Picard groups, pull back and class groups
Kalyan Banerjee, Azizul Hoque

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between the Picard group of a certain affine algebraic surface over $Q$, its pullback properties, and the class groups of quadratic fields, providing new insights into torsion line bundles and their arithmetic implications.
Contribution
It demonstrates that non-trivial torsion line bundles in the relative Picard group can be pulled back to ideal classes of quadratic fields with arbitrarily large order, answering a question by Agboola and Pappas.
Findings
Torsion line bundles can be pulled back to ideal classes in quadratic fields.
The Picard group of fibers remains stable over a Zariski open subset.
Existence of elements of odd order in class groups of imaginary quadratic fields.
Abstract
Let be a certain affine algebraic surface over such that it admits a regular map to . We show that any non-trivial torsion line bundle in the relative Picard group can be pulled back to ideal classes of quadratic fields whose order can be made sufficiently large. This gives an affirmative answer to a question raised by Agboola and Pappas, in case of affine algebraic surfaces. For a closed point , we show that the cardinality of a subgroup of the Picard group of the fiber remains unchanged when varies over a Zarisky open subset in . We also show by constructing an element of odd order in the class group of certain imaginary quadratic fields that the Picard group of has a subgroup isomorphic to .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Meromorphic and Entire Functions · Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Picard groups, pull back and class groups
Kalyan Banerjee and Azizul Hoque
Kalyan Banerjee @Harish-Chandra Research Institute, HBNI, Chhatnag Road, Jhunsi, Allahabad-211 019, India.
Azizul Hoque @Harish-Chandra Research Institute, HBNI, Chhatnag Road, Jhunsi, Allahabad-211 019, India.
Abstract.
Let be a certain affine algebraic surface over such that it admits a regular map to . We show that any non-trivial torsion line bundle in the relative Picard group can be pulled back to ideal classes of quadratic fields whose order can be made sufficiently large. This gives an affirmative answer to a question raised by Agboola and Pappas, in case of affine algebraic surfaces. For a closed point , we show that the cardinality of a subgroup of the Picard group of the fiber remains unchanged when varies over a Zariski open subset in . We also show by constructing an element of odd order in the class group of certain imaginary quadratic fields that the Picard group of has a subgroup isomorphic to .
Key words and phrases:
Picard group, Class group, Hyperelliptic surface, Imaginary quadratic field.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 11R29, 11R65 Secondary: 14C20
1. Introduction
Notations: Given a point in a surface defined over , by we mean a fiber; by we mean the field of definition of ; by we mean an affine plane; for a number field , by we mean the ring of integers of .
Let be an affine algebraic surface defined over and it admits a regular map to over . One of the goals of this paper is to give an affirmative answer to the following question in case of imaginary quadratic fields.
Question 1.1*.*
Let be a non-trivial line bundle in the relative Picard group . Is it possible to some find points for which the pull back of at is a non-trivial ideal class of the number field ?
This a special case of a question raised by Agboola and Pappas in [1]. Gillibert and Levin [11] affirmatively answered the question raised by Agboola and Pappas in the case of torsion line bundles on a hyperelliptic curve. Gillibert [13] also considered a similar question in case of non-trivial line bundles of degree zero on certain hyperelliptic curves which are not torsion.
Another goal of this paper is to show for a closed point in that the cardinality of certain types of subgroups of the Picard group of the fiber remains constant when varies over a Zariski open subset in . Moreover, we show that this Picard group has a subgroup isomorphic to by constructing an element of odd order in the class group of ertain families of imaginary quadratic fields. Producing an element of a given order in a class group of an imaginary quadratic field (in fact, any number field) provides more informations about the class group than showing the divisibility of the class number of the same field. However, the divisibility properties of the class number of a number field help us to understand the structure of class group. Many families of imaginary quadratic fields with class number divisible by a given integer are known. Most of such families are of the type , where and are positive integers with some restrictions, and (for see [2, 12, 16, 17, 22, 26]; for see [7, 15] and for see [6, 14, 20, 29]). Here, we consider the family , where are positive integers and is an odd prime such that . We produce an ideal class of order in , and then we use this ideal class to show that the Picard group of the fiber has a subgroup which is isomorphic to . The main idea that used to connect the two concepts of -divisibility is to understand the fiber of the natural map from the relative Chow schemes to the relative Picard scheme associated to a flat family of projective schemes.
2. Mumford-Roĭtman argument on Chow schemes and relative Picard schemes
For a flat morphism of projective schemes, we consider the Chow scheme, of relative co-dimension one subschemes of of degree , that is
[TABLE]
Then there is a natural map associating to a in its divisor class . In this set up, we consider the following:
[TABLE]
The proof of the following theorem is based on the idea introduced by Mumford in [21]. This idea had been elaborated by Roĭtman in [23] and Voisin in [28]. This idea had been used and presented in [3].
Theorem 2.1**.**
* is a countable union of Zariski closed subsets in .*
Proof.
Assume that the relation is rationally equivalent to zero. This means that there exists a map such that
[TABLE]
where is a positive divisor on . In other words, we have the following map:
[TABLE]
given by and image of is contained in .
Let us denote by for simplicity.
We now consider the subscheme of consisting of the pairs such that image of is contained in (such a universal family exists, for example see [18, Theorem 1.4]). This gives a morphism from to defined by
[TABLE]
Again, we consider the closed subscheme of given by , where . Suppose that the map from to is given by
[TABLE]
Then one writes the fiber product of and over . If we consider the projection from to , then we observe that and are supported as well as rationally equivalent on . Conversely, if and are supported as well as rationally equivalent on , then one gets the map
[TABLE]
of some degree satisfying
[TABLE]
where and are supported on . This implies that the image of the projection from to is a quasi-projective subscheme consisting of the tuples such that and are supported on , and that there exists a map
[TABLE]
such that and . Here is of degree , and are supported on and they are of co-dimension and degree cycles. This shows that . We now prove that the Zariski closure of is in for each and . For this, we prove the following:
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
defined by
[TABLE]
We assume in such a way that . This implies that there exists an element and an element satisfying
[TABLE]
as well as the image of and are contained in and respectively.
Also if then such that the image of is contained in as well as it satisfies the following:
[TABLE]
This shows that .
On the other hand, we assume that . Then there exists such that
[TABLE]
and image of is contained in the Chow scheme of .
We now compose with the projections to and to to get a map and a map satisfying
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Also, the image of and are contained in the respective Chow schemes of the fibers . Therefore, we have
[TABLE]
We are now in a position to prove that the closure of is contained in . Let be a closed point in the closure of . Let be an irreducible component of whose closure contains . Assume that is an affine neighborhood of such that is non-empty. Then there is an irreducible curve in passing through . Suppose that is the Zariski closure of in . The map
[TABLE]
given by
[TABLE]
is regular and is its image. We now choose a curve in such that the closure of is . Let be denote the normalization of the Zariski closure of , and be the pre-image of in this normalization. Then the regular morphism extends to a regular morphism from to . If is a pre-image of , then and the image of is contained in by the definition of . Therefore, and are rationally equivalent. This completes the proof. ∎
As a consequence, one gets the following:
Corollary 2.1**.**
The collection
[TABLE]
is a countable union of Zariski closed subsets in the scheme .
3. Mumford-Roitman arguments and monodromy representation
The main idea of this section, is due to Voisin [27, Chapter 3]. We consider the case when is a projective algebraic surface over fibered over a projective algebraic curve over . Then the fibers of the map are projective algebraic curves. Moreover, the fiber is smooth for a general . We now consider the complexification of the above family. That is, we consider the map , where . Then there is a map
[TABLE]
given by pull back. The set of all images of the torsions on under is a subgroup of the group of torsions in . We now consider the map
[TABLE]
Then , where is as defined in Corollary 2.1. Let , then
[TABLE]
We consider the map . Then for any there exists a supported on such that on . If is connected then there exists a such that the map from to is onto. Therefore, if is the Zariski open set in consisting of such that is smooth then one gets a surjective map . By removing a finite collection points from , one can assume that the map is smooth and proper in the sense of underlying smooth manifolds. Hence, is a fibration in the sense of differential topology. It is easy to see that has finite fibers since these fibers contain torsion points on . In fact, the torsion points are inside , which is an abelian variety isomorphic to , the Jacobian variety of .
We now consider the first cohomology which is also isomorphic to . We also consider the cohomology classes in of the elements in the fibers of , and let be its -span. Since the this map is smooth and proper, so that the cohomology classes in gives rise to a module which is a submodule of . Therefore, the cohomology classes of the torsion points on the fibers of give rise to a locally constant sheaf over by the equivalence between locally constant sheaves and -module representations. Hence, the dimension of the vector space over remains constant as is connected. Thus, the cardinality of the finite group of torsions coming from in remains constant. This gives the following result.
Theorem 3.1**.**
The cardinality of the subgroup of torsions in coming from the fibration for each remains constant and they vary in a family.
We now consider a smooth projective curve over an algebraically closed field in the projective plane over . Let be an affine piece of . That is, is minus finitely many points, viz. . Consider the following localization exact sequence of Picard groups
[TABLE]
Then the set of all torsion points in gives rise to elements of of the form such that , where are the finite number of points that are deleted. As before, we consider a fibration of smooth projective schemes over , where is a surface embedded in such that each fiber is contained in a projective plane over and is an algebraic curve. Suppose that the degree of the algebraic curve remains constant over a Zariski open set in . For an affine piece of the algebraic curve , we consider the following:
[TABLE]
By the above assumption, this a finite-to-one map from to and the degree of this map is constant. For a given any , let us suppose the fiber contains the points . We define the set:
[TABLE]
Then as a conseqeunce of Theorem 2.1 one gets the following result.
Corollary 3.1**.**
* is a countable union of Zariski closed subsets in the ambient relative Chow scheme , where is the pullback of the family to .*
We consider the map and the union
[TABLE]
Since is connected, so that there exists at least one such that is surjective. Therefore as in Theorem 3.1, it gives rise to a local system. More precisely, for each if one considers the module consisting of cohomology classes of the elements in the fibers of the map in , then the dimension of this vector space remains constant over . Therefore, we have the following:
Corollary 3.2**.**
The cardinality of the set of in for such that
[TABLE]
for points is constant as varies over .
These points on are correspondind to the torsion elements in , where is the open complement of obtained from by deleting the points .
4. Torsion in the Picard group of algebraic surfaces
In this section, we will show that certain algebraic surfaces have -torsion elements in the Picard group. We begin section with the algebraic surface defined by
[TABLE]
over . Its co-ordinate ring is given by
[TABLE]
We now consider the maximal ideal , for some algebraic numbers , in the polynomial ring . We also consider the map
[TABLE]
which is defined by
[TABLE]
and the map which is given by
[TABLE]
Then the tensor product
[TABLE]
is given by . Further, if the polynomial is irreducible over , then the above co-ordinate ring is isomorphic to , where is the imaginary quadratic extension of given by adjoining a root of . Therefore if we consider the family
[TABLE]
then the fibers are the ring of integers of .
Let us consider an affine surface fibered over as mentioned in the beginning of this section. Then if the pullback of the fibration over , that is then this is the family of ring of integers . Consider the Zariski closure of in and the Zariski closure of the family in . We denote it by . We also consider the Chow scheme
[TABLE]
and the subset
[TABLE]
where are the points in the complement of inside the Zariski closure . Then by Theorem 2.1, we get the following result.
Proposition 4.1**.**
The set is a countable union of Zariski closed subsets in the Chow scheme.
Applying the same argument as in Corollary 3.2, we see that there exists an irreducible Zariski closed subset inside the relative Picard scheme , where is Zariski open in , such that the complexification of maps dominantly onto as well as the number of points in the fiber of this map is constant. Therefore, one gets the following:
Theorem 4.1**.**
The cardinality of a certain subgroup of remains constant as varies over . However, the Picard group is nothing but the class group of the quadratic field for some fixed integers and .
This concludes that given an element of order in , one can find an element of the same order in for some which is different from .
5. Class group of
In this section, we will construct a subgroup in the class group of which is isomorphic to . More precisely, we prove:
Theorem 5.1**.**
Let be an integer, an odd integer and an odd integer such that and . Let be the square-free part of . Then the class group of has an element of order if the following conditions hold:
- (i)
.
- (ii)
* for any proper divisor of and any prime divisor of .*
- (iii)
* when , and with odd positive integer .*
Remark 5.1*.*
By putting an odd prime in Theorem 5.1, we obtain [5, Theorem 1.1].
Remark 5.2*.*
Theorem 5.1 gives [5, Theorem 4.1] when .
We begin with the following crucial proposition on the solutions in positive integers of the following equation,
[TABLE]
where and are fixed integers such that and is odd prime number.
Proposition 5.2**.**
The equation (5.1) has at most one solution in positive integer and , except which occurs only when and .
In order to prove this proposition, we need to recall the following result of Bugeaud and Shorey [4]. Before stating this result, one needs to introduce some definitions and notations.
Let be denote the -th term in the Fibonacci sequence defined by for with the initials and . Analogously, denotes the -th term in the Lucas sequence defined by for with the initials and . For , we define the subsets by
[TABLE]
except when , in which case the condition “odd” on the prime should be removed from the definitions of and .
Theorem I** (Bugeaud and Shorey, [4]).**
Given , a prime and positive co-prime integers and , the number of positive integer solutions of the equation
[TABLE]
is at most one except for
[TABLE]
and .
We also recall the following result of Ljunggren [19] which will be needed to prove Proposition 5.2.
Theorem II**.**
For an odd integer , the only solution to the equation
[TABLE]
in positive integers with is .
We also need the following result of Cohn [8] which talks about appearance of squares in the Lucas sequence.
Theorem III**.**
The only perfect squares appearing in the Lucas sequence are and .
Proof of Proposition 5.2.
Here, . Thus if , then , and hence (5.1) gives . Therefore by putting in (II) we see that is the only solution in positive integer of this equation.
We now assume that . Then , and thus by Theorem III only possible values of are and . Again utilizing , one gets which corresponds to and . Therefore by using , we get . This shows that by (5.1) since and . Hence .
Again, if then for some integer . This shows that which is not true.
Finally, if then there are positive integers and such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
One can conclude by reading (5.4) modulo that is not possible, and thus 5.4) becomes,
[TABLE]
This equation together with (5.5) imply
[TABLE]
This further implies
[TABLE]
This leads to the following possibilities:
[TABLE]
or
[TABLE]
The first pair of equations imply which is not possible. Again, the last pair of equations implies and . Thus (5.5) gives which is a contradiction. Hence by Theorem I, we complete the proof. ∎
We now recall the following result [5, Proposition 2.1] which will be needed in the proof of the next result.
Theorem IV**.**
Let be an integer and a prime. For any odd integers and , the following holds:
[TABLE]
We now prove the following result which is the main ingredient in the proof of Theorem 5.1.
Proposition 5.3**.**
Let be as in Theorem 5.1 and let be the positive integer such that . Then is not an power of an element in for any prime divisor of .
Proof.
Let be a prime number such that . Then is odd since is odd.
We first consider the case when . Suppose for some integers and . That is,
[TABLE]
We now compare the real parts to get,
[TABLE]
This shows that and thus or for some proper divisor of .
If , then (5.6) implies
[TABLE]
Reading this modulo , we get . This contradicts to (i).
When , then (5.6) becomes
[TABLE]
As in previous case, reading this modulo one gets . This contradicts to (ii).
We now consider the remaining case when . In this case, we have . We take the norm on both sides to get,
[TABLE]
This implies
[TABLE]
Also we have,
[TABLE]
Since is a prime divisor of , so that (5.7) and (5.8) together show that and are two distinct solutions of (5.1) in positive integers and . This contradicts to Proposition 5.2
We now consider the case when . If is an power of some element in , then there are some rational integers with same parity such that
[TABLE]
If both and are even then one can proceed as in the case , and gets a contradiction to Proposition 5.2. Therefore one assumes that both and are odd. Taking norm on both sides, one gets
[TABLE]
Since and are odd, so that reading (5.9) modulo , we obtain . As and , so that by Theorem IV we obtain . Therefore,
[TABLE]
We compare the real parts to get,
[TABLE]
Since is odd, so that for some odd divisor (other than ) of .
If then (5.10) gives . This is not possible as and are positive integers.
For , (5.9) and (5.10) become,
[TABLE]
This further implies
[TABLE]
For , (5.9) and (5.10) become,
[TABLE]
This further implies
[TABLE]
This again violates our assumption. Thus, we complete the proof. ∎
We are now in a position to present the proof of Theorem 5.1.
Proof of Theorem 5.1.
Let be the positive integer such that and . We note that and . Therefore, we can write for some ideal in . We assume that is the ideal class containing in the class group of . If the order of is less than , then we obtain an odd prime divisor of and an element satisfying . Since is square-free, so that the only units in are , and thus these units can be absorbed into the -th power of . Hence we obatin which contradicts to Proposition 5.3. Therefore, the order of is which completes the proof. ∎
For an odd positive integer not divisible by and a fixed psoitive integer , the conditions (i) and (ii) in Theorem 5.1 hold very often. This can be proved using Siegel’s theorem on integral points on affine curves. More precisely, we prove the following result to show the infinititude of the imaginary quadratic fields of the form whose class group has an element of order . We apply a celebrated theorem of Siegel [24] to prove this result.
Theorem 5.4**.**
Let be an odd integer not divisible by . For each positive integer , the class group of has an element of order for infinitely many odd primes .
Remark 5.3*.*
This is a generalization of [5, Theorem 1.2] which can be obtained by considering as an odd prime in Theorem 5.4. One can prove this theorem by a similar argument as in [5, Theorem 1.2]. However for the shake of completeness, we give a proof of it.
Proof.
Let be an odd integer not divisible by , and an arbitrary positive integer. Let be an odd prime such that . Then by Theorem 5.1, the class group of has an element of order except for , where is a divisor of and is a prime divisor of . For , one gets . For any positive integer ,
[TABLE]
is irreducible algebraic curve of genus bigger than [math] (see [25]). Thus by Siegel’s theorem [24], it follows that there are only finitely many integral points on the curve (5.11). Therefore for each positive integer , there are at most finitely many primes such that
[TABLE]
As , it follows that there are infinitely many fields of the form for each positive integer . Furthermore from , it follows that for sufficiently large . Therefore by Theorem 5.1, the class group of has an element of order for sufficiently large . ∎
6. Concluding result
In Theorem 5.1, we have proved that there exists an element of order in the class group of . By Theorem 4.1, it follows that if we consider the family then there exists a Zariski open set in the base of the family such that for all , the order of the -torsion subgroup of is invariant. Therefore we have:
Theorem 6.1**.**
* has a subgroups isomorhic to for a given odd integer .*
Acknowledgements. A part of this paper was completed while A. Hoque was visiting Professor Jianya Liu at Shandong University. He is thankful to Professor Liu and the University for hosting him during this project. The authors thank Professor Dipendra Prasad and Professor Jean Gillibert for their comments and their encouragement. The authors would also like to thank Professor Kalyan Chakraborty for his valuable comments to improve the presentation of this paper. K. Banerjee is supported by DAE, Govt. of India. A. Hoque is supported by SERB N-PDF (PDF/2017/001958), Govt. of India.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] A. Agboola and G. Pappas, Line bundles, rational points and ideal classes , Math. Res. Lett. 7 (2000), no. 5-6, 709–717.
- 2[2] N. C. Ankeny and S. Chowla, On the divisibility of the class number of quadratic fields , Pacific J. Math. 5 (1955), 321–324.
- 3[3] K. Banerjee and V. Guletskii, Rational equivalence for line configurations on cubic hypersurfaces in ℙ 5 superscript ℙ 5 \mathbb{P}^{5} , 2014. ar Xiv:1405.6430 v 1
- 4[4] Y. Bugeaud and T. N. Shorey, On the number of solutions of the generalized Ramanujan-Nagell equation , J. Reine Angew. Math. 539 (2001), 55–74.
- 5[5] K. Chakraborty, A. Hoque, Y. Kishi and P. P. Pandey, Divisibility of the class numbers of imaginary quadratic fields , J. Number Theory 185 (2018), 339–348.
- 6[6] K. Chakraborty, A. Hoque and R. Sharma, Divisibility of class numbers of quadratic fields: Qualitative aspects , Advances in Mathematical inequalities and Application, 247–264, Trends Math., Birkhäuser/Springer, Singapore, 2018.
- 7[7] K. Chakraborty and A. Hoque, Exponents of class groups of certain imaginary quadratic fields , Under Review. ar Xiv:1801.00392
- 8[8] J. H. E. Cohn, Square Fibonacci numbers, etc. , Fibonacci Quart. 2 (1964), 109–113.
