First order p-adic deformations of weight one newforms
Henri Darmon, Alan Lauder, Victor Rotger

TL;DR
This paper investigates the initial p-adic deformations of weight one newforms, linking their Fourier coefficients to p-adic logarithms of algebraic numbers in the related Galois field.
Contribution
It introduces a novel connection between first-order p-adic deformations of weight one newforms and p-adic logarithms of algebraic numbers.
Findings
Established a relationship between Fourier coefficients and p-adic logarithms.
Provided a framework for understanding first-order p-adic deformations.
Linked deformations to algebraic number theory and Galois representations.
Abstract
This article studies the first-order -adic deformations of classical weight one newforms, relating their fourier coefficients to the -adic logarithms of algebraic numbers in the field cut out by the associated projective Galois representation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · advanced mathematical theories
First order -adic deformations
of weight one newforms
Henri Darmon, Alan Lauder and Victor Rotger
H. D.: McGill University, Montreal, Canada
A. L.: University of Oxford, U. K.
V. R.: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Abstract.
This article studies the first-order -adic deformations of classical weight one newforms, relating their fourier coefficients to the -adic logarithms of algebraic numbers in the field cut out by the associated projective Galois representation.
Contents
Introduction
Let be a classical cuspidal newform of weight one, level and nebentypus character , with fourier expansion
[TABLE]
The *-stabilisations * of attached to a rational prime are the eigenforms of level defined by
[TABLE]
where and are the (not necessarily distinct) roots of the Hecke polynomial
[TABLE]
The forms and are eigenvectors for the Atkin operator, with eigenvalues and respectively. Since and are roots of unity, these eigenforms are both ordinary at .
An important feature of classical weight one forms is that they are associated to odd, irreducible, two-dimensional Artin representations, via a construction of Deligne-Serre. Let denote this Galois representation, and write for the underlying representation space.
A fundamental result of Hida asserts the existence of a *-adic family * of ordinary eigenforms specialising to (or to ) in weight one. Bellaiche and Dimitrov [BD] later established the uniqueness of this Hida family, under the hypothesis that is regular at , i.e., that , or equivalently, that the frobenius element at acts on with distinct eigenvalues. In the intriguing special case where is the theta series of a character of a real quadratic field in which the prime is split, the result of Bellaiche-Dimitrov further asserts that the unique ordinary first-order infinitesimal -adic deformation of is an overconvergent (but not classical) modular form of weight one. In [DLR2], the Fourier coefficients of this non-classical form were expressed as -adic logarithms of algebraic numbers in a ring class field of , suggesting that a closer examination of such deformations could have some relevance to explicit class field theory for real quadratic fields.
The primary purpose of this note is extend the results of [DLR2] to general weight one eigenforms.
Part A considers the regular setting where , in which the results exhibit a close analogy to those of [DLR2].
Part B takes up the case where is irregular at . Here the results are more fragmentary and less definitive. Let denote the space of -adic overconvergent modular forms of weight , level , and character , and let denote the generalised eigenspace attached to the system of Hecke eigenvalues of an irregular weight one form . The main conjecture of the second part asserts that is always four dimensional, with a two-dimensional subspace consisting of classical forms. Under this conjecture, an explicit description of the elements of the generalised eigenspace in terms of their -expansions is provided. The resulting concrete description of the generalised eigenspace that emerges from Part B is an indispensible ingredient in the extension of the “elliptic Stark conjectures” of [DLR1] to the irregular setting that will be presented in [DLR3].
**Acknowledgements. The first author was supported by an NSERC Discovery grant, and the third author was supported by Grant MTM2015-63829-P. The second author would like that thank Takeshi Saito of Tokyo University and Kenichi Bannai of Keio University for their hospitality. The three authors would like to thank the organizers of the Math Nisyros Conference in July 2017 for their hospitality before and after the workshop. This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 682152). **
Part A The regular setting
Let denote the Iwasawa algebra, and let
[TABLE]
denote the associated weight space. For each , write for the “weight ” homomorphism sending the group-like element to . The rule realises elements of as analytic functions on . The spectrum of a finite flat extension of is equipped with a “weight map”
[TABLE]
of finite degree. A -valued point is said to be of weight if , and is said to be étale over if the inclusion induces an isomorphism between and the completion of at the kernel of , denoted . An element of this completion thus gives rise to an analytic function of in a natural way.
A Hida family is a formal -series
[TABLE]
with coefficients in a finite flat extension of , specialising to a classical ordinary eigenform of weight at almost all points of of weight . Two Hida families and are regarded as equal if the -algebras and can be embedded in a common extension in such a way that and are identified. A well known theorem of Hida and Wiles asserts the existence of a Hida family specialising to in weight one. The following uniqueness result for this Hida family plays an important role in our study.
Theorem** (Bellaiche, Dimitrov).**
Assume that the weight one form is regular at , and let and denote the distinct points on attached to and respectively. Then
- (a)
The curve is smooth at and , and in particular there are unique Hida families specialising to and at and respectively.
- (b)
The weight map is furthermore étale at if any only if
[TABLE]
The setting where is regular at but is not étale at has been treated in [DLR2], and the remainder of Part A will therefore focus on the scenarios where is satisfied. In that case, after viewing elements of the completion of at as analytic functions of the “weight variable” , one may consider the canonical -series
[TABLE]
representing the first-order infinitesimal ordinary deformation of at the weight one point , along this canonical “weight direction”. The -series is analogous to the overconvergent generalised eigenform considered in [DLR2], with the following differences:
- (a)
While the overconvergent generalised eigenform of [DLR2] is a (non-classical, but overconvergent) modular form of weight one, such an interpretation is not available for the -series , which should rather be viewed as the first order term of a “modular form of weight ”.
- (b)
In the non-étale setting of [DLR2], the absence of a natural local coordinate with respect to which the derivative would be computed meant that the overconvergent generalised eigenform of loc.cit. could only be meaningfully defined up to scaling by a non-zero multiplicative factor. This ambiguity is not present in the definition of , whose fourier coefficients are therefore entirely well-defined.
The main results of Part A give explicit formulae for these fourier coefficients: they are stated in Theorems 1.10, 2.1, 2.3, and 3.1 below.
1. The general case
The goal of this section is to describe a general formula for the fourier coefficients of .
The Artin representation can be realised as a two-dimensional -vector space, where is a finite extension of , contained in a cyclotomic field. Let denote the adjoint equipped with its usual conjugation action of , denoted
[TABLE]
Let denote the finite Galois extensions of cut out by the representations and respectively, and write .
For notational simplicity, the following assumption is made in the rest of this paper:
Assumption 1.1**.**
The prime splits completely in the field of coefficients of the Artin representation .
This assumption amounts to a simple congruence condition on . The choice of an embedding of into , which is fixed henceforth, will allow us, when it is convenient, to view and as representations of with coefficients in , and the weight one form as a modular form with fourier coefficients in rather than in . The -vector spaces and are thus equipped with natural -stable -rational structures, denoted and respectively.
An embedding of into is fixed once and for all, determining a prime of and of above , and an associated frobenius element in and in . Let be the decomposition subgroup generated by .
The representations and admit the following decompositions as -modules:
[TABLE]
where and denote the and -eigenspaces for the action of on , and
[TABLE]
is a -stable line, on which acts with eigenvalue . Let
[TABLE]
Of course, is stable under the action of but not under the action of .
We propose to give a general formula for the -th fourier coefficient of as the trace of a certain explicit endomorphism of , which is constructed via a series of lemmas. In the lemma below, we let act on diagonally on both factors in the tensor product.
Lemma 1.2**.**
The -vector space of -invariant vectors is one-dimensional.
Proof.
Let be the subgroup of generated by a complex conjugation , which has order two, since is odd. By Dirichlet’s unit theorem, the global unit group is isomorphic to as a -module. Let denote the three-dimensional representation of consisting of trace zero endomorphisms of . As a representation of , we have , and does not contain the trivial representation as a constituent. By Frobenius reciprocity,
[TABLE]
The result follows. ∎
Assume that the field of coefficients is large enough so that the semisimple ring becomes isomorphic to a direct sum of matrix algebras over . The -module decomposes as a direct sum of -isotypic components,
[TABLE]
where runs over the irreducible representations of , and denotes the largest subrepresentation of which is isomorphic to a direct sum of copies of as an -module. For a general, not necessarily irreducible, representation , the module is defined as the direct sum of the as ranges over the irreducible constituents of . Because (viewed, for now, as a representation with coefficients in ) is self-dual, Lemma 1.2 can be recast as the assertion that is isomorphic to a single irreducible subrepresentation of . More precisely:
In the case of “exotic weight one forms” where has non-dihedral projective image (isomorphic to , or ), then
[TABLE]
and hence is three-dimensional.
If is induced from a character of an imaginary quadratic field , then
[TABLE]
where is the odd quadratic Dirichlet character associated to and is the two-dimensional representation of induced from the ring class character which cuts out the abelian extension of . The representation is irreducible if and only if is non-quadratic, and in that case,
[TABLE]
In the special case where is quadratic, the representation further decomposes as the direct sum of one-dimensional representations attached to an even and an odd quadratic Dirichlet character, denoted and respectively. That special case, in which is also induced from a character of the real quadratic field cut out by , is thus subsumed under (4) below.
If is induced from a character of a real quadratic field , then
[TABLE]
and one always has
[TABLE]
i.e., is generated by a fundamental unit of .
Let be any generator of the one-dimensional -vector space and let
[TABLE]
be the image of this vector under the linear map
[TABLE]
where is the -adic logarithm on the -adic completion of at .
Lemma 1.3**.**
There exists a non-zero endomorphism satisfying the following conditions:
- (a)
. 2. (b)
* belongs to , i.e., .*
This endomorphism is unique up to scaling.
Proof.
The space is four-dimensional over and the conditions in Lemma 1.3 amount to three linear conditions on . More precisely, choose a -eigenbasis for for which
[TABLE]
Relative to this basis, the endomorphism is represented by a matrix of the form
[TABLE]
where , and are generators of which (when non-zero) are eigenvectors for , satisfying
[TABLE]
The endomorphism satisfies condition (b) above if and only if the matrix representing it in the basis is of the form
[TABLE]
and condition (a) implies the further linear relation
[TABLE]
The injectivity of , which follows from the linear independence over of logarithms of algebraic numbers, implies that the coefficients and in (6) vanish simultaneously if and only if
[TABLE]
in , i.e., if and only if is one-dimensional over and generated by . This immediately rules out (2) and (3) as scenarios for the structure of , leaving only (4). Hence, is induced from a character of a real quadratic field . In that case, the lines spanned by and are interchanged under the action of any reflection in , and hence the condition implies that as well, thus forcing the vanishing of the full . This contradiction to Lemma 1.2 shows that (6) imposes a non-trivial linear condition on and , and therefore that is unique up to scaling. ∎
Lemma 1.4**.**
Let be any element of satisfying the conditions in Lemma 1.3. Then the following are equivalent:
- (a)
;
- (b)
The representation is not induced from a character of a real quadratic field in which the prime splits.
Proof.
The vanishing of is equivalent to the vanishing of the entry in (6), and hence to the vanishing of , and therefore of and as well. This implies that is one-dimensional and generated by . As in the proof of Lemma 1.3, this rules out (2) and (3), leaving only (4) as a possibility, i.e., is necessarily induced from a character of a real quadratic field . Furthermore, fixes the group generated by the fundamental unit of , which occurs precisely when splits in . The lemma follows. ∎
Assume from now on that the equivalent conditions of Lemma 1.4 hold. One can then define to be the unique - multiple of satisfying
[TABLE]
As in lemma 1.2, is endowed with the diagonal action of which acts on both and on in a natural way. Given and , let us write for the image of by the action of on the first factor , and for the image of by the action of by conjugation on the second factor .
Lemma 1.5**.**
The endomorphism belongs to the space of -invariants for the diagonal action of on , i.e.,
[TABLE]
Proof.
Relative to the -basis for used in the proof of Lemma 1.3, the endomorphism is represented by a matrix of the form
[TABLE]
The lemma follows immediately from this in light of the fact that conjugation by preserves the diagonal entries in such a matrix representation while multiplying its upper right hand entry by , whereas acts on the upper right-hand entry of the above matrix as multiplication by . ∎
The matrix gives rise to a -equivariant homomorphism by setting
[TABLE]
where, just as above, the group acts on trivially on the first factor and through the usual conjugation action induced by on the second factor.
Lemma 1.6**.**
The homomorphism takes values in .
Proof.
For any we have
[TABLE]
where Lemma 1.5 has been used to derive the second equation. ∎
By a slight abuse of notation, we shall continue to denote with the same symbol the homomorphism
[TABLE]
obtained from (7) by extending scalars. Note that embeds naturally in .
Lemma 1.7**.**
The homomorphism vanishes on and .
Proof.
Picking and an arbitrary , set
[TABLE]
as in the statement of Lemma 1.3. Note that is either trivial or a generator of the one-dimensional space . We have
[TABLE]
It follows from Property (a) satisfied by (and hence in particular) in Lemma 1.3 that
[TABLE]
The first assertion in the lemma follows from the non-degeneracy of the -valued trace pairing on . The second assertion follows from Property (b) satisfied by and by in Lemma 1.3.
∎
Let now be a rational prime, and let be a prime of above . Let be a -unit of satisfying
[TABLE]
This condition makes well-defined up to the addition of elements in , and hence the element
[TABLE]
is well-defined, by Lemma 1.7. Although only belongs to a priori, we have:
Lemma 1.8**.**
The trace of the endomorphism is equal to .
Proof.
Since the trace of and its conjugates are all equal to , we have
[TABLE]
The latter expression is equal to , by (8). ∎
Remark 1.9*.*
Although belongs to by Lemma 1.6, the entries of the matrix representing relative to an -basis for are -linear combinations of products of -adic logarithms of units and -units in , and in particular need not lie in . (In fact, it never does, since its trace is not algebraic.)
In addition to the invariant , the choice of the prime of above also determines a well-defined Frobenius element in , and even in , since lies in the center of this group.
We are now ready to state the main theorem of this section:
Theorem 1.10**.**
For all rational primes ,
[TABLE]
Remark 1.11*.*
This invariant does not depend on the choice of a prime of above , since replacing by another such prime has the effect of conjugating the endomorphisms and by the same element of .
Proof of Theorem 1.10.
Let denote the ring of dual numbers over , with , and let
[TABLE]
be the unique first order -ordinary deformation of satisfying
[TABLE]
This representation may be written as
[TABLE]
The multiplicativity of implies that the function is a -cocycle on with values in , whose class in (which shall be denoted with the same symbol, by a slight abuse of notation) depends only on the isomorphism class of . Furthermore,
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
To make explicit, observe that the inflation-restriction sequence combined with global class field theory for gives rise to a series of identifications
[TABLE]
Under this identification, the class can be viewed as an element of the space
[TABLE]
But the homomorphism of (7) belongs to the same one-dimensional space, by Lemma 1.6 and 1.7. By global class field theory, the endomorphism is therefore a -multiple of . The fact that these endomorphisms are actually equal now follows by comparing their traces and noting that
[TABLE]
while
[TABLE]
by Lemma 1.8. Theorem 1.10 follows. ∎
Corollary 1.12**.**
If the rational prime splits completely in , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
The hypothesis implies that is a scalar, and hence that . It follows that
[TABLE]
The corollary now follows from Theorem 1.10. ∎
Example 1.13*.*
Let be a Dirichlet character of conductor with order at and at . Then is a -vector space of dimension . It is spanned by an eigenform
[TABLE]
defined over , with a primitive th root of unity, and its Galois conjugate. (See [BL] for all weight one eigenforms of level at most .) The associated projective representation has -image and factors through the field
[TABLE]
Let , which splits completely in . The representation is regular at , with eigenvalues and . We computed the first order deformations through each of and to precision , and -adic precision , using methods based upon the algorithms in [La].
The predictions made from Theorem 1.10 for depend upon the conjugacy class of the Frobenius at in . For all primes which split completely in , such as , we verified that
[TABLE]
as asserted by Corollary 1.12.
2. CM forms
This section focuses on the case where is the CM theta series attached to a character
[TABLE]
of a quadratic imaginary field . The main theorems are Theorems 2.1 and 2.3 below, which will be derived in two independent ways, both “from first principles” and by specialising Theorem 1.10.
As in the previous section, the choice of an embedding of into allows us to view as a -valued character, and the weight one form as a modular form with coefficients in .
For a character , the notation will be used to designate the composition of with conjugation by the non-trivial element in :
[TABLE]
where is any element of which acts non-trivially on .
The Artin representation is induced from and its restriction to is the direct sum of two characters of , which are distinct by the irreducibility of resulting from the fact that is a cusp form. In this case, the field is the ring class field of which is cut out by the non-trivial ring class character . The Galois group is a generalised dihedral group containing as its abelian normal subgroup of index two.
The case of CM forms can be further subdivided into two sub-cases, depending on whether is split or inert in .
2.1. The case where splits in
Write , and fix a prime of above . The roots of the -th Hecke polynomial of are
[TABLE]
This case is notable in that the Hida family passing through can be written down explicitly as a family of theta series. Its weight specialisation is the theta-series attached to the character , where is a CM Hecke character of weight which is unramified at . For all rational primes , the -th fourier coefficient of is given by
[TABLE]
Letting be the class number of and the cardinality of the unit group , the character satisfies
[TABLE]
for any prime ideal of whose norm is the rational prime . Let denote the conjugate of in . It follows that
[TABLE]
and likewise that
[TABLE]
In light of (11), we have obtained:
Theorem 2.1**.**
For all rational primes that do not divide ,
[TABLE]
Thus, the prime fourier coefficients of are supported at the primes which are split in , where they are (algebraic multiples of) the -adic logarithms of -units in this quadratic field. This general pattern will persist in the other settings to be described below, with the notable feature that the fourier coefficients of will be more complicated expressions involving, in general, the -adic logarithms of units and -units in the full ring class field .
The reader will note Theorem 2.1 is consistent with Theorem 1.10, and could also have been deduced from it. More precisely, choose a basis of consisting of eigenvectors for the action of (and hence also, of ) which are interchanged by some element . Relative to such a basis, the endomorphisms and are represented by the following matrices, in which and are generators of the spaces of and -isotypic vectors in the group of elliptic units in :
[TABLE]
It follows that, if is split in , then is represented by the matrix
[TABLE]
while is the scalar matrix with trace equal to if is inert in .
2.2. The case where is inert in
We now turn to the more interesting case where is inert in . Let denote the frobenius element in attached to the prime of (which is well-defined modulo the inertia subgroup at ). Note that the prime splits completely in , since the image of in is a reflection in this generalised dihedral group. The image of in therefore belongs to the subgroup whose image under consists of scalar matrices. Similar notations and remarks apply to any rational prime which is inert in .
Relative to an eigenbasis for the action of on , the Galois representation takes the form
[TABLE]
The homomorphisms factor through and satisfy
[TABLE]
It follows that interchanges the lines spanned by and , for any element . The restriction of to can therefore be described in matrix form by
[TABLE]
where and are -valued functions on that satisfy
[TABLE]
as well as the relations
[TABLE]
After re-scaling and if necessary, we may assume that is sent to the matrix
[TABLE]
The eigenvalues of are equal to and , and hence is always regular in this setting.
Let
[TABLE]
denote the first-order infinitesimal deformation of attached to the Hida family passing through a choice of -stabilization of , where . The module is free of rank two over the ring arising from the mod reduction of the representation attached to . Choose any -basis of lifting , and note that the restriction of to is given by:
[TABLE]
In this expression,
- (a)
The functions and are continuous homomorphisms from to , i.e., elements of , which are interchanged by conjugation by the involution in :
[TABLE]
- (b)
The functions are one-cocycles with values in , and give rise to well defined classes
[TABLE]
which also satisfy
[TABLE]
For each rational prime , the -th fourier coefficient is given by
[TABLE]
Observe that the spaces and are of dimensions two and one respectively over , since . More precisely, restriction to the inertia group at combined with local class field theory induces an isomorphism
[TABLE]
Let denote the (one-dimensional) -isotypic component of on which acts through the character , and denote by the prime of above arising from our chosen embedding of into . Restriction to the inertia group at in likewise gives rise to an identification
[TABLE]
In the above equation, is to be understood as the natural image in of an element of the form
[TABLE]
where is an -module generator of , and is the image of under the conjugation action . Note that replacing by for some has the effect of multiplying both and by , so that the -line spanned by the right-hand side of (21) is independent of the choice of .
It follows from (20) and (21) that the total deformation space of (before imposing any ordinarity hypotheses, or restrictions on the determinant) is three dimensional.
Let and be the eigenvectors for acting on , with eigenvalues and respectively. Let and denote the restrictions and to the inertia groups at and in and respectively. Both can be viewed as characters of after identifiying the abelianisations of and with a quotient of via local class field theory.
Lemma 2.2**.**
The following are equivalent:
- (a)
The inertia group at acts as the identity on some lift of to ;
- (b)
The inertia group at acts as the identity on all lifts of to ;
- (c)
The restrictions and satisfy
[TABLE]
Similar statements hold when is replaced by , where the conclusion is that .
Proof.
The equivalence of the first two conditions follows from the fact that is unramified at and hence that inertia acts as the identity on the kernel of the natural map . To check the third, note that the inertia group at is contained in , since is unramified at , and observe that any sends to
[TABLE]
The lemma follows. ∎
A lift of is ordinary relative to the space spanned by if and only if it satisfies the equivalent conditions of Lemma 2.2. This lemma merely spells out the proof of the Bellaiche-Dimitrov theorem on the one-dimensionality of the tangent space of the eigencurve at the point associated to . More precisely, the general ordinary first-order deformation of is completely determined by the pair , which depends on a single linear parameter and is given by the rule
[TABLE]
where the sign in the second formula depends on whether one is working with the ordinary deformation of or .
Let us now make use of the fact that
[TABLE]
Since , this condition implies that
[TABLE]
and hence that and are given by
[TABLE]
Equations (24) and (25) give a completely explicit description of the first order deformation and , from which the fourier coefficients of and shall be readily calculated.
The formula for the -th fourier coefficient of involves the unit above as well as certain -units in whose definition depends on whether or not the prime is split or inert in .
If splits in , let and denote, as before, the -units in of norm with prime factorisation and respectively. Set
[TABLE]
In other words, is the unique element of whose prime factorisation is equal to . Note that, if splits completely in , i.e., if is equal to a scalar , then , but that otherwise and generate the -vector space of -units of (tensored with ).
If is inert in , choose a prime of lying above , and let be any -unit of satisfying , which is well defined up to units in . Define the elements
[TABLE]
Thus lies in the -component and is well-defined up to the addition of multiples of , where
[TABLE]
for any unit , while lies in the component and is well-defined up to the addition of multiples of , where
[TABLE]
Recall the function introduced in (14), with values in the roots of unity of . The main result of this section is:
Theorem 2.3**.**
Let be a rational prime.
- (a)
If splits in , then
[TABLE]
- (b)
If remains inert in , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let us first compute first the fourier coefficients at primes that split as in . Let and be the frobenius elements associated to and respectively. They are well-defined elements in the Galois group of any abelian extension of in which is unramified.
It follows from (19) and the matrix expression for given in (18) that
[TABLE]
Equation (26) then follows from the formula for given in (24).
We now turn now to the computation of the fourier coefficients of at primes that remain inert in . Let denote the Frobenius element in associated to the choice of a prime ideal above in , and let denote the associated frobenius element in .
Since belongs to , it follows from (14) that the matrix is of the form
[TABLE]
for suitable scalars , and . Since
[TABLE]
it follows that
[TABLE]
In order to compute this trace, we observe that it arises in the upper right-hand and lower left-hand entries of the matrix
[TABLE]
On the other hand, since belongs to it follows from (18) that
[TABLE]
By comparing upper-right entries in the matrices in (28) and (29) and invoking (27) together with the relation arising from (15), we deduce that
[TABLE]
It is worth noting that each of the expressions and depend on the choice of a prime of above that was made to define and , since changing this prime replaces and by their conjugates and by some . More precisely, by (16) and the cocycle property of ,
[TABLE]
In particular, the product is independent of the choice of a prime above , as it should be. Note that is a simple root of unity belonging to the image of , while represents the interesting “transcendental” contribution to the fourier coefficient .
By the description of arising from local and global class field theory, we conclude from (25) that
[TABLE]
as was to be shown. ∎
A more efficient (but somewhat less transparent) route to the proof of Theorem 2.3 is to specialise Theorem 1.10 to this setting. Relative to a basis of the form for , where spans a -stable subspace of on which acts via , the matrix for is proportional to one of the form
[TABLE]
and the ordinarity condition implies that the matrix representing is proportional to a matrix of the form
[TABLE]
The relations and show that is represented by the matrix
[TABLE]
and Theorem 2.3 is readily deduced from the general formula for the fourier coefficients of given in Theorem 1.10. The details are left to the reader.
2.3. Numerical examples
We begin with an illustration of Theorem 2.3 in which the image of is isomorphic to the symmetric group .
Example 2.4*.*
Let be the quadratic character of conductor and
[TABLE]
be the theta series attached to the imaginary quadratic field . The Hilbert class field of is
[TABLE]
Write . The smallest prime which is inert in is . The deformations and were computed to a -adic precision of (and -adic precision ).
Consider the inert prime in . Let , a root of . Taking a primitive cube root of unity we have
[TABLE]
Let be the elliptic unit in , a root of . Then likewise we have
[TABLE]
Now
[TABLE]
and one checks to digits of -adic precision that
[TABLE]
as predicted by part (b) of Theorem 2.3.
Consider next the prime , which splits in and factors as , where is a principal idead generated by , a root of . After setting , we let
[TABLE]
We have
[TABLE]
and one sees that
[TABLE]
to digits of -adic precision, confirming Part (a) of Theorem 2.3.
The experiment below focuses on the case where is a quartic ring class character, so that has image isomorphic to the dihedral group of order . The associated ring class character of is quadratic, i.e., a genus character which cuts out a biquadratic exension of containing . Let denote the unique real quadratic subfield of , and let the unique imaginary quadratic subfield of which is distinct from . The unit is a power of the fundamental unit of . Observe that the prime is necessarily inert in , since otherwise would be induced from a character of the real quadratic field in which splits. It follows that , so that by Theorem 2.3,
[TABLE]
It follows from the definition of that
[TABLE]
In particular, we obtain
[TABLE]
in perfect agreement with the experiments below.
Example 2.5*.*
Let where and are the quadratic characters of conductors and , respectively. The space is one dimensional and spanned by the form . The representation has projective image and is induced from characters of two imaginary quadratic fields and one real quadratic field. In particular, it is induced from the quadratic character of the Hilbert class field
[TABLE]
of (and also ramified characters of ray class fields of and ). Let , which is inert in . We computed to -digits of -adic precision (and to -adic precision ).
First consider the case of split in . Then one observes to -digits of -adic precision and all such that both and satisfy (31). Next we consider the case that is inert in . Here one observes numerically that the Fourier coefficients are zero when is inert in . When is split in the Fourier coefficients of the two stabilisations are opposite in sign and both equal to the -adic logarithm of a fundamental unit of norm in . (Observe that is split in and our numerical observations are consistent in this example with both our theorems for split and inert in the CM case.)
3. RM forms
Consider now the case where is the theta series attached to a character
[TABLE]
of mixed signature of a real quadratic field . As before, assume for simplicity that the field may be embedded into and fix one such embedding. We also continue to denote the abelian extensions of which is cut out by , and let be the ring class field of cut out by the non-trivial ring class character . Since has mixed signature, it follows that is totally odd and thus is totally imaginary. As before, write and .
As explained in the introduction, the case where splits in was already dealt with in [DLR2], so in this section we only consider the case where is inert in . The prime then splits completely in and we fix a prime of above . This choice determines an embedding and we write for the conjugation action of . Let denote the fundamental unit of of norm , which we regard as an element of through the above embedding, and let denote its algebraic conjugate.
Let be a basis for consisting of eigenvectors for the action of , and which are interchanged by the frobenius element . Just as in the previous section, relative to this basis the Galois representation takes the form
[TABLE]
where and are functions taking values in the group of roots of unity in . The element of (5) is thus represented the matrix
[TABLE]
and hence the endomorphism of Lemma 1.5 is represented by the particularly simple matrix
[TABLE]
It follows that, if is split in , we have
[TABLE]
while if is inert in and is a prime of lying above ,
[TABLE]
Theorem 3.1**.**
For all rational primes ,
- (a)
If is split in , then
[TABLE] 2. (b)
If is inert in , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
This follows directly from Theorem 1.10 in light of (33) and (34). ∎
Remark 3.2*.*
As already remarked in [DLR2], Theorem 3.1 above (and also Theorem 7.1 of Part B) display a striking analogy with Theorem 1.1. of [DLi] concerning the fourier expansions of mock modular forms whose shadows are weight one theta series attached to characters of imaginary quadratic fields. The underlying philosophy is that the -adic deformations considered in this paper behave somewhat like mock modular forms of weight one, “with replaced by ”. This explains why the analogy remains compelling when the quadratic imaginary fields of [DLi] are replaced by real quadratic fields in which is inert (these fields being “imaginary” from a -adic perspective).
We illustrate Theorem 3.1 on the form of smallest level whose associated Artin representation is induced from a character of a real quadratic field, but of no imaginary quadratic field. The projective image in this example is the dihedral group of order :
Example 3.3*.*
Let where and are quadratic and quartic characters of conductor and , respectively. Then is one dimensional and spanned by the eigenform
[TABLE]
The form is induced from a quartic character of a ray class group of (see [DLR1, Example 4.1] for a further discussion on this form). The relevant ring class field is
[TABLE]
Write . Take , and note that and so and . We compute to digits of -adic precision (and -adic precision ).
Consider first the prime which is inert in . We take the -unit to satisfy and define
[TABLE]
and so where . Then one checks that to digits of -adic precision
[TABLE]
which is in line with Theorem 3.1. Next we take the prime which is split in . Then to -digits of -adic precision
[TABLE]
exactly as predicted by Theorem 3.1.
Part B The irregular setting
Denote by (resp. by ) the space of classical (resp. -adic overconvergent) modular forms of weight , level (resp. tame level ) and character , with coefficients in . The Hecke algebra of level generated over by the operators with and with acts naturally on the spaces and .
As in the introduction, let be a newform and let be a -stabilisation of . The eigenform gives rise to a ring homomorphism to the field generated by the fourier coefficients of , satisfying
[TABLE]
For any ideal of a ring and any -module , denote by the -torsion in . Let be the kernel of , and set
[TABLE]
Our main object of study is the subspace
[TABLE]
of the space of overconvergent -adic modular forms of weight one, which is contained in the generalised eigenspace attached to . An element of is called an overconvergent generalised eigenform attached to , and it is said to be classical if it belongs to . The theorem of Bellaiche and Dimitrov stated in the opening paragraphs of Part A implies that the natural inclusion
[TABLE]
is an isomorphism, i.e., every overconvergent generalised eigenform is classical, except possibly in the following cases:
- (a)
is the theta series attached to a finite order character of a real quadratic field in which the prime splits, or
- (b)
is irregular at , i.e., .
The study of in scenario (a) was carried out in [DLR2] when . The main result of loc.cit. is the description of a basis for which is canonical up to scaling, and an expression for the fourier coefficients of the non-classical (or rather, of their ratios) in terms of -adic logarithms of certain algebraic numbers.
Assume henceforth that is not regular at , i.e., that . In that case, the form admits a unique -stabilisation . The Hecke operators for and for act semisimply (i.e., as scalars) on the two-dimensional vector space
[TABLE]
but the Hecke operator acts non-semisimply via the formulae
[TABLE]
Because
[TABLE]
the classical subspace has a natural linear complement in , consisting of the generalised eigenforms whose -expansions satisfy
[TABLE]
A modular form satisfying (36) is said to be normalised, and the space of normalised generalised eigenforms is denoted . The main goal of Part B is to study this space and give an explicit description of its elements in terms of their fourier expansions. The idoneous fourier coefficients will be expressed as determinants of matrices whose entries are -adic logarithms of algebraic numbers the number field cut out by the projective Galois representation attached to (cf. Theorems 5.3, 6.1 and 7.1).
4. Generalised eigenspaces
We begin by recalling some of the notations that were already introduced in Part A. Let
[TABLE]
be the odd, two-dimensional Artin representation associated to by Deligne and Serre (but viewed as having -adic rather than complex coefficients; as in Part A, we assume for simplicity that the image of can be embedded in and not just in ).
The four-dimensional -vector space of endomorphisms of is endowed with the conjugation action of ,
[TABLE]
Let be the field cut out by this Artin representation. The action of on factors through a faithful action of the finite quotient . Let denote the three-dimensional -submodule of consisting of trace zero endomorphisms. The exact sequence
[TABLE]
of -modules admits a canonical -equivariant splitting
[TABLE]
Because the action of on also factors through a finite quotient, the field generated by the traces of is a finite extension of , and maps the semisimple algebra to a central simple algebra of rank over . By eventually enlarging , it can be assumed that , and therefore that is realised on a two-dimensional -vector space equipped with an identification . The spaces
[TABLE]
likewise correspond to -stable -rational structures on and respectively, equipped with identifications
[TABLE]
The spaces and (as well as and ) are equipped with the Lie bracket and with a symetric non-degenerate pairing defined by the usual rules
[TABLE]
which are compatible with the -action in the sense that
[TABLE]
These operations can be combined to define a -invariant determinant function—i.e., a non-zero, alternating trilinear form—on and on by setting
[TABLE]
The rule described in (35) gives rise to natural identifications
[TABLE]
and hence the dual of the short exact sequence
[TABLE]
can be identified with
[TABLE]
In particular, one has the isomorphism
[TABLE]
Let denote the ring of dual numbers. Given , the modular form is an eigenform for with coefficients in . Its associated Galois representation
[TABLE]
satisfies
- (i)
and , 2. (ii)
for every prime number , the trace of an arithmetic Frobenius at is
[TABLE]
Conjecture 4.1**.**
Assume that is irregular at . Then the assignment gives rise to a canonical isomorphism between and the space of isomorphism classes of deformations of to the ring of dual numbers, with constant determinant.
We now derive some consequences of this conjecture.
Proposition 4.2**.**
Assume Conjecture 4.1. If is irregular at , then the space is two-dimensional over .
Proof.
Since any has constant determinant, it may be written as
[TABLE]
The multiplicativity of implies that the function is a -cocycle of with values in , whose class in (which shall be denoted with the same symbol, by a slight abuse of notation) depends only on the isomorphism class of . The assignment realises an isomorphism (cf. for instance [Ma, §1.2])
[TABLE]
Under Conjecture 4.1, this yields an isomorphism
[TABLE]
The inflation-restriction sequence combined with global class field theory for now gives rise to a series of identifications
[TABLE]
where denotes the natural image of in under the -adic logarithm map
[TABLE]
As representations for , the space is isomorphic to the regular representation
[TABLE]
while , by the Dirichlet unit theorem, is induced from the trivial representation of the subroup generated by a complex conjugation:
[TABLE]
Complex conjugation acts on with eigenvalues , and, and hence by Frobenius reciprocity,
[TABLE]
It follows from (41) that is two-dimensional over . Proposition 4.2 follows. ∎
For any , the -th fourier coefficient of is given in terms of the associated cocycle by the rule
[TABLE]
where is any prime above and denotes the arithmetic Frobenius associated to it. Note that the right-hand side of (43) does not depend on the choice of .
Our next goal is to parametrise the elements of (41) explicitly, and then to derive concrete formulae for the fourier expansions of the associated modular forms in via (40) and (43). After treating the general case in Section 5, Sections 6 and 7 focus on the special features of the scenarios where is reducible, i.e.,
- (i)
the CM case where is induced from a character of an imaginary quadratic field; 2. (ii)
the RM case where is induced from a character of a real quadratic field.
5. The general case
The Galois representation is irreducible if and only if is isomorphic to , , or . Otherwise, the representation has dihedral projective image and is isomorphic to a dihedral group.
The irregularity assumption implies that the prime splits completely in , and can therefore be viewed as a subfield of after fixing an embedding once and for all. This amounts to choosing a prime of above . Let denote the associated -adic logarithm map, which factors through .
The Dirichlet unit theorem implies (via the second equation in (42)) that
[TABLE]
In particular, for all and all , the element
[TABLE]
only depends on the choices of and up to scaling by a (possibly zero) factor in . As varies over and over , the elements
[TABLE]
therefore lie in a one-dimensional -vector subspace of . Choose a generator for this space. The coordinates of relative to a basis for are -adic logarithms of units in , namely, we can write
[TABLE]
for appropriate .
Let be a rational prime. For any prime of above , let be a generator of the principal ideal , where is the class number of , and set
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
be the endomorphisms of arising from the image of under . The element is well-defined up to multiplication by elements of , and hence the elements
[TABLE]
are defined up to translation by elements of the one-dimensional -vector spaces and respectively. Furthermore, the image of in the quotient does not depend on the choice of the prime of above that was made to define it. The Lie bracket
[TABLE]
is thus independent of the choices that were made in defining .
Remark 5.1*.*
The coordinates of relative to a basis for are -adic logarithms of -units in , i.e., one can write
[TABLE]
with for . A direct computation shows that
[TABLE]
It follows that for all regular primes ,
[TABLE]
and therefore that the element attached to any pair as in (48) is well-defined up to scaling by and up to translation by elements of the one-dimensional space . In particular, the associated vector lies in a canonical one-dimensional subspace of , namely, the orthogonal complement in of
[TABLE]
If the basis for in (46) and (49) is taken to be the standard basis
[TABLE]
then
[TABLE]
Remark 5.2*.*
Observe that if the prime is irregular for , the vector is a scalar endomorphism in and hence .
Our main result is
Theorem 5.3**.**
Assume Conjecture 4.1. For all , there exists an overconvergent generalised eigenform satisfying
[TABLE]
for all primes . The assignment induces an isomorphism between and .
Proof.
The semi-local field is naturally identified with the set of vectors with entries , indexed by the primes of above . The function which to associates the linear transformation
[TABLE]
identifies with . The linear function is trivial on if and only if, for all and all ,
[TABLE]
But
[TABLE]
and hence is trivial on if and only if is orthogonal in to the line spanned by . It follows that the -equivariant linear function
[TABLE]
factors through . The assignment identifies with , and gives an explicit description of the latter space.
Let be the eigenform with coefficients in which is attached to the cocycle . Equation (43) with (and hence ) combined with (47) shows that the -th the fourier coefficient of at a prime is equal to
[TABLE]
Class field theory for implies that
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
The theorem follows. ∎
If in a vector in , Theorem 5.3 shows that the associated overconvergent generalised eigenform has fourier coefficients which are -rational linear combinations of determinants of matrices whose entries are the -adic logarithms of algebraic numbers in . In the CM and RM cases to be discussed below, the representation is reducible and decomposes further into non-trivial irreducible representations. In that case the choice of an -basis for which is compatible with this decomposition leads to canonical elements of which can sometimes be re-scaled so that their fourier expansions admit even simpler expressions, as will be described in the next two sections.
6. CM forms
Assume that is the theta series attached to a character of a quadratic imaginary field , i.e., that
[TABLE]
where is a finite order character. Let denote the character deduced from by composing it with the involution in . The irreducibility assumption on implies that the characters and are distinct, and therefore the representations and decompose canonically as a direct sum of two -stable one-dimensional subspaces
[TABLE]
on which acts via the characters and respectively. The representations and also decompose as direct sums of four -stable lines
[TABLE]
The direct summands in parentheses are also stable under and are isomorphic to the induced representations and respectively, where , is the ring class character of associated to . It follows that
[TABLE]
It will be convenient to choose a basis for , and to denote by the resulting basis of , where is the elementary matrix whose -entry is . Relative to the identification of with the space of matrices of trace zero with entries in via this basis, the representation is identified with the space of diagonal matrices of trace [math], while is identified with the space of off-diagonal matrices in . Fix an element once and for all. By eventually re-scaling and , it can (and shall, henceforth) be assumed that is represented by the matrix \left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&t\\ t&0\end{array}\right) in this basis, where .
Let be the maximal abelian normal subgroup of the dihedral group . Note that every element in (such as the image of in ) is an involution, and that operates transitively on by either left or right multiplication.
The field through which factors is the ring class field of attached to the character . The group of units of is isomorphic to the regular representation of minus the trivial representation, and a finite index subgroup of can be constructed explicity from the elliptic units arising in the theory of complex multiplication. Let
[TABLE]
be the idempotent in the group ring of giving rise to the projection onto the -isotypic component for the action of . Choose a unit and let
[TABLE]
be elements of on which acts via the characters and respectively. With these choices, we can let
[TABLE]
The description of the canonical vectors attached to a rational prime depends in an essential way on whether is split or inert in .
If is split in and is regular for , i.e., , then the natural map
[TABLE]
is an isomorphism of -vector spaces.
Let be a generator of where is the class number of , and set
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
a direct calculation shows that
[TABLE]
It follows that
[TABLE]
If is inert in then is always regular for since has trace [math] and hence has distinct eigenvalues. The prime splits completely in , and hence the group is isomorphic to two copies of the regular representation of minus a trivial representation. The choice of a prime of above determines a matrix (and not just a conjugacy class)
[TABLE]
with entries in . Let be an element of whose prime factorisation is given by
[TABLE]
This -unit is only well defined by (53) up to translation by , and the defining equation (53) of course depends crucially on the choice of the prime above . However, the -isotypic projection
[TABLE]
is independent of this choice. A direct calculation shows that
[TABLE]
It follows that
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
is an -unit regulator attached to , which is independent of the choice of prime of above . The function does depend on the choice of the unit , but only up to scaling by .
Theorem 6.1**.**
The space has a canonical basis which is characterised by the properties:
- (i)
The fourier coefficients are [math] for all primes that are inert in . If is split in , then
[TABLE]
is a simple algebraic multiple of the -adic logarithm of the fundamental -unit of norm in . 2. (ii)
The fourier coefficients of are [math] at all the primes that are split in . If is inert in , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
This follows directly from the calculation of the matrices in (52) and (55) in light of Theorem 5.3. ∎
Example 6.2*.*
Let be the quadratic character of conductor . The space is one dimensional and spanned by the theta series
[TABLE]
Here and the ring class field attached to is
[TABLE]
The inert primes in are and the unit and first few -units are
[TABLE]
Let , an irregular prime for . We computed a basis of -expansions for the generalised eigenspace modulo and . One observes that it contains the classical space spanned by the forms and and in addition a complementary space of dimension two. This space is canonically spanned by two normalised generalised eigenforms
[TABLE]
Note that the natural scaling of the forms output by our algorithm is with leading Fourier coefficients equal to . By Theorem 6.1 one expects that for inert in , or split in but irregular, we have ; and for split in we have that
[TABLE]
where is a fundamental -unit in (the logarithm of this is well-defined up to sign). We checked this to -digits of -adic precision for primes . Further, one expects that
[TABLE]
We checked this for all split primes and for the inert primes and , constructing using the unit and -unit above.
7. RM forms
We now turn to the RM setting where is a real quadratic field and
[TABLE]
where is a finite order character of mixed signature. Letting denote the character deduced from by composing it with the involution in , the ratio is a totally odd -valued ring class character of .
As before, let denote the ring class field of which is fixed by the kernel of , and set and . Just as in the previous section,
[TABLE]
and we can set
[TABLE]
where is a fundamental unit of .
If is split in , it is easy to see that the vector is proportional to , and hence that
[TABLE]
If is inert in , let and denote the subspaces and . The the dimensions of these spaces are [math] and respectively. Choose a prime of above , and let and be the elements of determined by the relations
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
The -adic logarithms
[TABLE]
are well-defined invariants of and which do not depend on the choice of a prime lying above , and
[TABLE]
It follows that
[TABLE]
Theorem 7.1**.**
The space has a canonical basis which is characterised by the properties:
- (i)
The fourier coefficients of and are [math] at all primes that are split in . 2. (ii)
If is inert in , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
This follows directly from Theorem 5.3 in light of equations (56) and (57). ∎
Example 7.2*.*
Let and denote the quadratic characters of conductors and , respectively, and define . Then is one-dimensional and spanned by the form
[TABLE]
We take , an irregular prime for , and compute a basis for the generalised eigenspace modulo . The two dimensional space complementary to the classical space has a natural basis
[TABLE]
Take
[TABLE]
Here , and , denotes a fundamental -unit of norm in and , respectively. One finds that the coefficients at primes which are split in of both forms and are zero. At inert primes the coefficients of are the logarithms of fundamental -units of norm in , and those of are the logarithms of fundamental -units of norm in (such logarithms are well-defined up to sign; interestingly, the forms single out a consistent choice of signs).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[BD] J. Bellaïche, M. Dimitrov, On the eigencurve at classical weight one points , Duke Math Journal 165 , Issue 2 (2016), 245–266.
- 2[Bet] Adel Betina, Ramification of the eigencurve at classical RM points , submitted.
- 3[BL] K. Buzzard and A. Lauder, A computation of modular forms of weight one and small level , Annales mathématique du Québec, to appear. Appendix http://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/lauder/weight 1
- 4[D Li] W. Duke and Y. Li. Harmonic Maass forms of weight 1 . Duke Math. J. 164 (2015), no. 1, 39–113.
- 5[DLR 1] H. Darmon, A. Lauder and V. Rotger, Stark points and p 𝑝 p -adic iterated integrals attached to modular forms of weight one. Forum of Mathematics, Pi (2015), Vol. 3, e 8, 95 pages.
- 6[DLR 2] H. Darmon, A. Lauder, and V. Rotger, Overconvergent generalised eigenforms of weight one and class fields of real quadratic fields . Advances in Mathematics 283 (2015) 130-142.
- 7[DLR 3] H. Darmon, A. Lauder, and V. Rotger, Elliptic Stark conjectures and irregular weight one forms , in progress.
- 8[La] A. Lauder, Computations with classical and p-adic modular forms , LMS J. Comput. Math. 14 (2011) 214-231.
