# A systematic study of the phase difference between QPO harmonics in   black hole X-ray binaries

**Authors:** Iris de Ruiter, Jakob van den Eijnden, Adam Ingram, Phil Uttley

arXiv: 1903.03135 · 2019-03-11

## TL;DR

This study systematically analyzes the phase difference between fundamental and harmonic features of low-frequency QPOs in black hole X-ray binaries across multiple sources, confirming waveform stability and exploring frequency-dependent evolution.

## Contribution

It provides the first large-scale, automated analysis of QPO phase differences across 14 sources, validating spectral-timing methods and proposing models for Type-B and Type-C QPO behaviors.

## Key findings

- Type-B QPO phase difference remains constant with frequency.
- Type-C QPO phase difference evolves systematically with frequency.
- Most sources show persistent underlying QPO waveforms.

## Abstract

We perform a systematic study of the evolution of the waveform of black hole X-ray binary low-frequency QPOs, by measuring the phase difference between their fundamental and harmonic features. This phase difference has been studied previously for small number of QPO frequencies in individual sources. Here, we present a sample study spanning fourteen sources and a wide range of QPO frequencies. With an automated pipeline, we systematically fit power spectra and calculate phase differences from archival Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) observations. We measure well-defined phase differences over a large range of QPO frequencies for most sources, demonstrating that a QPO for a given source and frequency has a persistent underlying waveform. This confirms the validity of recently developed spectral-timing methods performing phase resolved spectroscopy of the QPO. Furthermore, we evaluate the phase difference as a function of QPO frequency. For Type-B QPOs, we find that the phase difference stays constant with frequency for most sources. We propose a simple jet precession model to explain these constant Type-B QPO phase differences. The phase difference of the Type-C QPO is not constant but systematically evolves with QPO frequency, with the resulting relation being similar for a number of high inclination sources, but more variable for low-inclination sources. We discuss how the evolving phase difference can naturally arise in the framework of precession models for the Type-C QPO, by considering the contributions of a direct and reflected component to the QPO waveform.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.03135/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.03135/full.md

## References

44 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.03135/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1903.03135