Surfaces with canonical map of maximum degree
Carlos Rito

TL;DR
This paper constructs examples of algebraic surfaces with maximal degree canonical maps, demonstrating new geometric properties and providing explicit equations over finite fields for certain fibers.
Contribution
It introduces surfaces with canonical maps of degrees 36 and 27, using equations from fake projective planes and the Cartwright-Steger surface, advancing understanding of surface mappings.
Findings
Existence of a regular surface with canonical map degree 36
Existence of an irregular surface with canonical map degree 27
Explicit equations for certain fibers over finite fields
Abstract
We use the Borisov-Keum equations of a fake projective plane and the Borisov-Yeung equations of the Cartwright-Steger surface to show the existence of a regular surface with canonical map of degree 36 and of an irregular surface with canonical map of degree 27. As a by-product, we get equations (over a finite field) for the -invariant fibres of the Albanese fibration of the Cartwright-Steger surface and show that they are smooth.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Surfaces with canonical map of maximum degree
Carlos Rito
Abstract
We use the Borisov-Keum equations of a fake projective plane and the Borisov-Yeung equations of the Cartwright-Steger surface to show the existence of a regular surface with canonical map of degree 36 and of an irregular surface with canonical map of degree 27. As a by-product, we get equations (over a finite field) for the -invariant fibres of the Albanese fibration of the Cartwright-Steger surface and show that they are smooth.
2010 MSC: 14J29, 14Q05, 14Q10.
Keywords: Surface of general type, Canonical map, Ball-quotient surface.
1 Introduction
Let be a smooth minimal surface of general type with geometric genus irregularity and self-intersection of the canonical divisor Denote by the canonical map of and let Beauville [Bea79] has proved that, if is finite, then
[TABLE]
Only recently examples with have been given, see [GPR18], [Rit17] for and [GPR18] for It follows from Beauville’s proof that the limit cases and can only occur for surfaces with invariants
[TABLE]
respectively. These satisfy hence are ball-quotient surfaces.
Surfaces of general type with invariants and (thus ) are the so-called fake projective planes. There are pairs of complex-conjugated such surfaces, according to the results of Prasad and Yeung [PY07], [PY10], and Cartwright and Steger [CS10], who have also found the unique known example of a surface with invariants (the so-called Cartwright-Steger surface).
The only surfaces available in the literature with invariants (1) are certain étale coverings of fake projective planes and of the Cartwright-Steger surface. In order to prove that their canonical map is of maximum degree, it suffices to show that the canonical system is free from base points. Since these surfaces are given by uniformization only, this is a hard task. But recently two papers appeared, Borisov-Keum [BK] and Borisov-Yeung [BY18], giving equations for a (pair of) fake projective plane and for the Catwright-Steger surface both embedded in by the bicanonical map.
For a long time people have searched for a more explicit construction of such surfaces, so these results were received with enthusiasm. But the equations are not nice, in the sense that computations are hard even for powerful computers. In this paper we show that we can actually prove results using their equations, namely we prove that:
Theorem 1**.**
*Let be the above fake projective plane and be the Cartwright-Steger surface. Denote by the canonical map of . We have that:
There is an étale -covering such that
There is an étale -covering such that and *
To achieve this, we work with the equations of given in [BK], [BY18] to find equations for the curves that pullback to generators of the canonical system of and we show that their intersection is empty. The calculations are very demanding and we had to find several workarounds in order to succeed.
Remark: Sai-Kee Yeung’s proof [Yeu17] for the case is not correct. Recently, he has informed me that he has a new proof that is also based on Borisov-Keum equations.
The computations for the case are harder than the ones for They require the computation of equations of some fibres of the Albanese fibration of the Cartwright-Steger surface More precisely, we compute, over a finite field, the equations of the three fibres that are fixed by the action of Then we show that they are smooth, which answers a question from Cartwright-Koziarz-Yeung [CKY17, Corollary 5.3, Remark 5.6], in particular it implies that the Albanese fibration of is stable.
All computations are implemented with the computer algebra system Magma [BCP97], and can be found on arXiv:1903.03017 as ancillary files.
We use the symbol for linear equivalence of divisors, the rest of the notation is standard in Algebraic Geometry.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Lev Borisov for a useful correspondence and for providing the equations of the two ball-quotient surfaces from [BK], [BY18].
This research was supported by FCT (Portugal) under the project PTDC/MAT-GEO/2823/2014, the fellowship SFRH/BPD/111131/2015 and by CMUP (UID/ MAT/00144/2019), which is funded by FCT with national (MCTES) and European structural funds through the programs FEDER, under the partnership agreement PT2020.
2 Lift to rationals
There is a classical method for computing a rational number from its values modulo a set of primes, by combining Chinese remaindering with Farey sequences (see e.g. algorithm 2 in [BDFP15]). It works well provided the set of primes is big and none of these is a ’bad prime’. We have implemented this algorithm with Magma, the usage is LiftToRationals(n,p), where is a list of prime numbers and is a list containing the values of modulo We use it in the computations below.
3 The case
In [BK], Borisov and Keum give the equations of a fake projective plane , embedded in by its bicanonical system. It is known that this surface has an action of such that the quotient is a surface with invariants and , and with singular set the union of ordinary cusps ( singularities).
Let and be the groups such that and where is the unit ball in Computing the index subgroups of we see that there is a unique normal subgroup of such that Let We have an abelian covering that factors as
[TABLE]
Since is a subgroup of the fundamental group of the -covering is étale. This gives and The maximal abelian quotient of is a finite group, thus and then
Our goal is to show that the canonical map of is of degree onto This happens if and only if the canonical system of is free from base points. By [Par91, Proposition 4.1], this system is generated by the pullback of three curves in Let be the corresponding curves in the fake projective plane Notice that is linearly equivalent to up to -torsion, thus and then is a hyperplane section of We will find the equations of these hyperplanes and verify that which implies that is free from base points.
The curves are invariant for the action. Keeping the notation from [BK], let and define -invariant sections
[TABLE]
We need to search for hyperplane sections of of the type
[TABLE]
and such that The strategy is to work over a finite field and test all possible values of . Then after finding a solution, repeat it for enough values of , and finally use our Magma function LiftToRationals to obtain the solution over characteristic zero.
**Step 1.
**Let be the reduced subscheme of the scheme defined in [BK, Remark 2.2], and let be the hyperplane section of given by We use the Magma function Difference to show that thus
**Step 2.
**For each possibility for the coefficients , we need to check if the hyperplane given by (2) is not reduced. This is very time consuming, thus we test instead if is reduced or not. Notice that here we can remove from the equation of , because is contained in the hyperplane . Then we assume Since the degree of is we search only for the cases where the degree of the reduced subscheme of is at most
**Step 3.
**We compute this for several different values of the prime number obtaining two solutions for each and . With such data we use our Magma function LiftToRationals and obtain the liftings
[TABLE]
**Step 4.
**For each of these two cases, we need now to test all hyperplanes of the type , running over all possible values of . In order to speed up computations, we take the hyperplane of cut out by and test if is reduced or not. Since the degree of is we search for the cases where the degree of the reduced subscheme of is at most
**Step 5.
**We repeat for several different values of to obtain a list of pairs . Then we use again the Magma function LiftToRationals, obtaining the hyperplanes
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
**Step 6.
**Let be the corresponding hyperplane sections of the fake projective plane defined over We need to show the existence of curves such that Ideally we would just compute the reduced subscheme of , but our computer cannot finish this task. Our workaround here is to find the system of quadrics through , as follows. We compute a zero-dimensional subscheme of with degree big enough such that every quadric that contains must also contain . Then we define the subscheme of cut out by these quadrics, and show that (using the Magma function Difference).
**Step 7.
**Consider the -torsion divisors and If then which is impossible because there is no hyperplane through This confirms that generate the group that corresponds to the covering
Finally we check that Since the curves generate the canonical system of then the canonical map of is of degree onto
4 The case
In [BY18], Borisov and Yeung give the equations of the so-called Cartwright-Steger surface , embedded in by its bicanonical system (we keep their notation). It is known that this surface has an action of such that the quotient is a surface with singular set the union of six ordinary cusps ( singularities) with three singularities, and whose smooth minimal model has invariants and . Correspondingly there is a Galois covering
[TABLE]
Borisov and Yeung also give the equations of the unique effective canonical divisor of it is the reduced subscheme of the hyperplane of given by We let be this curve.
It is known that the surface contains a pencil of curves with three multiple fibres such that contains the three singularities, and contain three cusps each. One has where each is a fibre of the Albanese fibration of .
Since two points in an elliptic curve move in a pencil, the same happens for We explicitly compute below the pencil and show that it contains the divisor (this linear equivalence could be proved by using the fact that there is a unique elliptic curve with an automorphism of order 3 that fixes points). This implies that Consider the -torsion element and the corresponding étale Galois covering
[TABLE]
Let and be the groups such that and where is the unit ball in Computing all index subgroups of we see that the maximal abelian quotient of is or , thus and then
We want to show that the canonical map of is of degree onto This happens if and only if the canonical system of is free from base points. By [Par91], this system is generated by the pullbacks of three curves with These are linearly equivalent up to -torsion. We will compute as elements in
[TABLE]
respectively. Finally we will verify that which implies that is free from base points.
The computation of and is very demanding, we have succeeded only working over finite fields . Fortunately, we got that is the hyperplane of with equation
[TABLE]
for several different values of which suggests that it remains unchanged over the rationals.
In the next section we show how to compute the equations of and working over Then we take the equations of and over the rationals, and do the necessary verifications.
4.1 Computation of the hyperplane
Here we work over a finite field We first compute the linear system (which is of dimension 19), then the systems and , giving the curves and , respectively.
**Step 1.
**JongHae Keum [Keu18] shows that a fibre of the Albanese fibration of is numerically equivalent to where are certain irreducible curves. Lev Borisov has informed me that is the subscheme of cut out by the hyperplane Then Magma gives the prime components of this hyperplane, i.e. the equations of and
We use the Magma function IsLinearSystemNonEmpty to compute the unique element in the linear system This curve contains the three points of that correspond to the three singularities of thus it is the fibre
**Step 2.
**From the equations of it is easy to give the defining equations of but we want an equation with the lowest possible degree and not identically zero on . We use the Magma function Divisor to get a basis of the ideal of (this takes several hours to finish). We then choose one polynomial of degree , the lowest possible degree, and take the corresponding hypersurface of .
**Step 3.
**Let be such that . We compute the basis of the ideal of the divisor from where we take another degree polynomial containing such that generate the pencil (after removing the base component ).
**Step 4.
**There is one element in this pencil containing six points that are fixed by the action of After removing the base component it must be the union of two Albanese fibres, thus it is In this way we obtain the equations of
**Step 5.
**Now we compute the divisor and then we use the Magma function RiemannRochBasis to compute a basis of its space of global sections. This basis is generated by some rational functions, with numerators , and with a common denominator. These are given on affine coordinates, so we take the projective closure.
**Step 6.
**Let be the linear system generated by the . We compute the unique element of that contains and take the corresponding curve in say given by . Then we compute the intersection of with the base scheme of which is .
**Step 7.
**We want to compute the element of that contains the fibre , but we don’t have a factorization of the curve , thus we use a workaround: the factorization of the zero-dimensional scheme contains two irreducible schemes of degree 39. We guess that one of these is in and the other is in . Then we compute the element of through the first one (hence through ).
**Step 8.
**Finally we use the Magma function Complement to compute the effective divisor (which satisfies ).
**Step 9.
**We repeat the above steps in order to get the curve ().
**Step 10.
**Looking to the equations, we verify that is cut out on by the hyperplane
[TABLE]
4.2 Linear equivalence of
Here we work over the rational field.
**Step 11.
**We get the defining equations of the curves and by computing the prime components of the hyperplane of given by (3).
**Step 12.
**A straightforward computation gives the system of degree 3 hypersurfaces that contain the divisor . Note that any element of is
**Step 13.
**For we show that which implies
**Step 14.
**The fact gives thus the curves pullback to linearly equivalent curves in
Finally we check that Since the curves generate the canonical system of the canonical map of is of degree onto
5 The -invariant Albanese fibres
Working over a finite field, the Magma function gives a unique element in each of the systems and which are then the curves and We want to compute the singular subset of the fibres Since a direct computation is hard, we proceed as follows.
Consider the map given by Let be the minimal resolution of the surface One can show that is the composition of the triple covering with the bicanonical map of . This bicanonical map is birational, hence is of degree 3. We check that the images are smooth. This implies that the fibres can be singular at most at the points of that are fixed by the action. The computation says that this is not the case, thus are smooth.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[BCP 97] W. Bosma, J. Cannon, and C. Playoust. The Magma algebra system. I. The user language. J. Symbolic Comput. , 24(3-4):235–265, 1997.
- 2[BDFP 15] J. Böhm, W. Decker, C. Fieker, and G. Pfister. The use of bad primes in rational reconstruction. Math. Comp. , 84(296):3013–3027, 2015.
- 3[Bea 79] A. Beauville. L’application canonique pour les surfaces de type général. Invent. Math. , 55(2):121–140, 1979.
- 4[BK] L. A. Borisov and J. Keum. Explicit equations of a fake projective plane. To appear in Duke Math J.
- 5[BY 18] L. A. Borisov and S.-K. Yeung. Explicit equations of the cartwright-steger surface, 2018. ar Xiv:1804.00737.
- 6[CKY 17] D. Cartwright, V. Koziarz, and S.-K. Yeung. On the Cartwright-Steger surface. J. Algebraic Geom. , 26(4):655–689, 2017.
- 7[CS 10] D. Cartwright and T. Steger. Enumeration of the 50 fake projective planes. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 348(1-2):11–13, 2010.
- 8[GPR 18] C. Gleissner, R. Pignatelli, and C. Rito. New surfaces with canonical map of high degree, 2018. ar Xiv:1807.11854.
