Boussinesq parts of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
