# Lempel-Ziv-like Parsing in Small Space

## TL;DR

This paper introduces ReLZ, a memory-efficient method combining RLZ and LZ parsing to approximate LZ compression, achieving comparable entropy bounds and faster computation with a controlled approximation ratio.

## Contribution

ReLZ is a novel two-level parsing technique that approximates LZ using significantly less memory and maintains strong theoretical compression guarantees.

## Key findings

- ReLZ achieves entropy bounds similar to LZ.
- ReLZ is faster than existing methods for LZ parsing.
- ReLZ's approximation ratio is below 2.0 in experiments.

## Abstract

Lempel-Ziv (LZ77 or, briefly, LZ) is one of the most effective and widely-used compressors for repetitive texts. However, the existing efficient methods computing the exact LZ parsing have to use linear or close to linear space to index the input text during the construction of the parsing, which is prohibitive for long inputs. An alternative is Relative Lempel-Ziv (RLZ), which indexes only a fixed reference sequence, whose size can be controlled. Deriving the reference sequence by sampling the text yields reasonable compression ratios for RLZ, but performance is not always competitive with that of LZ and depends heavily on the similarity of the reference to the text. In this paper we introduce ReLZ, a technique that uses RLZ as a preprocessor to approximate the LZ parsing using little memory. RLZ is first used to produce a sequence of phrases, and these are regarded as metasymbols that are input to LZ for a second-level parsing on a (most often) drastically shorter sequence. This parsing is finally translated into one on the original sequence. We analyze the new scheme and prove that, like LZ, it achieves the $k$th order empirical entropy compression $n H_k + o(n\log\sigma)$ with $k = o(\log_\sigma n)$, where $n$ is the input length and $\sigma$ is the alphabet size. In fact, we prove this entropy bound not only for ReLZ but for a wide class of LZ-like encodings. Then, we establish a lower bound on ReLZ approximation ratio showing that the number of phrases in it can be $\Omega(\log n)$ times larger than the number of phrases in LZ. Our experiments show that ReLZ is faster than existing alternatives to compute the (exact or approximate) LZ parsing, at the reasonable price of an approximation factor below $2.0$ in all tested scenarios, and sometimes below $1.05$, to the size of LZ.