Comparison of different algorithms for under-sampled image reconstruction
Drazen Jelic, Ana Scekic, Melvudin Hot, Nemanja Sevaljevic

TL;DR
This paper compares various algorithms used for image reconstruction in compressive sensing, highlighting their effectiveness in recovering signals from fewer samples than traditional methods.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of different algorithms for under-sampled image reconstruction within the compressive sensing framework.
Findings
Convex optimization and greedy algorithms are the main approaches.
Algorithms vary in reconstruction quality and computational efficiency.
The study guides selecting suitable algorithms for specific applications.
Abstract
The Compressive Sensing (CS) as a novel acquisition approach that finds its usage in image processing. The hypothesis like this one assures signal recovery with high quality from decreased number of samples compared with the number required by the Nyquist - Shannon sampling theorem. It includes a gathering of strategies for representing a signal that are based on the predetermined number of estimations and after that signal reconstruction. The CS has been broadly utilized and applied in numerous applications including computed tomography, WiFi communication, image processing and camera design. Complex mathematics is developed in order to ensure signal reconstruction from relatively small information. Two commonly used groups of the algorithms are convex optimization and greedy approaches.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis · Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
