Characterizing the metric compactification of $L_{p}$ spaces by random measures
Armando W. Guti\'errez

TL;DR
This paper fully characterizes the metric compactification of $L_{p}$ spaces for $1 \\leq p < \\infty$, representing elements via random measures and revisiting key ergodic and isometry examples.
Contribution
It provides a complete description of the metric compactification of $L_{p}$ spaces using random measures, extending understanding of their geometric structure.
Findings
Elements of the compactification are represented by random measures.
Revisits the $L_{p}$-mean ergodic theorem for $1 < p < \\infty$.
Analyzes Alspach's isometry example with no fixed points.
Abstract
We present a complete characterization of the metric compactification of spaces for . Each element of the metric compactification of is represented by a random measure on a certain Polish space. By way of illustration, we revisit the -mean ergodic theorem for , and Alspach's example of an isometry on a weakly compact convex subset of with no fixed points.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Characterizing the metric compactification of spaces by random measures
Armando W. Gutiérrez
Department of Mathematics and Systems Analysis, Aalto University, Otakaari 1 Espoo, Finland
Abstract.
We present a complete characterization of the metric compactification of spaces for . Each element of the metric compactification of is represented by a random measure on a certain Polish space. By way of illustration, we revisit the –mean ergodic theorem for , and Alspach’s example of an isometry on a weakly compact convex subset of with no fixed points.
Key words and phrases:
metric compactification, horofunction compactification, metric functional, random measure, Banach spaces
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 54D35; Secondary 46E30, 46B20, 60G57
1. Introduction
The metric compactification, which is known as the horofunction compactification in the setting of proper geodesic metric spaces, has been extensively studied during the last twenty years. Remarkably, the foundations of this compactification can be traced back to the early 1980s when Gromov [20, 7] introduced a technique to attach certain boundary points at infinity of every proper geodesic metric space. In 2002, Rieffel [35] identified the metric compactification of every complete locally compact metric space with the maximal ideal space of a unital commutative -algebra.
The modern procedure for constructing the metric compactification of general (not necessarily proper) metric spaces was discussed in [16, 34]. Every metric space is continuously injected into its metric compactification which becomes metrizable provided that the metric space is separable. Moreover, surjective isometries between metric spaces can be extended continuously to homeomorphisms between the corresponding metric compactifications.
Banach spaces form an important class of metric spaces for which the metric compactification deserves further study. Complete characterizations of the metric compactification of finite- and infinite-dimensional spaces were presented by the author in [22] and [21], respectively. More studies in this context can be found in [24, 36, 33, 40].
The purpose of this paper is to give a complete characterization of the metric compactification of the Banach space for all , where is a non-atomic standard probability space.
Several works have confirmed the importance of the metric compactification as a topological and geometric tool for the study of isometry groups [30, 32, 37, 38, 39], random walks on hyperbolic groups [8, 18], random product of semicontractions [29, 28, 19, 17], Denjoy-Wolff theorems [25, 26, 9, 1, 31], Teichmüller spaces [4], limit graphs [12], random triangulations [11], and first-passage percolation [6]. This list is by no means exhaustive, but it gives the reader a brief overview of the variety of applications where the metric compactification or some of its elements appear. The notion of the metric compactification plays an essential role in the development of a metric spectral theory proposed by Karlsson [27].
2. Preliminaries
Let be a metric space with an arbitrary base point . Consider the mapping from into defined by
[TABLE]
Denote by the space of -Lipschitz real-valued functions on vanishing at . It is straightforward to verify that
[TABLE]
Tychonoff’s theorem asserts that the Cartesian product in (2.2) is compact in the topology of pointwise convergence, which in turn implies that the space is also compact as it is closed in this topology.
Definition 2.1**.**
The metric compactification of , denoted by , is defined to be the pointwise closure of the family . Every element is called a metric functional on . Metric functionals of the form (2.1) are called internal.
For every metric functional , there exists a net of points in such that the net of internal metric functionals converges pointwise on to . If the metric space is separable, the topology in is metrizable. Hence, sequences are sufficient to describe metric funcionals on separable metric spaces. Also, the choice of the basepoint is irrelevant as different basepoints produce homeomorphic metric compactifications. See [16, 34] for more details.
In general, the mapping given by (2.1) is always a continuous injection. It becomes a homeomorphism onto its image whenever the metric space is proper111Every closed and bounded subset of is compact. and geodesic222For every pair of points , there is an isometry from the interval into .. In this particular case, the metric compactification coincides with Gromov’s original definition of horofunction compactification which is obtained as the closure of with respect to the topology of uniform convergence on bounded subsets of ; see [27].
Example 2.2**.**
The set of real numbers with the metric induced by the absolute value is proper and geodesic. Its metric/horofunction compactification contains the internal metric functionals
[TABLE]
and the two additional ”points at infinity” given by
[TABLE]
The elements of the compact space are used throughout the following sections, so it is convenient to establish the following special notations: functions of the form (2.3) are denoted by with , and the two functions in (2.4) are denoted by and , respectively. Therefore, the metric compactification of is the compact Polish space
[TABLE]
Throughout the paper, we assume that is a non-atomic standard probability space. We adopt the convention that all equalities involving measurable sets or measurable functions are assumed to hold modulo -null sets. For every , we denote by , or simply when no confusion arises, the Banach space of measurable functions with finite -norm
[TABLE]
For simplicity we choose the zero function as the basepoint. For each , the internal metric functional in (2.1) becomes
[TABLE]
The metric compactification of the Banach space is the set of all pointwise accumulation points of (2.6). We present explicit formulas for these limits by means of random measures on .
The notion of random measure was introduced by Aldous [3]; however, there are various equivalent approaches to random measures [15, 10, 23]. Let denote the space of all signed Borel measures on the compact space such that the total variation is finite. The linear space becomes a Banach space with respect to the norm . Let denote the space of all real-valued continuous functions on the compact space . The linear space endowed with the norm
[TABLE]
becomes a Banach space. The Riesz representation theorem (see e.g., [2, p. 78]) asserts that the dual space , equipped with the usual dual norm, can be identified with under the isometric isomorphism , given by
[TABLE]
We denote by the set of all Borel probability measures on , i.e.,
[TABLE]
Let denote the space of mappings from to with the following properties
- (i)
the function is measurable for all , 2. (ii)
the function is essentially bounded.
We say that an element of is a random measure on whenever for -almost every . Additionally, if for -almost every , we say that is a random measure on .
3. Main results
Theorem 3.1**.**
If then there exists a random measure on such that
[TABLE]
for all . Conversely, if is a random measure on then (3.1) defines an element of .
Remark 3.2**.**
Since and are defined on , the expectation operator in the representation formula (3.1) should be interpreted as
[TABLE]
Example 3.3**.**
Let and be two disjoint measurable subsets of . Suppose that is a random measure on defined by
[TABLE]
where is a measurable function. Then the metric functional on given by the formula (3.1) becomes
[TABLE]
for all . The metric functionals of the form (3.2) can be compared with those describing the metric compactification of the sequence space ; see [21]. Furthermore, if and are sets of measure zero, and then (3.2) becomes the internal metric functional .
Example 3.4**.**
Let be the open interval and let be the Lebesgue measure. For each , let and be the intervals
[TABLE]
and define by . It follows that
[TABLE]
In particular, the sequence does not converge to zero in -norm. However, for every we obtain
[TABLE]
This shows that although the sequence does not converge to zero in -norm, it does converge to zero in the metric compactification . The internal metric functional has the representation (3.1) with the (constant) random measure with .
Example 3.5**.**
For each , let and be the intervals defined in the previous example. Now, we define by . Then
[TABLE]
The sequence is bounded in , but it does not converge to zero in -norm. However, as in the previous example, we have as .
Example 3.6**.**
Let be a measurable subset of with . Suppose that is an element of . For each , we define by . It follows that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, for every we obtain
[TABLE]
Hence converges to the metric functional which has the representation formula (3.1), where is the random measure on given by
[TABLE]
Example 3.7**.**
Let be the interval and let be the Lebesgue measure. Consider the Rademacher sequence defined by for all and . It is not difficult to verify that converges to the metric functional with the representation formula (3.1), where is the constant random measure .
The above examples are merely to demonstrate some of the different cases that can appear when determining the metric functionals on . In Section 5 we present some applications of the metric compactification of spaces.
Theorem 3.8**.**
Let . Every element of has exactly one of the following forms: either
[TABLE]
where is a random measure on and ; or
[TABLE]
where is an element of the closed unit ball of .
Remark 3.9**.**
If the metric functional (3.3) is represented by the random measure on given by with , then the representation formula (3.3) becomes
[TABLE]
In [21], the author showed that bounded nets in the infinite-dimensional space with can only produce metric functionals represented by formulas analogous to (3.5). In the present paper, bounded nets in non-atomic spaces with yield metric functionals represented by the general formulas (3.3).
4. Proofs
Throughout this section we use well-known facts about representations of certain dual spaces. These results can be found in standard functional analysis books such as [13] or [14]. Recall that is the space of mappings from to such that for each the real-valued function
[TABLE]
is measurable, and the function is essentially bounded. The linear space is a Banach space with respect to the norm
[TABLE]
Let denote the linear space of all mappings such that the real-valued function is measurable and is finite. The real-valued function defines a norm on . The dual space , equipped with the usual dual norm, has the representation
[TABLE]
under the isometric isomorphism , defined by
[TABLE]
Lemma 4.1**.**
If is a net in , then there exists a random measure on and a subnet such that the net of random measures on converges weakly-star to in . That is,
[TABLE]
Moreover, if the net is bounded in , i.e., , then in (4.2) is a random measure on .
Proof.
For each , the mapping defines a random measure on , i.e., and for -almost every . By the representation (4.1), the net lies in the closed unit ball of the dual space . By the Banach-Alaouglu theorem, there exists a subnet and an element with such that converges weakly-star to in . Hence (4.2) holds.
Next, we will show that is a random measure on , i.e., for -almost every . Since is separable, the space of non-negative continuous functions on contains a dense countable subset, say . Fix . For every non-negative integrable function , we apply (4.2) with the mapping , to obtain
[TABLE]
Hence there is with such that for all . By letting , it follows that and
[TABLE]
Let be a non-negative continuous function. By density, there exists a sequence satisfying (4.3) and such that . Therefore,
[TABLE]
This shows that is a positive measure for all with . Furthermore, if we apply (4.2) with the mapping , we obtain
[TABLE]
Hence , and therefore is a random measure on .
For the last part of the lemma we need to prove that for -almost every . Let and let be a small positive real number. Define the compact interval
[TABLE]
Let denote a continuous function on with compact support such that on and on . For each define the mapping by
[TABLE]
Then, for every we have
[TABLE]
Hence, by applying (4.2) with , we obtain
[TABLE]
However, since is identified in (2.5) with the set , it follows that
[TABLE]
Therefore for -almost every . This completes the proof of the lemma. ∎
Proof of Theorem 3.1.
If is an element of , then there exists a net in such that converges pointwise on to . By Lemma 4.1, there exists a subnet and a random measure on such that the net of random measures on converges weakly-star to in .
Let be an element of . For each , the internal metric functional on can be written as
[TABLE]
Consider the mapping from to defined by for all . We claim that . Indeed, if is a sequence in converging to some , then for -almost every we have as . Moreover, the function is measurable and
[TABLE]
Note now that the formula (4.4) becomes . By applying the limit (4.2), we obtain
[TABLE]
Conversely, assume that is a random measure on . We need to find a net in such that converges pointwise on to the functional given by the formula (3.1). For this purpose, we introduce first some notations: let denote a finite measurable partition of , i.e., with and for all , and also for . Here denotes the number of elements of . Denote by the collection of all finite measurable partitions of . The set becomes a directed set with the partial order defined by if and only if is a refinement of , i.e., for each there exists such that .
Let us first suppose that the random measure is constant of the form
[TABLE]
where , , and for all . Since the probability measure is non-atomic, for each finite measurable partition we can divide each into further pairwise disjoint subsets such that for all . Now, we can define the net in by
[TABLE]
for all with . Then the net of internal metric functionals converges pointwise on to the functional given by the formula (3.1) and represented by the random measure (4.5).
Next, suppose that is a general random measure on . For each finite measurable partition of define by
[TABLE]
for all . It follows that for -almost every , and hence is a random measure on . We proceed to prove that
[TABLE]
Let be an element of and let be a small positive real number. Then there exists a measurable finite partition of and a -valued simple function
[TABLE]
such that . Therefore, for every we have
[TABLE]
Hence (4.8) holds. Finally, we observe that the random measure given by (4.7) is constant on each of the finite partition of . More precisely,
[TABLE]
Furthermore, each probability measure (4.9) can be approximated by measures of the form (4.5) with respect to the weak-star topology . This permits us to construct a net of the form (4.6) on each . By a simple diagonal argument with respect to the directed set of measurable finite partitions, we can construct a net in such that converges pointwise on , as the partition gets finer and finer, to the functional given by the formula (3.1). ∎
Proof of Theorem 3.8.
If then there exists a net in such that converges pointwise on to . The net is either bounded or unbounded with respect to the -norm.
Let us first suppose that the net is bounded in , i.e., . By taking a subnet if necessary, we may assume that
[TABLE]
Due to the inclusion , the net is bounded with respect to the -norm. By Lemma 4.1, there exists a subnet and a random measure on for which the limit (4.2) holds. Now, let be an element of . The internal metric functional on given by (2.6) becomes
[TABLE]
Let be the mapping defined by
[TABLE]
Then (4.10) becomes \mathbf{h}_{g_{\beta}}(f)=\big{(}\operatorname{\mathbf{E}}\left[\psi^{f}(\eta_{g_{\beta}})\right]+\left\lVert g_{\beta}\right\rVert_{L_{p}}^{p}\big{)}^{1/p}-\left\lVert g_{\beta}\right\rVert_{L_{p}}. Finally, due to the limit (4.2) we obtain
[TABLE]
with .
On the other hand, if the net is unbounded in , by taking a subnet, we may assume that
[TABLE]
By uniform convexity of the dual space and [21, Lemma 5.3], there exists a subnet and an element of the closed unit ball of such that
[TABLE]
Conversely, assume that is an arbitrary element of the closed unit ball of . Pick an increasing sequence of measurable subsets of with and . Define now the sequence in by
[TABLE]
Hence for all . Furthermore, we observe that converges weakly to in . Due to the –duality, for each there exists with such that . By letting for each and proceeding as in the proof of [21, Lemma 5.3], we can show that for all . ∎
5. Applications
5.1. The -mean ergodic theorem
Let . Assume that is a standard probability space. Let be a linear operator on such that for all . For an arbitrary element define the mapping by for all . Hence defines a -Lipschitz self-mapping of . We observe that
[TABLE]
Karlsson’s metric spectral principle [25, 27] asserts that there exists a metric functional such that
[TABLE]
where the escape rate is well-defined due to subadditivity of the sequence .
If then we obtain the trivial strong limit
[TABLE]
Suppose now that . Then the metric functional in (5.1) must be unbounded from below. Hence it is neither of the form (3.3) nor the zero functional in (3.4). Therefore, there exists with such that for all . We now proceed to show that must be an element of the unit sphere of . Indeed, for every we have
[TABLE]
By (5.1), it follows that . Hence . On the other hand, by –duality, there exists with such that . Next, we claim that
[TABLE]
Indeed, for every we have
[TABLE]
Due to (5.1) we obtain as . Since is uniformly convex, it follows that as . Hence (5.2) holds.
5.2. Alspach’s fixed-point free isometry
Alspach [5] presented an example of an isometry on a weakly compact convex subset of with no fixed points. More precisely, let be the interval and let be the Lebesgue measure. Consider the subset of defined by
[TABLE]
The set is a weakly compact convex subset of . The mapping defined by
[TABLE]
is an isometry, i.e., for all . Alspach proved that has no fixed points in . We verify this fact by using metric functionals on .
First, we denote and for all . More precisely, for every we have
[TABLE]
Equivalently, we can write , where is the -th Rademacher function. Therefore, for every we obtain
[TABLE]
where is the constant random measure on given by with . That is,
[TABLE]
In particular, we observe that the metric functional (5.3) vanishes on , i.e., for all .
Now, suppose that has a fixed point in . Hence
[TABLE]
The only solutions on to are of the form , where is a set of measure . However, this is not possible because we would have
[TABLE]
which is a contradiction. Therefore has no fixed points in .
Acknowledgments
The author is very grateful to Prof. Anders Karlsson, Prof. Kalle Kytölä, and Prof. Olavi Nevanlinna for many valuable discussions and suggestions. The author is also thankful to the anonymous referees for valuable suggestions that improved the presentation of this paper.
This work was supported by the Academy of Finland, Grant No. 288318.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] M. Abate and J. Raissy. Wolff-Denjoy theorems in nonsmooth convex domains . Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 193(5):1503–1518, 2014.
- 2[2] F. Albiac and N. J. Kalton. Topics in Banach space theory 2nd Ed., volume 233 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer, Cham, 2016
- 3[3] D. J. Aldous. Subspaces of L 1 superscript 𝐿 1 L^{1} , via random measures . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 267(2):445–463, 1981.
- 4[4] D. Alessandrini, L. Liu, A. Papadopoulos, and W. Su. The horofunction compactification of Teichmüller spaces of surfaces with boundary . Topology Appl., 208:160–191, 2016.
- 5[5] D. E. Alspach. A fixed point free nonexpansive map . Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 82(3):423–424, 1981.
- 6[6] A. Auffinger, M. Damron, and J. Hanson. Limiting geodesics for first-passage percolation on subsets of ℤ 2 superscript ℤ 2 \mathbb{Z}^{2} . Ann. Appl. Probab., 25(1):373–405, 2015.
- 7[7] W. Ballmann, M. Gromov, and V. Schroeder. Manifolds of nonpositive curvature , volume 61 of Progress in Mathematics . Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1985.
- 8[8] M. Björklund. Central limit theorems for Gromov hyperbolic groups . J. Theoret. Probab., 23(3):871–887, 2010.
