The role of Active Galactic Nuclei in galaxy evolution: insights from space ultraviolet spectropolarimetry
F. Marin, S. Charlot, B. Ag\'is Gonz\'alez, D. Sluse, D., Hutsem\'ekers, A. Labiano, L. Grosset, C. Neiner, J.-C. Bouret

TL;DR
This paper advocates for a space-based ultraviolet spectropolarimeter to advance understanding of active galactic nuclei, their physics, and their role in galaxy evolution through high-energy polarimetry.
Contribution
It proposes utilizing a new ultraviolet spectropolarimeter to reveal unknown aspects of AGN physics and their influence on galaxy evolution.
Findings
Potential to uncover mechanisms of matter and energy transfer in AGN
Insights into supermassive black hole growth
Understanding AGN feedback effects on galaxies
Abstract
This Astro2020 white paper summarizes the unknowns of active galactic nuclei (AGN) physics that could be unveiled thanks to a new, space-born, ultraviolet spectropolarimeter. The unique capabilities of high energy polarimetry would help us to understand the precise mechanisms of matter and energy transfer and supermassive black holes growth, together with the impact of AGN feedback on galaxy evolution.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
\undefine@key
newfloatplacement\undefine@keynewfloatname\undefine@keynewfloatfileext\undefine@keynewfloatwithin
Astro2020 Science White Paper
The role of Active Galactic Nuclei in galaxy evolution: insights from space ultraviolet spectropolarimetry
Thematic Areas: Planetary Systems Star and Planet Formation ✓ Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects Cosmology and Fundamental Physics Stars and Stellar Evolution Resolved Stellar Populations and their Environments ✓ Galaxy Evolution Multi-Messenger Astronomy and Astrophysics
Principal Author:
Name: Frédéric Marin Institution: Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550, F-67000 Strasbourg, France. Email: [email protected] Phone: +33 368 852 459
Co-authors: S. Charlot (Sorbonne Université, UPMC-CNRS, UMR7095, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, F-75014, Paris, France), B. Agís González (Space Sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research (STAR) Institute, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19c, B5c, 4000 Liège, Belgium), D. Sluse (Space Sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research (STAR) Institute, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19c, B5c, 4000 Liège, Belgium), D. Hutsemékers (Space Sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research (STAR) Institute, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19c, B5c, 4000 Liège, Belgium), A. Labiano (Centro de Astrobiología (CAB, CSIC-INTA), ESAC Campus, E-28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain), L. Grosset (LESIA, Paris Observatory, PSL University, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France), C. Neiner (LESIA, Paris Observatory, PSL University, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France), and J.-C. Bouret (Aix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, France)
Introduction
Active galactic nuclei (AGN) are extra-galactic objects observable from the nearby Universe out to cosmological distances thanks to their unmatched brightness among non-transient sources (Bañados et al. 2018). The tremendous amount of photons emitted by an AGN arise from mass accretion onto a central supermassive black hole (SMBH). Matter falling into the SMBH potential well forms an accretion disk which converts gravitational potential energy into kinetic energy. This kinetic energy is in turn transformed into internal energy (i.e. heat) thanks to friction processes occurring in the disk (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973). This is an extremely efficient way of producing radiation from the far ultraviolet (UV) to the near-infrared, with photons originating from a region not larger that a few hundred/thousand astronomical units. AGN are also powerful sources of high-energy (X-rays and gamma-ray) radiation, thermal-infrared re-emission by dust and, depending on the existence of a kiloparsec-scale jet of collimated material, synchrotron radio emission (see Fig. 1).
Although the global AGN picture seems rather understood, the details of AGN physics are still poorly constrained. The key role of AGN and the growth of SMBH in galaxy evolution is now recognized and highlighted by numerous observational studies and hydrodynamical simulations (see, e.g., Kormendy & Richstone 1995; Kauffmann & Haehnelt 2000; Sijacki et al. 2015). However, the small size of the central engine (less than a parsec) makes it challenging to spatially resolve the innermost regions of an AGN and its host galaxy with current spatial-resolution capabilities, and hence, to understand the precise mechanisms of matter and energy transfer and SMBH growth. Indeed, SMBH growth is sketchy but potentially large at low redshift (z 2, Daddi et al. 2007), while the early SMBH growth phase (at z 7) remains largely unknown (Elvis 2009). The strong radiation fields emerging from central regions of AGN or from radio-dominant jets are almost always accompanied by kinetic energy transfer. AGN have been observed to produce high-velocity winds at a fraction of the speed of light (e.g., Tombesi et al. 2010), which can extend over several hundred parsec before diluting into the interstellar medium. Winds are responsible for the radiative/kinetic perturbation of the dynamics and thermal state of the local environment (Fabian 2012). The even more powerful jets of magnetized plasma can reach the intergalactic medium, pushing everything along their path. Thus, AGN interact tightly with their host galaxies, as reflected also by the observed strong correlations between SMBH mass and properties of the host galaxy, such as bulge luminosity, mass and velocity dispersion (e.g., Kormendy & Ho 2013), and by the need for an energetic (feedback) process able to remove or heat gas in massive galaxies to prevent further star formation (see e.g., Kauffmann & Haehnelt 2000). Indeed, AGN hosts are, on average, more massive, compact, centrally peaked, and pressure-supported than non-active galaxies. They appear to lie in a transition region between star-forming and non-star-forming galaxies (Sanchez et al. 2018), indicating that AGN are in the process of halting/quenching star formation, effectively transforming galaxies between different families (Silk & Rees 1998). This brings a crucial question: how does AGN feedback on galaxy evolution actually work?
Significant progress in these fields was achieved thanks to the advent of high-resolution X-ray grating spectrometers (Chandra/LETGS, Chandra/HETGS, XMM-Newton/RGS), high-angular resolution imaging using either large radio array (ALMA, VLA) or adaptive optics in high-contrast (VLT, Keck), timing information (WHT/ULTRACAM, GBT/ARCONS), and interferometry (VLBI, VLBA). Yet, all these techniques are intrinsically limited by their lack of sensitivity to the morphology of the emitting/reprocessing regions and the intensity and configuration of the magnetic field. Polarimetry, on the other hand, is extremely sensitive to the geometry and magnetic-field properties of the light source. Unlike spectroscopy, which is limited by the physical size of the emitting region, polarimetry allows us to probe spatially-unresolved volumes and determine with precision their geometrical and magnetic topologies. Additionally, polarimetry provides information about matter composition, temperature, and velocity, which complements that obtainable via other techniques (most notably high-resolution spectroscopy). Hence, new polarimetric observations using state-of-the-art polarimeters promise us the strongest constraints on the physical parameters controlling SMBH growth, AGN radiative outputs and their impact on galaxy evolution.
Probing the spatially unresolved central engine with ultraviolet spectropolarimetry
Some key signatures of accretion disks can be revealed only in polarized light, and with higher contrast at ultraviolet than at longer wavelengths. Specifically, models of disk atmospheres usually assume Compton scattering in an electron-filled plasma, resulting in inclination-dependent polarization signatures (up to 10%, see e.g., Chandrasekhar 1960). Yet optical polarization is detected at less than a percent, and parallel to the radio jets if any (Stockman et al. 1979). Whether these low levels can be attributed to dominant absorption opacity (Laor & Netzer 1989) or complete Faraday depolarization (Agol & Blaes 1996) is unclear. This degeneracy can be broken by looking at the numerous UV lines that are formed in the innermost AGN regions (e.g, Ly 1216, C ii 1335, C iv 1549, Mg ii 2800 …). These lines are the key to understanding UV polarization, and only observations with high signal-to-noise ratio and high spectral resolution can distinguish between the two effects. If absorption opacity is responsible for the low continuum polarization we detect, the line profiles should also show a significant drop in polarization. High-resolution spectropolarimetry is thus mandatory if we want to better understand the immediate vicinity of SMBH. This requires a space telescope with a large collecting area (e.g. LUVOIR) able to provide UV spectropolarimetry.
At larger distances from the accretion disk, but still at (sub)parsec scale, the role and origin of the gas and dust reservoir situated along the disk plane must also be investigated. Is matter being transferred from the host to the AGN, or is this dusty medium outflowing from the accretion disk? Interestingly, in our Galaxy, dust extinction, which is highest in the UV, shows a local peak near 2175 Å (Stecher & Donn 1965). The strength of this feature varies from galaxy to galaxy: it is weaker in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds than in the Galaxy and almost never observed in AGN (Gaskell & Benker 2007). Unveiling the mineralogy of extragalactic dust grains is not easy and requires high-quality extinction-curve measurements. A strong advantage for any new-generation UV polarimeter is that polarization induced by dust scattering rises rapidly toward the blue, peaking near 3000 Å in the rest frame and remaining nearly constant at shorter wavelengths (see, e.g., Hines et al. 2001). Polarimetry at short wavelengths can thus discriminate between dust scattering and wavelength-independent electron scattering. Information about the associated polarization position angle would also set tight constraints on the dust location. Indeed, the decomposition of an AGN spectral energy distribution suggests that the mid-infrared component corresponds to equatorial emission, approximately aligned with the plane of the inner accretion disk, while the weaker near-infrared peak might be associated with hot dust in the inner polar region. This picture has been challenged recently by the finding in some AGN that the bulk of infrared emission originates from the polar region above the circumnuclear dust, where only little dust should be present (e.g., Asmus et al. 2016). Polarimetric observations in a band little affected by starlight dilution (e.g., the UV band) should help us determine where the polarized signal comes from: a polarization angle parallel to the radio axis would originate primarily from an equatorial dust distribution, and a perpendicular polarization angle primarily from a polar dust component (Lopez-Rodriguez et al. 2018). Such finding would provide strong constraints on evolutionary models of AGN, the origin and geometries of dusty winds, and the energy and kinetic budgets of galactic enrichment.
Polarimetric measurements can not only probe the dust composition in extragalactic objects, but also help us determine magnetic-field topology and strength. Theory predicts that paramagnetic grains will be aligned with their longer axes perpendicular to the local magnetic field if exposed to magnetic or anisotropic-radiation fields with wavelengths less than the grain diameter (Lazarian & Hoang 2007). Therefore, the UV band can not only selectively trace the smallest dust grains, allowing better characterization of AGN dust composition, but since polarization degree is predicted to be proportional to magnetic-field strength, UV polarimetry would enable first measurements of the intensity and direction of the magnetic field on parsec scales around an AGN core (Hoang et al. 2014). Also, radiative pumping of fine-structure levels in atoms and ions in a magnetic field is expected to give rise to polarized line emission. A number of prominent UV lines are predicted to show significant polarization following that mechanism, providing a means of tracing the magnetic field in hot AGN gas on sub-parsec scales (Yan & Lazarian 2008). On larger scales, synchrotron polarization from prominent jets can also teach us about the evolution of the magnetic-field configuration. As an example, polarization measurements of Fanaroff-Riley class I AGN indicate that the component of the magnetic field projected on the plane of the sky is first parallel to the axis of the jet close to the central engine, and then becomes transverse at larger distances (Laing et al. 2011). The transition region, controlled by poorly constrained physical processes, can be investigated only with polarimetry. Finally, not only does polarization probe the magnetic-field structure of jets, serving as a hydrodynamic tracer of shocks, bends, and shear, but it also probes the medium through which it propagates by encoding the signature of Faraday effects along the line of sight (Homan 2005).
AGN outflows and their impact on the host galaxy
Dissipative processes in the accretion disk transfer matter inward, angular momentum outward, and heat up the disk. Magnetic-field lines from the inner part of the accretion disk cross the event horizon of the black hole and are wound up by its spin, launching Poynting flux-dominated outflows (see, e.g., Blandford & Znajek 1977). The resulting jets tend to be collimated for a few parsecs and dilute in giant lobes on kilo-parsec scales. Relativistic electrons traveling in ordered magnetic fields are responsible for the high polarization we detect (of the order of 40–60%, see e.g., Thomson et al. 1995). Interestingly, the continuum polarization degree and angle are extremely sensitive to the strength and direction of the magnetic field, and to the charge distribution. A high-energy polarimeter would be able to probe in detail the magnetic configuration of such jets by measuring the electron-beam polarization in different regions. If a jet is inclined toward the observer (blazar-like objects), a non-thermal spectral energy distribution will be observed, with a low-energy broadband peak in the radio-to-UV wavelength range. Comparing the observed high-energy polarization degree of blazars to leptonic, hadronic or alternative jet models will enable better constraints on the composition and lifetimes of particles in the plasma (Zhang 2017). Since jets are also responsible for ion and neutrino emission, they are valuable sources to understand how cosmic rays are produced.
In addition to jets, strong outflows will be important targets for future high-resolution polarimeters. At redshifts greater than 1.5–2.0, a sub-category of AGN, called Broad-Absorption-Line quasars (BAL QSO), exhibit very broad absorption features in UV resonant lines (Ly, C iv, Si iv). The gas outflows producing these signatures presumably contribute to the enrichment of the AGN host galaxies. BAL QSO are particularly interesting as they tend to have high polarization degrees ( 1%, e.g., Ogle et al. 1999), which can be used to constrain wind geometry (Young et al. 2007). These BAL QSO are believed to be the high-redshift analogues of more nearby, polar-scattered Seyfert galaxies, whose UV and optical emission can be explored with spatial polarimeters. High-resolution spectropolarimetry, achievable from space with a telescope with large collecting area (e.g. LUVOIR), would provide new constraints on wind kinematics, for the first time from UV resonance lines, similarly to what has been achieved by Young et al. (2007) using the H line. UV polarimetry, in combination with optical data, would enable the first detailed and consistent picture of the launch of outflowing winds in targets which we can resolve spatially (a goal unachievable with higher-redshift targets).
AGN also have a strong impact on the star-formation and chemical-evolution histories of their host galaxies. When an AGN episode onsets in a galaxy, the radiative and kinetic power transferred from the AGN to the host can easily quench, suppress or re-activate star formation, profoundly altering the whole galaxy (see Fig. 2 and Wagner et al. 2012). The extent to which the AGN impacts on its host through this feedback is largely unknown. Polarization is needed to quantitatively determine the AGN contribution to feedback by measuring the broadband synchrotron (de)polarization signatures. As summarized by Mao et al. (2014), at radio wavelengths, minimal AGN contribution would result in polarized emission from a geometrically thin layer located at the top of the jet lobes, while a major contribution to star formation/quenching would result in large-scale, diffuse Faraday signatures detectable in polarization. In addition to broadband polarimetry, high-resolution spectropolarimetry can bring valuable information about the processes acting on star formation thanks to the Zeeman effect associated with intense local magnetic fields. The star formation episode can be probed through spectral-line polarization, such as achieved for the starburst galaxy NGC 1808 using the H line (Scarrott et al. 1993). Extended surveys of emission-line polarization compared to other AGN activity indicators across the UV/visible spectrum can help us quantify in this way the impact of AGN feedback on the evolutionary path of galaxies.
References
Agol, E., & Blaes, O. 1996, MNRAS, 282, 965
Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. 1977, MNRAS, 179, 433
Bañados, E., Venemans, B. P., Mazzucchelli, C., et al. 2018, Nature, 553, 473
Chandrasekhar, S. 1960, New York: Dover, 1960
Daddi, E., Alexander, D. M., Dickinson, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 173
Elvis, M. 2009, astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, 2010
Fabian, A. C. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 455
Gaskell, C. M., & Benker, A. J. 2007, arXiv:0711.1013
George, K., Joseph, P., Mondal, C., et al. 2018, A&A, 613, L9
Hines, D. C., Schmidt, G. D., Gordon, K. D., et al. 2001, ApJ, 563, 512
Hoang, T., Lazarian, A., & Martin, P. G. 2014, ApJ, 790, 6
Homan, D. C. 2005, Future Directions in High Resolution Astronomy, 340, 133
Kauffmann, G., & Haehnelt, M. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 576
Kishimoto, M., Antonucci, R., Blaes, O., et al. 2008, Nature, 454, 492
Kormendy, J., & Richstone, D. 1995, ARA&A, 33, 581 Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511
Laing, R. A., Guidetti, D., Bridle, A. H., Parma, P., & Bondi, M. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2789
Lamy, H., & Hutsemékers, D. 2004, A&A, 427, 107
Laor, A., & Netzer, H. 1989, MNRAS, 238, 897
Lazarian, A., & Hoang, T. 2007, ApJL, 669, L77
Lazarian, A., & Hoang, T. 2008, ApJL, 676, L25
Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Alonso-Herrero, A., Diaz-Santos, T., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2350
Mao, S. A., Banfield, J., Gaensler, B., et al. 2014, arXiv:1401.1875
Marin, F. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 3679
Ogle, P. M., Cohen, M. H., Miller, J. S., et al. 1999, ApJs, 125, 1
Sánchez, S. F., Avila-Reese, V., Hernandez-Toledo, H., et al. 2018, RMxAA, 54, 217
Scarrott, S. M., Draper, P. W., Stockdale, D. P., & Wolstencroft, R. D. 1993, MNRAS, 264, L7
Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337
Sijacki, D., Vogelsberger, M., Genel, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 575 Silk, J., & Rees, M. J. 1998, A&A, 331, L1
Stecher, T. P., & Donn, B. 1965, ApJ, 142, 1681
Stockman, H. S., Angel, J. R. P., & Miley, G. K. 1979, ApJL, 227, L55
Thomson, R. C., Robinson, D. R. T., Tanvir, N. R., Mackay, C. D., & Boksenberg, A. 1995, MNRAS, 275, 921
Tombesi, F., Cappi, M., Reeves, J. N., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, A57
Wagner, A. Y., Bicknell, G. V., & Umemura, M. 2012, ApJ, 757, 136
Young, S., Axon, D. J., Robinson, A., Hough, J. H., & Smith, J. E. 2007, Nature, 450, 74
Zhang, H. 2017, Galaxies, 5, 32
