TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that learning certain constant-depth classical circuits with quantum algorithms is computationally hard, assuming the security of quantum-resistant cryptographic problems like RLWE and LWE.
Contribution
It establishes the quantum hardness of learning AC$^0$, TC$^0$, and TC$^0_2$ circuits under standard cryptographic assumptions, linking quantum learning difficulty to quantum-secure cryptosystems.
Findings
Hardness of learning AC$^0$ and TC$^0$ under the uniform distribution.
Hardness of learning TC$^0_2$ in the PAC setting.
Conditional negative results based on quantum cryptographic assumptions.
Abstract
In this paper we study the quantum learnability of constant-depth classical circuits under the uniform distribution and in the distribution-independent framework of PAC learning. In order to attain our results, we establish connections between quantum learning and quantum-secure cryptosystems. We then achieve the following results. 1) Hardness of learning AC and TC under the uniform distribution. Our first result concerns the concept class TC (resp. AC), the class of constant-depth and polynomial-sized circuits with unbounded fan-in majority gates (resp. AND, OR, NOT gates). We show that if there exists no quantum polynomial-time (resp. strong sub-exponential time) algorithm to solve the Ring Learning with Errors (RLWE) problem, then there exists no polynomial-time quantum learning algorithm for TC (resp. AC) under the uniform distribution (even with access to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Quantum Hardness of Learning Shallow Classical Circuits· youtube
