Odd-mass nuclei in the cluster shell model
R. Bijker, A.H. Santana-Vald\'es

TL;DR
This paper introduces a cluster shell model for odd-mass nuclei, focusing on three-alpha-particle configurations and their symmetry properties, and applies it to the nucleus 13C to analyze its rotational band structure.
Contribution
The paper develops a cluster shell model analogous to the Nilsson model, incorporating discrete symmetries of alpha-particle configurations, and demonstrates its application to 13C.
Findings
Identification of unique rotational band structures linked to alpha-particle symmetry
Application of the model to 13C reveals specific spectral features
Symmetry considerations serve as fingerprints for geometric configurations
Abstract
In this contribution, we present the cluster shell model which is analogous to the Nilsson model, but for cluster potentials. Special attention is paid to the consequences of the discrete symmetries of three alpha-particles in an equilateral triangle configuration. This configuration is characterized by a special structure of the rotational bands which can be used as a fingerprint of the underlying geometric configuration. The cluster shell model is applied to the nucleus 13C.
| ACM | Exp | ||
| 8.4 | |||
| 73 | |||
| 44 | |||
| fm |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 |
| CSM | Exp | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Odd-mass nuclei in the cluster shell model
R. Bijker and A.H. Santana-Valdés
Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A.P. 70-543, 04510 Ciudad de México, México [email protected]
Abstract
In this contribution, we present the cluster shell model which is analogous to the Nilsson model, but for cluster potentials. Special attention is paid to the consequences of the discrete symmetries of three -particles in an equilateral triangle configuration. This configuration is characterized by a special structure of the rotational bands which can be used as a fingerprint of the underlying geometric configuration. The cluster shell model is applied to the nucleus 13C.
1 Introduction
Cluster degrees of freedom are very important for the description of light nuclei, in particular and nuclei, due to the large binding energy of the 4He nucleus. Early work on -cluster models goes back to the 1930’s with studies by Wheeler [1], and Hafstad and Teller [2], followed by later work by Brink [3, 4] and Robson [5, 6]. Recently, there has been a lot of renewed interest in the structure of -cluster nuclei, especially for the nucleus 12C [7]. The measurement of new rotational excitations of the ground state [8, 9, 10] and of the Hoyle state [11, 12, 13, 14] has stimulated a large theoretical effort to understand the structure of 12C (for a review see e.g. Refs. [7, 15, 16]).
In this contribution, we present a study of cluster states in 12C and 13C in the framework of the algebraic cluster model and the cluster shell model, respectively.
2 The algebraic cluster model
The algebraic cluster model (ACM) is an interacting boson model to describe the relative motion of cluster systems (see e.g. [17, 18]). The relevant degrees of freedom of a system of -body clusters are given by the relative Jacobi coordinates and their conjugate momenta. The building blocks of the ACM consist of a vector boson for each relative coordinate and a scalar boson. Cluster states are then described in terms of a system of interacting bosons with angular momentum and parity (vector bosons) and (scalar bosons). The components of the vector bosons together with the scalar boson span a -dimensional space with group structure . The many-body states are classified according to the totally symmetric irreducible representation of . The ACM has a very rich symmetry structure. In addition to continuous symmetries like the angular momentum, in case of -cluster nuclei the Hamiltonian has to be invariant under the permuation of the identical particles. Since one does not consider the excitations of the particles themselves, the allowed cluster states have to be symmetric under the permutation group .
The potential energy surface corresponding to the invariant ACM Hamiltonian gives rise to several possible equilibrium shapes. The ones of special interest for applications to -cluster nuclei, correspond to the geometrical configuration of a dumbbell for 8Be ( with symmetry), an equilateral triangle for 12C ( with symmetry) and a regular tetrahedron for 16O ( with symmetry), see Table 1. Even though these cases do not correspond to dynamical symmetries of the ACM Hamiltonian, one can still obtain approximate solutions for the rotation-vibration spectrum and electromagnetic properties [19, 21, 23].
In this contribution, we present the results for three-body clusters with a triangular configuration. The rotation-vibration spectrum is given by
[TABLE]
The rotational structure of the ground-state band, , and the fundamental vibrations, and , depends on the point group symmetry of the equilateral triangle configuration and is summarized in Fig. 1. The ground-state band is characterized by a rotational sequence involving both positive and negative parity states, , , , , , , all of which have been observed in 12C. The so-called Hoyle band has the same structure, but so far only the positive parity states have been observed. The rotational bands in 12C are shown in Fig. 2.
The matter and charge distributions are usually taken as a Gaussian distribution
[TABLE]
where the -particles are located at a distance from the center of mass with . The charge density is obtained by multiplying Eq. (2) by and the matter density by . Electromagnetic transition probabilities can be obtained from the transition form factors, which are the matrix elements of the Fourier transform of the charge distribution. For transitions along the ground-state band the transition form factors are given in terms of a product of a spherical Bessel function and an exponential factor arising from a Gaussian distribution of the electric charges [21]
[TABLE]
The transition form factors depend on the parameters and . The value of is determined from the radius of the -particle to be fm*-2* [24], and the value of from the first minimum of the elastic form factor of 12C to be fm [21].
The transition probabilities along the ground-state band can be extracted from the form factors in the long wavelength limit
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
and the charge radius from the slope of the elastic form factor in the origin
[TABLE]
Eq. (4) shows that all electric transitions are related to one another, and only depend on the value of . For example, quadrupole, octupole and hexadecupole transitions are related by
[TABLE]
The quadrupole moment can be calculated as [25]
[TABLE]
a positive value, as is to be expected for a planar configuration of three -particles.
Table 2 shows a good agreement with the experimental values of 12C which provides evidence that the and states belong to the ground-state rotational band of the equilateral triangle [21]. It is important to note that the ACM results only depend on the value of and which have been determined from other observables.
3 The cluster shell model
For the description of odd-cluster nuclei, the cluster shell model (CSM) was developed recently [18, 19, 29]. The CSM combines cluster and single-particle degrees of freedom, and is very similar in spirit as the Nilsson model [30], but in the CSM the odd nucleon moves in the deformed field generated by the (collective) cluster degrees of freedom. The Hamiltonian is written as
[TABLE]
i.e. the sum of the kinetic energy, a central potential obtained by convoluting the density of Eq. (2) with the interaction between the -particle and the nucleon, a spin-orbit interaction and, for an odd proton, a Coulomb potential [29]. Fig. 3 shows the splitting of single-particles levels of a neutron moving in the deformed potential generated by a triangular configuration of three -particles as a function of . The solutions of the CSM Hamiltonian, with energy , are labeled by the irreducible representations of the double group : , and , each of which is doubly degenerate. The resolution of single-particle levels into representations of is shown in Table 3.
In a study of 12C the value of was determined from the first minimum of the elastic form factor to be fm [21]. Inspection of Fig. 3 shows that for this value of , the first 6 neutrons occupy the intrinsic states with (black), (blue) and (red), so that the last neutron in 13C occupies the intrinsic state with (red), followed by (black).
The representations , and can be further decomposed into values of [31].
[TABLE]
with and . The angular momenta are given by . As a result, the rotational sequences for each one of the irreducible representations of are given by (see also Table 3)
[TABLE]
The angular momentum structure of each one of the representations of is shown in Fig. 4.
The rotational energy spectra can be analyzed with
[TABLE]
where is the intrinsic energy, the inertial parameter, a Coriolis term, and the decoupling parameter. The latter term applies only to representations and .
Fig. 5 shows the rotational bands of 13C. The ground-state band has and is assigned to the representation of (blue lines and filled circles) arising from the coupling of the ground-state band in 12C to the intrinsic state with . According to Eq. (10), this representation contains also and bands, both of which appear to have been observed. In the shell model, positive parity states are expected to occur at much higher energies since they come from the - shell. The first excited rotational band has which can be assigned to (black line and filled squares) arising from the coupling of the ground-state band in 12C to the excited intrinsic state with . In contrast to the ground-state band, this excited band has a large decoupling parameter. In addition, Fig. 5 shows evidence for the occurrence of a rotational band at an energy slightly higher than that of the Hoyle state in 12C which is interpreted as the coupling of the Hoyle band in 12C to the ground-state intrinsic state (red line and filled triangles).
Further evidence for the occurrence of symmetry in 13C is provided by electromagnetic transition rates. The values in 13C are related to those in 12C [31] (see also Fig. 6),
[TABLE]
The numerical factors arise from combinations of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. The results are shown in Table 4. The good agreement with the experimental values in 13C shows that the states , and belong to the same rotational band with . Just as in the case of 12C there is a large octupole transition which is obtained in the CSM without the need to introduce effective charges.
4 Summary and conclusions
In this contribution, we presented a combined analysis of the rotation-vibration spectra and electromagnetic transition rates in 12C and 13C. A comparison with the theoretical predictions of the algebraic cluster model (12C) and the cluster shell model (13C) provides strong evidence for the occurrence of triangular symmetry in these nuclei. A characteristic feature of the triangular symmetry is the appearance of rotational bands consisting of both positive and negative parity states. The quadrupole and octupole transitions in 12C and 13C are strongly correlated and only depend on a single coefficient whose value was determined independently from the first minimum in the elastic form factor of 12C. The good agreement between theory and experiment supports the interpretation of the nucleus 13C as a system of three -particles in a triangular configuration plus an additional neutron moving in the deformed field generated by the cluster.
\ack
This work was supported in part by grant IN109017 from DGAPA-UNAM, Mexico.
References
- [1]
Wheeler J A 1937 Phys. Rev. 52 1083
- [2]
Hafstad L R and Teller E 1938 Phys. Rev. 54 681
- [3]
Brink D M 1965 Int. School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Course XXXVI 247
- [4]
Brink D M, Friedrich H, Weiguny A and Wong C W 1970 Phys. Lett. B 33 143
- [5]
Robson D 1978 Nucl. Phys. A 308 381
- [6]
Robson D 1982 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 8 257
- [7]
Freer M and Fynbo H O U 2014 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 78 1
- [8]
Freer M et al. 2007 Phys. Rev. C 76 034320
- [9]
Kirsebom O S et al. 2010 Phys. Rev. C 81 064313
- [10]
Marín-Lámbarri D J, Bijker R, Freer M, Gai M, Kokalova T, Parker D J and Wheldon C 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 012502
- [11]
Itoh M et al. 2011 Phys. Rev. C 84 054308
- [12]
Freer M et al. 2012 Phys. Rev. C 86 034320
- [13]
Zimmerman W R et al. 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 152502
- [14]
Freer M et al. 2011 Phys. Rev. C 83 034314
- [15]
Schuck P, Funaki Y, Horiuchi H, Röpke G, Tohsaki A and Yamada T 2016 Phys. Scr. 91 123001
- [16]
Freer M, Horiuchi H, Kanada-En’yo Y, Lee D and Meissner U G 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 035004
- [17]
Bijker R 2016 Phys. Scr. 91 073005
- [18]
Bijker R and Iachello F 2019 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. submitted.
- [19]
Della Rocca V and Iachello F 2017 Nucl. Phys. A 973 1
- [20]
Bijker R and Iachello F 2000 Phys. Rev. C 61 067305
- [21]
Bijker R and Iachello F 2002 Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 298 334
- [22]
Bijker R and Iachello F 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 152501
- [23]
Bijker R and Iachello F 2017 Nucl. Phys. A 957 154
- [24]
Sick I, McCarthy J S and Whitney R R 1976 Phys. Lett. B 64 33
- [25]
Bijker R 2019 AIP Conf Proc in press [arXiv:1901.11057]
- [26]
Kelley J H, Purcell J E and Sheu C G 2017 Nucl. Phys. A 968 71
- [27]
Kumar Raju M et al. 2018 Phys. Lett. B 777 250
- [28]
Reuter W, Fricke G, Merle K and Miska H 1982 Phys. Rev. C 26 806
- [29]
Della Rocca V, Bijker R and Iachello F 2017 Nucl. Phys. A 966 158
- [30]
Nilsson S G 1955 Kong Dan Vid Sel Mat Fys Med 29 (16) 1
- [31]
Bijker R and Iachello F 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. submitted [arXiv:1902.00451].
- [32]
Ajzenberg-Selove F 1991 Nucl. Phys. A 523 1
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Wheeler J A 1937 Phys. Rev. 52 1083
- 2[2] Hafstad L R and Teller E 1938 Phys. Rev. 54 681
- 3[3] Brink D M 1965 Int. School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Course XXXVI 247
- 4[4] Brink D M, Friedrich H, Weiguny A and Wong C W 1970 Phys. Lett. B 33 143
- 5[5] Robson D 1978 Nucl. Phys. A 308 381
- 6[6] Robson D 1982 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 8 257
- 7[7] Freer M and Fynbo H O U 2014 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 78 1
- 8[8] Freer M et al. 2007 Phys. Rev. C 76 034320
