On the resilience of magic number theory for conductance ratios of aromatic molecules
Lara Ul\v{c}akar, Toma\v{z} Rejec, Jure Kokalj, Sara Sangtarash, Hatef, Sadeghi, Anton Ram\v{s}ak, John H. Jefferson, Colin J. Lambert

TL;DR
This paper investigates the robustness of magic number theory in predicting conductance ratios of aromatic molecules, showing that it remains reliable despite electron-electron interactions, with some connectivities exhibiting notable deviations.
Contribution
It demonstrates that magic number theory's predictions are resilient to Coulomb interactions and screening effects, simplifying the analysis of quantum interference in molecular conductance.
Findings
Conductance ratios are resilient to electron-electron interactions due to cancellation effects.
Qualitative trends can be predicted using simple non-interacting models.
Certain connectivities show significant deviations, useful for probing interactions.
Abstract
If simple guidelines could be established for understanding how quantum interference (QI) can be exploited to control the flow of electricity through single molecules, then new functional molecules, which exploit room-temperature QI could be rapidly identified and subsequently screened. Recently it was demonstrated that conductance ratios of molecules with aromatic cores, with different connectivities to electrodes, can be predicted using a simple and easy-to-use 'magic number theory'. In contrast with counting rules and 'curly-arrow' descriptions of destructive QI, magic number theory captures the many forms of constructive QI, which can occur in molecular cores. Here we address the question of how conductance ratios are affected by electron-electron interactions. We find that due to cancellations of opposing trends, when Coulomb interactions and screening due to electrodes are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
