Ionization-density-dependent Scintillation Pulse Shape and Mechanism of Luminescence Quenching in LaBr3:Ce
Jirong Cang, XinChao Fang, Zhi Zeng, Ming Zeng, Yinong Liu, Zhigang, Sun, Ziyun Chen

TL;DR
This paper models the ionization-density-dependent scintillation pulse shape in LaBr3:Ce, revealing nonlinear quenching of Ce3+ ions as the key to pulse-shape differences and extending findings to other scintillators.
Contribution
The study introduces a quantitative model explaining pulse-shape differences in LaBr3:Ce based on nonlinear quenching, and predicts similar effects in other fast scintillators.
Findings
Model reproduces electron and alpha particle responses.
Nonlinear quenching of Ce3+ ions causes pulse-shape differences.
Predictions confirmed in other scintillators like LYSO and CeBr3.
Abstract
Pulse-shape discrimination (PSD) is usually achieved using the different fast and slow decay components of inorganic scintillators, such as BaF2, CsI:Tl, etc. However, LaBr3:Ce is considered to not possess different components at room temperature, but has been proved to have the capability of discriminating {\gamma} and {\alpha} events using fast digitizers. In this paper, ionization-density-dependent transport and rate equations are used to quantitatively model the competing processes in a particle track. With one parameter set, the model reproduces the nonproportionality response of electrons or {\alpha} particles, and explains the measured {\alpha} and {\gamma} pulse-shape difference well. In particular, the nonlinear quenching of excited dopant ions, Ce3+, is confirmed herein to mainly contribute observable ionization {\alpha} and {\gamma} pulse-shape differences. Further study of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
